植物生态学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 536-543.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0067 cstr: 32100.14.cjpe.2007.0067
收稿日期:2005-06-28
接受日期:2006-07-06
出版日期:2007-06-28
发布日期:2007-05-30
作者简介:*E-mail: zhuqs@yzu.edu.cn基金资助:
CAI Yi-Xia1,2(
), WANG Wei2, ZHU Qing-Sen1,*(
)
Received:2005-06-28
Accepted:2006-07-06
Online:2007-06-28
Published:2007-05-30
摘要:
以生产上广泛使用的水稻(Oryza sativa)品种‘汕优63’、‘扬稻6号’和‘武育粳3号’为材料,研究了水分胁迫对结实期水稻籽粒蛋白质积累及营养品质的影响。结果表明:正常施氮水平下,花后10~20 d的水分胁迫提高了谷氨酰胺合成酶(Glutamine synthetase,GS)和谷氨酸合酶(Glutamate synthase,GOGAT)活性,提高了籽粒自身利用无机氮合成氨基酸的能力,从而利于籽粒内蛋白质的积累,而高氮水平下,水分胁迫降低了籽粒自身合成氨基酸的能力。以重量为基数的蛋白质含有率在整个灌浆过程中呈“V”型消长,正常施氮水平下,水分胁迫明显提高了花后15 d至成熟期蛋白质含有率,而高氮水平下,水分胁迫处理的蛋白质含有率明显低于水层灌溉。与水层灌溉相比,水分胁迫提高了正常施氮水平下精米中醇溶蛋白和谷蛋白含量,但却明显降低了高氮水平下精米中醇溶蛋白和谷蛋白含量。水分胁迫对稻米中赖氨酸含量的影响因品种、植株的氮营养水平的不同而不同,水分胁迫显著降低了两种氮肥水平下‘汕优63’中赖氨酸含量,但却明显提高‘扬稻6号’中赖氨酸含量;而‘武育粳3号’于两种氮肥水平下表现恰好相反,正常施氮水平下赖氨酸含量略有升高;而高氮水平下赖氨酸含量明显降低。
蔡一霞, 王维, 朱庆森. 水分胁迫对水稻籽粒蛋白质积累及营养品质的影响. 植物生态学报, 2007, 31(3): 536-543. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0067
CAI Yi-Xia, WANG Wei, ZHU Qing-Sen. EFFECTS OF WATER STRESS ON NUTRIENT QUALITY AND ACCUMULATION OF PROTEIN IN RICE GRAINS. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2007, 31(3): 536-543. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0067
图1 不同土水势下籽粒中GS和GOGAT活性的变化
Fig.1 Changes of activities of GS and GOGAT in the grains HN-WW: 高氮水层灌溉处理 High nitrogon with well water HN-WS: 高氮水分胁迫处理 High nitrogen with water stress NN-WW: 正常施氮水层灌溉处理 Normal nitrogen with well water NN-WS: 正常施氮水分胁迫处理 Normal nitrogen with water stress
图2 不同土水势下两种氮肥水平下籽粒中蛋白质含量的变化
Fig.2 Change of protein content of grain under two nitrogen levels and different soil water potentials NN-WW、HN-WS、NN-WW、NN-WS:同图1 See Fig. 1
图3 水分胁迫对两种氮肥水平下精米中粗蛋白含量的影响
Fig.3 Protein contents of rice grain in two nitrogen levels subjected to water stress NN-WW、HN-WS、NN-WW、NN-WS:同图1 See Fig. 1
| 品 种 Cultivars | 处 理 Treatments | 清蛋白 Albumin | 球蛋白 Globulin | 醇溶蛋白 Prolamine | 谷蛋白 Glutelin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘汕优63’ Shanyou63 | HN-WW | 0.47b | 0.73a | 1.22a | 11.13a |
| HN-WS | 0.40b | 0.60b | 1.00b | 10.75b | |
| NN-WW | 0.60a | 0.55b | 0.42d | 9.73d | |
| NN-WS | 0.57a | 0.50b | 0.70c | 9.88c | |
‘扬稻6号’ Yangdao6 | HN-WW | 0.51b | 0.41a | 0.90a | 10.98a |
| HN-WS | 0.43b | 0.38ab | 0.74b | 10.50b | |
| NN-WW | 0.62a | 0.34b | 0.64b | 8.50d | |
| NN-WS | 0.61a | 0.36b | 0.70b | 8.80c | |
‘武育粳3号’ Wuyujing3 | HN-WW | 0.30c | 0.84a | 0.88a | 9.23a |
| HN-WS | 0.26c | 0.78a | 0.70b | 8.86b | |
| NN-WW | 0.61a | 0.61b | 0.61c | 7.42d | |
| NN-WS | 0.40b | 0.68b | 0.64bc | 7.68c |
表1 水分胁迫对两种氮肥水平下精米中蛋白质各组份含量的影响(%)
Table 1 Effect of water stress on the components of protein of milled rice in two nitrogen level
| 品 种 Cultivars | 处 理 Treatments | 清蛋白 Albumin | 球蛋白 Globulin | 醇溶蛋白 Prolamine | 谷蛋白 Glutelin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘汕优63’ Shanyou63 | HN-WW | 0.47b | 0.73a | 1.22a | 11.13a |
| HN-WS | 0.40b | 0.60b | 1.00b | 10.75b | |
| NN-WW | 0.60a | 0.55b | 0.42d | 9.73d | |
| NN-WS | 0.57a | 0.50b | 0.70c | 9.88c | |
‘扬稻6号’ Yangdao6 | HN-WW | 0.51b | 0.41a | 0.90a | 10.98a |
| HN-WS | 0.43b | 0.38ab | 0.74b | 10.50b | |
| NN-WW | 0.62a | 0.34b | 0.64b | 8.50d | |
| NN-WS | 0.61a | 0.36b | 0.70b | 8.80c | |
‘武育粳3号’ Wuyujing3 | HN-WW | 0.30c | 0.84a | 0.88a | 9.23a |
| HN-WS | 0.26c | 0.78a | 0.70b | 8.86b | |
| NN-WW | 0.61a | 0.61b | 0.61c | 7.42d | |
| NN-WS | 0.40b | 0.68b | 0.64bc | 7.68c |
| 处 理 Treatments | ‘汕优63’Shanyou63 | ‘扬稻6号’Yangdao6 | ‘武育粳3号’Wuyujing3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| HN-WW | 7.58±0.281 | 5.58±0.065 | 5.18±0.169 |
| HN-WS | 7.04±0.523 | 6.37±0.101 | 4.93±0.135 |
| NN-WW | 6.27±0.065 | 4.64±0.299 | 4.15±0.001 |
| NN-WS | 5.69±0.055 | 4.76±0.479 | 4.32±0.135 |
表2 水分胁迫对两种氮肥水平下精米中赖氨酸含量的影响(mg·mg-1)
Table 2 Effect of water stress on the lysine content in two nitrogen levels (mg·mg-1)
| 处 理 Treatments | ‘汕优63’Shanyou63 | ‘扬稻6号’Yangdao6 | ‘武育粳3号’Wuyujing3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| HN-WW | 7.58±0.281 | 5.58±0.065 | 5.18±0.169 |
| HN-WS | 7.04±0.523 | 6.37±0.101 | 4.93±0.135 |
| NN-WW | 6.27±0.065 | 4.64±0.299 | 4.15±0.001 |
| NN-WS | 5.69±0.055 | 4.76±0.479 | 4.32±0.135 |
| [1] | Chen YQ (陈毓荃) (1995). Research Techniqe of Biochemical Technology (生物化学研究技术). China Agriculture Press, Beijing, 196-197. |
| [2] | Ding YF (丁艳锋), Zhao CH (赵长华), Wang QS (王强盛), Wang SH (王绍华), Huang PS (黄丕生) (2003). Effect of application time of panicle fertileizer on accumulation of endosperm protein in rice kernels. Acta Agronomica Sinica (作物学报), 29, 606-609 (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [3] | Dunn TS, Fitzgerald MA, Batten GD (2000). A panicle culture system to manipulate protein in rice grain. In: Wootton M, Batey IL, Wrigley CW eds. Proceeding of 11th Cereals and Bread Congress, Rice Satellite Symposium. Royal Australian Chemical Institute, Queensland, Australia, 15. |
| [4] | Evers T, Millart S (2002). Cereal grain structure and development: some implications for quality. Journal of Cereal Science, 36, 261-284. |
| [5] | Huang FS (黄发松), Sun ZX (孙宗修), Hu PS (胡培松), Tang SQ (唐绍清) (1998). Present situations and prospects for the research on rice grain quality for ming. Chinese Journal of Rice Science (中国水稻科学), 12, 172-176. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [6] |
Lawlor DW (2002). Carbon and nitrogen assimilation in relation to yield, mechanisms are the key to understanding production systems. Journal of Experimental Botany, 53, 773-787.
URL PMID |
| [7] | Li HS (李合生) (1999). Experimental Principle and Technique for Plant Physiology and Biochemistry (植物生理生化实验原理和技术). Higher Education Press, Beijing, 250-252. (in Chinese) |
| [8] | Lu LS (卢良恕) (1990). The food demand and countermeasure of China in 2000. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin (中国农学通报), 6(1), 1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [9] | Martin M, Fitzgerald MA (2002). Proteins in rice grains influence cooking properties. Journal of Cereal Science, 36, 285-294. |
| [10] | Matsuzaki A, Matsushima S, Tomita T (1973). Effects of the nitrogen top-dressing at the full heading stage on kernel qualities. Proceedings of the Crop Science Society of Japan, 42, 54-62. |
| [11] | Okadome H, Kurihara M, Kusuda O, Toyoshima H, Kim J, Shinotsubo K, Matsuda T, Ohtubo K (1999). Multiple measurements of physical properties of cooked rice grains with different nitrogenous fertileizers. Japanese Journal of Crop Science, 68, 211-216. |
| [12] | Takeda S (1979). Researches on the protein content of rice. Proceedings of the Crop Science Society of Japan, 48, 517-524. |
| [13] | Wang W (王维) (2003). Soil Drying in Regulation to the Remobilization of Carbon and Nitrogen Reserves During Grain-Filling Period of Wheat and Rice and Its Physiological Mechanism (适度土壤干旱对稻麦碳氮营养运转的调节作用及其机理). PhD dissertation, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 115-131. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [14] | Yang J, Zhang J, Wang Z, Zhu Q, Liu L (2003). Activities of enzymes involved in sucrose-to-starch metabolism in rice grains subjected to water stress during filling. Field Crop Research, 81, 69-81. |
| [15] | Zou Q (邹琦) (2000). Experiment Instruction of Plant Physiology (植物生理学实验指导). China Agriculture Press, Beijing, 122-123. (in Chinese) |
| [16] | Zhu ZW (朱智伟), Yang W (杨炜), Lin RH (林榕辉) (1991). Nutrient value of rice protein on different rice types. Chinese Journal of Rice Science (中国水稻科学), 5, 157-162. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | 樊月玲, 蒋正德, 叶佳舒, 郑立臣, 陈欣. 2005-2015年下辽河平原农田长期观测样地主要农作物收获期性状和产量数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(8): 1271-1282. |
| [2] | 田奥, 李苇洁, 曹洋, 贾真真, 曾松. 马缨杜鹃幼苗生长对土壤水分胁迫的响应及其生理机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(3): 488-501. |
| [3] | 张振振, 杨轲嘉, 顾宇璐, 赵平, 欧阳磊. 模拟降雨格局变化对亚热带地区两树种液流特征的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(11): 988-998. |
| [4] | 李豆豆, 席本野, 王斐, 贾素苹, 赵洪林, 贺曰林, 刘洋, 贾黎明. 毛白杨叶片膨压变化规律及其对环境因子的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(7): 741-751. |
| [5] | 刘畅, 孙鹏森, 刘世荣. 植物反射光谱对水分生理变化响应的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(1): 80-91. |
| [6] | 沙依然·外力,李秉柏,张佳华,杨沈斌. 水稻模拟模型在高温敏感性研究中的应用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(5): 515-528. |
| [7] | 邹媛媛, 刘琳, 刘洋, 赵亮, 邓启云, 吴俊, 庄文, 宋未. 不同水稻品种种子固有细菌群落的多样性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(8): 880-890. |
| [8] | 隗溟,廖学群,李冬霞,段海龙. 水稻分蘖节位生产力比较[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(4): 324-332. |
| [9] | 顾东祥, 汤亮, 徐其军, 雷晓俊, 曹卫星, 朱艳. 水氮处理下不同品种水稻根系生长分布特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(5): 558-566. |
| [10] | 陈洁, 汤亮, 刘小军, 曹卫星, 朱艳. 基于植株碳流的水稻籽粒淀粉积累模拟模型[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(4): 431-440. |
| [11] | 王维, 蔡一霞, 杨建昌, 朱庆森. 结实期土壤水分亏缺影响水稻籽粒灌浆的生理原因[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(2): 195-202. |
| [12] | 张智猛, 万书波, 戴良香, 宋文武, 陈静, 石运庆. 花生抗旱性鉴定指标的筛选与评价[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(1): 100-109. |
| [13] | 杨杰, 田永超, 姚霞, 曹卫星, 朱艳. 利用高光谱参数反演水稻叶片类胡萝卜素含量[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(7): 845-854. |
| [14] | 张玉森, 姚霞, 田永超, 曹卫星, 朱艳. 应用近红外光谱预测水稻叶片氮含量[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(6): 704-712. |
| [15] | 田永超, 杨杰, 姚霞, 朱艳, 曹卫星. 利用红边面积形状参数估测水稻叶层氮浓度[J]. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(4): 791-801. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2026 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19