植物生态学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 138-144.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0017 cstr: 32100.14.cjpe.2007.0017
收稿日期:2005-10-17
接受日期:2006-03-13
出版日期:2007-10-17
发布日期:2007-01-30
作者简介:* Email: tingbod@njau.edu.cn基金资助:
LIU Jian-Hui, SUN Jian-Yun, DAI Ting-Bo(
), JIANG Dong, JING Qi, CAO Wei-Xing
Received:2005-10-17
Accepted:2006-03-13
Online:2007-10-17
Published:2007-01-30
摘要:
以二倍体野生一粒小麦(Triticum boeoticum)、栽培一粒小麦(T. monococcum)、节节麦(Aegilops tauschii)和黑麦(Secale cereale)、四倍体野生二粒小麦(T. dicoccoides)、栽培二粒小麦(T. dicoccum)、硬粒小麦(T. durum)、六倍体普通小麦(T. aestivum)‘扬麦9号’和‘扬麦158’及八倍体小黑麦(Triticale)为材料,采用盆栽试验研究了不同小麦进化材料生育后期旗叶光合特性的演变及产量的差异。结果表明,与六倍体普通小麦和八倍体小黑麦相比,二倍体和四倍体材料在开花前具有较高的光合速率(Pn)、气孔导度(Gs)、最大光能转换效率(Fv/Fm)和实际光化学效率(ΦPSⅡ)。开花以后,二倍体和四倍体材料受非气孔因素的影响,光合能力下降较快;除黑麦外,旗叶光合速率在开花10 d后都低于普通小麦和小黑麦,胞间CO2浓度(Ci)迅速增加,Fv/Fm、ΦPSⅡ和叶绿素含量快速下降。二倍体和四倍体材料开花前单株总叶面积和旗叶叶面积较大,花后下降迅速,功能期短;单株穗数也较多,但穗粒数、千粒重、产量和收获指数却显著低于普通小麦。因此,小麦长期进化过程中,普通小麦花后较高的光合能力及较长的光合持续期是提高千粒重,进而提高产量的重要生理基础。
刘建辉, 孙建云, 戴廷波, 姜东, 荆奇, 曹卫星. 不同小麦进化材料生育后期光合特性和产量. 植物生态学报, 2007, 31(1): 138-144. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0017
LIU Jian-Hui, SUN Jian-Yun, DAI Ting-Bo, JIANG Dong, JING Qi, CAO Wei-Xing. LATE-GROWTH PHOTOSYNTHETIC CHARACTERISTICS AND GRAIN YIELD OF DIFFERENT WHEAT EVOLUTIONARY MATERIALS. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2007, 31(1): 138-144. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0017
图1 不同小麦进化材料生育后期SPAD的变化 YS1:二倍体野生一粒小麦(Triticum boeoticum) ZP1:栽培一粒小麦(T. monococcum) JJM:节节麦(Aegilops tauschii) HM:黑麦(Secale cereale) YS2:野生二粒小麦(T. dicoccoides) ZP2:栽培二粒小麦(T. dicoccum) YLM:硬粒小麦(T. dicoccum) YM9:普通小麦‘扬麦9号’(T. aestivum cv. Yangmai9) YM158:普通小麦‘扬麦158号’(T. aestivum cv. Yangmai158) XHM:八倍体小黑麦(Triticale) 括号内数字为旗叶占单株总叶面积的比例 The data in the brackets represent the fraction of flag leaf area to plant leaf area -10代表孕穗期 -10 represents booting stage
Fig.1 Changes of SPAD in flag leaves of different wheat evolution materials during late growth period
图2 不同小麦进化材料生育后期光合速率(Pn)的变化 图注见图1
Fig.2 Changes of Net photosynthesynthesis (Pn) in flag leaves of different wheat evolution materials during late growth period Note see Fig. 1
图3 不同小麦进化材料生育后期旗叶气孔导度(Gs)和胞间CO2浓度(Ci)的变化 图注见图1
Fig.3 Changes of stomatal conductance (Gs) and intercelular CO2 cocentration (Ci) in flag leaves of different wheat evolution materials during late growth period Note see Fig. 1
图4 不同小麦进化材料生育后期旗叶最大光能转换效率(Fv/Fm)和实际光化学效率(ΦPSⅡ)的变化 图注见图1
Fig.4 Changes of maximum photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) and actual light transformation efficiency (ΦPSⅡ) in flag leaves of different wheat evolution materials during late growth period Note see Fig. 1
| 倍性 Ploidy | 小麦进化材料 Wheat evolution materials | 孕穗 Booting | 开花 Anthesis | 花后10天 10 days after anthesis | 花后20天 20 days after anthesis | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LA | FLA | LA | FLA | LA | FLA | LA | FLA | ||||||||||||||
| 二倍体 Dioploid | YS1 | 414.89 | 60.40(14.6) | 235.46 | 62.09(26.4) | 116.40 | 65.32(56.1) | 15.40 | 12.35(80.2) | ||||||||||||
| ZP1 | 426.73 | 41.23(9.7) | 269.97 | 47.34(17.5) | 118.50 | 43.93(37.1) | 12.75 | 10.51(82.4) | |||||||||||||
| JJM | 332.61 | 48.97(14.7) | 311.21 | 56.84(18.3) | 81.90 | 31.89(39.0) | 10.39 | 10.36(99.7) | |||||||||||||
| HM | 315.64 | 19.67(6.2) | 193.21 | 22.49(11.6) | 80.65 | 10.88(13.5) | 72.08 | 8.69(12.1) | |||||||||||||
| 四倍体 Tetraploid | YS2 | 279.90 | 43.91(15.7) | 224.51 | 50.21(22.4) | 207.47 | 56.36(27.2) | 18.97 | 14.22(75.0) | ||||||||||||
| ZP2 | 287.21 | 72.18(25.1) | 232.13 | 80.27(34.6) | 104.15 | 36.02(34.6) | 17.24 | 10.78(62.5) | |||||||||||||
| YLM | 336.03 | 47.31(14.1) | 176.22 | 50.09(28.4) | 56.05 | 23.65(42.2) | 23.30 | 17.47(75.0) | |||||||||||||
| 六倍体 Hexaploid | YM9 | 244.81 | 35.74(14.6) | 170.23 | 37.92(22.2) | 129.95 | 34.22(26.3) | 90.10 | 34.01(37.7) | ||||||||||||
| YM158 | 206.27 | 33.76(16.4) | 183.99 | 35.06(19.1) | 130.46 | 34.77(26.7) | 81.47 | 32.60(40.0) | |||||||||||||
| 八倍体 Octoploid | XHM | 265.89 | 25.84(9.7) | 195.45 | 27.51(14.1) | 173.70 | 25.17(14.5) | 120.50 | 19.42(16.1) | ||||||||||||
表1 不同小麦进化材料生育后期单株叶面积的变化
Table 1 Changes of leaf area per plant of different wheat evolution materials during late growth period (cm2·plant-1)
| 倍性 Ploidy | 小麦进化材料 Wheat evolution materials | 孕穗 Booting | 开花 Anthesis | 花后10天 10 days after anthesis | 花后20天 20 days after anthesis | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LA | FLA | LA | FLA | LA | FLA | LA | FLA | ||||||||||||||
| 二倍体 Dioploid | YS1 | 414.89 | 60.40(14.6) | 235.46 | 62.09(26.4) | 116.40 | 65.32(56.1) | 15.40 | 12.35(80.2) | ||||||||||||
| ZP1 | 426.73 | 41.23(9.7) | 269.97 | 47.34(17.5) | 118.50 | 43.93(37.1) | 12.75 | 10.51(82.4) | |||||||||||||
| JJM | 332.61 | 48.97(14.7) | 311.21 | 56.84(18.3) | 81.90 | 31.89(39.0) | 10.39 | 10.36(99.7) | |||||||||||||
| HM | 315.64 | 19.67(6.2) | 193.21 | 22.49(11.6) | 80.65 | 10.88(13.5) | 72.08 | 8.69(12.1) | |||||||||||||
| 四倍体 Tetraploid | YS2 | 279.90 | 43.91(15.7) | 224.51 | 50.21(22.4) | 207.47 | 56.36(27.2) | 18.97 | 14.22(75.0) | ||||||||||||
| ZP2 | 287.21 | 72.18(25.1) | 232.13 | 80.27(34.6) | 104.15 | 36.02(34.6) | 17.24 | 10.78(62.5) | |||||||||||||
| YLM | 336.03 | 47.31(14.1) | 176.22 | 50.09(28.4) | 56.05 | 23.65(42.2) | 23.30 | 17.47(75.0) | |||||||||||||
| 六倍体 Hexaploid | YM9 | 244.81 | 35.74(14.6) | 170.23 | 37.92(22.2) | 129.95 | 34.22(26.3) | 90.10 | 34.01(37.7) | ||||||||||||
| YM158 | 206.27 | 33.76(16.4) | 183.99 | 35.06(19.1) | 130.46 | 34.77(26.7) | 81.47 | 32.60(40.0) | |||||||||||||
| 八倍体 Octoploid | XHM | 265.89 | 25.84(9.7) | 195.45 | 27.51(14.1) | 173.70 | 25.17(14.5) | 120.50 | 19.42(16.1) | ||||||||||||
| 倍性 Ploidy | 小麦进化材料 Wheat evolution materials | 单株穗数 Spikes per plant | 穗粒数 Kernels per spike | 千粒重 1 000 kernels weight(g) | 产量(克/株) Yield(g·plant-1) | 收获指数 Harvest index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 二倍体Dioploid | YS1 | 7.62 | 10.80 | 22.22 | 1.78cd | 0.17d |
| ZP1 | 5.62 | 14.94 | 18.48 | 1.56d | 0.15d | |
| JJM | 5.71 | 15.64 | 21.77 | 1.82cd | 0.19cd | |
| HM | 2.81 | 38.16 | 21.19 | 2.35b | 0.23b | |
| 四倍体Tetraploid | YS2 | 5.57 | 12.31 | 25.38 | 1.75c | 0.17d |
| ZP2 | 3.90 | 26.35 | 25.09 | 2.60b | 0.22bc | |
| YLM | 3.38 | 20.39 | 40.48 | 2.20bc | 0.22bc | |
| 六倍体Hexaploid | YM9 | 2.29 | 40.11 | 41.33 | 3.74a | 0.38a |
| YM9 | 2.38 | 37.26 | 38.21 | 3.40a | 0.34a | |
| 八倍体Octoploid | XHM | 2.52 | 36.64 | 38.27 | 3.54a | 0.33a |
表2 不同小麦进化材料产量及产量构成因素的差异
Table 2 Differences of grain yield and yield components in different wheat evolution materials
| 倍性 Ploidy | 小麦进化材料 Wheat evolution materials | 单株穗数 Spikes per plant | 穗粒数 Kernels per spike | 千粒重 1 000 kernels weight(g) | 产量(克/株) Yield(g·plant-1) | 收获指数 Harvest index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 二倍体Dioploid | YS1 | 7.62 | 10.80 | 22.22 | 1.78cd | 0.17d |
| ZP1 | 5.62 | 14.94 | 18.48 | 1.56d | 0.15d | |
| JJM | 5.71 | 15.64 | 21.77 | 1.82cd | 0.19cd | |
| HM | 2.81 | 38.16 | 21.19 | 2.35b | 0.23b | |
| 四倍体Tetraploid | YS2 | 5.57 | 12.31 | 25.38 | 1.75c | 0.17d |
| ZP2 | 3.90 | 26.35 | 25.09 | 2.60b | 0.22bc | |
| YLM | 3.38 | 20.39 | 40.48 | 2.20bc | 0.22bc | |
| 六倍体Hexaploid | YM9 | 2.29 | 40.11 | 41.33 | 3.74a | 0.38a |
| YM9 | 2.38 | 37.26 | 38.21 | 3.40a | 0.34a | |
| 八倍体Octoploid | XHM | 2.52 | 36.64 | 38.27 | 3.54a | 0.33a |
| [1] | Austin RB, Morgan CL, Ford MA, Bhagwat SG (1982). Flag leaf photosynthesis of Triticum aestivum and related diploid and tetraploid species. Annals of Botany, 49,177-189. |
| [2] | Demmig-Adams B, Adams WW III (1996). Xanthophyll cycle and light stress in nature: uniform response to excess direct sunlight among higher plant species. Planta, 198,460-470. |
| [3] | Dunstone RL, Evans LT (1974). Role of changes in cell sizes in the evolution of wheat. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 1,157-165. |
| [4] |
Evans JR, Seemann JR (1984). Differences between wheat genotypes in specific activity of ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase and the relationship to photosynthesis. Plant Physiology, 74,759-765.
DOI URL PMID |
| [5] | Krause GH, Weis E (1991). Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: the basics. Annual Review in Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 42,313-349. |
| [6] |
Lal AM, Ku SB, Edwards GE (1996). Analysis of inhibition of photosynthesis due to water stress in the C 3 species Hordeum vulgare and Vicia faba: electron transport, CO 2 fixation and carboxylation capacity. Photosynthesis Research, 49,57-69.
DOI URL PMID |
| [7] | Lu QT(卢庆陶), Li WH(李卫华), Jiang GM(蒋高明), Ge QY(戈巧英), Hao NB(郝乃斌), Sun JZ(孙家柱), Guo RJ(郭仁峻) (2001). Studies on the characteristics of chlorophyll fluorescence of winter wheat flag leaves at different developing stages. Acta Botanica Sinica(植物学报), 43,801-804. (in English with Chinese abstract). |
| [8] |
Oh SA, Park JH, Lee GI, Paek KH, Park SK, Nam HG (1997). Identification of three genetic loci controlling leaf senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal, 12,527-533.
DOI URL PMID |
| [9] | Quick WP, Chaves MM, Wendler R, David M, Rodrigues ML, Passaharinho JA, Pereira JS, Adcock MD, Leegood RC, Stitt M (1992). The effect of water stress on photosynthetic carbon metabolism in four species grown under field conditions. Plant,Cell and Environment, 15,25-35. |
| [10] | Sui N(隋娜), Li M(李萌), Tian JC(田纪春), Meng QW(孟庆伟), Zhao SJ(赵世杰) (2005). Photosynthetic characteristics of super high yield wheat cultivars at late growth period. Acta Agronomica Sinica(作物学报), 31,807-814. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [11] |
van Kooten O, Snel JFH (1990). The use of chlorophyll fluorescence nomenclature in plant stress physiology. Photosynthesis Research, 25,147-150.
URL PMID |
| [12] | Wei AL(魏爱丽), Wang ZM(王志敏), Zhang JP(张俊平), Zhao M(赵明), Zhai ZX(翟志席) (2002). Photosynthetic characteristics and chloroplast structure of different green organs in wild wheat T. boeoticum and cultivated wheat (cv. Pin7). Acta Agronomica Sinica(作物学报), 28,351-354. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [13] | Xiao K(肖凯), Zhang RX(张荣铣) (1997). Studies on physiological mechanism of photosynthetic function senescence of different wheat species. Journal of Agricultural University of Hebei(河北农业大学学报), 20(3),38-43. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [14] | Xu DQ(许大全) (2002). Efficiency of Photosynthesis(光合作用效率). Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, Shanghai, 84-98. (in Chinese) |
| [15] | Zhang QD(张其德), Liu HQ(刘合芹), Zhang JH(张建华), Li JM(李建民) (2000). Effects of limited irrigation on some photosynthetic functions of flag leaves in winter wheat. Acta Agronomica Sinica (作物学报), 26,869-873. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [16] | Zhang RX(张荣铣), Dai XB(戴新宾), Xu XM(许晓明), Lu W(陆巍), Jiang P(蒋平) (1999). Effect of A,D-genome chromosomes on photosynthetic carbonassimilation in common wheat. Acta Genetica Sinica(遗传学报), 26,683-689. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [17] | Zhang RX(张荣铣), Zhang YZ(张玉忠), Shen YG(沈允钢) (1995). Responses of photosynthesis to light, temperature, CO 2, and water stress in different wheat species. Acta Agronomica Sinica(作物学报), 21,161-164. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [18] | Zhang SR(张守仁) (1999). A discussion on chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics parameters and their significance. Chinese Bulletin of Botany(植物学通报), 16,444-448. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | 李月琪, 麻仲花, 刘威帆, 苏明, 万猛虎, 李清云, 张丹, 刘吉利, 吴娜. 垂直深旋耕配施有机肥对盐碱地玉米叶片衰老特性及产量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(1): 222-236. |
| [2] | 徐恩相, 周蕾, 章晓炜, 张国萍, 仲杜伟, 黄智, 刘派, 迟永刚. 基于不同生育阶段冠层光谱和碳通量的水稻产量估算[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(1): 82-93. |
| [3] | 李少伟, 何永涛, 孙维, 戴尔阜. 2016-2020年拉萨河谷典型农田生态系统长期监测样地作物收获期性状和产量数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(8): 1321-1328. |
| [4] | 樊月玲, 蒋正德, 叶佳舒, 郑立臣, 陈欣. 2005-2015年下辽河平原农田长期观测样地主要农作物收获期性状和产量数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(8): 1271-1282. |
| [5] | 王志波, 刘文胜, 吴瑞俊, 王国梁. 2018-2023年黄土高原丘陵沟壑区川台地农田长期监测样地作物收获期性状和产量数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(8): 1301-1311. |
| [6] | 王书伟, 林静慧, 周伟, 单军, 赵旭, 颜晓元. 2004-2020年太湖平原典型农田生态系统长期监测样地作物收获期性状和产量数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(8): 1283-1292. |
| [7] | 王鹏, 李向义, 高艳菊, 热甫开提·沙比提, 曾凡江. 2005-2010年塔克拉玛干沙漠南缘绿洲农田长期监测样地棉花收获期性状和产量数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(8): 1329-1338. |
| [8] | 朱喜, 何志斌, 杜明武, 赵丽雯, 吴丹丹. 2004-2010年河西走廊中段绿洲农田生态系统长期监测样地作物性状和产量数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(8): 1312-1320. |
| [9] | 严文秀, 赵诗晗, 郑春燕, 张萍, 沈海花, 常锦峰, 徐亢. 基于多物候指标的人工饲草长势监测及产量估测[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(7): 1096-1109. |
| [10] | 张斌, 张浩成, 乔天, 吕治兵, 许亚男, 李雪芹, 原向阳, 冯美臣, 张美俊. 接种丛枝菌根真菌对干旱胁迫燕麦非结构性碳水化合物及碳氮磷化学计量特征的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(7): 1082-1095. |
| [11] | 唐远翔, 熊仕臣, 朱洪锋, 张新生, 游成铭, 刘思凝, 谭波, 徐振锋. 长期氮添加对四川盆地西缘常绿阔叶林优势树种凋落叶产量及碳氮磷归还的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(5): 720-731. |
| [12] | 闫小莉, 刘贵梅, 李小玉, 江宇翔, 全小强, 王燕茹, 曲鲁平, 汤行昊. 不同氮添加水平和铵硝态氮配比环境下木荷幼苗光合及叶绿素荧光特性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(4): 624-637. |
| [13] | 欧阳子龙, 贾湘璐, 石景忠, 滕维超, 刘秀. 生长调节剂对低温胁迫及复温下红海榄幼苗光合特性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(4): 638-652. |
| [14] | 张晓婷, 王俊杰. 盐和铜处理下红树植物叶绿素荧光特性变化与叶片结构及生化组分关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(11): 1944-1956. |
| [15] | 范宏坤, 曾涛, 金光泽, 刘志理. 小兴安岭不同生长型阔叶植物叶性状变异及权衡[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(3): 364-376. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2026 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19