2008年初特大冰雪灾害对粤北地区杉木人工林树木损害的类型及程度

doi:10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.02.011

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

2008年8月, 采用典型取样法, 设置20 m × 30 m (或15 m × 30 m)的方形样地13个, 对广东省天井山林场杉木(Cunninghamia lanceolata)人工林冰雪灾害进行调查。结果表明: 1)粤北地区杉木人工林受损严重, 样地内受害杉木比例高于80%, 主要集中在海拔500-900 m的地区; 2)杉木人工林受损类型主要划分为3种, 以折断类型为主(65.09%), 其次为倒伏(或翻蔸, 18.37%)和弯曲(3.20%)。其中, 根据不同程度将折断划分为5个级别: 轻微受损, 即断稍(占折断总数的12.28 %); 轻度受损, 即树冠顶端至中部断裂(38.49%); 中度受损, 即树冠中部至下部断裂, 受到较严重损伤(31.15%); 严重受损, 即树冠全部受损(15.97%); 极严重受损, 即树冠近根部断裂或折断后枯死(2.11%), 树冠受损为杉木受灾的主要特征; 3)林分密度过高(> 3 500株·hm^-2)或过低(< 1 500株·hm^-2)都易造成杉木折断, 坡向与坡位对其影响较小, 合理的密度调控至关重要; 4)杉木胸径对受损类型及程度的敏感性较高, 表现为粗壮杉木易发生断稍和较轻微的树冠受损, 细弱杉木虽不易折断, 但一经折断则受损严重。适宜的尖削度对有效预防和减轻杉木受损十分重要。

关键词: 杉木, 受损类型, 粤北地区, 人工林, 冰雪灾害

Abstract:

Aims Forest ecosystems were seriously damaged by unusually heavy snow and ice in early 2008 in southern China. Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata), the main timber tree in southern China, was one of the most severely affected species. Our objective was to investigate and assess types and extent of damage to this tree species in plantation stands in northern Guangdong, analyze relationships among site condition, forest structure and damage, and provide a theoretical basis and technical guidance for protecting existing forest resources and restoring damaged forests.

Methods The study was conducted in Chinese fir plantation in Tianjingshan forest farm of Guangdong, which was damaged by this snow and ice event. Thirteen plots 20 m × 30 m (or 15 m × 30 m) were placed in typical damaged areas in August 2008. Site factors such as altitude, aspect, slope position and slope steepness were recorded, and forest structure factors such as trunk diameter at breast height (DBH), tree height, crown size, lowest height of living branches, trunk taper (diameter/height) and stand density were measured.

Important findings Over 80% of the Chinese fir trees at 500-900 m elevation were damaged. There were three types of damage: crown broken (65.09%), uprooted (18.37%) and trunk bent (3.20%). The crown broken category was divided into five grades corresponding to extent of damage: top broken, crown fracture from the top to the central part, crown fracture from the top to the lower part with serious injury, entire crown broken, trunk broken off near the base or tree death after trunk broken. Plantation density was very important for the resistance of Chinese fir to the snow and ice storms, because trees were more severely broken where stand density was > 3 500 per hm² or < 1 500 per hm². DBH was a sensitive index of the type and extent of damage. Stunted trees tended to show mild damage. Trunk taper was an important factor for Chinese fir in the prevention and mitigation of snow and ice damage.

Key words: Cunninghamia lanceolata, damage type, northern Guangdong, plantation, snow and ice disaster

何茜, 李吉跃, 陈晓阳, 陈红跃, 彭华贵, 樊顺江. 2008年初特大冰雪灾害对粤北地区杉木人工林树木损害的类型及程度. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(2): 195-203. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.02.011

HE Qian, LI Ji-Yue, CHEN Xiao-Yang, CHEN Hong-Yue, PENG Hua-Gui, FAN Shun-Jiang. Types and extent of damage to Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations due to unusually heavy snow and ice in southern China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(2): 195-203. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.02.011

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.02.011

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2010/V34/I2/195

图/表 7

参考文献 29

[1]	Associated Investigation Group (林业寒害联合调查组) (2000). Survey reports on cold damage to forestry in Guangdong in the end of 1999. Forestry Science and Technology of Guangdong Province (广东林业科技), 16(4), 26-33. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	Bruederle LP, Stearns FW (1985). Ice storm damage to a southern Wisconsin mesic forest. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 112, 167-175. DOI URL
[3]	Cai ZL (蔡子良), Zhong QP (钟秋平), Liu QY (刘清元), Bai LH (白灵海) (2008). Investigation on main trees species damaged by ice storm in Guangxi and the restoration measures. Forest Research (林业科学研究), 21, 837-841. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	Chen HR (陈华荣), Wang SC (王世春) (2008). Analysis of damage on Cunninghamia lanceolata medium-aged forest suffered from ice-snow damage. Chinese Forestry (中国林业), 12B, 40. (in Chinese)
[5]	de Stevens D, Kline J, Kline M, Paul E (1991). Long-term changes in a Wisconsin Fagus-Acer forest in relation to glaze storm disturbance. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2, 208-210.
[6]	Hou XY (侯向阳), Han JX (韩进轩) (1996). Regeneration and restoration of Korean pine broadleaf mixed forest in windfall area. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 32, 420-425. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	http://www.nfdaily.cn/gd/gd_list/content/2008-03/18/content_4355513.htm
[8]	Li WC (李伟成), Wang SD (王树东), Zhong ZK (钟哲科), Zhou Y (周妍), Sheng HY (盛海燕), Sheng BY (盛碧云) (2008). The relationship among environment, management, biological characteristics and snow/ice disaster in phyllostachys edulis forest. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 44(11), 128-133. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	Li XF (李秀芬), Zhu JJ (朱教君), Wang QL (王庆礼), Liu ZG (刘足根) (2005). Forest damage induced by wind/snow: a review. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 25, 150-159. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	Li XF (李秀芬), Zhu JJ (朱教君), Wang QL (王庆礼) , Liu ZG (刘足根), Mao ZH (毛志宏) (2006). Relationships between snow/wind damage and tree species as well as forest types in secondary forests. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (北京林业大学学报), 28(4), 28-33. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	Li XF (李秀芬), Zhu JJ (朱教君), Wang QL (王庆礼), Liu ZG (刘足根), Hou CS (侯传生), Yang HJ (杨焕君) (2004). Snow/wind damage in natural secondary forests in Liaodong mountainous regions of Liaoning Province. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 15, 941-946 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	Lopez MJI, Nognes-Bravo D (2005). A generalized additive model for the spatial distribution of snowpack in the Spanish Pyrenees. Hydrological Processes, 19, 3167-3176.
[13]	Megahan WF, Steele R (1987). An approach for predicting snow damage to ponderosa pine plantations. Forest Science, 33, 485-503.
[14]	Melacon S, Lechowicz MJ (1986). Differences in the damage caused by glaze ice on codominant Acer saccharum and Fagus grandifolia. Canadian Journal of Botany, 65, 1157-1159.
[15]	Mou P, Warrillow MP (2000). Ice storm damage to a mixed hardwood forest and its impacts on forest regeneration in the ridge and valley region of southwestern Virginia. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, 127, 66-82. DOI URL
[16]	Nykanen ML, Peltola HL, Quine C, KellomAki S, Broadgate M (1997). Factors affecting snow damage of tree with particular reference to European conditions. Silva Fennica, 31, 193-213.
[17]	Paatalo ML, Pehola H, Kellomaki S (1999). Modelling the risk of snow damage to forests under short-term snow loading. Forest Ecology and Management, 116, 51-70. DOI URL
[18]	Petty JA, Worrell R (1981). Stability of coniferous tree stems in relation to damage by snow. Forestry, 54, 115-128.
[19]	Rebertus AJ, Shifley SR, Richards RH, Roovers LM (1997). Ice storm damage to an old-growth oak-hickory forest in Missouri. American Midland Naturalist, 137, 48-61.
[20]	Seischab FK, Bernard JM, Eberle MD (1993). Glaze storm damage to western New York forest communities. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 120, 64-72.
[21]	Smolnik M, Hessl A, Colbert JJ (2006). Species-specific effects of a 1994 ice storm on radial tree growth in Delaware. The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, 133, 577-584. DOI URL
[22]	South China Botanical Garden (华南植物园) (2008). Snow and ice disasters on the impact of forest vegetation in the south of the preliminary investigation have been completed by South China Botanical Garden. Science Times (科学时报), April 14. (in Chinese)
[23]	Tang JM (汤景明), Song CW (宋丛文), Dai JH (戴均华), Liu HG (刘恒贵), Zheng XY (郑孝严) (2008). Investigation on the frozen snow damage of main afforestation tree species in Hubei Province. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 44(11), 2-10. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	Valinger E, Lundqvist L (1992). The influence of thinning and nitrogen fertilization on the frequency of snow and wind induced stand damage in forests. Scottish Forestry, 46, 311-320.
[25]	Xu JM (徐建民), Li GY (李光友), Lu ZH (陆钊华), Xiang DY (项东云), Zeng BS (曾炳山), Zhang NN (张宁南), Guo HY (郭洪英) (2008). Investigation on eucalypt forest plantations subjected to the freezing catastrophe in southern China. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 44(7), 103-110. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	Xue L (薛立), Feng HF (冯慧芳), Zheng WG (郑卫国), Fu JD (傅静丹), Cao H (曹鹤) (2008). Water capacity character-ristic of the broken crown and litter in a Cunninghamia lanceolata stand suffered from ice-snow damage in north Guangdong Province. Scientia silvae sinicae (林业科学), 44(11), 82-86. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	Yan SK (颜绍馗), Zhang WD (张伟东), Liu YX (刘燕新), Fu SL (傅声雷), Li YL (李媛良), Wang SL (汪思龙) (2009). Impact of heavy snow storm and freezing rain disasters on soil fauna in Chinese fir plantation in southern China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 20, 65-70. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	Zhang JG (张建国), Duan AG (段爱国), Tong SZ (童书振), Sun HG (孙洪刚), Deng ZF (邓宗富), Zhang SG (张守攻) (2008). Harm of frost and snow suppress to near mature stands of Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 44(11), 18-22. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	Zhu JJ, Li XF, Liu ZG, Cao W, Gonda Y, Matsuzaki T (2006). Factors affecting the snow and wind induced damage of a montane secondary forest in northeastern China. Silva Fennica, 40, 37-51.

样地号 Plot No.	海拔 Alt. (m)	坡向 Asp.	坡位 SP	坡度 Grad (°)	经度 Long.(E)	纬度 Lat.(N)	林分密度 SD (株·hm^-2)	胸径 DBH (cm)	树高 TH (m)	枝下高 FB (m)	冠幅 CS (m)
1	575	南坡 Southern slope	上坡 Uphill	8	113°1′22′′	24°41′15′′	3 517	8.1	5.4	3.0	2.0
2	563	北偏西20° North-west 20°	上坡 Uphill	32	113°4′15′′	24°44′29′′	3 700	10.6	6.4	4.7	2.4
3	573	西偏南10° West-south 10°	山脊 Ridge	-	113°14′19′′	24°44′28′′	2 633	9.9	5.8	3.5	2.4
4	472	西坡 Western slope	下坡 Downhill	32	113°4′9′′	24°44′44′′	2 533	9.0	7.1	4.3	2.5
5	668	北偏西55° North-west 20°	上坡 Uphill	23	113°9′50′′	24°44′49′′	1 467	11.4	8.5	4.3	2.3
6	700	东偏南13° Eest-south 13°	下坡 Downhill	36	113°4′27′′	24°44′52′′	1 717	11.1	6.6	3.9	2.3
7	715	南偏西20° South-west 20°	中坡 Middlehill	6	113°4′56′′	24°44′59′′	3 533	6.1	3.6	1.9	1.7
8	900	西偏南10° West-south 10°	下坡 Downhill	21	112°56′56′′	24°41′49′′	3 311	12.3	9.9	6.7	2.3
9	936	南坡 Southern slope	下坡 Downhill	27	113°4′55′′	24°41′25′′	1 883	13.2	9.4	6.6	1.9
10	840	南坡 Southern slope	下坡 Downhill	5	113°1′18′′	24°41′5′′	4 867	11.3	9.1	5.8	2.4
11	688	南坡 Southern slope	中坡 Middlehill	21	113°1′58′′	24°41′35′′	2 367	11.5	6.6	4.0	2.4
12	511	东坡 Eastern slope	下坡 Downhill	37	113°4′7′′	24°44′52′′	1 917	11.0	6.2	3.7	2.2
13	531	南偏西35° South-west 35°	中坡 Middlehill	36	113°4′12′′	24°44'′59′′	2 917	12.0	6.2	4.4	1.8

样地号 Plot No.	海拔 Alt. (m)	坡向 Asp.	坡位 SP	坡度 Grad (°)	经度 Long.(E)	纬度 Lat.(N)	林分密度 SD (株·hm^-2)	胸径 DBH (cm)	树高 TH (m)	枝下高 FB (m)	冠幅 CS (m)
1	575	南坡 Southern slope	上坡 Uphill	8	113°1′22′′	24°41′15′′	3 517	8.1	5.4	3.0	2.0
2	563	北偏西20° North-west 20°	上坡 Uphill	32	113°4′15′′	24°44′29′′	3 700	10.6	6.4	4.7	2.4
3	573	西偏南10° West-south 10°	山脊 Ridge	-	113°14′19′′	24°44′28′′	2 633	9.9	5.8	3.5	2.4
4	472	西坡 Western slope	下坡 Downhill	32	113°4′9′′	24°44′44′′	2 533	9.0	7.1	4.3	2.5
5	668	北偏西55° North-west 20°	上坡 Uphill	23	113°9′50′′	24°44′49′′	1 467	11.4	8.5	4.3	2.3
6	700	东偏南13° Eest-south 13°	下坡 Downhill	36	113°4′27′′	24°44′52′′	1 717	11.1	6.6	3.9	2.3
7	715	南偏西20° South-west 20°	中坡 Middlehill	6	113°4′56′′	24°44′59′′	3 533	6.1	3.6	1.9	1.7
8	900	西偏南10° West-south 10°	下坡 Downhill	21	112°56′56′′	24°41′49′′	3 311	12.3	9.9	6.7	2.3
9	936	南坡 Southern slope	下坡 Downhill	27	113°4′55′′	24°41′25′′	1 883	13.2	9.4	6.6	1.9
10	840	南坡 Southern slope	下坡 Downhill	5	113°1′18′′	24°41′5′′	4 867	11.3	9.1	5.8	2.4
11	688	南坡 Southern slope	中坡 Middlehill	21	113°1′58′′	24°41′35′′	2 367	11.5	6.6	4.0	2.4
12	511	东坡 Eastern slope	下坡 Downhill	37	113°4′7′′	24°44′52′′	1 917	11.0	6.2	3.7	2.2
13	531	南偏西35° South-west 35°	中坡 Middlehill	36	113°4′12′′	24°44'′59′′	2 917	12.0	6.2	4.4	1.8

样地类型 Plot type	样地号 Plot No.	未损 Undamage	受损类型 Damage type
样地类型 Plot type	样地号 Plot No.	未损 Undamage	弯曲 Bending	倒伏 Lodging	折断 Broken	总计 Total
未受损 Undamaged	4	148 / 97.37	0 / 0	0 / 0	4 / 2.63	4 / 2.63
	8	149 / 100.00	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
	9	113 / 100.00	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
轻微受损 Slightly damaged	10	182 / 81.98	4 / 1.8	0 / 0	33 / 14.86	37 / 16.67
受损 Damaged	1	4 / 1.89	17 / 8.02	79 / 37.26	111 / 52.36	207 / 97.64
	2	14 / 6.28	3 / 1.35	22 / 9.87	183 / 82.06	208 / 93.27
	3	5 / 3.14	7 / 4.4	22 / 13.84	124 / 77.99	153 / 96.23
	5	16 / 18.18	1 / 1.14	2 / 2.27	69 / 78.41	72 / 81.82
	6	0 / 0.00	9 / 8.74	27 / 26.21	67 / 65.05	103 / 100
	7	15 / 9.43	5 / 3.14	38 / 23.9	101 / 63.52	144 / 90.57
	11	6 / 4.23	2 / 1.41	17 / 11.97	117 / 82.39	136 / 95.77
	12	6 / 5.22	1 / 0.87	31 / 26.96	77 / 66.96	109 / 94.78
	13	1 / 0.57	2 / 1.14	55 / 31.43	117 / 66.86	174 / 99.43
	总数/平均值 Total/average	67 / 4.88	47 / 3.42	293 / 21.34	966 / 70.36	1 306 / 95.12

样地类型 Plot type	样地号 Plot No.	未损 Undamage	受损类型 Damage type
样地类型 Plot type	样地号 Plot No.	未损 Undamage	弯曲 Bending	倒伏 Lodging	折断 Broken	总计 Total
未受损 Undamaged	4	148 / 97.37	0 / 0	0 / 0	4 / 2.63	4 / 2.63
	8	149 / 100.00	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
	9	113 / 100.00	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
轻微受损 Slightly damaged	10	182 / 81.98	4 / 1.8	0 / 0	33 / 14.86	37 / 16.67
受损 Damaged	1	4 / 1.89	17 / 8.02	79 / 37.26	111 / 52.36	207 / 97.64
	2	14 / 6.28	3 / 1.35	22 / 9.87	183 / 82.06	208 / 93.27
	3	5 / 3.14	7 / 4.4	22 / 13.84	124 / 77.99	153 / 96.23
	5	16 / 18.18	1 / 1.14	2 / 2.27	69 / 78.41	72 / 81.82
	6	0 / 0.00	9 / 8.74	27 / 26.21	67 / 65.05	103 / 100
	7	15 / 9.43	5 / 3.14	38 / 23.9	101 / 63.52	144 / 90.57
	11	6 / 4.23	2 / 1.41	17 / 11.97	117 / 82.39	136 / 95.77
	12	6 / 5.22	1 / 0.87	31 / 26.96	77 / 66.96	109 / 94.78
	13	1 / 0.57	2 / 1.14	55 / 31.43	117 / 66.86	174 / 99.43
	总数/平均值 Total/average	67 / 4.88	47 / 3.42	293 / 21.34	966 / 70.36	1 306 / 95.12

样地号 Plot No.	折断等级(株数/百分比(%)) Grades of broken trees (number/percentage)
样地号 Plot No.	I 轻微受损 Slightly damaged	II 轻度受损 Mild damaged	III 中度受损 Moderate damaged	IV 严重受损 Severe damaged	V 极严重受损 Very serious damaged
1	12 / 10.81	35 / 31.53	26 / 23.42	34 / 30.63	4 / 3.60
2	56 / 30.60	75 / 40.98	37 / 20.22	13 / 7.10	2 / 1.09
3	12 / 9.68	50 / 40.32	30 / 24.19	28 / 22.58	4 / 3.23
5	6 / 8.70	32 / 46.38	23 / 33.33	6 / 8.70	2 / 2.90
6	4 / 6.06	26 / 39.39	20 / 30.30	14 / 20.9	2 / 2.99
7	0 / 0.00	21 / 20.79	52 / 51.49	28 / 27.72	0 / 0.00
11	34 / 29.06	41 / 35.04	26 / 22.22	11 / 9.40	5 / 4.27
12	10 / 12.99	35 / 45.45	28 / 36.36	4 / 5.19	0 / 0.00
13	3 / 2.59	54 / 46.55	45 / 38.79	13 / 11.11	1 / 0.85
平均值 Mean	12.28	38.49	31.15	15.97	2.11