植物生态学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 353-361.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00353
所属专题: 生态化学计量
• 研究论文 • 下一篇
阎凯1,*(), 付登高1, 何峰1,2, 段昌群1,**(
)
收稿日期:
2010-05-24
接受日期:
2010-12-07
出版日期:
2011-05-24
发布日期:
2011-04-13
通讯作者:
段昌群
作者简介:
**E-mail: chqduan@ynu.edu.cn
YAN Kai1,*(), FU Deng-Gao1, HE Feng1,2, DUAN Chang-Qun1,**(
)
Received:
2010-05-24
Accepted:
2010-12-07
Online:
2011-05-24
Published:
2011-04-13
Contact:
DUAN Chang-Qun
摘要:
滇池流域是我国典型的富磷区, 分析该区域内不同土壤磷含量下主要植物的化学计量特征, 有助于理解该区域的生态环境特点和生态恢复的特殊性。该研究测定了滇池流域滇中地区75种常见植物叶片的碳(C)、氮(N)、磷(P)及钾(K)含量, 综合分析了该区域不同土壤磷水平(富磷和正常)下不同生活型植物叶片的C、N、P和K的计量特征。结果表明, 研究区域植物叶片C、N和K含量的算术平均数分别是441.42、16.17和13.57 mg·g-1, P含量的几何平均数为1.92 mg·g-1, 植物叶片的N、P和K含量之间呈显著的正相关; 富磷区域植物叶片的P和K含量显著高于正常区域, N/P、K/P显著低于正常区域。无论是富磷还是正常区域, 草本植物的N、P和K含量均高于木本植物, 乔木与灌木差异不明显。植物叶片的P含量及N/P与土壤磷水平呈显著相关; 叶片N/P分析结果表明, N是影响滇池流域植物生长和群落恢复的主要限制元素。研究指出, 在滇池流域增加陆地植物群落及生态系统的氮素来源是进行生态修复和面源污染防治的重要切入点。
阎凯, 付登高, 何峰, 段昌群. 滇池流域富磷区不同土壤磷水平下植物叶片的养分化学计量特征. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(4): 353-361. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00353
YAN Kai, FU Deng-Gao, HE Feng, DUAN Chang-Qun. Leaf nutrient stoichiometry of plants in the phosphorus-enriched soils of the Lake Dianchi watershed, southwestern China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2011, 35(4): 353-361. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00353
项目 Item | C含量 C content (mg·g-1) | N含量 N content (mg·g-1) | P含量 P content (mg·g-1) | K含量 K content (mg·g-1) | C/N | C/P | C/K | N/P | N/K | K/P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A.M. | 441.42 | 16.17 | 2.30 | 13.57 | 37.71 | 267.50 | 39.58 | 8.61 | 1.35 | 7.20 |
SD | 60.51 | 8.91 | 1.51 | 5.74 | 26.37 | 143.93 | 20.37 | 5.35 | 0.94 | 3.54 |
CV (%) | 13.71 | 55.10 | 65.80 | 42.29 | 49.15 | 53.80 | 51.45 | 62.15 | 69.85 | 49.15 |
G.M. | 436.00 | 13.89 | 1.92 | 12.36 | 31.38 | 227.06 | 35.28 | 7.23 | 1.12 | 6.44 |
MIN | 153.10 | 2.91 | 0.50 | 3.63 | 8.21 | 59.95 | 12.67 | 1.31 | 0.24 | 0.60 |
MAX | 594.10 | 42.60 | 6.91 | 29.73 | 144.48 | 663.86 | 124.84 | 40.14 | 5.82 | 24.27 |
p | 0.140 | 0.244 | 0.002 | 0.510 | 0.110 | 0.541 | 0.210 | 0.397 | 0.062 | 0.078 |
r | - | - | - | - | -0.176 | -0.130 | -0.039 | 0.433** | 0.394** | 0.557** |
n | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 |
表1 滇池流域植物叶片养分的统计特征
Table 1 Descriptive statistics of leaf nutrients of plants in the Lake Dianchi watershed
项目 Item | C含量 C content (mg·g-1) | N含量 N content (mg·g-1) | P含量 P content (mg·g-1) | K含量 K content (mg·g-1) | C/N | C/P | C/K | N/P | N/K | K/P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A.M. | 441.42 | 16.17 | 2.30 | 13.57 | 37.71 | 267.50 | 39.58 | 8.61 | 1.35 | 7.20 |
SD | 60.51 | 8.91 | 1.51 | 5.74 | 26.37 | 143.93 | 20.37 | 5.35 | 0.94 | 3.54 |
CV (%) | 13.71 | 55.10 | 65.80 | 42.29 | 49.15 | 53.80 | 51.45 | 62.15 | 69.85 | 49.15 |
G.M. | 436.00 | 13.89 | 1.92 | 12.36 | 31.38 | 227.06 | 35.28 | 7.23 | 1.12 | 6.44 |
MIN | 153.10 | 2.91 | 0.50 | 3.63 | 8.21 | 59.95 | 12.67 | 1.31 | 0.24 | 0.60 |
MAX | 594.10 | 42.60 | 6.91 | 29.73 | 144.48 | 663.86 | 124.84 | 40.14 | 5.82 | 24.27 |
p | 0.140 | 0.244 | 0.002 | 0.510 | 0.110 | 0.541 | 0.210 | 0.397 | 0.062 | 0.078 |
r | - | - | - | - | -0.176 | -0.130 | -0.039 | 0.433** | 0.394** | 0.557** |
n | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 |
项目 Item | n | A.M. (mg·g-1) | SD | CV (%) | G.M. (mg·g-1) | MIN | MAX | r |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NH | 21 | 18.22 | 9.41 | 51.67 | 15.44 | 2.91 | 42.64 | - |
PH | 21 | 3.96a | 1.41 | 35.66 | 3.71a | 1.62 | 6.92 | - |
KH | 21 | 16.83a | 5.49 | 32.65 | 15.73a | 3.84 | 27.26 | - |
NH/PH | 21 | 4.81b | 2.40 | 49.93 | 4.16b | 1.33 | 10.04 | 0.32 |
NH/KH | 21 | 1.28 | 1.18 | 91.80 | 0.98 | 0.24 | 5.88 | 0.16 |
KH/PH | 21 | 4.65a | 1.61 | 34.63 | 4.24a | 0.60 | 7.56 | 0.19 |
NRef | 36 | 15.85 | 8.00 | 50.43 | 14.09 | 4.82 | 41.21 | - |
PRef | 36 | 1.49b | 0.51 | 34.50 | 1.40b | 0.71 | 2.82 | - |
KRef | 36 | 11.31b | 5.03 | 44.52 | 10.28b | 3.63 | 21.19 | - |
NRef/PRef | 36 | 11.19a | 6.01 | 53.67 | 10.01a | 3.75 | 37.75 | 0.54** |
NRef/KRef | 36 | 1.58 | 0.93 | 58.80 | 1.37 | 0.56 | 5.14 | 0.32 |
KRef/PRef | 36 | 7.97a | 3.77 | 47.31 | 7.31a | 3.01 | 24.27 | 0.45** |
表2 不同土壤P水平下植物叶片N、P、K的浓度及其比值
Table 2 Leaf N, P, K concentrations and their ratios at different soil P contents
项目 Item | n | A.M. (mg·g-1) | SD | CV (%) | G.M. (mg·g-1) | MIN | MAX | r |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NH | 21 | 18.22 | 9.41 | 51.67 | 15.44 | 2.91 | 42.64 | - |
PH | 21 | 3.96a | 1.41 | 35.66 | 3.71a | 1.62 | 6.92 | - |
KH | 21 | 16.83a | 5.49 | 32.65 | 15.73a | 3.84 | 27.26 | - |
NH/PH | 21 | 4.81b | 2.40 | 49.93 | 4.16b | 1.33 | 10.04 | 0.32 |
NH/KH | 21 | 1.28 | 1.18 | 91.80 | 0.98 | 0.24 | 5.88 | 0.16 |
KH/PH | 21 | 4.65a | 1.61 | 34.63 | 4.24a | 0.60 | 7.56 | 0.19 |
NRef | 36 | 15.85 | 8.00 | 50.43 | 14.09 | 4.82 | 41.21 | - |
PRef | 36 | 1.49b | 0.51 | 34.50 | 1.40b | 0.71 | 2.82 | - |
KRef | 36 | 11.31b | 5.03 | 44.52 | 10.28b | 3.63 | 21.19 | - |
NRef/PRef | 36 | 11.19a | 6.01 | 53.67 | 10.01a | 3.75 | 37.75 | 0.54** |
NRef/KRef | 36 | 1.58 | 0.93 | 58.80 | 1.37 | 0.56 | 5.14 | 0.32 |
KRef/PRef | 36 | 7.97a | 3.77 | 47.31 | 7.31a | 3.01 | 24.27 | 0.45** |
生活型 Life form | n | N含量 N content | P含量 P content | N/P | K含量 K content | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A.M. (mg·g-1) | CV (%) | G.M. (mg·g-1) | CV (%) | A.M. | CV (%) | A.M. (mg·g-1) | CV (%) | ||||||
木本 Woody plant | H | 6 | 13.39 | 61.16 | 2.71 | 40.91 | 4.50 | 47.49 | 13.18 | 16.77 | |||
Ref | 21 | 13.61 | 45.82 | 1.22** | 22.39 | 11.51 | 64.33 | 8.23** | 45.82 | ||||
T | 27 | 13.52 a | 48.18 | 1.51a | 54.80 | 9.83 | 72.98 | 9.29a | 34.02 | ||||
草本 Herb | H | 15 | 20.13 | 45.15 | 4.21 | 28.86 | 4.93 | 50.12 | 18.29 | 30.52 | |||
Ref | 15 | 19.46 | 46.16 | 1.71** | 33.59 | 10.83** | 27.74 | 16.15 | 27.74 | ||||
T | 30 | 19.81b | 46.46 | 2.51b | 52.78 | 7.73 | 52.67 | 17.26b | 29.40 | ||||
灌木 Shrub | H | 3 | 14.00 | 41.59 | 3.30 | 30.58 | 4.34 | 41.65 | 14.70 | 11.51 | |||
Ref | 10 | 13.16 | 54.25 | 1.21** | 19.15 | 11.81 | 79.51 | 8.93* | 30.88 | ||||
T | 13 | 13.30 | 53.52 | 1.60 | 63.65 | 10.09 | 91.41 | 10.26 | 35.76 | ||||
乔木 Tree | H | 3 | 12.80 | 68.75 | 2.30 | 36.22 | 4.66 | 44.48 | 10.54 | 6.78 | |||
Ref | 11 | 14.00 | 35.88 | 1.20* | 23.50 | 11.10* | 41.00 | 7.64* | 25.14 | ||||
T | 14 | 13.66 | 45.12 | 1.50 | 44.07 | 9.40 | 51.73 | 8.44 | 29.16 |
表3 不同土壤全磷水平下不同生活型植物叶片的养分计量特征
Table 3 Stoichiometric characteristics of leaf nutrition of different plant life forms at different levels of soil total P
生活型 Life form | n | N含量 N content | P含量 P content | N/P | K含量 K content | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A.M. (mg·g-1) | CV (%) | G.M. (mg·g-1) | CV (%) | A.M. | CV (%) | A.M. (mg·g-1) | CV (%) | ||||||
木本 Woody plant | H | 6 | 13.39 | 61.16 | 2.71 | 40.91 | 4.50 | 47.49 | 13.18 | 16.77 | |||
Ref | 21 | 13.61 | 45.82 | 1.22** | 22.39 | 11.51 | 64.33 | 8.23** | 45.82 | ||||
T | 27 | 13.52 a | 48.18 | 1.51a | 54.80 | 9.83 | 72.98 | 9.29a | 34.02 | ||||
草本 Herb | H | 15 | 20.13 | 45.15 | 4.21 | 28.86 | 4.93 | 50.12 | 18.29 | 30.52 | |||
Ref | 15 | 19.46 | 46.16 | 1.71** | 33.59 | 10.83** | 27.74 | 16.15 | 27.74 | ||||
T | 30 | 19.81b | 46.46 | 2.51b | 52.78 | 7.73 | 52.67 | 17.26b | 29.40 | ||||
灌木 Shrub | H | 3 | 14.00 | 41.59 | 3.30 | 30.58 | 4.34 | 41.65 | 14.70 | 11.51 | |||
Ref | 10 | 13.16 | 54.25 | 1.21** | 19.15 | 11.81 | 79.51 | 8.93* | 30.88 | ||||
T | 13 | 13.30 | 53.52 | 1.60 | 63.65 | 10.09 | 91.41 | 10.26 | 35.76 | ||||
乔木 Tree | H | 3 | 12.80 | 68.75 | 2.30 | 36.22 | 4.66 | 44.48 | 10.54 | 6.78 | |||
Ref | 11 | 14.00 | 35.88 | 1.20* | 23.50 | 11.10* | 41.00 | 7.64* | 25.14 | ||||
T | 14 | 13.66 | 45.12 | 1.50 | 44.07 | 9.40 | 51.73 | 8.44 | 29.16 |
研究区域 Study region | N含量 N content | P含量 P content | N/P | 资料来源 Date source | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A.M. (mg·g-1) | G.M. (mg·g-1) | SD | A.M. (mg·g-1) | G.M. (mg·g-1) | SD | A.M. | G.M. | SD | ||||
正常区域 Reference sites | 15.85 | 14.09 | 8.00 | 1.49 | 1.40 | 0.51 | 11.19 | 10.01 | 6.01 | 本研究 This study | ||
富磷区域 Phosphorus-enriched area | 18.22 | 15.44 | 9.41 | 3.96 | 3.71 | 1.41 | 4.81 | 4.16 | 2.40 | 本研究 This study | ||
中国 China | 20.20 | 18.60 | 8.41 | 1.46 | 1.21 | 0.99 | 16.30 | 14.40 | 9.32 | |||
全球1 World 1 | 20.10 | 18.30 | 8.71 | 1.77 | 1.42 | 1.12 | 13.80 | 11.80 | 9.47 | |||
全球2 World 2 | 20.60 | 17.70 | 12.23 | 1.99 | 1.58 | 1.49 | 12.70 | 11.00 | 6.82 |
表4 滇池流域和其他研究区域的植物叶片N、P及N/P计量比较
Table 4 Comparisons of leaf nitrogen, phosphorus and N/P between this study and any other investigation
研究区域 Study region | N含量 N content | P含量 P content | N/P | 资料来源 Date source | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A.M. (mg·g-1) | G.M. (mg·g-1) | SD | A.M. (mg·g-1) | G.M. (mg·g-1) | SD | A.M. | G.M. | SD | ||||
正常区域 Reference sites | 15.85 | 14.09 | 8.00 | 1.49 | 1.40 | 0.51 | 11.19 | 10.01 | 6.01 | 本研究 This study | ||
富磷区域 Phosphorus-enriched area | 18.22 | 15.44 | 9.41 | 3.96 | 3.71 | 1.41 | 4.81 | 4.16 | 2.40 | 本研究 This study | ||
中国 China | 20.20 | 18.60 | 8.41 | 1.46 | 1.21 | 0.99 | 16.30 | 14.40 | 9.32 | |||
全球1 World 1 | 20.10 | 18.30 | 8.71 | 1.77 | 1.42 | 1.12 | 13.80 | 11.80 | 9.47 | |||
全球2 World 2 | 20.60 | 17.70 | 12.23 | 1.99 | 1.58 | 1.49 | 12.70 | 11.00 | 6.82 |
[1] | Aerts R, Chapin FS III (2000). The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Advances in Ecological Research, 30, 1-67. |
[2] | Agren GI (2004). The C:N:P stoichiometry of autotrophs- theory and observations. Ecology Letters, 7, 185-191. |
[3] | Agricultural Biochemistry Committee of Chinese Soil Society (中国土壤学会农业化学专业委员会) (1983). Routine Analysis Method of Soil Agricultural Chemistry (土壤农业化学常规分析方法). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[4] | Bhattarai KR, Vetaas OR (2003). Variation in plant species richness of different life forms along a subtropical elevation gradient in the Himalayas, east Nepal. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 12, 327-340. |
[5] | Cakmak I (2005). The role of potassium in alleviating detrimental effects of abiotic stresses in plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 168, 521-530. |
[6] | Chen R (陈锐) (2008). Ecological Responses of the Keystone Species to the Water and Nutrient in the Soil of the Plant Communities at Different Successional Restoration: Case Studies at Samachang and Lancang in Yunnan, China (不同演替恢复阶段群落的土壤水肥动态与关键种的养分特征和生态效应: 以滇中和滇西两个观测点为例). Master dissertation, Yunnan University, Kunming. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[7] | Commings J, Reid N, Davies I, Grant C (2005). Adaptive restoration of sand-mined areas for biological conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42, 160-170. |
[8] | Committee of Chinese Ecological Research Network (中国生态系统研究网络科学委员会) (2007). Protocols for Standard Biological Observation and Measurement in Terrestrial Ecosystems (陆地生态系统生物观测规范方法). China Environment Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[9] | Elser JJ, Dobberfuhl DR, MacKay NA, Schampel JH (1996). Organism size, life history, and N:P stoichiometry: towards a unified view of cellular and ecosystem processes. BioScience, 46, 674-684. |
[10] |
Elser JJ, Fagan WF, Denno RF, Dobberfuhl DR, Folarin A, Huberty A, Interlandi S, Kilham SS, McCauley E, Schulz KL, Siemann EH, Sterner RW (2000a). Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater food webs. Nature, 408, 578-580.
DOI URL PMID |
[11] | Elser JJ, Sterner RW, Gorokhova E, Fagan WF, Markow TA, Cotner JB, Harrison JF, Hobbie SE, Odell GM, Weider LJ (2000b). Biological stoichiometry from genes to ecosystems. Ecology Letters, 3, 540-550. |
[12] | Gan L (甘露), Chen FS (陈伏生), Hu XF (胡小飞), Tian QX (田秋香), Ge G (葛刚), Zhan SX (詹书侠) (2008). Leaf N and P concentrations and their stoichiometric ratios of different functional groups of plants in Nanchang City. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 27, 344-348. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] | Gao SP (高三平), Li JX (李俊祥), Xu MC (徐明策), Chen X (陈熙), Dai J (戴洁) (2007). Leaf N and P stoichiometry of common species in successional stages of the evergreen broad-leaved forest in Tiantong National Forest Park, Zhejiang Province, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 27, 947-952. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[14] | Güsewell S (2004). N:P ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance. New Phytologist, 164, 243-266. |
[15] | Güsewell S, Koerselman W, Verhoeven JTA (2003). Biomass N:P rations as indictors of nutrient limitation for plant populations in Wetlands. Ecological Applications, 13, 372-384. |
[16] | Han W, Fang J, Guo D, Zhang Y (2005). Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across 753 terrestrial plant species in China. New Phytologist, 168, 377-385. |
[17] | Han WX (韩文轩), Wu Y (吴漪), Tang LY (汤璐瑛), Chen YH (陈雅涵), Li LP (李利平), He JS (贺金生), Fang JY (方精云) (2009). Leaf carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across plant species in Beijing and its periphery. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis (Science Edition) (北京大学学报(自然科学版), 45, 855-860. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[18] | He JS (贺金生), Han XG (韩兴国) (2010). Ecological stoichiometry: searching for unifying principles from individuals to ecosystems. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology (植物生态学报), 34, 2-6. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[19] |
He JS, Wang L, Flynn DFB, Wang XP, Fang JY, Ma WH (2008). Leaf nitrogen: phosphorus stoichiometry across Chinese grassland biomes. Oecologia, 155, 301-310.
DOI URL PMID |
[20] | Hou XY (侯学煜) (1982). Vegetation Geography of China and Chemical Composition of Their Dominant Plants (中国植被地理及优势植物化学成分). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[21] | Koerselman W, Meuleman AFM (1996). The vegetation N:P ratio: a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 33, 1441-1450. |
[22] | Lambers H, Chapin FS, Pons TL (1998). Plant Physiological Ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York. |
[23] | Lu JL (陆景陵) (2003). Science of Plant Nutrition (Rudin) 2nd edn (植物营养学(上册), 第二版). China Agricultural University Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[24] | Mo DL (莫大伦), Wu JX (吴建学) (1988). A study on the characteristics of the chemical composition and the interrelationship between the elements in the plants of 86 species in Hainan Island. Acta Phytoecologica et Geobotanica Sinica (植物生态学与地植物学学报), 12, 51-62. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[25] | Reich PB, Oleksyn J (2004). Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 11001-11006. |
[26] | Ren SJ (任书杰), Yu GR (于贵瑞), Tao B (陶波), Guan LL (官丽莉), Fang HJ (方华军), Jiang CM (姜春明) (2009). Spatial patterns for variations in leaf nutrient contents of Dahurian Larch (Larix gmelinii Rupr.). Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 29, 1899-1906. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[27] | Ren SJ (任书杰), Yu GR (于贵瑞), Tao B (陶波), Wang SQ (王绍强) (2007). Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across 654 terrestrial plant species in NSTEC. Chinese Journal of Environmental Science (环境科学), 28, 2665-2673. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[28] | Richardson SJ, Allen RB, Doherty JE (2008). Shifts in leaf N:P ratio during resorption reflect soil P in temperate rainforest. Functional Ecology, 22, 738-745. |
[29] | Schindler DW (2003). Balancing planets and molecules. Nature, 423, 225-226. |
[30] | Sharma NC, Sahi SV (2005). Characterization of phosphate accumulation in Lolium multiflorum for remediation of phosphorus-enriched soils. Environmental Science Technology, 39, 5475-5480. |
[31] |
Sharma NC, Sahi SV, Jain JC, Raghothama KG (2004). Enhanced accumulation of phosphate by Lolium multiflorum cultivars grown in phosphate-enriched medium. Environmental Science Technology, 38, 2443-2448.
DOI URL PMID |
[32] | Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2002). Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere. Princeton University Press, Princeton. |
[33] |
van der Salm C, Chardon WJ, Koopmans GF, van Middelkoop JC, Ehlert PAI (2009). Phytoextraction of phosphorus- enriched grassland soils. Journal of Environmental Quality, 38, 751-761.
URL PMID |
[34] | Venterink HO, Wassen MJ, Verkroost AWM, de Ruiter PC (2003). Species richness-productivity patterns differ between N-, P-, and K-limited wetlands. Ecology, 84, 2191-2199. |
[35] | Vetaas OR (1997). The effect of canopy disturbance on species richness in a central Himalayan oak forest, Nepal. Plant Ecology, 132, 29-38. |
[36] | Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin T, Cornelissen JHC, Diemer M, Flexas J, Garnier E, Groom PK, Gulias J, Hikosaka K, Lamont BB, Lee T, Lee W, Lusk C, Midgley JJ, Navas M, Niinemets Ü, Oleksyn J, Osada N, Poorter H, Poot P, Prior L, Pyankov VI, Roumet C, Thomas SC, Tjoelker MG, Veneklaas EJ, Villar R (2004). The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature, 428, 821-827. |
[37] | Wu TG (吴统贵), Chen BF (陈步峰), Xiao YH (肖以华), Pan YJ (潘勇军), Chen Y (陈勇), Xiao JH (萧江华) (2010). Leaf stoichiometry of trees in three forest types in Pearl River Delta, South China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology (植物生态学报), 34, 58-63. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[38] | Yan ER (阎恩荣), Wang XH (王希华), Zhou W (周武) (2008). N:P stoichiometry in secondary succession in evergreen broadleaved forest, Tiangtong, East China. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version) ((植物生态学报)), 32, 13-22. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[39] | Yin XR (银晓瑞), Liang CZ (梁存柱), Wang LX (王立新), Wang W (王炜), Liu ZL (刘钟龄), Liu XP (刘小平) (2010). Ecological stoichiometry of plant nutrients at different restoration succession stages in typical steppe of Inner Mongolia, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology (植物生态学报), 34, 39-47. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[40] | Zeng DH (曾德慧), Chen GS (陈广生) (2005). Ecological stoichiometry: a science to explore the complexity of living systems. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 29, 1007-1019. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[41] | Zheng SX, Shangguan ZP (2007). Spatial patterns of leaf nutrient traits of the plants in the Loess Plateau of China. Trees-Structure and Function, 21, 357-370. |
[1] | 张文瑾 佘维维 秦树高 乔艳桂 张宇清. 氮和水分添加对黑沙蒿群落优势植物叶片氮磷化学计量特征的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(5): 590-600. |
[2] | 韩路, 冯宇, 李沅楷, 王雨晴, 王海珍. 地下水埋深对灰胡杨叶片与土壤养分生态化学计量特征及其内稳态的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(1): 92-102. |
[3] | 李兆光, 文高, 和桂青, 徐天才, 和琼姬, 侯志江, 李燕, 薛润光. 滇西北藜麦氮磷钾生态化学计量特征的物候期动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(5): 724-732. |
[4] | 林少颖, 曾瑜, 杨文文, 陈斌, 阮敏敏, 尹晓雷, 阳祥, 王维奇. 添加秸秆及其生物炭对茉莉植株与土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(4): 530-545. |
[5] | 刘婧, 缑倩倩, 王国华, 赵峰侠. 晋西北丘陵风沙区柠条锦鸡儿叶片与土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(4): 546-558. |
[6] | 何茜, 冯秋红, 张佩佩, 杨涵, 邓少军, 孙小平, 尹华军. 基于叶片和土壤酶化学计量的川西亚高山岷江冷杉林养分限制海拔变化规律[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(12): 1646-1657. |
[7] | 彭鑫, 金光泽. 植物特性和环境因子对阔叶红松林暗多样性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(6): 656-666. |
[8] | 翟江维, 林馨慧, 武瑞哲, 徐义昕, 靳豪豪, 金光泽, 刘志理. 小兴安岭不同功能型阔叶植物的柄叶权衡[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(6): 700-711. |
[9] | 吴赞, 彭云峰, 杨贵彪, 李秦鲁, 刘洋, 马黎华, 杨元合, 蒋先军. 青藏高原高寒草地退化对土壤及微生物化学计量特征的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(4): 461-472. |
[10] | 张英, 张常洪, 汪其同, 朱晓敏, 尹华军. 氮沉降下西南山地针叶林根际和非根际土壤微生物养分限制特征差异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(4): 473-483. |
[11] | 师斌, 窦建德, 黄维, 李小伟. 宁夏贺兰山斑子麻黄荒漠群落特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(3): 362-367. |
[12] | 宋语涵, 张鹏, 金光泽. 阔叶红松林不同演替阶段灌木叶片碳氮磷化学计量特征及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(9): 952-960. |
[13] | 尹晓雷, 刘旭阳, 金强, 李先德, 林少颖, 阳祥, 王维奇, 张永勋. 不同管理模式对茶树碳氮磷含量及其生态化学计量比的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(7): 749-759. |
[14] | 朱湾湾, 王攀, 许艺馨, 李春环, 余海龙, 黄菊莹. 降水量变化与氮添加下荒漠草原土壤酶活性及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(3): 309-320. |
[15] | 胡琪娟, 盛茂银, 殷婕, 白义鑫. 西南喀斯特石漠化环境适生植物构树细根、根际土壤化学计量特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(9): 962-972. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19