Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2013, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 279-295.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00028
Special Issue: 生态系统结构与功能; 青藏高原植物生态学:生态系统生态学; 生物多样性
• Research Articles • Next Articles
WANG Hai-Dong, ZHANG Lu-Lu, ZHU Zhi-Hong*()
Received:
2012-11-20
Accepted:
2013-02-25
Online:
2013-11-20
Published:
2013-04-09
Contact:
ZHU Zhi-Hong
WANG Hai-Dong, ZHANG Lu-Lu, ZHU Zhi-Hong. Effects of clipping and fertilizing on the relationships between species diversity and ecosystem functioning and mechanisms of community stability in alpine meadow[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2013, 37(4): 279-295.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00028
植物种 Plant species | 变异来源(自由度) Sources of variance (df (m, n)) | R2 (n = 36) | 物种类型 Species type | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B (2, 4) | C (2, 4) | F (1, 18) | W (1, 18) | C × F (2, 18) | C × W (2, 18) | F × W (1, 18) | C × F × W (2, 18) | |||
矮嵩草 Kobresia humilis | 4.43 | 0.32 | 5.29* | 0.96 | 1.25 | 0.23 | 0.52 | 0.24 | 0.006 | RS |
鹅绒委陵菜 Potentilla anserina | 12.71* | 6.96* | 14.87** | 0 | 5.52* | 4.86* | 0.01 | 0.89 | 0.014 | RS |
甘肃马先蒿 Pedicularis kansuensis | 0.27 | 2.56 | 5.51* | 4.55* | 0.54 | 1.01 | 3.91 | 1.19 | 0.013 | RS |
海乳草 Glaux maritima | 8.53* | 7.01* | 0.58 | 0.30 | 6.91** | 0.12 | 0.01 | 0.43 | 0 | RS |
尖叶龙胆 Gentiana lawrencei | 1.48 | 5.02 | 41.23** | 4.02 | 2.58 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 1.96 | 0.014 | RS |
美丽风毛菊 Saussurea superba | 2.61 | 7.16* | 1.33 | 0.02 | 0.80 | 0.91 | 1.28 | 0.05 | 0.024 | RS |
棉毛茛 Ranunculus membranaceus | 1.72 | 10.86* | 7.13* | 0.79 | 2.19 | 0.48 | 0.35 | 1.87 | 0.022 | RS |
蒲公英 Taraxacum mongolicum | 1.46 | 16.47* | 0.03 | 0.35 | 0.54 | 1.61 | 0.16 | 0.95 | 0.033 | RS |
溚草 Koeleria cristata | 1.00 | 1.46 | 15.83** | 0.83 | 1.77 | 0.12 | 0.46 | 0.53 | 0.009 | RS |
麻花艽 Gentiana macrophylla | 2.62 | 4.21 | 4.64* | 0.39 | 0.29 | 4.69* | 4.21 | 0.36 | 0.033 | RS |
小米草 Euphrasia regelii | 1.41 | 2.61 | 10.92** | 0.61 | 0.95 | 0.71 | 0.21 | 0.34 | 0.002 | RS |
亚洲蒲公英 Taraxacum leucanthum | 0.19 | 5.08** | 1.97 | 1.76 | 6.23** | 3.02 | 0.26 | 0.96 | 0.028 | RS |
紫菀 Aster alpinus | 1.81 | 8.21* | 0.68 | 0.86 | 3.43 | 0.40 | 0.28 | 5.06* | 0.016 | RS |
矮火绒草 Leontopodium nanum | 1.20 | 3.76 | 6.20* | 0.13 | 1.45 | 0.13 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.072** | RS, ES |
繁缕 Stellaria umbellata | 0.55 | 0.56 | 79.92** | 3.43 | 0.25 | 0.13 | 1.58 | 0.04 | 0.153** | RS, ES |
甘肃棘豆 Oxytropis kansuensis | 1.34 | 3.10 | 51.59** | 0.09 | 3.12 | 0.17 | 1.30 | 0.09 | 0.172** | RS, ES |
黄花棘豆 Oxytropis ochrocephala | 0.30 | 1.92 | 25.48** | 1.65 | 2.63 | 0.71 | 2.35 | 1.18 | 0.039* | RS, ES |
黄芪 Astragalus licentianus | 0.60 | 1.5 | 17.70** | 0.22 | 3.67* | 0.92 | 3.93 | 1.31 | 0.088** | RS, ES |
米口袋 Gueldenstaedtia verna | 2.21 | 3.91 | 20.17** | 0.27 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 1.17 | 0.79 | 0.101** | RS, ES |
垂穗披碱草 Elymus nutans | 0.63 | 1.66 | 26.18** | 0.26 | 0 | 0.13 | 0.07 | 2.05 | 0.145** | RS, ES |
青海棘豆 Oxytropis qinghaiensis | 0.63 | 1.22 | 35.19** | 1.88 | 1.73 | 0.56 | 0.04 | 1.56 | 0.130** | RS, ES |
三脉梅花草 Parnassia trinervis | 3.48 | 2.5 | 17.60** | 0 | 1.55 | 0.08 | 0 | 0.46 | 0.155** | RS, ES |
湿生扁蕾 Gentianopsis paludosa | 6.98 | 15.05* | 17.77** | 16.99** | 0.55 | 3.94* | 2.03 | 3.17 | 0.058* | RS, ES |
银莲花 Anemone obtusiloba | 1.05 | 11.88* | 8.32** | 1.85 | 2.95 | 2.69 | 1.3 | 2.79 | 0.125** | RS, ES |
圆萼刺参 Morina chinensis | 1.47 | 13.77* | 0 | 0.22 | 0 | 1.32 | 0.59 | 0.86 | 0.079* | RS, ES |
早熟禾 Poa sp. | 1.13 | 13.76* | 52.94** | 1.37 | 7.17** | 1.51 | 0.88 | 1.46 | 0.319** | RS, ES |
响应物种数(%) No. of response species (%) | 2 (2.8) | 11 (15.5) | 20 (28.4) | 2 (2.8) | 5 (7.0) | 3 (4.2) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.4) | 13 (18.3) |
Table 1 ANOVA for important value (IV) of response species and regression analysis for the IV with aboveground net primary productivity
植物种 Plant species | 变异来源(自由度) Sources of variance (df (m, n)) | R2 (n = 36) | 物种类型 Species type | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B (2, 4) | C (2, 4) | F (1, 18) | W (1, 18) | C × F (2, 18) | C × W (2, 18) | F × W (1, 18) | C × F × W (2, 18) | |||
矮嵩草 Kobresia humilis | 4.43 | 0.32 | 5.29* | 0.96 | 1.25 | 0.23 | 0.52 | 0.24 | 0.006 | RS |
鹅绒委陵菜 Potentilla anserina | 12.71* | 6.96* | 14.87** | 0 | 5.52* | 4.86* | 0.01 | 0.89 | 0.014 | RS |
甘肃马先蒿 Pedicularis kansuensis | 0.27 | 2.56 | 5.51* | 4.55* | 0.54 | 1.01 | 3.91 | 1.19 | 0.013 | RS |
海乳草 Glaux maritima | 8.53* | 7.01* | 0.58 | 0.30 | 6.91** | 0.12 | 0.01 | 0.43 | 0 | RS |
尖叶龙胆 Gentiana lawrencei | 1.48 | 5.02 | 41.23** | 4.02 | 2.58 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 1.96 | 0.014 | RS |
美丽风毛菊 Saussurea superba | 2.61 | 7.16* | 1.33 | 0.02 | 0.80 | 0.91 | 1.28 | 0.05 | 0.024 | RS |
棉毛茛 Ranunculus membranaceus | 1.72 | 10.86* | 7.13* | 0.79 | 2.19 | 0.48 | 0.35 | 1.87 | 0.022 | RS |
蒲公英 Taraxacum mongolicum | 1.46 | 16.47* | 0.03 | 0.35 | 0.54 | 1.61 | 0.16 | 0.95 | 0.033 | RS |
溚草 Koeleria cristata | 1.00 | 1.46 | 15.83** | 0.83 | 1.77 | 0.12 | 0.46 | 0.53 | 0.009 | RS |
麻花艽 Gentiana macrophylla | 2.62 | 4.21 | 4.64* | 0.39 | 0.29 | 4.69* | 4.21 | 0.36 | 0.033 | RS |
小米草 Euphrasia regelii | 1.41 | 2.61 | 10.92** | 0.61 | 0.95 | 0.71 | 0.21 | 0.34 | 0.002 | RS |
亚洲蒲公英 Taraxacum leucanthum | 0.19 | 5.08** | 1.97 | 1.76 | 6.23** | 3.02 | 0.26 | 0.96 | 0.028 | RS |
紫菀 Aster alpinus | 1.81 | 8.21* | 0.68 | 0.86 | 3.43 | 0.40 | 0.28 | 5.06* | 0.016 | RS |
矮火绒草 Leontopodium nanum | 1.20 | 3.76 | 6.20* | 0.13 | 1.45 | 0.13 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.072** | RS, ES |
繁缕 Stellaria umbellata | 0.55 | 0.56 | 79.92** | 3.43 | 0.25 | 0.13 | 1.58 | 0.04 | 0.153** | RS, ES |
甘肃棘豆 Oxytropis kansuensis | 1.34 | 3.10 | 51.59** | 0.09 | 3.12 | 0.17 | 1.30 | 0.09 | 0.172** | RS, ES |
黄花棘豆 Oxytropis ochrocephala | 0.30 | 1.92 | 25.48** | 1.65 | 2.63 | 0.71 | 2.35 | 1.18 | 0.039* | RS, ES |
黄芪 Astragalus licentianus | 0.60 | 1.5 | 17.70** | 0.22 | 3.67* | 0.92 | 3.93 | 1.31 | 0.088** | RS, ES |
米口袋 Gueldenstaedtia verna | 2.21 | 3.91 | 20.17** | 0.27 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 1.17 | 0.79 | 0.101** | RS, ES |
垂穗披碱草 Elymus nutans | 0.63 | 1.66 | 26.18** | 0.26 | 0 | 0.13 | 0.07 | 2.05 | 0.145** | RS, ES |
青海棘豆 Oxytropis qinghaiensis | 0.63 | 1.22 | 35.19** | 1.88 | 1.73 | 0.56 | 0.04 | 1.56 | 0.130** | RS, ES |
三脉梅花草 Parnassia trinervis | 3.48 | 2.5 | 17.60** | 0 | 1.55 | 0.08 | 0 | 0.46 | 0.155** | RS, ES |
湿生扁蕾 Gentianopsis paludosa | 6.98 | 15.05* | 17.77** | 16.99** | 0.55 | 3.94* | 2.03 | 3.17 | 0.058* | RS, ES |
银莲花 Anemone obtusiloba | 1.05 | 11.88* | 8.32** | 1.85 | 2.95 | 2.69 | 1.3 | 2.79 | 0.125** | RS, ES |
圆萼刺参 Morina chinensis | 1.47 | 13.77* | 0 | 0.22 | 0 | 1.32 | 0.59 | 0.86 | 0.079* | RS, ES |
早熟禾 Poa sp. | 1.13 | 13.76* | 52.94** | 1.37 | 7.17** | 1.51 | 0.88 | 1.46 | 0.319** | RS, ES |
响应物种数(%) No. of response species (%) | 2 (2.8) | 11 (15.5) | 20 (28.4) | 2 (2.8) | 5 (7.0) | 3 (4.2) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.4) | 13 (18.3) |
物种类型 Species type | 不施肥 Unfertilized | 施肥 Fertilized | 施肥效应 Fertilized effect | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
不刈割 Unclipped | 中度刈割 Stubbled 3 cm | 重度刈割 Stubbled 1 cm | F | 平均值 Mean | 不刈割Unclipped | 中度刈割Stubbled 3 cm | 重度刈割Stubbled 1 cm | F | 平均值 Mean | F | ||
全部物种数 No. of total species | 28.7b | 33.4a | 28.9b | 13.79*** | 30.4 | 22.8c | 30.1a | 27.1b | 17.64*** | 26.6 | 20.33*** | |
响应物种(%) Response species (%) | 58.6a | 56.3a | 60.8a | 2.89 | 58.6 | 54.9b | 53.1b | 56.7a | 15.20*** | 54.9 | 40.32*** | |
作用物种(%) Effect species (%) | 28.4b | 28.4b | 31.5a | 3.76* | 29.5 | 23.9b | 24.2b | 27.5a | 10.23*** | 25.2 | 48.50*** | |
共有物种(%) Common species (%) | 94.0a | 91.5b | 93.8a | 12.64*** | 93.1 | 95.1a | 92.6b | 94.7a | 15.21*** | 94.1 | 20.55*** |
Table 2 ANOVA for difference in the number of total species and percentage of each species type accounted for total species among different treatments
物种类型 Species type | 不施肥 Unfertilized | 施肥 Fertilized | 施肥效应 Fertilized effect | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
不刈割 Unclipped | 中度刈割 Stubbled 3 cm | 重度刈割 Stubbled 1 cm | F | 平均值 Mean | 不刈割Unclipped | 中度刈割Stubbled 3 cm | 重度刈割Stubbled 1 cm | F | 平均值 Mean | F | ||
全部物种数 No. of total species | 28.7b | 33.4a | 28.9b | 13.79*** | 30.4 | 22.8c | 30.1a | 27.1b | 17.64*** | 26.6 | 20.33*** | |
响应物种(%) Response species (%) | 58.6a | 56.3a | 60.8a | 2.89 | 58.6 | 54.9b | 53.1b | 56.7a | 15.20*** | 54.9 | 40.32*** | |
作用物种(%) Effect species (%) | 28.4b | 28.4b | 31.5a | 3.76* | 29.5 | 23.9b | 24.2b | 27.5a | 10.23*** | 25.2 | 48.50*** | |
共有物种(%) Common species (%) | 94.0a | 91.5b | 93.8a | 12.64*** | 93.1 | 95.1a | 92.6b | 94.7a | 15.21*** | 94.1 | 20.55*** |
Fig. 1 Effects of clipping and fertilizing on species diversity (mean ± SE, n = 36). NH, unclipped; H3, stubbled 3 cm; H1, stubbled 1 cm. Same capital letters indicate no significant difference among clipping treatments in unfertilized quadrat (p < 0.05). Same small letters indicate no significant difference among clipping treatments in fertilized quadrat (p < 0.05); **, p < 0.01.
Fig. 2 Effects of different treatments on ecosystem function in alpine meadow (mean ± SE, n = 36). NH, unclipped; H3, stubbled 3 cm; H1, stubbled 1 cm; **, p < 0.01. Same capital letters indicate no significant difference among clipping treatments in unfertilized quadrat (p > 0.05). Small letters indicate no significant difference among clipping treatments in fertilized quadrat (p > 0.05).
物种类型 Species type | 施肥梯度 Fertility gradient | 刈割梯度 Clipping gradient | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
不施肥 Unfertilized | 施肥 Fertilized | 不刈割 Unclipped | 中度刈割 Stubbled 3 cm | 重度刈割 Stubbled 1 cm | |||||||||||||||
K | F | R2 | K | F | R2 | K | F | R2 | K | F | R2 | K | F | R2 | |||||
全部物种 Total species | 2.90 | 2.7 | 0.05 | -0.84 | 1.4 | 0.03 | -0.71 | 0.7 | 0.02 | -1.00 | 0.1 | 0 | 2.41 | 0.8 | 0.02 | ||||
响应物种 Response species | 1.31 | 1.4 | 0.03 | -1.13 | 5.5* | 0.10 | -1.58 | 10.3** | 0.23 | -0.16 | 0 | 0 | 0.80 | 0.2 | 0.01 | ||||
作用物种 Effect species | 0.03 | 0 | 0 | -0.28 | 0.8 | 0.02 | -0.86 | 5.1* | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0 | 0 | -0.54 | 0.7 | 0.02 | ||||
共有物种 Common species | 2.84 | 2.6 | 0.05 | -0.81 | 1.3 | 0.02 | -0.68 | 0.6 | 0.02 | -0.55 | 0 | 0 | 2.62 | 0.9 | 0.03 | ||||
样方数 No. of quadrat | 54 | 54 | 36 | 36 | 36 |
Table 3 Regression analysis for the relationship between species diversity and aboveground net primary productivity of community
物种类型 Species type | 施肥梯度 Fertility gradient | 刈割梯度 Clipping gradient | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
不施肥 Unfertilized | 施肥 Fertilized | 不刈割 Unclipped | 中度刈割 Stubbled 3 cm | 重度刈割 Stubbled 1 cm | |||||||||||||||
K | F | R2 | K | F | R2 | K | F | R2 | K | F | R2 | K | F | R2 | |||||
全部物种 Total species | 2.90 | 2.7 | 0.05 | -0.84 | 1.4 | 0.03 | -0.71 | 0.7 | 0.02 | -1.00 | 0.1 | 0 | 2.41 | 0.8 | 0.02 | ||||
响应物种 Response species | 1.31 | 1.4 | 0.03 | -1.13 | 5.5* | 0.10 | -1.58 | 10.3** | 0.23 | -0.16 | 0 | 0 | 0.80 | 0.2 | 0.01 | ||||
作用物种 Effect species | 0.03 | 0 | 0 | -0.28 | 0.8 | 0.02 | -0.86 | 5.1* | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0 | 0 | -0.54 | 0.7 | 0.02 | ||||
共有物种 Common species | 2.84 | 2.6 | 0.05 | -0.81 | 1.3 | 0.02 | -0.68 | 0.6 | 0.02 | -0.55 | 0 | 0 | 2.62 | 0.9 | 0.03 | ||||
样方数 No. of quadrat | 54 | 54 | 36 | 36 | 36 |
物种类型 Species type | 施肥梯度 Fertility gradient | 刈割梯度 Clipping gradient | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
不施肥 Unfertilized | 施肥 Fertilized | 不刈割 Unclipped | 中度刈割 Stubbled 3 cm | 重度刈割 Stubbled 1 cm | |||||||||||||||
K | F | R2 | K | F | R2 | K | F | R2 | K | F | R2 | K | F | R2 | |||||
全部物种 Total species | 6.18 | 161.8*** | 0.76 | 2.88 | 97.7*** | 0.65 | 2.85 | 85.8*** | 0.72 | 7.16 | 74.6*** | 0.69 | 5.52 | 62.1*** | 0.65 | ||||
响应物种 Response species | 2.39 | 22.3*** | 0.30 | 1.70 | 45.8*** | 0.47 | 1.31 | 19.5*** | 0.36 | 2.14 | 13.2*** | 0.28 | 2.95 | 28.1*** | 0.45 | ||||
作用物种 Effect species | 0.59 | 13.5*** | 0.21 | 0.83 | 22.0*** | 0.30 | 0.79 | 11.6** | 0.25 | 0.51 | 12.3** | 0.27 | 0.77 | 10.2** | 0.23 | ||||
共有物种 Common species | 6.18 | 160.4*** | 0.76 | 2.90 | 101.3*** | 0.66 | 2.83 | 87.3*** | 0.72 | 7.15 | 80.4*** | 0.70 | 5.79 | 66.2*** | 0.66 | ||||
样方数 No. of quadrats | 54 | 54 | 36 | 36 | 36 |
Table 4 Regression analysis for relationships between species diversity of different species types and community stability
物种类型 Species type | 施肥梯度 Fertility gradient | 刈割梯度 Clipping gradient | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
不施肥 Unfertilized | 施肥 Fertilized | 不刈割 Unclipped | 中度刈割 Stubbled 3 cm | 重度刈割 Stubbled 1 cm | |||||||||||||||
K | F | R2 | K | F | R2 | K | F | R2 | K | F | R2 | K | F | R2 | |||||
全部物种 Total species | 6.18 | 161.8*** | 0.76 | 2.88 | 97.7*** | 0.65 | 2.85 | 85.8*** | 0.72 | 7.16 | 74.6*** | 0.69 | 5.52 | 62.1*** | 0.65 | ||||
响应物种 Response species | 2.39 | 22.3*** | 0.30 | 1.70 | 45.8*** | 0.47 | 1.31 | 19.5*** | 0.36 | 2.14 | 13.2*** | 0.28 | 2.95 | 28.1*** | 0.45 | ||||
作用物种 Effect species | 0.59 | 13.5*** | 0.21 | 0.83 | 22.0*** | 0.30 | 0.79 | 11.6** | 0.25 | 0.51 | 12.3** | 0.27 | 0.77 | 10.2** | 0.23 | ||||
共有物种 Common species | 6.18 | 160.4*** | 0.76 | 2.90 | 101.3*** | 0.66 | 2.83 | 87.3*** | 0.72 | 7.15 | 80.4*** | 0.70 | 5.79 | 66.2*** | 0.66 | ||||
样方数 No. of quadrats | 54 | 54 | 36 | 36 | 36 |
Fig. 5 Effect of fertility treatment on summed variance of total species (mean ± SE, n = 36). F, Fertilized; NF, unfertilized. Different small letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).
参数 Parameter | 物种类型 Species type | 施肥梯度 Fertility gradient | 刈割梯度 Clipping gradient | R2 的平均值 Mean of R2 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
不施肥 Unfertilized | 施肥 Fertilized | 不刈割 Unclipped | 中度刈割 Stubbled 3 cm | 重度刈割 Stubbled 1 cm | |||||||||||||||||
K | F | R2 | K | F | R2 | K | F | R2 | K | F | R2 | K | F | R2 | |||||||
总密度 Summed density | 全部物种Total species | -2 962.36 | 0.6 | 0.04 | 6 116.24 | 12.5** | 0.44 | 608.86 | 0.2 | 0.02 | -5 788.52 | 0.9 | 0.08 | 1 783.14 | 0.1 | 0.01 | 0.12 | ||||
响应物种Response species | -3 017.15 | 1.8 | 0.10 | 4 027.39 | 7.9** | 0.33 | 1 174.81 | 2.2 | 0.18 | -4 791.46 | 3.2 | 0.24 | -3 290.57 | 0.9 | 0.09 | 0.19 | |||||
作用物种Effect species | -1 387.72 | 5.2* | 0.25 | 1 854.35 | 3.2 | 0.17 | 919.64 | 2.6 | 0.21 | -1 443.65 | 6.1* | 0.38 | -333.98 | 0.1 | 0.01 | 0.20 | |||||
共有物种Common species | -3 983.58 | 2 | 0.11 | 5 920.40 | 11.1** | 0.41 | 622.84 | 0.2 | 0.02 | -3 339.45 | 1.0 | 0.09 | 2 521.8 | 0.2 | 0.02 | 0.13 | |||||
总方差 Summed variance | 全部物种Total species | -25.69 | 7.7** | 0.32 | -1.36 | 0.2 | 0.01 | -12.74 | 11.9** | 0.54 | -31.64 | 6.0* | 0.37 | -19.37 | 3.8 | 0.27 | 0.30 | ||||
响应物种Response species | -13.79 | 5.2* | 0.25 | -0.42 | 0 | 0 | -5.07 | 2.6 | 0.21 | -15.23 | 5.8* | 0.37 | -18.19 | 11.3** | 0.53 | 0.27 | |||||
作用物种Effects species | -5.28 | 11.8** | 0.43 | 0.19 | 0 | 0 | -2.93 | 1.5 | 0.13 | -5.06 | 23.1** | 0.70 | -3.80 | 2.8 | 0.22 | 0.30 | |||||
共有物种Common species | -24.51 | 16.1** | 0.50 | -1.63 | 0.3 | 0.02 | -12.61 | 11.7** | 0.54 | -20.84 | 11.2** | 0.53 | -19.44 | 3.0 | 0.23 | 0.36 | |||||
同步性 Synchrony | 全部物种Total species | -0.19 | 37.1** | 0.70 | -0.10 | 48.0** | 0.75 | -0.10 | 12.7** | 0.56 | -0.18 | 51.9** | 0.84 | -0.11 | 6.1* | 0.38 | 0.65 | ||||
响应物种Response species | -0.09 | 12.7** | 0.44 | -0.08 | 57.5** | 0.78 | -0.05 | 8.0* | 0.44 | -0.08 | 26.3** | 0.72 | -0.09 | 9.7** | 0.49 | 0.57 | |||||
作用物种Effects species | -0.02 | 8.4** | 0.34 | -0.03 | 7.0** | 0.30 | -0.04 | 5.5* | 0.35 | -0.02 | 20.2** | 0.67 | -0.02 | 1.8 | 0.15 | 0.36 | |||||
共有物种Common species | -0.09 | 6.5* | 0.29 | -0.10 | 47.6** | 0.75 | -0.09 | 12.2** | 0.55 | -0.05 | 2.8 | 0.22 | -0.12 | 5.8* | 0.37 | 0.44 | |||||
样方数 No. of quadrats | 18 | 18 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Table 5 Regression analysis for relationships between species diversity and stability parameters of community
参数 Parameter | 物种类型 Species type | 施肥梯度 Fertility gradient | 刈割梯度 Clipping gradient | R2 的平均值 Mean of R2 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
不施肥 Unfertilized | 施肥 Fertilized | 不刈割 Unclipped | 中度刈割 Stubbled 3 cm | 重度刈割 Stubbled 1 cm | |||||||||||||||||
K | F | R2 | K | F | R2 | K | F | R2 | K | F | R2 | K | F | R2 | |||||||
总密度 Summed density | 全部物种Total species | -2 962.36 | 0.6 | 0.04 | 6 116.24 | 12.5** | 0.44 | 608.86 | 0.2 | 0.02 | -5 788.52 | 0.9 | 0.08 | 1 783.14 | 0.1 | 0.01 | 0.12 | ||||
响应物种Response species | -3 017.15 | 1.8 | 0.10 | 4 027.39 | 7.9** | 0.33 | 1 174.81 | 2.2 | 0.18 | -4 791.46 | 3.2 | 0.24 | -3 290.57 | 0.9 | 0.09 | 0.19 | |||||
作用物种Effect species | -1 387.72 | 5.2* | 0.25 | 1 854.35 | 3.2 | 0.17 | 919.64 | 2.6 | 0.21 | -1 443.65 | 6.1* | 0.38 | -333.98 | 0.1 | 0.01 | 0.20 | |||||
共有物种Common species | -3 983.58 | 2 | 0.11 | 5 920.40 | 11.1** | 0.41 | 622.84 | 0.2 | 0.02 | -3 339.45 | 1.0 | 0.09 | 2 521.8 | 0.2 | 0.02 | 0.13 | |||||
总方差 Summed variance | 全部物种Total species | -25.69 | 7.7** | 0.32 | -1.36 | 0.2 | 0.01 | -12.74 | 11.9** | 0.54 | -31.64 | 6.0* | 0.37 | -19.37 | 3.8 | 0.27 | 0.30 | ||||
响应物种Response species | -13.79 | 5.2* | 0.25 | -0.42 | 0 | 0 | -5.07 | 2.6 | 0.21 | -15.23 | 5.8* | 0.37 | -18.19 | 11.3** | 0.53 | 0.27 | |||||
作用物种Effects species | -5.28 | 11.8** | 0.43 | 0.19 | 0 | 0 | -2.93 | 1.5 | 0.13 | -5.06 | 23.1** | 0.70 | -3.80 | 2.8 | 0.22 | 0.30 | |||||
共有物种Common species | -24.51 | 16.1** | 0.50 | -1.63 | 0.3 | 0.02 | -12.61 | 11.7** | 0.54 | -20.84 | 11.2** | 0.53 | -19.44 | 3.0 | 0.23 | 0.36 | |||||
同步性 Synchrony | 全部物种Total species | -0.19 | 37.1** | 0.70 | -0.10 | 48.0** | 0.75 | -0.10 | 12.7** | 0.56 | -0.18 | 51.9** | 0.84 | -0.11 | 6.1* | 0.38 | 0.65 | ||||
响应物种Response species | -0.09 | 12.7** | 0.44 | -0.08 | 57.5** | 0.78 | -0.05 | 8.0* | 0.44 | -0.08 | 26.3** | 0.72 | -0.09 | 9.7** | 0.49 | 0.57 | |||||
作用物种Effects species | -0.02 | 8.4** | 0.34 | -0.03 | 7.0** | 0.30 | -0.04 | 5.5* | 0.35 | -0.02 | 20.2** | 0.67 | -0.02 | 1.8 | 0.15 | 0.36 | |||||
共有物种Common species | -0.09 | 6.5* | 0.29 | -0.10 | 47.6** | 0.75 | -0.09 | 12.2** | 0.55 | -0.05 | 2.8 | 0.22 | -0.12 | 5.8* | 0.37 | 0.44 | |||||
样方数 No. of quadrats | 18 | 18 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
[1] | Cottingham KL, Brown BL, Lennon JT (2001). Biodiversity may regulate the temporal variability of ecological system. Ecology Letters, 4, 72-85. |
[2] | Díaz S, Cabido M (2001). Vive la difference: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16, 646-655. |
[3] |
Doak DF, Bigger D, Harding EK, Marvier MA, O’Malley RE, Thomson D (1998). The statistical inevitability of stability-diversity relationships in community ecology. The American Naturalist, 151, 264-276.
URL PMID |
[4] | Fox JW (2003). The long-term relationship between plant diversity and total plant biomass depends on the mechanism maintaining diversity. Oikos, 102, 630-640. |
[5] | Gonzalez A, Loreau M (2009). The causes and consequences of compensatory dynamics in ecological communities. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 40, 393-414. |
[6] |
Grace JB, Anderson TM, Smith MD, Seabloom E, Andelman SJ, Meche G, Weiher E, Allain LK, Jutila H, Sankaran M (2007). Does species diversity limit productivity in natural grassland communities? Ecology Letters, 10, 680-689.
DOI URL PMID |
[7] |
Grime JP (1998). Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. Journal of Ecology, 86, 902-910.
DOI URL |
[8] |
Grman E, Lau JA, Schoolmaster DR Jr, Gross KL (2010). Mechanisms contributing to stability in ecosystem function depend on the environmental context. Ecology Letters, 13, 1400-1410.
URL PMID |
[9] | Gu MH, Wang T, Du GZ (2011). Primary productivity and species abundance of cultivated grassland under different clipping and seeding combinations. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 31, 1672-1676. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 顾梦鹤, 王涛, 杜国祯 (2011). 刈割留茬高度和不同播种组合对人工草地初级生产力和物种丰富度的影响. 西北植物学报, 31, 1672-1676.] | |
[10] | Hillebrand H, Matthiessen B (2009). Biodiversity in a complex world: consolidation and progress in functional biodiversity research. Ecology Letters, 12, 1405-1419. |
[11] | Hooper DU (1998). The role of complementarity and competition in ecosystem responses to variation in plant diversity. Ecology, 79, 704-719. |
[12] | Hooper DU, Chapin FS, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M, Naeem S, Schmid B, Setala H, Symstad AJ, Vandermeer J, Wardle DA (2005). Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs, 75, 3-35. |
[13] |
Isbell FL, Polley HW, Wilsey BJ (2009). Biodiversity, productivity and the temporal stability of productivity: patterns and processes. Ecology Letters, 12, 443-451.
DOI URL PMID |
[14] | Lehman CL, Tilman D (2000). Biodiversity, stability and productivity in competitive communities. The American Naturalist, 156, 534-552. |
[15] | Lepš J (2004). Variability in population and community biomass in a grassland community affected by environmental productivity and diversity. Oikos, 107, 64-71. |
[16] | Li XG, Zhu ZH, Zhou XS, Yuan FR, Fan RJ, Xu ML (2011). Effects of clipping, fertilizing and watering on the relationship between species diversity, functional diversity and primary productivity in alpine meadow of China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 35, 1136-1147. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 李晓刚, 朱志红, 周晓松, 袁芙蓉, 樊瑞俭, 许曼丽 (2011). 刈割、施肥和浇水对高寒草甸物种多样性、功能多样性与初级生产力关系的影响. 植物生态学报, 35, 1136-1147.] | |
[17] | Li YN, Zhao XQ, Cao GM, Zhao L, Wang QX (2004). Analyses on climates and vegetation productivity background at Haibei alpine meadow ecosystem research station. Plateau Meteorology, 23, 558-567. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 李英年, 赵新全, 曹广民 . 赵亮, 王勤学 (2004). 海北高寒草甸生态系统定位站气候、植被生产力背景的分析. 高原气象, 23, 558-567.] | |
[18] | Li YN, Guan DG, Zhao L, Gu S, Zhao XQ (2005). Seasonal frozen soil and its effect on vegetation production in Haibei alpine meadow. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 27, 311-319.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 李英年, 关定国, 赵亮, 古松, 赵新全 (2005). 海北高寒草甸的季节冻土及在植被生产力形成过程中的作用. 冰川冻土, 27, 311-319.] | |
[19] | Loreau M, de Mazancourt C (2008). Species synchrony and its drivers: neutral and nonneutral community dynamics in fluctuating environments. The American Naturalist, 172, 48-66. |
[20] | Ma KP, Liu YM (1994). Measurement of biotic community diversity I α diversity (Part 2). Chinese Biodiversity, 2, 231-239.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 马克平, 刘玉明 (1994). 生物群落多样性的测度方法I. α多样性的测度方法(下). 生物多样性, 2, 231-239.] | |
[21] | Ren JZ (1998). Research Approaches on Grass Science . China Agriculture Press, Beijing. 15-16.(in Chinese) |
[ 任继周(1998). 草业科学研究方法. 中国农业出版社, 北京. 15-16.] | |
[22] |
Sasaki T, Lauenroth WK (2011). Dominant species, rather than diversity, regulates temporal stability of plant communities. Oecologia, 166, 761-768.
URL PMID |
[23] | Taylor LR (1961). Aggregation, variance and the mean. Nature, 189, 732-735. |
[24] | Tilman D (1982). Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton. |
[25] | Tilman D (1987). Secondary succession and the pattern of plant dominance along experimental nitrogen gradients. Ecological Monographs, 57, 189-214. |
[26] | Tilman D (1999). The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: a search for general principles. Ecology, 80, 1455-1474. |
[27] |
Tilman D, Reich PB, Knops JMH (2006). Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment. Nature, 441, 629-632.
URL PMID |
[28] | Valone TJ, Hoffman CD (2003). A mechanistic examination of diversity-stability relationship in annual plant communities. Oikos, 103, 519-527. |
[29] | Wang CT, Long RJ, Wang QJ, Jing ZC, Ding LM (2005). Relationship between species diversity and productivity in four types of alpine meadow plant communities. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 24, 483-487. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 王长庭, 龙瑞军, 王启基, 景增春, 丁路明 (2005). 高寒草甸不同草地群落物种多样性与生产力关系研究. 生态学杂志, 24, 483-487.] | |
[30] | Xi B, Zhu ZH, Li YN, Wang WJ, Zang YM (2010). Effect of grazing disturbance and nutrient availability on the compensatory responses of community in alpine meadows. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences), 4, 77-84. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 席博, 朱志红, 李英年, 王文娟, 臧岳铭 (2010). 放牧强度和生境资源对高寒草甸群落补偿能力的影响. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 4, 77-84.] | |
[31] | Yang ZL, van Ruijven J, Du GZ (2011). The effects of long-term fertilization on the temporal stability of alpine meadow communities. Plant and Soil, 345, 315-324. |
[32] | Zang YM, Zhu ZH, Li YN, Wang WJ, Xi B (2009). Effects of species diversity and functional diversity on primary productivity of alpine meadow. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 28, 999-1005. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 臧岳铭, 朱志红, 李英年, 王文娟, 席博 (2009). 高寒矮嵩草草甸物种多样性与功能多样性对初级生产力的影响. 生态学杂志, 28, 999-1005.] | |
[33] | Zhang QG, Zhang DY (2002). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent advances and controversies. Biodiversity Science, 10, 49-60. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 张全国, 张大勇 (2002). 生物多样性与生态系统功能: 进展与争论. 生物多样性, 10, 49-60.] | |
[34] | Zhang QG, Zhang DY (2003). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent advances and trends. Biodiversity Science, 11, 351-363. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 张全国, 张大勇 (2003). 生物多样性与生态系统功能: 最新的进展与动向. 生物多样性, 11, 351-363.] | |
[35] | Zhao XQ (2009). Global Change and Ecological System in Alpine Meadow. Science Press, Beijing. 78. (in Chinese) |
[ 赵新全 (2009). 高寒草甸生态系统与全球变化. 科学出版社, 北京. 78.] | |
[36] | Zhou XS, Zhu ZH, Li YN, Yuan FR, Fan RJ (2011). Community compensatory mechanism under clipping, fertilizing and watering treatment in alpine meadow. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences), 47, 50-57. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 周晓松, 朱志红, 李英年, 袁芙蓉, 樊瑞俭 (2011). 刈割、施肥和浇水对高寒草甸物种多样性、功能多样性与初级生产力关系的影响. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 47, 50-57.] | |
[37] |
Zhu ZH, Lundholm J, Li YN, Wang XA (2008). Response of Polygonum viviparum species and community level to long-term livestock grazing in alpine shrub meadow in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 50, 659-672.
DOI URL PMID |
[38] | Zhu ZH, Xi B, Li YN, Zang YM, Wang WJ, Liu JX, Guo H (2010). Compensatory growth of Carex scabrirostris in different habitats in alpine meadow. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 34, 348-358. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 朱志红, 席博, 李英年, 臧岳铭, 王文娟, 刘建秀, 郭华 (2010). 高寒草甸不同生境粗喙薹草补偿生长研究. 植物生态学报, 34, 348-358.] | |
[39] | Zhu ZH, Wang XA, Li YN, Wang G, Guo H (2012). Predicting plant traits and functional types response to grazing in an alpine shrub meadow on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Science China Earth Sciences, 5, 837-851. |
[1] | YANG Yu-Meng, LAI Quan, LIU Xin-Yi. Quantitative analysis of climate change and human activities on vegetation gross primary productivity in Nei Mongol, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(3): 306-316. |
[2] | NIU Yi-Di, CAI Ti-Jiu. Changes in species diversity and influencing factors in secondary forest succession in northern Da Hinggan Mountains [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(3): 349-363. |
[3] | LI Na, TANG Shi-Ming, GUO Jian-Ying, TIAN Ru, WANG Shan, HU Bing, LUO Yong-Hong, XU Zhu-Wen. Meta-analysis of effects of grazing on plant community properties in Nei Mongol grassland [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(9): 1256-1269. |
[4] | YANG Xin, REN Ming-Xun. Species distribution pattern and formation mechanism of mangrove plants around the South China Sea [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(8): 1105-1115. |
[5] | YU Xiao, JI Ruo-Xuan, REN Tian-Meng, XIA Xin-Li, YIN Wei-Lun, LIU Chao. Distribution, characteristics and classification of Caryopteris mongholica communities in northern China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(8): 1182-1192. |
[6] | LI Hong-Qin, ZHANG Fa-Wei, YI Lü-Bei. Stoichiometric responses in topsoil and leaf of dominant species to precipitation change and nitrogen addition in an alpine meadow [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(7): 922-931. |
[7] | LÜ Zi-Li, LIU Bin, CHANG Feng, MA Zi-Jing, CAO Qiu-Mei. Relationship between plant functional diversity and ecosystem multifunctionality in Bayanbulak alpine meadow along an altitude gradient [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(6): 822-832. |
[8] | LI Wei, ZHANG Rong. Case verification of community structure determining community productivity in subalpine meadow [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(5): 713-723. |
[9] | ZHU Hua, TAN Yun-Hong. Community characteristics, research states and problems of tropical rain forests in China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(4): 447-468. |
[10] | XIA Jing-Yu, ZHANG Yang-Jian, ZHENG Zhou-Tao, ZHAO Guang, ZHAO Ran, ZHU Yi-Xuan, GAO Jie, SHEN Ruo-Nan, LI Wen-Yu, ZHENG Jia-He, ZHANG Yu-Xue, ZHU Jun-Tao, SUN Osbert Jianxin. Asynchronous response of plant phenology to warming in a Kobresia pygmaea meadow in Nagqu, Qingzang Plateau [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(2): 183-194. |
[11] | LI Jie, HAO Min-Hui, FAN Chun-Yu, ZHANG Chun-Yu, ZHAO Xiu-Hai. Effect of tree species and functional diversity on ecosystem multifunctionality in temperate forests of northeast China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(11): 1507-1522. |
[12] | YANG Yuan-He, ZHANG Dian-Ye, WEI Bin, LIU Yang, FENG Xue-Hui, MAO Chao, XU Wei-Jie, HE Mei, WANG Lu, ZHENG Zhi-Hu, WANG Yuan-Yuan, CHEN Lei-Yi, PENG Yun-Feng. Nonlinear responses of community diversity, carbon and nitrogen cycles of grassland ecosystems to external nitrogen input [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(1): 1-24. |
[13] | DONG Liu-Wen, REN Zheng-Wei, ZHANG Rui, XIE Chen-Di, ZHOU Xiao-Long. Functional diversity rather than species diversity can explain community biomass variation following short-term nitrogen addition in an alpine grassland [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(8): 871-881. |
[14] | LIU Pei-Rong, TONG Xiao-Juan, MENG Ping, ZHANG Jin-Song, ZHANG Jing-Ru, YU Pei-Yang, ZHOU Yu. Effect of diffuse radiation on gross primary productivity of typical planted forests in eastern China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(8): 904-918. |
[15] | ZENG Kai-Na, SUN Hao-Ran, SHEN Yi-Chun, REN Ming-Xun. Pollination network and seasonal dynamics of Yangshan Wetland in Hainan Island, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(7): 775-784. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn