鲁东沿海丘陵茶园防护林的小气候特征

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00116

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

近年来山东乳山茶业逐渐兴起, 但由于北方冬春季温度低和倒春寒频繁发生, 茶叶种植面积逐年减小。如何在低成本管理的基础上提高茶叶产量和品质, 成为乳山茶园管理的一大难题。以2007年春季采用水平梯田整地种植的茶园为试验区, 以梯田周围营造的4种网格(8 m × 80 m, 12 m × 80 m, 20 m × 80 m, 40 m × 80 m)茶园防护林为研究对象, 分别在2013年4月、8月和12月, 测定风速、空气温度、土壤温度、空气相对湿度及土壤相对湿度, 以纯茶园作为对照, 进行了小气候因子测定和分析。结果表明: (1) 4种防护林均能有效地降低茶园内风速, 调节气温、土壤温度和土壤相对湿度, 增加空气相对湿度, 为茶树生长提供适宜的生态环境; (2)由于区域水分通量和太阳辐射的季节变化, 4种防护林的小气候调节效应也表现出一定的季节性差异; (3)主成分分析结果表明, 4种茶园防护林中, 影响小气候因子的主要因素是气温和土壤温度, 其因子负荷量分别为-0.978和0.986, 但风速与气温呈极显著相关关系, 与土壤温度之间无显著线性关系, 因此, 风速也能间接地影响林内小气候; (4) 8 m × 80 m的防护林对小气候的总体调节效应优于其他3种防护林。

关键词: 湿度, 小气候, 北方茶园, 防护林, 温度, 风速

Abstract: Aims Over a year, Rushan tea is booming gradually, but due to the low temperature in winter and early spring, the areas for tea plantation has been decreasing year by year. Therefore, how to achieve a higher yield at lower cost has become a major issue in the test plantation area. The paper examined the characteristics of microclimate in four shelterbelt systems of tea garden in order to identify a suitable forest-tea system in the study area.Methods The tea plantation studied was established in the spring of 2007 with terrace soil preparations, involving four forest shelterbelt grid systems (i.e. 8 m × 80 m, 12 m × 80 m, 20 m × 80 m and 40 m × 80 m). The wind speed, air temperature, soil temperature, relative air humidity and relative soil moisture were measured in the four shelterbelt systems in April, August and December of 2013, with the tea plantation without shelterbelt as control. Important findings Firstly, the four shelterbelt systems all reduced wind speed effectively, increased air relative humidity, regulated air temperature, soil temperature and soil relative moisture, and improved ecological environment in favor of tea production. Secondly, due to the seasonal variations of regional water flux and solar radiation, the regulation effects of the four shelterbelt systems differed. Thirdly, the results of principal component analysis showed that, the main factors inducing different microclimate characteristics were the air temperature and soil temperature, with factor loads of -0.978 and 0.986, respectively. The wind speed and air temperature showed a highly significant correlation, but there was no significant linear relationship between wind speed and soil temperature, indicating that wind speed could affect the microclimate indirectly. Overall, the shelterbelt system of 8 m × 80 m is better than the other three systems in the effects of regulating microclimate.

Key words: humidity, microclimate, northern tea garden, protection forest, temperature, wind speed

杨菲,杨吉华,艾钊,张国庆,胡建朋. 鲁东沿海丘陵茶园防护林的小气候特征. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(11): 1205-1213. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00116

YANG Fei,YANG Ji-Hua,AI Zhao,ZHANG Guo-Qing,HU Jian-Peng. Microclimate characteristics in shelterbelt of tea garden in coastal hilly region of eastern Shandong, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2014, 38(11): 1205-1213. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00116

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00116

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2014/V38/I11/1205

图/表 8

图1 茶园防护林配置图。 , 黑松。 , 龙柏。 , 蜀桧。 , 樱桃。观测点。

Fig. 1 A configuration diagram of shelterbelt of tea garden. Pinus thunbergii; , Sabina chinensis; , Sabina komarovii; , Sabina komarovii; , Cerasus pseudocerasus; , observation points.

图2 茶园防护林防风效能(平均值±标准误差)。I, 8 m × 80 m; II, 12 m × 80 m; III, 20 m × 80 m; IV, 40 m × 80 m。不同的小写字母表示不同网格之间的差异显著(p < 0.05); 不同的大写字母表示不同月份之间的差异显著(p < 0.05)。

Fig. 2 Wind-break potencies of shelterbelt of tea gardens (mean ± SE). I, 8 m × 80 m; II, 12 m × 80 m; III, 20 m × 80 m; IV, 40 m × 80 m. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among shelterbelt of tea gardens (p < 0.05); different capital letters indicate significant differences among months of measurements (p < 0.05).

图3 茶园防护林空气温度调节效应(平均值±标准误差)。I, 8 m × 80 m; II, 12 m × 80 m; III, 20 m × 80 m; IV, 40 m × 80 m。不同的小写字母表示不同网格之间的差异显著(p < 0.05)。

Fig. 3 Regulation effects of air temperature in shelterbelt of tea gardens (mean ± SE). I, 8 m × 80 m; II, 12 m × 80 m; III, 20 m × 80 m; IV, 40 m × 80 m. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among shelterbelt of tea gardens (p < 0.05).

图4 茶园防护林土壤温度调节效应(平均值±标准误差)。I, 8 m × 80 m; II, 12 m × 80 m; III, 20 m × 80 m; IV, 40 m × 80 m。不同的小写字母表示不同网格之间的差异显著(p < 0.05)。

Fig. 4 Regulation effects of soil temperature in shelterbelt of tea gardens (mean ± SE). I, 8 m × 80 m; II, 12 m × 80 m; III, 20 m × 80 m; IV, 40 m × 80 m. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among shelterbelt of tea gardens (p < 0.05).

图5 茶园防护林空气相对湿度调节效应(平均值±标准误差)。I, 8 m × 80 m; II, 12 m × 80 m; III, 20 m × 80 m; IV, 40 m × 80 m。小写字母为不同网格之间的差异显著(p < 0.05)。大写字母为不同月份之间的差异显著(p < 0.05)。

Fig. 5 Regulation effects of relative air humidity in shelterbelt of tea gardens (mean ± SE). I, 8 m × 80 m; II, 12 m × 80 m; III, 20 m × 80 m; IV, 40 m × 80 m. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among shelterbelt of tea gardens (p < 0.05). Different capital letters indicate significant differences among months of measurements (p < 0.05).

图6 茶园防护林土壤相对湿度调节效应(平均值±标准误差)。I, 8 m × 80 m; II, 12 m × 80 m; III, 20 m × 80 m; IV, 40 m × 80 m。不同的小写字母表示不同网格之间的差异显著(p < 0.05)。

Fig. 6 Regulation effects of relative soil moisture in four shelterbelt of tea gardens (mean ± SE). I, 8 m × 80 m; II, 12 m × 80 m; III, 20 m × 80 m; IV, 40 m × 80 m. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among shelterbelt of tea gardens (p < 0.05).

表1 不同茶园防护林内小气候因子数据标准化矩阵

Table 1 The means matrix of microclimate factors in different shelterbelt systems

网格面积 Network area	风速 Wind speed	空气温度 Air temperature	土壤温度 Soil temperature	空气相对湿度 Relative air humidity	土壤相对湿度 Relative soil moisture
8 m × 80 m	-1.250 93	-1.181 59	1.269 18	1.112 76	1.200 96
12 m × 80 m	-0.288 68	-0.322 25	-0.152 30	0.332 68	-1.200 96
20 m × 80 m	0.481 13	0.322 25	0.050 77	-0.172 08	0.240 19
40 m × 80 m	1.058 48	1.181 59	-1.167 65	-1.273 37	-0.240 19

表2 不同茶园防护林内小气候因子的主分量和因子负荷量

Table 2 The principal component coordination and factor load values of microclimate factors in different shelterbelt systems

项目 Items	气候因子 Microclimate factors					特征根 Eigenvalue	累计贡献 Accumulative contribution
项目 Items	风速 Wind speed	空气温度 Air temperature	土壤温度 Soil temperature	空气相对湿度 Relative air humidity	土壤相对湿度 Relative soil moisture	特征根 Eigenvalue	累计贡献 Accumulative contribution
主分量1 Principal component 1	-0.233	-0.235	0.236	0.234	0.142	4.169	0.833 9
因子负荷量 Factor load value	-0.971	-0.978	0.986	0.974	0.590
主分量2 Principal component 2	0.234	0.262	0.142	-0.271	1.030	0.783	0.990 6
因子负荷量 Factor load value	0.183	0.205	0.111	-0.212	0.806

参考文献 23

1	Cao XS (1983). Shelterbelt for Farmland. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[ 曹新孙 (1983). 农田防护林学. 中国林业出版社, 北京.]
2	Duan YC, Liu JX, Dong SQ, Xue HY ( 2010). Preliminary research of developing pattern of Shandong Province ecological tea garden. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 26, 281-286. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 段永春, 刘加秀, 董书强, 薛花余 ( 2010). 山东生态茶园建设模式初探. 中国农学通报, 26, 281-286.]
3	Fan ZP, Zeng DH, Zhu JJ, Jiang FQ, Yu XX ( 2002). Advance in characteristics of ecological effects of farmland shelterbelts. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 16, 130-140. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 范志平, 曾德慧, 朱教君, 姜凤岐, 余新晓 ( 2002). 农田防护林生态作用特征研究. 水土保持学报, 16, 130-140.]
4	Huang SB, Fan XH, Fu MY, Fu JH ( 1994). Study on microclimate effects in different tree-tea intercropping models and pure tea plantation. Forest Research, 7, 93-100. (in Chinese)
	[ 黄寿波, 范兴海, 傅懋毅, 傅金和 ( 1994). 不同林-茶栽培模式小气候特征研究. 林业科学研究, 7, 93-100.]
5	Jiang FQ, Zhu JJ, Zeng DH (2003). Management for Protective Plantations. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[ 姜凤岐, 朱教君, 曾德慧 (2003). ,防护林经营学. 中国林业出版社, 北京.]
6	Kong DS, Jin BW, Jin M, Lu YF, Sheng JX ( 2014). Microclimate effects of farmland shelterbelt in middle reaches of Heihe basin. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 28(1), 32-36. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 孔东升, 金博文, 金铭, 鲁艳芳, 盛吉兴 ( 2014). 黑河流域中游农田防护林小气候效应. 干旱区资源与环境, 28(1), 32-36.]
7	Liu ZL, Fang JM, Yu MK, Wang C, Liu HJ ( 2009). Study on diurnal variation of microclimate characteristics of three forest-tea compound systems. China Forestry Science and Technology, 23(2), 55-59. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 刘志龙, 方建民, 虞木奎, 王臣, 刘洪剑 ( 2009). 3种林茶复合系统小气候特征日变化研究. 林业科技开发, 23(2), 55-59.]
8	Peng FR, Li J, Huang BL, Zhang JL ( 2001). The microclimate characteristics in different agroforestry systems of seacoast. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 10, 16-20. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 彭方仁, 李杰, 黄宝龙, 张纪林 ( 2001). 海岸带不同复合农林业系统的小气候特征. 植物资源与环境学报, 10, 16-20.]
9	Rapp JM, Silman MR ( 2012). Diurnal, seasonal, and altitudinal trends in microclimate across a tropical montane cloud forest. Climate Research, 55, 17-32. DOI URL
10	Shang JY, Zhao HC, Wang BZ ( 2006). Shading effects of farmland shelter-belt and countermeasures. Protection Forest Science and Technology,( 4), 71, 97. (in Chinese)
	[ 尚静原, 赵焕成, 王宝珠 ( 2006). 农田防护林胁地效应及其解决对策. 防护林科技, ( 4), 71, 97.]
11	Teng HZ, Chen XF, Wang C, Dong SQ, Zheng HT ( 2012). The development trend and suggestions of the tea industry in Shandong Province. Chinese Horticultural Abstracts, ( 3), 179-180. (in Chinese)
	[ 滕怀泽, 陈秀峰, 王超, 董书强, 郑海涛 ( 2012). 山东省茶叶产业发展趋势与建议. 中国园艺文摘, ( 3), 179-180.]
12	Wang GM ( 2012). Effects on chestnut-tea intercrop pattern of Xinyang tea garden on the ecological environment. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 51, 2207-2211. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 王广铭 ( 2012). 信阳茶区栗茶间作模式对生态环境的影响. 湖北农业科学, 51, 2207-2211.]
13	Wang LX, Wang BR, Zhu JZ (2000). Forestry Ecological Engineering. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. 223. (in Chinese)
	[ 王礼先, 王斌瑞, 朱金兆 (2000). 林业生态工程学. 中国林业出版社, 北京. 223.]
14	Xiao RL, Peng WX, Song TQ, Wang JR, Xia YJ, Tang Y ( 2006). Ecological regulation effects of straw mulching in tea plantation in subtropical hilly red soil region. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 25, 507-511. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 肖润林, 彭晚霞, 宋同清, 王久荣, 夏艳珺, 汤宇 ( 2006). 稻草覆盖对红壤丘陵茶园的生态调控效应. 生态学杂志, 25, 507-511.]
15	Ye J, Wu JS, Yan XJ, Lin L, Wang GY, Qiu ZM ( 2013). Effects of tea-persimmon interplanting on the ecological environment of tea plantations and tea quality. Northern Horticulture, ( 16), 39-41. (in Chinese)
	[ 叶晶, 吴家森, 颜晓捷, 林丽, 王国英, 邱智敏 ( 2013). 茶-柿复合栽培对茶园生态环境及产品品质的影响. 北方园艺, ( 16), 39-41.]
16	Yu XX, Wang CL, Niu LL (2010). Para Allocation of Watershed Protection Forest System. Science Press, Beijing. 42-45. (in Chinese)
	[ 余新晓, 王春玲, 牛丽丽 (2010). 流域防护林体系对位配置. 科学出版社, 北京. 42-45.]
17	Zhang HL, Zhang QL, Ma LQ ( 2009). Study on microclimate effect of different deploy structure of farm land sheltbelt in Ulanbuh Desert. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 23, 191-194. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 张红利, 张秋良, 马利强 ( 2009). 乌兰布和沙地东北缘不同配置的农田防护林小气候效应的对比研究. 干旱区资源与环境, 23, 191-194.]
18	Zhang YP, Liu Y ( 2005). A comparative research on microclimate characteristics between ancient tea plantation and conventional tea plantation in Yunnan Province. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 26, 17-21. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 张一平, 刘洋 ( 2005). 云南古茶园与常规茶园小气候特征比较研究. 华南农业大学学报, 26, 17-21.]
19	Zhao LQ, Li CL, Zhao L, Wang QP, Fan ZZ ( 1992). The investigation of soil coerced status of farmland protection forest in Yinhe Township. Protection Forest Science and Technology, ( 1), 1-5. (in Chinese)
	[ 赵凌泉, 李成烈, 赵岭, 汪庆平, 范忠志 ( 1992). 音河乡农田防护林胁地状况的调查研究. 防护林科技, ( 1), 1-5.]
20	Zhu JJ ( 2013). A review of the present situation and future prospect of science of protective forest. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 37, 872-888. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 朱教君 ( 2013). 防护林学研究现状与展望. 植物生态学报, 37, 872-888.]
21	Zhu TY (2001). Farmland Shelterbelt and Ecological Engineering. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. 8-16. (in Chinese)
	[ 朱廷曜 (2001). 农田防护林生态工程学. 中国林业出版社, 北京. 8-16.]
22	Zhu XH, Yuan HG, Zheng HT ( 2012). Analysis of tea freeze climate causes in the past 45 years of Shandong. China Tea, ( 3), 11-13. (in Chinese)
	[ 朱秀红, 袁洪刚, 郑海涛 ( 2012). 近45年山东茶树冻害气候原因分析. 中国茶叶, ( 3), 11-13.]
23	Zong PP, Bao YH, Yang JH, Sun CN, Wang L ( 2005). Study on protective effects of small network farm-shelter forest in sandy area of Yellow River. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 19, 110-130. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 宗萍萍, 鲍玉海, 杨吉华, 孙成楠, 王力 ( 2005). 黄泛沙地小网格农田防护林网防护效应的研究. 水土保持学报, 19, 110-130.]

[1]	王袼, 胡姝娅, 李阳, 陈晓鹏, 李红玉, 董宽虎, 何念鹏, 王常慧. 不同类型草原土壤净氮矿化速率的温度敏感性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 523-533.
[2]	沈健, 何宗明, 董强, 郜士垒, 林宇. 轻度火烧对滨海沙地人工林土壤呼吸速率和非生物因子的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(7): 1032-1042.
[3]	张敏, 桑英, 宋金凤. 水培富贵竹的根压及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(7): 1010-1019.
[4]	李卫英, 章正仁, 辛雅萱, 王飞, 辛培尧, 高洁. 云南松、思茅松和卡西亚松天然种群间的针叶表型变异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(6): 833-846.
[5]	夏璟钰, 张扬建, 郑周涛, 赵广, 赵然, 朱艺旋, 高洁, 沈若楠, 李文宇, 郑家禾, 张雨雪, 朱军涛, 孙建新. 青藏高原那曲高山嵩草草甸植物物候对增温的异步响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(2): 183-194.
[6]	叶洁泓, 于成龙, 卓少菲, 陈新兰, 杨科明, 文印, 刘慧. 木兰科植物叶片光合系统耐热性与叶片形态及温度生态位的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(10): 1432-1440.
[7]	李一丁, 桑清田, 张灏, 刘龙昌, 潘庆民, 王宇, 刘伟, 袁文平. 内蒙古半干旱地区空气和土壤加湿对幼龄樟子松生长的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 1077-1085.
[8]	朱明阳, 林琳, 佘雨龙, 肖城材, 赵通兴, 胡春相, 赵昌佑, 王文礼. 云南轿子山不同海拔急尖长苞冷杉径向生长动态及其低温阈值[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 1038-1049.
[9]	熊博文, 李桐, 黄樱, 鄢春华, 邱国玉. 不同参考温度取值对三温模型反演植被蒸腾精度的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(4): 383-393.
[10]	丛楠, 张扬建, 朱军涛. 北半球中高纬度地区近30年植被春季物候温度敏感性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(2): 125-135.
[11]	杨萌, 于贵瑞. 中国干旱半干旱区土壤CO₂与CH₄通量的耦联解耦及其对温度的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(12): 1497-1507.
[12]	张小燕, WEE Kim Shan Alison, KAJITA Tadashi, 曹坤芳. 种源地对两种红树叶片结构和功能的影响: 对温度的适应性遗传[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(11): 1241-1250.
[13]	张宏锦, 王娓. 生态系统多功能性对全球变化的响应: 进展、问题与展望[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(10): 1112-1126.
[14]	赵河聚, 岳艳鹏, 贾晓红, 成龙, 吴波, 李元寿, 周虹, 赵雪彬. 模拟增温对高寒沙区生物土壤结皮-土壤系统呼吸的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(9): 916-925.
[15]	郑甲佳, 黄松宇, 贾昕, 田赟, 牟钰, 刘鹏, 查天山. 中国森林生态系统土壤呼吸温度敏感性空间变异特征及影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(6): 687-698.