›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (濒危植物的保护与恢复): 0-.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2024.0387

• •    下一篇

基于IUCN全球评估数据的中国高等植物红色名录指数

李利平, 余堃, 陈芳淼, 陈强, 景雨航, 牛振国, 胡辰璐, 覃海宁, 黄慧萍, 田亦陈   

  1. 中国科学院空天信息创新研究院, 北京 100101 中国
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-31 修回日期:2025-03-21 出版日期:2025-08-20

Red List Index of Chinese higher plants based on IUCN global assessment data

Li Liping, Yu Kun, Chen Fangmiao, Chen Qiang, Jing Yuhang, Niu Zhenguo, Hu Chenlu, Ning Qin Hai, Huang Huiping, Tian Yichen   

  1. , Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences 100101, China
  • Received:2024-10-31 Revised:2025-03-21 Online:2025-08-20

摘要: IUCN红色名录是进行生物多样性保育的依据之一,由红色名录评估结果数据计算的红色名录指数(Red List Index, RLI)是评估全球/国家/区域/某生物类群的物种整体生存状况的指标。红色名录指数计算的数据源可以为国家的红色名录评估结果数据,也可以为IUCN全球红色名录评估结果数据;我国已完成基于国家高等植物评估结果数据的红色名录指数计算,而基于IUCN全球红色名录评估结果数据的红色名录指数尚未有报道。本研究基于IUCN评估框架方法,考虑物种的分布区,计算了基于IUCN全球红色名录评估结果数据的我国高等植物红色名录指数,并与生物多样性指标联盟(Biodiversity Indicators Partnership, BIP)仅采用苏铁类代表植物来计算国家红色名录指数的结果进行了比较。研究发现,采用等权重法,基于IUCN红色名录评估结果数据、合并IUCN和中国特有种评估结果数据、仅采用苏铁类评估结果数据,这三种数据源得到的中国高等植物红色名录指数分别为0.9467、0.9082和0.5401,仅采用苏铁类评估结果数据的方法低估了我国高等植物红色名录指数,存在类群偏差,所以用尽可能多的可靠数据进行该指数的计算更为合理。本研究在红色名录指数的计算方面进行了探索,考虑了物种分布区的情况。研究结果可以与其他国家对比,也可以为我国生物多样性相关的国际履约提供基础数据。

关键词: 生物多样性, 基于国家评估数据的红色名录指数, 基于全球评估数据的红色名录指数, 物种分布区, 分布面积, 特有种

Abstract: Aims The IUCN Red List provides basis to biodiversity conservation designation. The Red List Index (RLI) derived from the results of Red List assessment is an indicator for the status of species and specific taxonomic groups at global, national, regional scales. Based on the IUCN global assessment data, this study aims to analyze the RLI of Chinese higher plants. Methods The RLI can be calculated based on either national or global assessment data. Chinese Red List Index based on national assessment data (nRLI) for higher plants has been reported. Following the IUCN assessment framework, through the partition of species Extent of Occurrence (EOO) of China and the rest of the world, this study calculated Chinese higher plant Red List Index based on global assessment data (gRLI). And then compared Chinese higher plant gRLI with the results from the Biodiversity Indicators Partnership (BIP), which relied only on a representative subset of Cycads to calculate a nation’s gRLI. Important findings The Chinese higher plant gRLI, with equal steps method, is 0.9467, 0.9082, and 0.5401 for the source data of IUCN assessments, IUCN and Chinese endemic species assessments, and solely Cycas, respectively. The BIP approach underestimates Chinese gRLI for higher plants, suggesting taxonomical bias. This highlights the importance of utilizing as much reliable data as possible for a more precise result of gRLI. By calculating Chinese higher plant gRLI which is comparable to that of other countries, this study provides essential baseline data to support China's international commitments and conservation efforts for various international conventions about biodiversity.

Key words: Biodiversity, Red List Index based on national assessment data (nRLI), Red List Index based on global assessment data (gRLI), Species range size, Extent of Occurrence (EOO), Endemic species