植物生态学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 1181-1189.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0147
所属专题: 生物多样性
杨明博1,2(), 杨劼1, 杨九艳1,3, 梁娜3, 清华1
收稿日期:
2006-04-06
接受日期:
2007-02-03
出版日期:
2007-04-06
发布日期:
2007-11-30
作者简介:
E-mail: jyang@mail.imu.edu.cn
基金资助:
YANG Ming-Bo1,2(), YANG Jie1, YANG Jiu-Yan1,3, LIANG Na3, QING Hua1
Received:
2006-04-06
Accepted:
2007-02-03
Online:
2007-04-06
Published:
2007-11-30
摘要:
该研究在鄂尔多斯高原从东到西按照降雨量逐渐减少的梯度选取了5个地区,对中间锦鸡儿(Caragana davazamcii)叶片的表皮结构进行了比较观察,发现不同生境条件下的中间锦鸡儿由于环境的长期作用表皮表现出一定的差异性,主要表现在随着多年平均降雨量的减少叶片表皮毛密度、气孔密度、气孔指数均有所增加,气孔深陷程度逐渐加深,角质层由光滑变得粗糙,但并不是线性增加,因此本研究对不同生境的中间锦鸡儿植物叶片做了遗传多样性分析,发现随着生境由东向西的变化,中间锦鸡儿种群遗传多样性有增加的趋势,与表皮形态特征变化一致,说明中间锦鸡儿呈现明显的表现型可塑性,可塑性反应比较高。
杨明博, 杨劼, 杨九艳, 梁娜, 清华. 鄂尔多斯高原不同生境条件下中间锦鸡儿植物叶片表皮特征及遗传多样性变化分析. 植物生态学报, 2007, 31(6): 1181-1189. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0147
YANG Ming-Bo, YANG Jie, YANG Jiu-Yan, LIANG Na, QING Hua. CHANGES OF CHARACTERISTICS OF THE LEAF EPIDERMIS AND GENETIC DIVERSITY OF CARAGANA DAVAZAMCII IN DIFFERENT HABITATS IN ERDOS PLATEAU, CHINA. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2007, 31(6): 1181-1189. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0147
采样点 Sampling sites | 纬度 Latitude (N) | 经度 Longitude (E) | 海拔 Altitude (m) | 年均降水量 Annual precipitation (mm) | 年均温 Annual temperature (℃) | 湿润系数 Moisture coefficient | 生境特点 Habitat characteristic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | 39°23'47″ | 110°22'42″ | 1 217 | 322 | 7.5 | >0.4 | 典型草原区的覆沙地 Land covered with sand in typical steppe region | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ⅱ | 39°23'24″ | 109°48'25″ | 1 372 | 286 | 6.8 | 0.4~0.35 | 典型草原区的覆沙硬梁 Solid girder coverd with sand in typical steppe region | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ⅲ | 39°02'01″ | 109°22'44″ | 1 309 | 262 | 6.8 | 0.35~0.3 | 毛乌素沙地半固定沙丘梁上 Semi-fixed sand dune in Mu Us Sandland | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ⅳ | 38°36'55″ | 108°42'58″ | 1 348 | 251 | 7.4 | 0.25~0.23 | 毛乌素沙地覆沙硬梁 Solid girder covered with sand in Mu Us Sandland | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ⅴ | 39°14'30″ | 108°02'27″ | 1 375 | 221 | 7.1 | 0.23~0.2 | 荒漠草原平缓的沙质地 Flat sandland in desert steppe |
表1 中间锦鸡儿样品采集地概况
Table 1 The general situation of the sampling sites
采样点 Sampling sites | 纬度 Latitude (N) | 经度 Longitude (E) | 海拔 Altitude (m) | 年均降水量 Annual precipitation (mm) | 年均温 Annual temperature (℃) | 湿润系数 Moisture coefficient | 生境特点 Habitat characteristic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | 39°23'47″ | 110°22'42″ | 1 217 | 322 | 7.5 | >0.4 | 典型草原区的覆沙地 Land covered with sand in typical steppe region | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ⅱ | 39°23'24″ | 109°48'25″ | 1 372 | 286 | 6.8 | 0.4~0.35 | 典型草原区的覆沙硬梁 Solid girder coverd with sand in typical steppe region | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ⅲ | 39°02'01″ | 109°22'44″ | 1 309 | 262 | 6.8 | 0.35~0.3 | 毛乌素沙地半固定沙丘梁上 Semi-fixed sand dune in Mu Us Sandland | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ⅳ | 38°36'55″ | 108°42'58″ | 1 348 | 251 | 7.4 | 0.25~0.23 | 毛乌素沙地覆沙硬梁 Solid girder covered with sand in Mu Us Sandland | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ⅴ | 39°14'30″ | 108°02'27″ | 1 375 | 221 | 7.1 | 0.23~0.2 | 荒漠草原平缓的沙质地 Flat sandland in desert steppe |
采样点 Sampling sites | 群落组成 Community composition | 中间锦鸡儿种 群平均株高 Average height of Caragana davazancii population (cm) | 中间锦鸡儿种群 平均冠幅 Average canopy of Caragana davazancii population (m2) | 土壤类型 Soil type | 土壤容重 Soil bulk density (g·cm-3) | 土壤含水量 Soil water content (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | 中间锦鸡儿+本氏针茅群落 Caragana davazancii+Stipa bungeana community | 102.4±3.2 | 1.799±0.05 | 黄土 Loess | 1.54±0.03 | 4.62±0.44 |
Ⅱ | 中间锦鸡儿+牛心朴子群落 C. davazancii+Cynanchua komarovii community | 48.9±2.4 | 0.817±0.07 | 黄土 Loess | 1.50±0.02 | 7.86±0.11 |
Ⅲ | 中间锦鸡儿+油蒿群落 C. davazancii+Artemisia ordosica community | 77.7±4.8 | 0.856±0.22 | 风沙土 Aeolian sandy soil | 1.60±0.01 | 2.86±0.21 |
Ⅳ | 中间锦鸡儿+油蒿+羊柴群落 C. davazancii+A. ordosica+Hedysanum maxion community | 116.9±4.3 | 2.01±0.28 | 风沙土 Aeolian sandy soil | 1.50±0.03 | 5.56±0.49 |
Ⅴ | 中间锦鸡儿+小针茅-短花针茅群落 C. davazancii+Stipa kleneazii+S. breviflora community | 152.3±2.6 | 2.43±0.25 | 棕钙土 Brown soil | 1.56±0.01 | 3.18±0.18 |
表2 样品采集地的群落特征
Table 2 The community characteristics of the sampling sites
采样点 Sampling sites | 群落组成 Community composition | 中间锦鸡儿种 群平均株高 Average height of Caragana davazancii population (cm) | 中间锦鸡儿种群 平均冠幅 Average canopy of Caragana davazancii population (m2) | 土壤类型 Soil type | 土壤容重 Soil bulk density (g·cm-3) | 土壤含水量 Soil water content (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | 中间锦鸡儿+本氏针茅群落 Caragana davazancii+Stipa bungeana community | 102.4±3.2 | 1.799±0.05 | 黄土 Loess | 1.54±0.03 | 4.62±0.44 |
Ⅱ | 中间锦鸡儿+牛心朴子群落 C. davazancii+Cynanchua komarovii community | 48.9±2.4 | 0.817±0.07 | 黄土 Loess | 1.50±0.02 | 7.86±0.11 |
Ⅲ | 中间锦鸡儿+油蒿群落 C. davazancii+Artemisia ordosica community | 77.7±4.8 | 0.856±0.22 | 风沙土 Aeolian sandy soil | 1.60±0.01 | 2.86±0.21 |
Ⅳ | 中间锦鸡儿+油蒿+羊柴群落 C. davazancii+A. ordosica+Hedysanum maxion community | 116.9±4.3 | 2.01±0.28 | 风沙土 Aeolian sandy soil | 1.50±0.03 | 5.56±0.49 |
Ⅴ | 中间锦鸡儿+小针茅-短花针茅群落 C. davazancii+Stipa kleneazii+S. breviflora community | 152.3±2.6 | 2.43±0.25 | 棕钙土 Brown soil | 1.56±0.01 | 3.18±0.18 |
种群 No. of population | 表皮毛密度 Trichome density (ind.·mm-2) | 气孔密度 Stomatal density (ind.·mm-2) | 气孔大小 Stomatal size (μm) | 气孔指数 Stomatal index | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
长Length | 宽Width | ||||
Ⅰ | 339.2±52.7b | 214.4±47.8a | 19.3±1.35 | 12.5±0.28 | 8.41±1.30a |
Ⅱ | 400.0±45.9b | 371.2±95.6b | 17.2±1.26 | 11.8±0.43 | 8.16±2.40a |
Ⅲ | 448.0±74.6c | 256.6±56.5a | 21.5±2.81 | 12.9±0.65 | 10.43±1.41c |
Ⅳ | 256.0±43.2a | 224.0±33.7a | 19.9±0.46 | 12.3±0.37 | 9.10±2.28b |
Ⅴ | 454.4±70.4c | 384.2±74.6b | 19.8±0.59 | 16.4±1.24 | 11.43±1.81c |
表3 表皮及其附属物特征值
Table 3 Characteristic values of epidemis and its auessory
种群 No. of population | 表皮毛密度 Trichome density (ind.·mm-2) | 气孔密度 Stomatal density (ind.·mm-2) | 气孔大小 Stomatal size (μm) | 气孔指数 Stomatal index | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
长Length | 宽Width | ||||
Ⅰ | 339.2±52.7b | 214.4±47.8a | 19.3±1.35 | 12.5±0.28 | 8.41±1.30a |
Ⅱ | 400.0±45.9b | 371.2±95.6b | 17.2±1.26 | 11.8±0.43 | 8.16±2.40a |
Ⅲ | 448.0±74.6c | 256.6±56.5a | 21.5±2.81 | 12.9±0.65 | 10.43±1.41c |
Ⅳ | 256.0±43.2a | 224.0±33.7a | 19.9±0.46 | 12.3±0.37 | 9.10±2.28b |
Ⅴ | 454.4±70.4c | 384.2±74.6b | 19.8±0.59 | 16.4±1.24 | 11.43±1.81c |
图3 不同地区中间锦鸡儿叶片扫描电镜观察——气孔 ×4 000 Ⅳ:角质层有蜡被保护 Cutide covered with wax Ⅴ:角质层有瘤状突起 Cutide with strumae
Fig.3 Observation on the leaves of Caragana davazamcii through a seaming election microscope (SEM) in the different habitats—stoma×4 000
图4 不同地区中间锦鸡儿叶片扫描电镜观察——表皮毛×400
Fig.4 Observation on the leaves of Caragana davazamcii through a seaming election microscope (SEM) in the different habitats—trichome×400
种群 Population | 多态位点 Polymorphic loci | 多态性位点百分率 Percentage of polymorphic loci (PPB) (%) |
---|---|---|
I | 98 | 64.90 |
Ⅱ | 113 | 74.83 |
Ⅲ | 109 | 72.19 |
Ⅳ | 107 | 70.86 |
Ⅴ | 117 | 77.48 |
表4 不同生境中间锦鸡儿种群多态位点的差异
Table 4 Difference of polymorphic loci of Caragana davazamcii populations in different habitats
种群 Population | 多态位点 Polymorphic loci | 多态性位点百分率 Percentage of polymorphic loci (PPB) (%) |
---|---|---|
I | 98 | 64.90 |
Ⅱ | 113 | 74.83 |
Ⅲ | 109 | 72.19 |
Ⅳ | 107 | 70.86 |
Ⅴ | 117 | 77.48 |
图5 引物AW64751对5个地区中间锦鸡儿种群的扩增谱带 Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ、Ⅴ: 分别代表5个采样点的中间锦鸡儿种群 Five C. davazamcii populations from different habitats
Fig.5 PCR-amplified fragment patterns with AW64571 primer in Caragana davazamcii populations in different habitats
种群 Population | Nei遗传多样性指数 Nei's gene diversity index (h) | Shannon 信息指数 Shannon information index (I) |
---|---|---|
Ⅰ | 0.209 3 | 0.317 7 |
Ⅱ | 0.252 9 | 0.378 9 |
Ⅲ | 0.239 7 | 0.359 5 |
Ⅳ | 0.235 5 | 0.354 5 |
Ⅴ | 0.246 9 | 0.375 8 |
总计 Total | 0.296 3 | 0.454 2 |
表5 不同生境中间锦鸡儿种群Nei's遗传多样性指数、Shannon信息指数
Table 5 Nei's gene diversity index and Shannon information index of Caragana davazamcii populations in different habitats
种群 Population | Nei遗传多样性指数 Nei's gene diversity index (h) | Shannon 信息指数 Shannon information index (I) |
---|---|---|
Ⅰ | 0.209 3 | 0.317 7 |
Ⅱ | 0.252 9 | 0.378 9 |
Ⅲ | 0.239 7 | 0.359 5 |
Ⅳ | 0.235 5 | 0.354 5 |
Ⅴ | 0.246 9 | 0.375 8 |
总计 Total | 0.296 3 | 0.454 2 |
样本大小 Sample size | HT | HS | GST | | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均值 Mean | 55 | 0.296 3 | 0.236 9 | 0.200 5 | 1.993 6 |
标准差 SD | 0.023 4 | 0.017 1 |
表6 不同生境中间锦鸡儿种群HT、HS、GST、 N m *
Table 6 HT、HS、GST and Nm of Caragana davazamcii populations in different habitats
样本大小 Sample size | HT | HS | GST | | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均值 Mean | 55 | 0.296 3 | 0.236 9 | 0.200 5 | 1.993 6 |
标准差 SD | 0.023 4 | 0.017 1 |
种群 Population | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | Ⅳ | Ⅴ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | **** | 0.926 7 | 0.917 6 | 0.905 3 | 0.894 8 |
Ⅱ | 0.076 1 | **** | 0.890 3 | 0.876 9 | 0.887 4 |
Ⅲ | 0.086 0 | 0.116 2 | **** | 0.938 4 | 0.899 8 |
Ⅳ | 0.099 5 | 0.131 4 | 0.063 6 | **** | 0.889 8 |
Ⅴ | 0.111 2 | 0.119 4 | 0.105 6 | 0.116 7 | **** |
表7 不同生境中间锦鸡儿种群遗传距离(下三角)和遗传一致度(上三角)
Table 7 Nei's genetic distance (below diagonal) and genetic identity (above diagonal) of Caragana davazamcii populations in different habitats
种群 Population | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | Ⅳ | Ⅴ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | **** | 0.926 7 | 0.917 6 | 0.905 3 | 0.894 8 |
Ⅱ | 0.076 1 | **** | 0.890 3 | 0.876 9 | 0.887 4 |
Ⅲ | 0.086 0 | 0.116 2 | **** | 0.938 4 | 0.899 8 |
Ⅳ | 0.099 5 | 0.131 4 | 0.063 6 | **** | 0.889 8 |
Ⅴ | 0.111 2 | 0.119 4 | 0.105 6 | 0.116 7 | **** |
毛密度 Trichome density (ind.·mm-2) | 气孔密度 Stomatal density (ind.·mm-2) | 气孔指数 Stomatal index | 多态位点 Polymorphic loci | Nei指数 Nei's index | Shannon 信息指数 Shannon information index | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
毛密度 Trichome density (ind.·mm-2) | Correlation Coefficient Sig. (2-tailed) | 1 . | 0.650 0.235 | 0.593 0.292 | 0.577 0.308 | 0.577 0.309 | 0.458 0.438 |
气孔密度 Stomatal density (ind.·mm-2) | Correlation Coefficient Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.650 0.235 | 1 . | 0.400 0.505 | 1.000** . | 0.900* 0.037 | 0.901* 0.039 |
气孔指数 Stomatal index | Correlation Coefficient Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.593 0.292 | 0.400 0.505 | 1 . | 0.575 0.310 | 0.575 0.311 | 0.333 0.584 |
多态位点 Polymorphic loci | Correlation Coefficient Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.577 0.308 | 1.000* . | 0.575 0.310 | 1 . | 1.000** . | 0.937* 0.019 |
Nei指数 Nei's index | Correlation Coefficient Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.577 0.309 | 0.900* 0.037 | 0.575 0.311 | 1.000** . | 1 . | 0.937* 0.019 |
Shannon 信息指数 Shannon information index | Correlation Coefficient Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.458 0.438 | 0.901* 0.039 | 0.333 0.584 | 0.937* 0.019 | 0.937* 0.019 | 1 . |
表8 不同生境条件下中间锦鸡儿的表型特征与遗传特征的相关分析
Table 8 Correlation analysis between phenotypic and genetic characteristics of Caragana davazamcii in different habitats
毛密度 Trichome density (ind.·mm-2) | 气孔密度 Stomatal density (ind.·mm-2) | 气孔指数 Stomatal index | 多态位点 Polymorphic loci | Nei指数 Nei's index | Shannon 信息指数 Shannon information index | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
毛密度 Trichome density (ind.·mm-2) | Correlation Coefficient Sig. (2-tailed) | 1 . | 0.650 0.235 | 0.593 0.292 | 0.577 0.308 | 0.577 0.309 | 0.458 0.438 |
气孔密度 Stomatal density (ind.·mm-2) | Correlation Coefficient Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.650 0.235 | 1 . | 0.400 0.505 | 1.000** . | 0.900* 0.037 | 0.901* 0.039 |
气孔指数 Stomatal index | Correlation Coefficient Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.593 0.292 | 0.400 0.505 | 1 . | 0.575 0.310 | 0.575 0.311 | 0.333 0.584 |
多态位点 Polymorphic loci | Correlation Coefficient Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.577 0.308 | 1.000* . | 0.575 0.310 | 1 . | 1.000** . | 0.937* 0.019 |
Nei指数 Nei's index | Correlation Coefficient Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.577 0.309 | 0.900* 0.037 | 0.575 0.311 | 1.000** . | 1 . | 0.937* 0.019 |
Shannon 信息指数 Shannon information index | Correlation Coefficient Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.458 0.438 | 0.901* 0.039 | 0.333 0.584 | 0.937* 0.019 | 0.937* 0.019 | 1 . |
[1] | Antonielli M, Pasqualini S, Batini P, Ederli L, Massacci A, Loreto F (2002). Physiological and anatomical characterization of Phragmites australis leaves. Aquatic Botany, 72,55-66. |
[2] | Anyia AO, Herzog H (2004). Water-use efficiency, leaf area and leaf gas exchange of cowpeas under mid-season drought. European Journal of Agronomy, 20,327-339. |
[3] | Bradshaw AD (1965). Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Advances in Genetics, 13,115-155. |
[4] | Cai YL (蔡永立), Song YC (宋永昌) (2001). Adaptive ecology of lianas in Tiantong evergreen broad-leaved forest Zhejiang, China. Ⅰ. Leaf anatomical characters. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 25,90-98. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[5] | Chen XD (陈旭东), Chen ZX (陈仲新), Zhao YX (赵雨兴) (1998). The determination of ecotone and the characteristics of biome on Ordos Plateau. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 22,312-318. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[6] | Morris DW (2006). Ecology: moving to the ideal free home. Nature, 443,645-646. |
[7] | Doyle J (1991). DNA protocols for plants. In: Hewitt GM, Johnston AWB, Young JPWeds. Molecular Techniques in Taxonomy. Springer, Berlin,283-293. |
[8] | Gao JP (高建平), Wang YH (王彦涵), Chen DF (陈道峰) (2003). Anatomical characteristics of leaf epidermis and vessel elements of Schisandra sphenanthera from different districts and their relationships to environmental factors. Acta Botanica Boreali-occidentalia Sinica (西北植物学报), 23,715-723. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[9] | Gao LF (高丽锋), Deng X (邓馨), Wang HX (王洪新), Hu ZA (胡志昂) (2002). Genetic diversity and 16S rDNA sequence of rhizobia isolated from nodules of Caragana intermedia in Maowusu sandland. Acta Microbiologica Sinica (微生物学报), 42,649-656. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[10] | Honer CP, Mikael L, Gabrielle R, Mcorgareta I, Merit K (2006). Gene diversity in a fragmented population of Briza media: grassland continuity in a landscape context. Journal of Ecology, 94,87-97. |
[11] | Li B (李博), Shi PJ (史培军), Li TJ (李天杰), Chen QL (陈钦峦), Yang MH (杨美华) (1990). Natural Resource and Environment, Study of the Ordos Plateau of Inner Mongolia (内蒙古鄂尔多斯高原自然资源与环境研究). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[12] | Li XR (李新荣) (2000). Discussion on the characteristics of shrubby diversity of Ordos Plateau. Resources Science (资源科学), 22(3),54-59. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] | Li XR (李新荣), Liu XM (刘新民), Yang ZY (杨正宇) (1998). A study on the relation of shrub community and environment in desertified steppe and steppefied desert of Ordos Plateau. Journal of Desert Research (中国沙漠), 18,123-130. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[14] | Ren H (任辉), Pan KY (潘开玉), Chen ZD (陈之端), Wang RQ (王仁卿) (2003). Structural characters of leaf epidermis and their systematic significance in Vitaceae. Acta Phytotaxo-nomica Sinica (植物分类学报), 41,531-544. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[15] | Robert GL (2006). Integrating patterns across multiple genetic markers to infer spatial processes. Landscape Ecology, 21,809-820. |
[16] | Sam O, Jeréz E, Dell'Amico J, Ruiz-Sánchez MC (2000). Water stress induced changes in anatomy of tomato leaf epidermis. Biologia Plantarum, 43,275-277. |
[17] | Shi J (施蛟), Chen B (陈博), Sun ZH (孙智华), Hu CQ (胡昌奇) (2003). Studies on flavonoid constituents of Caragana intermediia. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica (药学学报), 38,599-602. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[18] | Sun ZH (孙智华), Zhang S (张甦), Hu CQ (胡昌奇) (2004). Preparation of carainterol a derivatives. Chinese Journal of Pharmaceuticals (中国医药工业杂志), 35(4),197-199. |
[19] | Wang XL (王勋陵), Wang J (王静) (1989). Plant Morphological Structure and Environmental (植物形态结构与环境). Lanzhou University Press, Lanzhou,1-90. (in Chinese) |
[20] | Yang MB (杨明博), Yang J (杨劼), Yang JY (杨九艳) (2005a). The changes of free proline and MDA contents and POD activity of Caragana davazamcii in different habitats in Erdos Plateau. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Neimongol(Natural Science Edition) (内蒙古大学学报 (自然科学版)), 36,192-196. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[21] | Yang MB (杨明博), Yang J (杨劼), Yang JY (杨九艳) (2005b). Physiological and biochemical analysis of the leaves of seven species of Caragana. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica (西北植物学报), 38,599-602. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[22] | Zhou YG (周永刚), Wang HX (王洪新), Hu ZA (胡志昂) (2001). Variation of breeding systems in populations of Caragana intermedia (Leguminosae) in Maowusu sandy grassland. Acta Botanica Sinica (植物学报), 43,1307-1309. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 陈天翌, 娄安如. 青藏高原东侧白桦种群的遗传多样性与遗传结构[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(5): 561-568. |
[2] | 马龙龙, 杜灵通, 丹杨, 王乐, 乔成龙, 吴宏玥. 基于茎流-蒸渗仪法的荒漠草原带人工灌丛群落蒸散特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(8): 807-818. |
[3] | 张新新, 王茜, 胡颖, 周玮, 陈晓阳, 胡新生. 植物边缘种群遗传多样性研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(5): 383-395. |
[4] | 张俪文, 韩广轩. 植物遗传多样性与生态系统功能关系的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(10): 977-989. |
[5] | 王锦楠, 陈进福, 陈武生, 周新洋, 许东, 李际红, 亓晓. 柴达木地区野生黑果枸杞种群遗传多样性的AFLP分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(10): 1003-1011. |
[6] | 刘军, 姜景民, 邹军, 徐金良, 沈汉, 刁松峰. 中国特有濒危树种毛红椿核心和边缘居群的遗传多样性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(1): 52-60. |
[7] | 张炜, 罗建勋, 辜云杰, 胡庭兴. 西南地区麻疯树天然种群遗传多样性的等位酶变异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(3): 330-336. |
[8] | 魏源, 王世杰, 刘秀明, 黄天志. 不同喀斯特小生境中土壤丛枝菌根真菌的遗传多样性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(10): 1083-1090. |
[9] | 张云红, 侯艳, 娄安如. 华北地区小丛红景天种群的AFLP遗传多样性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(9): 1084-1094. |
[10] | 刘伟, 王曦, 干友民, 黄林凯, 谢文刚, 苗佳敏. 高山嵩草种群在放牧干扰下遗传多样性的变化[J]. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(5): 966-973. |
[11] | 臧春鑫, 杨劼, 袁劼, 刘鑫, 宋炳煜. 毛乌素沙地中间锦鸡儿整株丛的蒸腾特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(4): 719-727. |
[12] | 陈良华, 胡庭兴, 张帆, 李国和. 用AFLP技术分析四川核桃资源的遗传多样性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(6): 1362-1372. |
[13] | 周会平, 陈进, 张寿洲. 具混合繁殖策略的草本植物异果舞花姜的居群遗传结构[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(4): 751-759. |
[14] | 严茂粉, 李向华, 王克晶. 北京地区野生大豆种群SSR标记的遗传多样性评价[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(4): 938-950. |
[15] | 刘亚令, 李作洲, 姜正旺, 刘义飞, 黄宏文. 中华猕猴桃和美味猕猴桃自然居群遗传结构及其种间杂交渐渗[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(3): 704-718. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19