植物生态学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 9-16.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0002
所属专题: 生物多样性
魏守辉1(), 强胜1,*(
), 马波1, 韦继光1, 陈建卫2, 吴建强2, 谢桐洲2, 沈晓昆3
收稿日期:
2004-06-07
接受日期:
2004-10-19
出版日期:
2006-06-07
发布日期:
2006-01-30
通讯作者:
强胜
作者简介:
*E-mail:wrl@njau.edu.cn基金资助:
WEI Shou-Hui1(), QIANG Sheng1,*(
), MA Bo1, WEI Ji-Guang1, CHEN Jian-Wei2, WU Jian-Qiang2, XIE Tong-Zhou2, SHEN Xiao-Kun3
Received:
2004-06-07
Accepted:
2004-10-19
Online:
2006-06-07
Published:
2006-01-30
Contact:
QIANG Sheng
摘要:
2000~2003年连续4年研究了稻鸭共作条件下田间杂草群落的特征及其动态变化规律。结果表明,在长期稻鸭共作条件下,田间杂草密度逐年降低,下降趋势符合阻滞模型y=k+a·ebx,模型参数b反映了杂草种群的下降速率。在稻田6种主要杂草中,水虱草(Fimbristylis miliaceae)、陌上菜(Lindernia procumbens)、丁香蓼(Ludwigia prostrata)种群数量降低较快,鸭舌草(Monochoria vaginalis)、异型莎草(Cyperus difformis)次之,稗(Echinochloa crusgalli)最慢。稻鸭共作使稻田杂草群落的物种多样性持续降低,群落均匀度提高,群落相似性与稻鸭共作前相比逐年降低。说明稻鸭共作改变了田间杂草的群落结构,有利于限制杂草的发生危害。随着稻鸭共作的连年进行,对田间杂草的控制效果逐渐上升,4年后达99%以上。稻鸭共作是稻田替代化学除草的一种非常有效的生物、生态控草措施,具有显著的经济和生态效益。
魏守辉, 强胜, 马波, 韦继光, 陈建卫, 吴建强, 谢桐洲, 沈晓昆. 长期稻鸭共作对稻田杂草群落组成及物种多样性的影响. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(1): 9-16. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0002
WEI Shou-Hui, QIANG Sheng, MA Bo, WEI Ji-Guang, CHEN Jian-Wei, WU Jian-Qiang, XIE Tong-Zhou, SHEN Xiao-Kun. INFLUENCE OF LONG-TERM RICE-DUCK FARMING SYSTEMS ON THE COMPOSITION AND DIVERSITY OF WEED COMMUNITIES IN PADDY FIELDS. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2006, 30(1): 9-16. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0002
图2 稻鸭共作对稻田主要杂草密度的影响 a: 鸭舌草Monochoria vaginalis b: 丁香蓼Ludwigia prostrata c: 稗Echinochloa crusgalli d: 水虱草Fimbristylis miliaceae e: 陌上菜Lindernia procumbens f: 异型莎草Cyperus difformis
Fig.2 Effects of rice-duck farming on the density of major weed species in paddy fields
指数 Indices | 对照区 Check plot | 稻鸭共作区Rice-duck farming plot | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | |||||||||||||
物种丰富度Species richness | 6 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 3 | 2* | 1* | ||||||||||||
香农指数Shannon-Wiener index | 1.55 | 1.52 | 1.44 | 1.38 | 1.78 | 0.51* | - | - | ||||||||||||
辛普森指数Simpson's index | 0.24 | 0.28 | 0.35 | 0.40 | 0.37 | 0.47 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Pielou均匀度指数Pielou evenness index | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.92 | 0.87 | - | - |
表1 长期稻鸭共作对稻田杂草群落物种多样性的影响
Table 1 Influence of long-term rice-duck farming on the species diversity of weed communities in paddy fields
指数 Indices | 对照区 Check plot | 稻鸭共作区Rice-duck farming plot | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | |||||||||||||
物种丰富度Species richness | 6 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 3 | 2* | 1* | ||||||||||||
香农指数Shannon-Wiener index | 1.55 | 1.52 | 1.44 | 1.38 | 1.78 | 0.51* | - | - | ||||||||||||
辛普森指数Simpson's index | 0.24 | 0.28 | 0.35 | 0.40 | 0.37 | 0.47 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Pielou均匀度指数Pielou evenness index | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.92 | 0.87 | - | - |
Sorensen指数 Sorensen indices | 年份 Year | 对照区 Check plot | 稻鸭共作区 Rice-duck farming plot | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | ||
对照区Check plot | 2000 | - | (0.409) | (0.282) | (0.171) | (0.192) | (0.004) | (0.006) | (0.000) |
2001 | 0.857 | - | (0.737) | (0.480) | (0.429) | (0.041) | (0.022) | (0.002) | |
2002 | 0.857 | 1.000 | - | (0.688) | (0.440) | (0.018) | (0.037) | (0.003) | |
2003 | 0.823 | 0.933 | 0.933 | - | (0.473) | (0.032) | (0.055) | (0.005) | |
稻鸭共作区 Rice-duck farming plot | 2000 | 0.857 | 0.875 | 0.875 | 0.933 | - | (0.025) | (0.024) | (0.004) |
2001 | 0.444 | 0.464 | 0.364 | 0.400 | 0.364 | - | (0.049) | (0.044) | |
2002 | 0.250 | 0.400 | 0.400 | 0.222 | 0.300 | 0.400 | - | (0.126) | |
2003 | 0.286 | 0.222 | 0.222 | 0.250 | 0.222 | 0.500 | 0.667 | - |
表2 长期稻鸭共作对稻田杂草群落相似性的影响
Table 2 Influence of long-term rice-duck farming on the similarity of weed communities in paddy fields
Sorensen指数 Sorensen indices | 年份 Year | 对照区 Check plot | 稻鸭共作区 Rice-duck farming plot | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | ||
对照区Check plot | 2000 | - | (0.409) | (0.282) | (0.171) | (0.192) | (0.004) | (0.006) | (0.000) |
2001 | 0.857 | - | (0.737) | (0.480) | (0.429) | (0.041) | (0.022) | (0.002) | |
2002 | 0.857 | 1.000 | - | (0.688) | (0.440) | (0.018) | (0.037) | (0.003) | |
2003 | 0.823 | 0.933 | 0.933 | - | (0.473) | (0.032) | (0.055) | (0.005) | |
稻鸭共作区 Rice-duck farming plot | 2000 | 0.857 | 0.875 | 0.875 | 0.933 | - | (0.025) | (0.024) | (0.004) |
2001 | 0.444 | 0.464 | 0.364 | 0.400 | 0.364 | - | (0.049) | (0.044) | |
2002 | 0.250 | 0.400 | 0.400 | 0.222 | 0.300 | 0.400 | - | (0.126) | |
2003 | 0.286 | 0.222 | 0.222 | 0.250 | 0.222 | 0.500 | 0.667 | - |
杂草种类 Weed species | 控草效果 Weed control effects (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | |
鸭舌草Monochoria vaginalis | 95 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
异型莎草Cyperus difformis | 82 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
丁香蓼Ludwigia prostrata | 90 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
稗Echinochloa crusgalli | 75 | 96 | 73 | 97 |
水虱草Fimbristylis miliaceae | 78 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
节节菜Rotala indica | - | 100 | 100 | 100 |
陌上菜Lindernia procumbens | 91 | 95 | 100 | 100 |
千金子Leptochloa chinensis | - | 100 | 100 | 100 |
萤蔺Scirpus juncoides | 100 | 100 | 0 | 100 |
矮慈姑Sagittaria pygmaea | 100.00 | - | 100.00 | 100.00 |
单子叶杂草Monocot weeds | 83.44 | 95.99* | 97.44* | 99.64* |
双子叶杂草Dicot weeds | 88.59 | 98.33* | 100.00* | 100.00* |
阔叶草Broadleaf weeds | 90.32 | 95.67* | 100.00* | 100.00* |
禾草Grass weeds | -50.00 | 96.27* | 73.33* | 97.19* |
莎草Sedge weeds | 80.81 | 100.00* | 96.88* | 100.00* |
所有杂草Overall weed species | 86.24 | 96.62* | 98.11* | 99.76* |
表3 长期稻鸭共作对稻田杂草的控制效果
Table 3 Control effects of long-term rice-duck farming on the weed species in paddy fields
杂草种类 Weed species | 控草效果 Weed control effects (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | |
鸭舌草Monochoria vaginalis | 95 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
异型莎草Cyperus difformis | 82 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
丁香蓼Ludwigia prostrata | 90 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
稗Echinochloa crusgalli | 75 | 96 | 73 | 97 |
水虱草Fimbristylis miliaceae | 78 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
节节菜Rotala indica | - | 100 | 100 | 100 |
陌上菜Lindernia procumbens | 91 | 95 | 100 | 100 |
千金子Leptochloa chinensis | - | 100 | 100 | 100 |
萤蔺Scirpus juncoides | 100 | 100 | 0 | 100 |
矮慈姑Sagittaria pygmaea | 100.00 | - | 100.00 | 100.00 |
单子叶杂草Monocot weeds | 83.44 | 95.99* | 97.44* | 99.64* |
双子叶杂草Dicot weeds | 88.59 | 98.33* | 100.00* | 100.00* |
阔叶草Broadleaf weeds | 90.32 | 95.67* | 100.00* | 100.00* |
禾草Grass weeds | -50.00 | 96.27* | 73.33* | 97.19* |
莎草Sedge weeds | 80.81 | 100.00* | 96.88* | 100.00* |
所有杂草Overall weed species | 86.24 | 96.62* | 98.11* | 99.76* |
处理 Treatment | 投入 Input | 产出 Output | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
项目 Item | 费用 Fees | 项目 Item | 费用 Fees | |
稻鸭共作 Rice-duck farming | 稻种 Rice seeds | 127.5 | 稻谷 Rice grains | 6 750×1.8=12 150.0 |
绿肥 Green manure | 82.5 | 肉鸭 Ducks | 265×1.5×9.0=3 577.5 | |
灌溉 Irrigation | 375.0 | 合计 Total | 15 727.5 | |
农事操作 Agronomic practices | 2 250.0 | |||
雏鸭 Ducklings | 1 134.0 | |||
饲料 Forage | 1 050.0 | |||
防护设施 Safeguards | 2 775.0 | 净收益 Net income | 6 621.0 | |
农业税 Agricultural tax | 1 312.5 | |||
合计 Total | 9 106.5 | |||
常规稻作 Conventional rice farming | 稻种 Rice seeds | 115.5 | 稻谷 Rice grains | 7 950×1.1=8 745.0 |
化肥 Chemical fertilizer | 1 882.5 | 合计 Total | 8 745.0 | |
农药 Pesticides | 255.0 | |||
灌溉 Irrigation | 682.5 | |||
农事操作 Agronomic practices | 1 237.5 | 净收益 Net income | 3 259.5 | |
农业税 Agricultural tax | 1 312.5 | |||
合计 Total | 5 485.5 |
表4 稻鸭共作与常规稻作经济效益比较
Table 4 Comparison of economic benefits between rice-duck farming and conventional rice farming (yuan·hm-2)
处理 Treatment | 投入 Input | 产出 Output | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
项目 Item | 费用 Fees | 项目 Item | 费用 Fees | |
稻鸭共作 Rice-duck farming | 稻种 Rice seeds | 127.5 | 稻谷 Rice grains | 6 750×1.8=12 150.0 |
绿肥 Green manure | 82.5 | 肉鸭 Ducks | 265×1.5×9.0=3 577.5 | |
灌溉 Irrigation | 375.0 | 合计 Total | 15 727.5 | |
农事操作 Agronomic practices | 2 250.0 | |||
雏鸭 Ducklings | 1 134.0 | |||
饲料 Forage | 1 050.0 | |||
防护设施 Safeguards | 2 775.0 | 净收益 Net income | 6 621.0 | |
农业税 Agricultural tax | 1 312.5 | |||
合计 Total | 9 106.5 | |||
常规稻作 Conventional rice farming | 稻种 Rice seeds | 115.5 | 稻谷 Rice grains | 7 950×1.1=8 745.0 |
化肥 Chemical fertilizer | 1 882.5 | 合计 Total | 8 745.0 | |
农药 Pesticides | 255.0 | |||
灌溉 Irrigation | 682.5 | |||
农事操作 Agronomic practices | 1 237.5 | 净收益 Net income | 3 259.5 | |
农业税 Agricultural tax | 1 312.5 | |||
合计 Total | 5 485.5 |
[1] | Bai LX (柏立新), Zhang LW (张龙娃), Chen XB (陈小波), Feng HJ (冯汉金) (2003). Composition and diversity of the weed community in transgenic Bt cotton (four bollguard strains) fields. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 27,610-616. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[2] | Huang H (黄璜), Yang ZH (杨志辉), Wang H (王华), Hu ZY (胡泽友), Chen SG (陈仕贵), Chen C (陈灿) (2003). A study on the pattern of methane emission in wetland rice-duck complex ecosystems. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 23,929-934. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[3] | Legere A, Samson DN (1999). Relative influence of crop rotation, tillage, and weed management on weed associations in spring barley cropping system. Weed Science, 47,112-122. |
[4] | Li YF (李永丰), Li YW (李宜慰), Liu ZD (刘正道), Zeng XB (曾宪彬) (1999). New developments in herbicide resistance in weed species and management strategies. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis (江西农业大学学报), 21,42-46. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[5] | Li YM (李云明), Zhao SQ (赵守清), Chen SC (陈绍才), Di XG (狄新贵) (2004). Effects of rice-duck farming for the control of major pests in paddy fields. China Plant Protection (中国植保导刊), 24(2),14-15. (in Chinese) |
[6] | Ma KP (马克平), Liu YM (刘玉明) (1994). The methods of measuring community biodiversity. I. Measurement of α diversity (Part 2). Chinese Biodiversity (生物多样性), 2,231-239. (in Chinese) |
[7] | Ma KP (马克平), Liu CR (刘灿然), Liu YM (刘玉明) (1995). The methods of measuring community biodiversity. II. Measurement of β diversity. Chinese Biodiversity (生物多样性), 3,38-43. (in Chinese) |
[8] | Manda M (1992). Paddy rice cultivation using crossbred duck. Farming Japan, 26,35-42. |
[9] | Maxwell BD (1999). My view. Weed Science, 47,129. |
[10] | Nakornsri K, Vongsaroj P (1998). Weed control with khaki Campbell ducks in transplanted rice. Khon Kaen Agriculture Journal, 26,101-108. |
[11] | Qiang S (强胜), Shen JM (沈俊明), Zhang CQ (张成群), Shao GY (邵耕耘), Hu JL (胡金良), Wang FL (王凤良) (2003). The influence of cropping systems on weed communities in the cotton fields of Jiangsu Province. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 27,278-282. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[12] | Shen XK (沈晓昆) (2003). A new bio-rational and high quality rice production technique: rice-duck farming. Agricultural Equipment and Technology (农业装备技术), 29(2),9-10. (in Chinese) |
[13] | Shrestha A, Knezeric SZ, Roy RC, Ball-Coelho BR, Swanton CJ (2002). Effect of tillage, cover crop and crop rotation on the composition of weed flora in a sandy soil. Weed Research, 42,76-87. |
[14] | Su ST (2001). Evaluation of different duck varieties for the control of the golden apple snail ( Pomacea canaliculata) in transplanted and direct seeded rice. Crop Protection, 20,599-604. |
[15] | Wang H (王华), Huang H (黄璜), Yang ZH (杨志辉), Liao XL (廖晓兰) (2003). Integrated benefits of paddy rice-duck complex ecosystem. Rural Eco-Environment (农村生态环境), 19(4),23-26. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[16] | Wang QS (王强盛), Huang PS (黄丕生), Zhen RH (甄若宏), Jing LM (荆留明), Tang HB (唐和宝), Zhang CY (张春阳) (2004). Effect of rice-duck mutualism on nutrition ecology of paddy field and rice quality. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 15,639-645. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[17] | Wu CH (吴春华), Chen X (陈欣) (2004). Impact of pesticides on biodiversity in agricultural areas. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 15,341-344. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[18] | You MS (尤民生), Liu YF (刘雨芳), Hou YM (侯有明) (2004). Biodiversity and integrated pest management in agroecosystems. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 24,117-122. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[19] | Zhang CX (张朝贤), Hu XE (胡祥恩), Qian YX (钱益新), Zhu WD (朱文达), Wei SH (魏守辉), Ye GB (叶贵标), Li YZ (黎银忠), Xu ZM (徐正明) (1998). Weed survey in wheat fields in Jianghan Plain. Plant Protection (植物保护), 24(3),14-16. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[20] | Zhang JE (章家恩), Lu JX (陆敬雄), Zhang GH (张光辉), Luo SM (骆世明) (2002). Study on the function and benefit of rice-duck agroecosystem. Ecologic Science (生态科学), 21,6-10. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[21] | Zhang ZB (张宗炳) (1988). Influence of pesticides on agroecosystem. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 7(3),25-29. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[22] | Zhu FG (朱凤姑), Feng QS (丰庆生), Zhuge Z (诸葛梓) (2004). Control impact of rice-duck ecological structure on harmful biotic community of rice fields. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis (浙江农业学报), 16,37-41. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[23] | Zhu KM (朱克明), Shen XK (沈晓昆), Xie TZ (谢桐洲), Dai WC (戴网成), Chen LG (陈良根), Gao JC (高金成), Wu JQ (吴建强), Yang YJ (杨玉俊), Chen JW (陈建卫), Xu G (徐刚) (2001). Preliminary study on rice-duck farming system. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences (安徽农业科学), 29,262-264. (in Chinese) |
[1] | 牛一迪, 蔡体久. 大兴安岭北部次生林演替过程中物种多样性的变化及其影响因子[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(3): 349-363. |
[2] | 李娜, 唐士明, 郭建英, 田茹, 王姗, 胡冰, 罗永红, 徐柱文. 放牧对内蒙古草地植物群落特征影响的meta分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(9): 1256-1269. |
[3] | 杨鑫, 任明迅. 环南海区域红树物种多样性分布格局及其形成机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(8): 1105-1115. |
[4] | 于笑, 纪若璇, 任天梦, 夏新莉, 尹伟伦, 刘超. 中国北方蒙古莸群落的分布、特征和分类[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(8): 1182-1192. |
[5] | 朱华, 谭运洪. 中国热带雨林的群落特征、研究现状及问题[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(4): 447-468. |
[6] | 杨元合, 张典业, 魏斌, 刘洋, 冯雪徽, 毛超, 徐玮婕, 贺美, 王璐, 郑志虎, 王媛媛, 陈蕾伊, 彭云峰. 草地群落多样性和生态系统碳氮循环对氮输入的非线性响应及其机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(1): 1-24. |
[7] | 董六文, 任正炜, 张蕊, 谢晨笛, 周小龙. 功能多样性比物种多样性更好解释氮添加对高寒草地生物量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(8): 871-881. |
[8] | 曾凯娜, 孙浩然, 申益春, 任明迅. 海南羊山湿地的传粉网络及其季节动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(7): 775-784. |
[9] | 彭鑫, 金光泽. 植物特性和环境因子对阔叶红松林暗多样性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(6): 656-666. |
[10] | 卢晶, 马宗祺, 高鹏斐, 樊宝丽, 孙坤. 祁连山区演替先锋物种西藏沙棘的种群结构及动态对海拔梯度的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(5): 569-579. |
[11] | 陈丽, 田新民, 任正炜, 董六文, 谢晨笛, 周小龙. 养分添加对天山高寒草地植物多样性和地上生物量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(3): 280-289. |
[12] | 张义, 程杰, 苏纪帅, 程积民. 长期封育演替下典型草原植物群落生产力与多样性关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(2): 176-187. |
[13] | 郝建锋, 周润惠, 姚小兰, 喻静, 陈聪琳, 向琳, 王姚瑶, 苏天成, 齐锦秋. 二代野猪放牧对夹金山针阔混交林物种多样性与土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(2): 197-207. |
[14] | 宋语涵, 张鹏, 金光泽. 阔叶红松林不同演替阶段灌木叶片碳氮磷化学计量特征及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(9): 952-960. |
[15] | 钏会艳, 贾东瑞, 浦江, 张翠萍, 李淑英, 周元清. 云南新平铁坚油杉森林群落结构特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(2): 207-212. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19