草地利用方式对土壤呼吸和凋落物分解的影响

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2015.0023

植物生态学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 239-248.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0023

所属专题：碳水能量通量

草地利用方式对土壤呼吸和凋落物分解的影响

王忆慧, 龚吉蕊^*(), 刘敏, 黄永梅, 晏欣, 张梓瑜, 徐沙, 罗亲普

北京师范大学中药资源保护与利用北京市重点实验室, 北京师范大学地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室, 北京师范大学资源学院, 北京 100875

收稿日期:2014-04-01 接受日期:2014-12-09 出版日期:2015-03-01 发布日期:2015-03-17
通讯作者: 龚吉蕊
作者简介:
# 共同第一作者
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(41340015和41030535)

Effects of grassland-use on soil respiration and litter decomposition

WANG Yi-Hui, GONG Ji-Rui^*(), LIU Min, HUANG Yong-Mei, YAN Xin, ZHANG Zi-Yu, XU Sha, LUO Qin-Pu

Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Protection and Utilization of Beijing City, State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, College of Resources Science & Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

Received:2014-04-01 Accepted:2014-12-09 Online:2015-03-01 Published:2015-03-17
Contact: Ji-Rui GONG
About author:
# Co-first authors

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

草地利用方式影响植被群落结构和土壤微环境, 制约草地生态系统碳循环。该文通过测定温带草原在放牧、割草、围封3种利用方式下湿润年(2012年)和干旱年(2011年)的凋落物产量、质量及其分解速率和土壤碳通量, 分析了草地利用方式对土壤呼吸和凋落物的影响, 探讨了凋落物对土壤呼吸的贡献机制。结果表明: 在干旱年份, 放牧样地土壤呼吸最大, 分别达到割草和围封样地的1.5倍和1.29倍; 在湿润年份, 割草样地土壤呼吸最大, 为309 g C∙m^-2∙a^-1, 明显高于放牧样地和围封样地。不论干旱年还是湿润年, 围封样地凋落物产量都大于放牧样地和割草样地。3种利用方式下湿润年土壤呼吸和凋落物分解均比干旱年增强。因此, 水分是温带草原植物生长和生态系统碳循环的主要限制因子, 草地利用方式则显著影响凋落物生产和分解。进一步分析表明, 经过两年的分解, 同一样地内凋落物质量C:N下降, N含量和木质素:N升高, 土壤呼吸与凋落物产量、凋落物分解速率以及木质素:N正相关, 而与凋落物C:N负相关。

关键词: 草地利用方式, 土壤呼吸, 凋落物分解, 凋落物生产, 凋落物质量

Abstract: Aims

Land use change affects ecosystem carbon dynamics by changing the plant community structure and soil micro-environment in grassland ecosystems. The aims of this study were to determine the effects of land use on soil respiration and litter decomposition in the temperate grasslands of Nei Mongol and to identify the effects of litter quantity, quality and decomposition on soil respiration during growing season.

Methods

We measured soil respiration during growing season in 2011 and 2012 under three land use types, i.e. grazing, mowing, and grazing exclusion, by using an automatic infrared gas analyzer (LI-8100) that was connected to a multiplexer system (LI-8150). Quadrat surveys and litter bags were utilized to measure litter production and decomposition. Several chemical indicators of litter quality were measured to calculate the litter decay rates. All data were analyzed with ANOVA and Pearson correlation procedures of SPSS.

Important findings

Soil respiration and litter decomposition differed greatly among the three land-use types. In the drought year, the total soil respiration at the grazing site was 1.5 times greater than at the mowing site and 1.29 times greater than at the grazing-exclusion site. However, in the wet year, the total soil respiration at the mowing site reached 309 g C∙m^-2∙a^-1 and was greater than at both the grazing site and the grazing-exclusion site. Precipitation increased soil respiration and litter decomposition, indicating that soil water availability was a primary constraint on plant growth and ecosystem C processes. Also, the responses of soil respiration and litter composition to rainfall differed among the land-use types. Further analysis showed that the litter C:N decreased and the litter N content and lignin:N increased after 2-years of decomposition. In addition, soil respiration was significantly correlated to litter production (r = 0.78, p < 0.01), decay rates, C:N (r = -0.84, p < 0.01), and lignin:N (r = 0.62, p < 0.05).

Key words: land-use type, soil respiration, litter decomposition, litter production, litter quality

王忆慧, 龚吉蕊, 刘敏, 黄永梅, 晏欣, 张梓瑜, 徐沙, 罗亲普. 草地利用方式对土壤呼吸和凋落物分解的影响. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(3): 239-248. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0023

WANG Yi-Hui,GONG Ji-Rui,LIU Min,HUANG Yong-Mei,YAN Xin,ZHANG Zi-Yu,XU Sha,LUO Qin-Pu. Effects of grassland-use on soil respiration and litter decomposition. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2015, 39(3): 239-248. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0023

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2015.0023

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2015/V39/I3/239

图/表 7

图1 2011-2012年研究区的每日降水量和气温。

Fig. 1 Daily precipitation and air temperature in the study area during 2011-2012.

表1 3种利用方式下样地优势种的重要值(平均值±标准误差, n = 5)

Table 1 Importance value of dominant species under three land use types (mean ± SE, n = 5)

优势种 Dominant species	放牧样地 Grazing site	割草样地 Mowing site	围封样地 Grazing- exclusion site
冷蒿 Artemisia frigida	0.06 ± 0.01	0.16 ± 0.07	0.11 ± 0.08
羊草 Leymus chinensis	0.22 ± 0.05	0.14 ± 0.04	0.08 ± 0.12
大针茅 Stipa grandis	0.15 ± 0.08	0.10 ± 0.02	0.07 ± 0.08

表2 3种利用方式下样地的土壤特性(平均值±标准误差, n = 5)

Table 2 Soil properties under three land use types (mean ± SE, n = 5)

样地 Site	pH	全氮 Total nitrogen (g·kg^-1)	全磷 Total phosphorus (g·kg^-1)	全硫 Total sulfur (g·kg^-1)	有机质 Organic matter (g·kg^-1)
放牧 Grazing	7.51 ± 0.17	1.50 ± 0.19	0.15 ± 0.01	0.11 ± 0.09	16.49 ± 3.73
割草 Mowing	6.91 ± 0.08	1.20 ± 0.05	0.37 ± 0.25	0.04 ± 0.00	21.30 ± 2.74
围封 Grazing-exclusion	7.78 ± 0.06	1.06 ± 0.06	0.12 ± 0.01	0.02 ± 0.01	15.36 ± 2.29

图2 2011和2012年3种草地利用方式下生长季土壤呼吸总量, 2011年土壤呼吸总量之间的差异用大写字母表示, 2012年土壤呼吸总量之间的差异用小写字母表示。

Fig. 2 Total soil respiration during the growing season under three grassland use types in 2011and 2012. The capital letters indicate the differences in total soil respiration in 2011 and the lowercase letters indicate the differences in total soil respiration in 2012.

图3 2011和2012年3种草地利用方式下凋落物产量(A)及其与土壤呼吸的相关性(B)(平均值±标准误差)。2011年凋落物产量之间的差异用大写字母表示, 2012年的用小写字母表示。

Fig. 3 Litter production (A) and its relationship with total soil respiration (B) under three grassland use types in 2011 and 2012 (mean ± SE). The capital letters indicate the differences in litter production in 2011 and the lowercase letters indicate the differences in litter production in 2012.

图4 2011和2012年3种草地利用方式下凋落物N含量(A)、C:N (B)、木质素:N (C)和土壤呼吸总量与凋落物N含量(D)、C:N (E)、木质素:N (F)的线性回归(平均值±标准误差)。2011年凋落物质量之间的差异用大写字母表示, 2012年凋落物质量之间的差异用小写字母表示。

Fig. 4 Litter N content (A), C:N ratio (B), and lignin:N ratio (C), and the liner regressions of total soil respiration with litter N content (D), C:N ratio (E), and lignin:N ratio (F) under three grassland-use types in 2011 and 2012 (mean ± SE). The capital letters indicate the differences in litter quality in 2011 and the lowercase letters indicate the differences in litter quality in 2012.

图5 2011和2012年生长季内土壤呼吸总量与凋落物分解速率k (A)、纤维素损失率(B)、木质素损失率(C)和土壤呼吸总量与凋落物分解速率k (D)、纤维素损失率(E)、木质素损失率(F)的线性回归(平均值±标准误差)。2011年凋落物质量之间的差异用大写字母表示, 2012年凋落物质量之间的差异用小写字母表示。

Fig. 5 Decomposition rate k (A), cellulose loss rate (B), and lignin loss rate (C), and the liner regressions of total soil respiration with decomposition rate k (D), cellulose loss rate (E) and lignin loss rate (F) under three grassland-use types in 2011 and 2012 (mean ± SE). The capital letters indicate the differences in the litter quality in 2011 and the lowercase letters indicate the differences in litter quality in 2012.

参考文献 41

1	Akiyama T, Kawamura K (2007). Grassland degradation in China: Methods of monitoring, management and restoration.Grassland Science, 53, 1-17.
2	Bontti EE, Decant JP, Munson SM, Gathany MA, Przeszlowska A, Haddix ML, Owens S, Burke IC, Parton WJ, Harmon ME (2009). Litter decomposition in grasslands of Central North America (US Great Plains).Global Change Biology, 15, 1356-1363.
3	Cao GM, Tang YH, Mo WH, Wang YS, Li YN, Zhao XQ (2004). Grazing intensity alters soil respiration in an alpine meadow on the Tibetan Plateau.Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 36, 237-243.
4	Carrera AL, Bertiller MB, Larreguy C (2008). Leaf litterfall, fine-root production, and decomposition in shrublands with different canopy structure induced by grazing in the Patagonian Monte, Argentina.Plant and Soil, 311, 39-50.
5	Casanovas NG, Matamalar AR, Cook D, Gonzalez-Meler MA (2012). Net ecosystem exchange modifies the relationship between the autotrophic and heterotrophic components of soil respiration with abiotic factors in prairie grasslands.Global Change Biology, 18, 2532-2545.
6	Chen QS, Li LH, Han XG, Yan ZD (2003). Effects of water content on soil respiration and the mechanisms.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 23, 972-978. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[陈全胜, 李凌浩, 韩兴国, 阎志丹 (2003). 水分对土壤呼吸的影响及机理. 生态学报, 23, 972-978.]
7	Chen SQ, Cui XY, Zhou GS, Li LH (1999). Study on the CO2-release rate of soil respiration and litter decomposition in Stipa grandis Steppe in Xilin River Basin, Inner Mongolia.Acta Botanica Sinica, 41, 645-650. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[陈四清, 崔骁勇, 周广胜, 李凌浩 (1999). 内蒙古锡林河流域大针茅草原土壤呼吸和凋落物分解的CO2排放速率研究. 植物学报, 41, 645-650.]
8	Chu JM, Wang Q, Fan ZP, Li FY, Sun XK (2013). Effects of soil moisture condition and freeze-thaw cycle on soil respiration of different land-use types in Horqin Sandy Land.Chinese Journal of Ecology, 32, 1399-1404. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[褚建民, 王琼, 范志平, 李法云, 孙学凯 (2013). 水分条件和冻融循环对科尔沁沙地不同土地利用方式土壤呼吸的影响. 生态学杂志, 32, 1399-1404.]
9	Cleveland CC, Reed SC, Keller AB, Nemergut DR, O’Neill SP, Ostertag R, Vitousek PM (2014). Litter quality versus soil microbial community controls over decomposition: A quantitative analysis.Oecologia, 174, 283-294.
10	Cui XY, Chen ZZ, Chen SQ (2001). Progress in research on soil respiration of grasslands.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 21, 315-325. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[崔骁勇, 陈佐忠, 陈四清 (2001). 草地土壤呼吸研究进展. 生态学报, 21, 315-325.]
11	Deng Q, Liu SZ, Liu JX, Meng Y, Zhang DQ (2007). Contributions of litter-fall to soil respiration and its affecting factors in Southern subtropical forests of China.Advances in Earth Science, 22, 976-986. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[邓琦, 刘世忠, 刘菊秀, 孟泽, 张德强 (2007). 南亚热带森林凋落物对土壤呼吸的贡献及其影响因素. 地球科学进展, 22, 976-986.]
12	Dong QM, Zhao XQ, Ma YS, Shi JJ, Wang YL, Li SX, Yang SH, Wang LY, Sheng L (2012). Influence of grazing on biomass, growth ratio and compensatory effect of different plant groups in Kobresia parva meadow.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 32, 2640-2650. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[董全民, 赵新全, 马玉寿, 施建军, 王彦龙, 李世雄, 杨时海, 王柳英, 盛丽 (2012). 放牧对小嵩草草甸生物量及不同植物类群生长率和补偿效应的影响. 生态学报, 32, 2640-2650.]
13	Galvánek D, Lepš J (2012). The effect of management on productivity, litter accumulation and seedling recruitment in a Carpathian mountain grassland.Plant Ecology, 213, 523-533.
14	Gao YZ, Han XG, Wang SP (2004). The effects of grazing on grassland soils.Acta Ecologica Sinca, 24, 790-797.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[高英志, 韩兴国, 汪诗平 (2004). 放牧对草原土壤的影响. 生态学报, 24, 790-797.]
15	Gong JR, Wang Y, Liu M, Huang Y, Yan X, Zhang Z, Zhang W (2014). Effects of land use on soil respiration in the temperate steppe of Inner Mongolia, China.Soil and Tillage Research, 144, 20-31.
16	Han Y, Zhang Z, Wang CH, Jiang FH, Xia JY (2012). Effects of mowing and nitrogen addition on soil respiration in three patches in an old field grassland in Inner Mongolia.Journal of Plant Ecology, 5, 219-228.
17	Hossain MZ, Sugiyama SI (2008). Effects of chemical composition on the rate and temporal pattern of decomposition in grassland species leaf litter.Grassland Science, 54, 40-44.
18	Hu YL, Wang SL, Huang Y, Yu XJ (2005). Effects of litter chemistry on soil biological property and enzymatic activity.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 25, 2662-2668. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[胡亚林, 汪思龙, 黄宇, 于小军 (2005). 凋落物化学组成对土壤微生物学性状及土壤酶活性的影响. 生态学报, 25, 2662-2668.]
19	IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2011). Contribution of working group 1 to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DG, Noguer M, Linden PJ, Xiaosu D eds. Climate Change in 2001: The Scientific Basic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
20	Jiang Y, Wang B, Wang YR, Yang QP (2010). Soil respiration in subtropical forests and model simulation of its relationship with soil temperature and moisture content.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 21, 1641-1648. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[姜艳, 王兵, 汪玉如, 杨清培 (2010). 亚热带林分土壤呼吸及其与土壤温湿度关系的模型模拟. 应用生态学报, 21, 1641-1648.]
21	Jia BR, Zhou GS, Wang FY, Wang YH (2005). Affecting factors of soil microorganism and root respiration.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 16, 1547-1552. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[贾丙瑞, 周广胜, 王风玉, 王玉辉 (2005). 土壤微生物与根系呼吸作用影响因子分析. 应用生态学报, 16, 1547-1552.]
22	Lett MS, Knapp AK, Briggs JM, Blair JM (2004). Influence of shrub encroachment on aboveground net primary productivity and carbon and nitrogen pools in a mesic grassland.Canadian Journal of Botany, 82, 1363-1370.
23	Liu SH, Fang JY (1997). Effect factors of soil respiration and the temperature’s effects on soil respiration in the global scale.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 17, 469-476. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[刘绍辉, 方精云 (1997). 土壤呼吸的影响因素及全球尺度下温度的影响. 生态学报, 17, 469-476.]
24	Liu ZK, Wang SP, Han JG, Chen ZZ (2005). Decomposition and nutrients dynamics of plant litter and roots in Inner Mongolia steppe.Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 14, 24-30. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[刘忠宽, 汪诗平, 韩建国, 陈佐忠 (2005). 内蒙古温带典型草原植物凋落物和根系的分解及养分动态的研究. 草业学报, 14, 24-30.]
25	Ning F, Xu Z, Shan GL (2008). Effects of disturbance ways on soil physical and chemical properties.Chinese Journal of Grassland, 4, 46-50. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[宁发, 徐柱, 单贵莲 (2008). 干扰方式对典型草原土壤理化性质的影响. 中国草地学报, 4, 46-50.]
26	Olson JS (1963). Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems.Ecology, 44, 322-331.
27	Qi YC, Dong YS, Liu LX, Liu XR, Peng Q, Xiao SS, He YT (2010). Spatial-temporal variation in soil respiration and its controlling factors in three steppes of Stipa L. in Inner Mongolia, China. Science China: Earth Sciences, 40, 341-351. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[齐玉春, 董云社, 刘立新, 刘杏认, 彭琴, 肖胜生, 何亚婷 (2010). 内蒙古锡林河流域主要针茅属草地土壤呼吸变化及其主导因子. 中国科学: 地球科学, 40, 341-351.]
28	Raich JW, Schlesinger WH (1992). The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate.Tellus B, 44, 81-99.
29	Raich JW, Tufekciogul A (2000). Vegetation and soil respiration: Correlations and controls.Biogeochemistry, 48, 71-90.
30	Thomey ML, Collins SL, Vargas R, Johnson JE, Brown RF, Natvig DO, Friggens MT (2011). Effect of precipitation variability on net primary production and soil respiration in a Chihuahuan Desert grassland.Global Change Biology, 17, 1505-1515.
31	Tu LH, Hu TX, Huang LH, Li RH, Dai HZ, Luo SH, Xiang YB (2009). Response of soil respiration to simulated nitrogen deposition in Pleioblastus amarus forest, rainy area of west China.Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 4, 728-738. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[涂利华, 胡庭兴, 黄立华, 李仁洪, 戴洪忠, 雒守华, 向元彬 (2009). 华西雨屏区苦竹林土壤呼吸对模拟氮沉降的响应. 植物生态学报, 33, 728-738.]
32	van Soest PJ (1963). Use of detergents in analysis of fibrous feeds: A rapid method for the determination of fiber and lignin.Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 46, 829-835.
33	van Soest PJ (1967). Development of a comprehensive system of feed analyses and its application to forages.Journal of Animal Science, 26, 119-128.
34	Walter J, Hein R, Beierkuhnlein C, Hammerl V, Jentsch A, Schädler M, Schuerings J, Kreyling J (2013). Combined effects of multifactor climate change and land-use on decomposition in temperate grassland.Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 60, 10-18.
35	Wang C, Yang J, Zhang Q (2006). Soil respiration in six temperate forests in China.Global Change Biology, 12, 2103-2114.
36	Wang GB, Hao YS, Wang B, Ruan HH (2006). Influence of land-use change on soil respiration and soil microbial biomass.Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 28(Suppl. 2), 73-79. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[王国兵, 郝岩松, 王兵, 阮宏华 (2006). 土地利用方式的改变对土壤呼吸及土壤微生物生物量的影响. 北京林业大学学报, 28(增刊2), 73-79.]
37	Wang M, Han SJ, Wang YS (2004). Important factors controlling CO2 emission rates from forest soil.Chinese Journal of Ecology, 23(5), 24-29. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[王淼, 韩士杰, 王跃思 (2004). 影响阔叶红松林土壤CO2排放的主要因素. 生态学杂志, 23(5), 24-29.]
38	Wang W, Guo JX (2002). Contribution of CO2 emission from soil respiration and from litter decomposition in Leymus chinensis community in Northeast Songnen grassland. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 22, 655-660. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[王娓, 郭继勋 (2002). 东北松嫩平原羊草群落的土壤呼吸与枯枝落叶分解释放CO2贡献量. 生态学报, 22, 655-660.]
39	Zhang DQ, Shi PL, Zhang XZ (2005). Some advance in the main factors controlling soil respiration.Advances in Earth Science, 20, 778-785. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[张东秋, 石培礼, 张宪洲 (2005). 土壤呼吸主要影响因素的研究进展. 地球科学进展, 20, 778-785.]
40	Zhang K, Cheng X, Dang H, Ye C, Zhang Y, Zhang Q (2013). Linking litter production, quality and decomposition to vegetation succession following agricultural abandonment.Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 57, 803-813.
41	Zhang Z, Duan J, Wang S, Luo C, Chang X, Zhu X, Xu B, Wang W (2012). Effects of land use and management on ecosystem respiration in alpine meadow on the Tibetan Plateau.Soil and Tillage Research, 124, 161-169.

[1]	沈健, 何宗明, 董强, 郜士垒, 林宇. 轻度火烧对滨海沙地人工林土壤呼吸速率和非生物因子的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(7): 1032-1042.
[2]	李慧璇, 马红亮, 尹云锋, 高人. 亚热带天然阔叶林凋落物分解过程中活性、惰性碳氮的动态特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(5): 618-628.
[3]	赵小祥, 朱彬彬, 田秋香, 林巧玲, 陈龙, 刘峰. 叶片凋落物分解的主场优势研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(5): 597-607.
[4]	杨元合, 张典业, 魏斌, 刘洋, 冯雪徽, 毛超, 徐玮婕, 贺美, 王璐, 郑志虎, 王媛媛, 陈蕾伊, 彭云峰. 草地群落多样性和生态系统碳氮循环对氮输入的非线性响应及其机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(1): 1-24.
[5]	张景慧, 王铮, 黄永梅, 陈慧颖, 李智勇, 梁存柱. 草地利用方式对温性典型草原优势种植物功能性状的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(8): 818-833.
[6]	范琳杰, 李成道, 李向义, Henry J. SUN, 林丽莎, 刘波. 极端干旱区沙土掩埋对凋落物分解速率及盐分含量动态的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(2): 144-153.
[7]	杨德春, 胡雷, 宋小艳, 王长庭. 降雨变化对高寒草甸不同植物功能群凋落物质量及其分解的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(12): 1314-1328.
[8]	郑甲佳, 黄松宇, 贾昕, 田赟, 牟钰, 刘鹏, 查天山. 中国森林生态系统土壤呼吸温度敏感性空间变异特征及影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(6): 687-698.
[9]	杨泽, 嘎玛达尔基, 谭星儒, 游翠海, 王彦兵, 杨俊杰, 韩兴国, 陈世苹. 氮添加量和施氮频率对温带半干旱草原土壤呼吸及组分的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(10): 1059-1072.
[10]	胡姝娅,刁华杰,王惠玲,薄元超,申颜,孙伟,董宽虎,黄建辉,王常慧. 北方农牧交错带温性盐碱化草地土壤呼吸对不同形态氮添加和刈割的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(1): 70-79.
[11]	温超,单玉梅,晔薷罕,张璞进,木兰,常虹,任婷婷,陈世苹,白永飞,黄建辉,孙海莲. 氮和水分添加对内蒙古荒漠草原放牧生态系统土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(1): 80-92.
[12]	贾丙瑞. 凋落物分解及其影响机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(8): 648-657.
[13]	闫鹏飞, 展鹏飞, 肖德荣, 王燚, 余瑞, 刘振亚, 王行. 模拟增温及分解界面对茭草凋落物分解速率及叶际微生物结构和功能的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(2): 107-118.
[14]	王祥, 朱亚琼, 郑伟, 关正翾, 盛建东. 昭苏山地草甸4种典型土地利用方式下的土壤呼吸特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(3): 382-396.
[15]	武启骞, 王传宽. 控雪处理下红松和蒙古栎凋落叶分解动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(2): 153-163.

草地利用方式对土壤呼吸和凋落物分解的影响

Effects of grassland-use on soil respiration and litter decomposition

全文

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 41

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价