植物生态学报 ›› 2005, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 871-877.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2005.0123
• 论文 • 下一篇
王向荣1, 王政权1,*(), 韩有志1,2, 谷加存1, 郭大立3, 梅莉1
收稿日期:
2004-09-15
接受日期:
2005-01-14
出版日期:
2005-09-15
发布日期:
2005-09-30
通讯作者:
王政权
作者简介:
*E-mail:wzqsilv@mail.nefu.edu.cn基金资助:
WANG Xiang-Rong1, WANG Zheng-Quan1,*(), HAN You-Zhi1,2, GU Jia-Cun1, GUO Da-Li3, MEI Li1
Received:
2004-09-15
Accepted:
2005-01-14
Online:
2005-09-15
Published:
2005-09-30
Contact:
WANG Zheng-Quan
摘要:
细根直径大小和根序高低对细根寿命和周转估计具有重要的影响,研究不同根序之间的直径变异对认识细根直径与根序的关系具有重要意义。该文根据Pregitzer等(2002)提供的方法,研究了位于东北林业大学帽儿山实验林场尖砬沟森林培育实验站17年生水曲柳(Fraxinus mandshurica)和落叶松(Larix gmelinii)人工林细根1~5级根序的平均直径的变化、直径的最小值和最大值范围、直径的变异系数。结果表明,水曲柳和落叶松细根直径<2 mm时,包含5个根序,随着根序由小到大的增加,细根直径也在增大。各根序平均直径之间,存在较大的差异。在同一根序内,细根直径范围很大,水曲柳和落叶松一级根最小直径均<0.20 mm,最大直径分别<0.50 mm(水曲柳)和<0.70 mm(落叶松)左右。2~3级根序直径最小值在0.20~0.30 mm之间,最大值≤1.0 mm。5级根直径最小值<1.0 mm,最大值超过2.0 mm。随着根序等级增加,直径变异系数增大。一级根序的直径平均变异系数<10%,2~3级根序直径平均变异系数在10%~15%左右,4~5级根序直径的平均变异系数在20%~30%之间。因此,在细根寿命与周转研究过程中,必须同时考虑直径和根序对细根的寿命估计的影响。
王向荣, 王政权, 韩有志, 谷加存, 郭大立, 梅莉. 水曲柳和落叶松不同根序之间细根直径的变异研究. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(6): 871-877. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2005.0123
WANG Xiang-Rong, WANG Zheng-Quan, HAN You-Zhi, GU Jia-Cun, GUO Da-Li, MEI Li. VARIATIONS OF FINE ROOT DIAMETER WITH ROOT ORDER IN MANCHURIAN ASH AND DAHURIAN LARCH PLANTATIONS. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2005, 29(6): 871-877. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2005.0123
图1 水曲柳(A)和落叶松(B)根系分支结构照片,数字代表1~5级根序
Fig.1 Root branching systems of Fraxinus mandshurica (A) and Larix gmelinii (B) with representative root order (1~5) labeled
土层 Soil depth (cm) | 细根平均直径 Mean diameters of fine roots | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
一级 First-order | 二级 Second-order | 三级 Third-order | 四级 Fourth-order | 五级 Fifth-order | ||
水曲柳 Fraxinus mandshurica | ||||||
5月 May | 0~10 | 0.266 (0.005) | 0.363 (0.020) | 0.468 (0.018) | 0.862 (0.051) | 1.788 (0.116) |
11~20 | 0.269 (0.009) | 0.349 (0.013) | 0.493 (0.026) | 0.930 (0.063) | 2.317 (0.398) | |
7月 July | 0~10 | 0.242 (0.006) | 0.326 (0.025) | 0.410 (0.020) | 0.673 (0.045) | 1.287 (0.118) |
11~20 | 0.245 (0.006) | 0.337 (0.015) | 0.417 (0.028) | 0.663 (0.046) | 1.408 (0.039) | |
9月 Sept. | 0~10 | 0.276 (0.008) | 0.384 (0.010) | 0.470 (0.019) | 0.642 (0.025) | 1.190 (0.026) |
11~20 | 0.277 (0.009) | 0.376 (0.014) | 0.461 (0.015) | 0.645 (0.021) | 1.290 (0.055) | |
平均 Mean | 0~10 | 0.261 (0.006) | 0.358 (0.019) | 0.449 (0.019) | 0.726 (0.040) | 1.422 (0.087) |
11~20 | 0.264 (0.008) | 0.354 (0.014) | 0.457 (0.023) | 0.746 (0.043) | 1.672 (0.164) | |
落叶松 Larix gmelinii | ||||||
5月 May | 0~10 | 0.328 (0.008) | 0.417 (0.018) | 0.533 (0.020) | 0.868 (0.047) | 2.103 (0.206) |
11~20 | 0.330 (0.005) | 0.430 (0.021) | 0.659 (0.027) | 1.029 (0.040) | 2.105 (0.151) | |
7月 July | 0~10 | 0.308 (0.005) | 0.450 (0.017) | 0.530 (0.027) | 0.813 (0.045) | 1.551 (0.104) |
11~20 | 0.312 (0.007) | 0.434 (0.013) | 0.576 (0.031) | 0.965 (0.089) | 1.759 (0.157) | |
9月 Sept. | 0~10 | 0.369 (0.007) | 0.424 (0.009) | 0.507 (0.015) | 0.647 (0.025) | 1.140 (0.051) |
11~20 | 0.389 (0.006) | 0.467 (0.011) | 0.597 (0.026) | 0.831 (0.047) | 1.559 (0.103) | |
平均 Mean | 0~10 | 0.335 (0.007) | 0.431 (0.015) | 0.532 (0.020) | 0.776 (0.039) | 1.598 (0.120) |
11~20 | 0.344 (0.006) | 0.443 (0.015) | 0.611 (0.028) | 0.942 (0.059) | 1.808 (0.137) |
表1 水曲柳和落叶松不同根序的平均直径
Table 1 Mean diameter of fine roots among the first five orders in Fraxinus mandshurica and Larix gmelinii trees
土层 Soil depth (cm) | 细根平均直径 Mean diameters of fine roots | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
一级 First-order | 二级 Second-order | 三级 Third-order | 四级 Fourth-order | 五级 Fifth-order | ||
水曲柳 Fraxinus mandshurica | ||||||
5月 May | 0~10 | 0.266 (0.005) | 0.363 (0.020) | 0.468 (0.018) | 0.862 (0.051) | 1.788 (0.116) |
11~20 | 0.269 (0.009) | 0.349 (0.013) | 0.493 (0.026) | 0.930 (0.063) | 2.317 (0.398) | |
7月 July | 0~10 | 0.242 (0.006) | 0.326 (0.025) | 0.410 (0.020) | 0.673 (0.045) | 1.287 (0.118) |
11~20 | 0.245 (0.006) | 0.337 (0.015) | 0.417 (0.028) | 0.663 (0.046) | 1.408 (0.039) | |
9月 Sept. | 0~10 | 0.276 (0.008) | 0.384 (0.010) | 0.470 (0.019) | 0.642 (0.025) | 1.190 (0.026) |
11~20 | 0.277 (0.009) | 0.376 (0.014) | 0.461 (0.015) | 0.645 (0.021) | 1.290 (0.055) | |
平均 Mean | 0~10 | 0.261 (0.006) | 0.358 (0.019) | 0.449 (0.019) | 0.726 (0.040) | 1.422 (0.087) |
11~20 | 0.264 (0.008) | 0.354 (0.014) | 0.457 (0.023) | 0.746 (0.043) | 1.672 (0.164) | |
落叶松 Larix gmelinii | ||||||
5月 May | 0~10 | 0.328 (0.008) | 0.417 (0.018) | 0.533 (0.020) | 0.868 (0.047) | 2.103 (0.206) |
11~20 | 0.330 (0.005) | 0.430 (0.021) | 0.659 (0.027) | 1.029 (0.040) | 2.105 (0.151) | |
7月 July | 0~10 | 0.308 (0.005) | 0.450 (0.017) | 0.530 (0.027) | 0.813 (0.045) | 1.551 (0.104) |
11~20 | 0.312 (0.007) | 0.434 (0.013) | 0.576 (0.031) | 0.965 (0.089) | 1.759 (0.157) | |
9月 Sept. | 0~10 | 0.369 (0.007) | 0.424 (0.009) | 0.507 (0.015) | 0.647 (0.025) | 1.140 (0.051) |
11~20 | 0.389 (0.006) | 0.467 (0.011) | 0.597 (0.026) | 0.831 (0.047) | 1.559 (0.103) | |
平均 Mean | 0~10 | 0.335 (0.007) | 0.431 (0.015) | 0.532 (0.020) | 0.776 (0.039) | 1.598 (0.120) |
11~20 | 0.344 (0.006) | 0.443 (0.015) | 0.611 (0.028) | 0.942 (0.059) | 1.808 (0.137) |
土层 Soil depth (cm) | 根序与直径最小值和最大值 Diameter range (min-max) among the first five orders | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
一级 First-order | 二级 Second-order | 三级 Third-order | 四级 Fourth-order | 五级 Fifth-order | ||
水曲柳 Fraxinus mandshurica | ||||||
5月 May | 0~10 | 0.15~0.78 | 0.21~0.78 | 0.27~0.83 | 0.38~1.73 | 0.96~3.31 |
11~20 | 0.19~0.47 | 0.19~0.66 | 0.27~0.94 | 0.43~1.51 | 1.30~4.16 | |
7月 July | 0~10 | 0.12~0.47 | 0.14~0.64 | 0.22~0.78 | 0.33~1.31 | 0.60~2.23 |
11~20 | 0.14~0.47 | 0.15~0.67 | 0.22~1.37 | 0.32~1.37 | 0.62~2.46 | |
9月 Sept. | 0~10 | 0.16~0.49 | 0.22~0.68 | 0.29~0.88 | 0.36~1.24 | 0.58~2.12 |
11~20 | 0.15~0.49 | 0.20~0.69 | 0.32~0.84 | 0.39~1.46 | 0.64~2.27 | |
平均 Mean | 0~10 | 0.15~0.58 | 0.19~0.70 | 0.26~0.83 | 0.36~1.43 | 0.71~2.56 |
11~20 | 0.16~0.48 | 0.18~0.67 | 0.27~1.05 | 0.38~1.45 | 0.85~2.96 | |
落叶松 Larix gmelinii | ||||||
5月 May | 0~10 | 0.18~0.65 | 0.17~1.11 | 0.24~1.07 | 0.42~1.55 | 1.13~3.29 |
11~20 | 0.18~0.58 | 0.23~0.81 | 0.35~1.06 | 0.50~1.90 | 1.01~3.44 | |
7月 July | 0~10 | 0.19~0.81 | 0.25~1.17 | 0.26~1.01 | 0.40~1.56 | 0.84~2.52 |
11~20 | 0.15~0.69 | 0.23~0.84 | 0.28~1.06 | 0.45~1.81 | 0.95~2.63 | |
9月 Sept. | 0~10 | 0.17~0.82 | 0.26~0.77 | 0.27~0.95 | 0.33~1.25 | 0.54~2.11 |
11~20 | 0.19~0.80 | 0.22~0.89 | 0.30~1.16 | 0.40~1.60 | 0.98~2.32 | |
平均 Mean | 0~10 | 0.18~0.76 | 0.23~1.02 | 0.26~1.01 | 0.38~1.45 | 0.84~2.64 |
11~20 | 0.17~0.69 | 0.23~0.85 | 0.31~1.10 | 0.45~1.77 | 0.98~2.80 |
表2 水曲柳和落叶松各级根序的细根直径 (mm)最小值和最大值
Table 2 Diameter (mm) range (min-max) of fine roots among the first five orders in Fraxinus mandshurica and Larix gmelinii trees
土层 Soil depth (cm) | 根序与直径最小值和最大值 Diameter range (min-max) among the first five orders | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
一级 First-order | 二级 Second-order | 三级 Third-order | 四级 Fourth-order | 五级 Fifth-order | ||
水曲柳 Fraxinus mandshurica | ||||||
5月 May | 0~10 | 0.15~0.78 | 0.21~0.78 | 0.27~0.83 | 0.38~1.73 | 0.96~3.31 |
11~20 | 0.19~0.47 | 0.19~0.66 | 0.27~0.94 | 0.43~1.51 | 1.30~4.16 | |
7月 July | 0~10 | 0.12~0.47 | 0.14~0.64 | 0.22~0.78 | 0.33~1.31 | 0.60~2.23 |
11~20 | 0.14~0.47 | 0.15~0.67 | 0.22~1.37 | 0.32~1.37 | 0.62~2.46 | |
9月 Sept. | 0~10 | 0.16~0.49 | 0.22~0.68 | 0.29~0.88 | 0.36~1.24 | 0.58~2.12 |
11~20 | 0.15~0.49 | 0.20~0.69 | 0.32~0.84 | 0.39~1.46 | 0.64~2.27 | |
平均 Mean | 0~10 | 0.15~0.58 | 0.19~0.70 | 0.26~0.83 | 0.36~1.43 | 0.71~2.56 |
11~20 | 0.16~0.48 | 0.18~0.67 | 0.27~1.05 | 0.38~1.45 | 0.85~2.96 | |
落叶松 Larix gmelinii | ||||||
5月 May | 0~10 | 0.18~0.65 | 0.17~1.11 | 0.24~1.07 | 0.42~1.55 | 1.13~3.29 |
11~20 | 0.18~0.58 | 0.23~0.81 | 0.35~1.06 | 0.50~1.90 | 1.01~3.44 | |
7月 July | 0~10 | 0.19~0.81 | 0.25~1.17 | 0.26~1.01 | 0.40~1.56 | 0.84~2.52 |
11~20 | 0.15~0.69 | 0.23~0.84 | 0.28~1.06 | 0.45~1.81 | 0.95~2.63 | |
9月 Sept. | 0~10 | 0.17~0.82 | 0.26~0.77 | 0.27~0.95 | 0.33~1.25 | 0.54~2.11 |
11~20 | 0.19~0.80 | 0.22~0.89 | 0.30~1.16 | 0.40~1.60 | 0.98~2.32 | |
平均 Mean | 0~10 | 0.18~0.76 | 0.23~1.02 | 0.26~1.01 | 0.38~1.45 | 0.84~2.64 |
11~20 | 0.17~0.69 | 0.23~0.85 | 0.31~1.10 | 0.45~1.77 | 0.98~2.80 |
土层 Soil depth (cm) | 细根直径变异系数 Coefficients of variations in fine root diameters | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
一级 First-order | 二级 Second-order | 三级 Third-order | 四级 Fourth-order | 五级 Fifth-order | ||
水曲柳 Fraxinus mandshurica | ||||||
5月 May | 0~10 | 0.058 | 0.167 | 0.116 | 0.178 | 0.195 |
11~20 | 0.104 | 0.108 | 0.157 | 0.204 | 0.515 | |
7月 July | 0~10 | 0.073 | 0.233 | 0.145 | 0.199 | 0.275 |
11~20 | 0.074 | 0.129 | 0.201 | 0.208 | 0.082 | |
9月 Sept. | 0~10 | 0.086 | 0.079 | 0.119 | 0.116 | 0.066 |
11~20 | 0.095 | 0.111 | 0.097 | 0.099 | 0.128 | |
平均 Mean | 0~10 | 0.072 | 0.159 | 0.127 | 0.165 | 0.179 |
11~20 | 0.091 | 0.116 | 0.152 | 0.170 | 0.242 | |
落叶松 Larix gmelinii | ||||||
5月 May | 0~10 | 0.084 | 0.150 | 0.128 | 0.188 | 0.338 |
11~20 | 0.048 | 0.170 | 0.142 | 0.133 | 0.249 | |
7月 July | 0~10 | 0.056 | 0.130 | 0.176 | 0.193 | 0.233 |
11~20 | 0.073 | 0.104 | 0.189 | 0.321 | 0.309 | |
9月 Sept. | 0~10 | 0.047 | 0.138 | 0.184 | 0.242 | 0.316 |
11~20 | 0.055 | 0.078 | 0.149 | 0.195 | 0.229 | |
平均 Mean | 0~10 | 0.062 | 0.139 | 0.163 | 0.208 | 0.296 |
11~20 | 0.059 | 0.117 | 0.160 | 0.216 | 0.262 |
表3 水曲柳和落叶松细根直径变异系数
Table 3 Coefficients of variations in fine root diameters among the first five orders in Fraxinus mandshurica and Larix gmelinii trees
土层 Soil depth (cm) | 细根直径变异系数 Coefficients of variations in fine root diameters | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
一级 First-order | 二级 Second-order | 三级 Third-order | 四级 Fourth-order | 五级 Fifth-order | ||
水曲柳 Fraxinus mandshurica | ||||||
5月 May | 0~10 | 0.058 | 0.167 | 0.116 | 0.178 | 0.195 |
11~20 | 0.104 | 0.108 | 0.157 | 0.204 | 0.515 | |
7月 July | 0~10 | 0.073 | 0.233 | 0.145 | 0.199 | 0.275 |
11~20 | 0.074 | 0.129 | 0.201 | 0.208 | 0.082 | |
9月 Sept. | 0~10 | 0.086 | 0.079 | 0.119 | 0.116 | 0.066 |
11~20 | 0.095 | 0.111 | 0.097 | 0.099 | 0.128 | |
平均 Mean | 0~10 | 0.072 | 0.159 | 0.127 | 0.165 | 0.179 |
11~20 | 0.091 | 0.116 | 0.152 | 0.170 | 0.242 | |
落叶松 Larix gmelinii | ||||||
5月 May | 0~10 | 0.084 | 0.150 | 0.128 | 0.188 | 0.338 |
11~20 | 0.048 | 0.170 | 0.142 | 0.133 | 0.249 | |
7月 July | 0~10 | 0.056 | 0.130 | 0.176 | 0.193 | 0.233 |
11~20 | 0.073 | 0.104 | 0.189 | 0.321 | 0.309 | |
9月 Sept. | 0~10 | 0.047 | 0.138 | 0.184 | 0.242 | 0.316 |
11~20 | 0.055 | 0.078 | 0.149 | 0.195 | 0.229 | |
平均 Mean | 0~10 | 0.062 | 0.139 | 0.163 | 0.208 | 0.296 |
11~20 | 0.059 | 0.117 | 0.160 | 0.216 | 0.262 |
土层 Soil depth (cm) | 土壤温度 Soil temperature(℃) | 土壤水分 Soil moisture (%) | 土壤有效N Soil nitrogen availability (mg·kg-1) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
水曲柳 Fraxinus mandshurica | ||||
5月 May | 0~10 | 9.93(0.65)a | 0.55(0.02)a | 24.69(1.36)a |
11~20 | 8.87(0.42)b | 0.63(0.01)b | 11.39(0.71)b | |
7月 July | 0~10 | 16.95(0.45)a | 0.52(0.01)a | 26.75(1.33)a |
11~20 | 16.01(0.47)b | 0.59(0.02)b | 12.57(0.89)b | |
9月 Sept. | 0~10 | 10.05(0.08)a | 0.57(0.01)a | 18.99(1.41)a |
11~20 | 10.50(0.09)a | 0.67(0.01)b | 9.81(0.74)b | |
落叶松 Larix gmelinii | ||||
5月 May | 0~10 | 8.43(0.44)a | 0.58(0.01)a | 21.38(3.18)a |
11~20 | 7.73(0.18)b | 0.65(0.01)b | 13.15(0.76)b | |
7月 July | 0~10 | 17.10(0.58)a | 0.61(0.06)a | 21.05(1.37)a |
11~20 | 16.25(0.31)b | 0.62(0.01)a | 11.33(0.84)b | |
9月 Sept. | 0~10 | 9.85(0.42)a | 0.65(0.01)a | 18.88(1.99)a |
11~20 | 10.13(0.41)b | 0.70(0.01)b | 11.64(0.92)b |
表4 水曲柳和落叶松不同土壤层次温度、水分和N有效性
Table 4 Soil temperature, moisture and nitrogen availability of different soil depths in Fraxinus mandshurica and Larix gmelinii trees
土层 Soil depth (cm) | 土壤温度 Soil temperature(℃) | 土壤水分 Soil moisture (%) | 土壤有效N Soil nitrogen availability (mg·kg-1) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
水曲柳 Fraxinus mandshurica | ||||
5月 May | 0~10 | 9.93(0.65)a | 0.55(0.02)a | 24.69(1.36)a |
11~20 | 8.87(0.42)b | 0.63(0.01)b | 11.39(0.71)b | |
7月 July | 0~10 | 16.95(0.45)a | 0.52(0.01)a | 26.75(1.33)a |
11~20 | 16.01(0.47)b | 0.59(0.02)b | 12.57(0.89)b | |
9月 Sept. | 0~10 | 10.05(0.08)a | 0.57(0.01)a | 18.99(1.41)a |
11~20 | 10.50(0.09)a | 0.67(0.01)b | 9.81(0.74)b | |
落叶松 Larix gmelinii | ||||
5月 May | 0~10 | 8.43(0.44)a | 0.58(0.01)a | 21.38(3.18)a |
11~20 | 7.73(0.18)b | 0.65(0.01)b | 13.15(0.76)b | |
7月 July | 0~10 | 17.10(0.58)a | 0.61(0.06)a | 21.05(1.37)a |
11~20 | 16.25(0.31)b | 0.62(0.01)a | 11.33(0.84)b | |
9月 Sept. | 0~10 | 9.85(0.42)a | 0.65(0.01)a | 18.88(1.99)a |
11~20 | 10.13(0.41)b | 0.70(0.01)b | 11.64(0.92)b |
[1] |
Burton AJ, Pregitzer KS, Hendrick RL (2000). Relationships between fine root dynamics and nitrogen availability in Michigan northern hardwood forests. Oecologia, 125,389-999.
URL PMID |
[2] | Eissenstat DM, Caldwell MM (1988). Seasonal timing of root growth in favorable microsites. Ecology, 69,870-873. |
[3] | Eissenstat DM, Wells CE, Yanai RD (2000). Research review: building roots in a changing environment: implications for root longevity. New Phytologist, 147,32-42. |
[4] | Eissenstat DM, Yanai RD (1997). The ecology of root lifespan. Advances in Ecological Research, 27,2-59. |
[5] | Eissenstat DM, Yanai RD (2002). Root life span, efficiency and turnover. In: Waisel Y, Eshel A, Kafkafi U eds. Plant Roots: the Hidden Half 3rd edn. Dekker, New York,221-238. |
[6] | Eissenstat EM (1992). Cost and benefit of constructing roots of small diameter. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 15,763-782. |
[7] | Fahey TJ, Hughes JW (1994). Fine root dynamics in northern hardwood forest ecosystem, Hubbard Brook experimental forest, NH. Journal of Ecology, 82,533-548. |
[8] | Fitter AH, Stickland TR (1992). Architectural analysis of plant root systems Ⅲ. Studies on plants under field conditions. New Phytologist, 121,243-248. |
[9] | Fitter AH (1996). Characteristics and functions of root systems. In: Waisel, Y, Eshel E, Kafkafi U eds. Plant Roots: the Hidden Half 2nd edn. Dekker, New York,1-20. |
[10] | Forde BG, Lorenzo H (2001). The nutritional control of root development. Plant and Soil, 232,51-68. |
[11] | Friend AL, Eide MR, Hinckley TA (1990). Nitrogen stress alters root proliferation in Douglas-fir seedlings. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 20,1524-1529. |
[12] | Gill RA, Jackson RB (2000). Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytologist, 147,13-31. |
[13] | Gordon WS, Jackson RB (2000). Nutrient concentration in fine roots. Ecology, 81,275-280. |
[14] |
Guo DL, Mitchell RJ, Hendricks JJ (2004). Fine root branch orders respond differentially to carbon source-sink manipulations in a longleaf pine forest. Oecologia, 140,450-457.
DOI URL PMID |
[15] | Liu GS (刘光崧), Jiang NH (蒋能慧), Zhang LD (张连第), Liu ZL (刘兆礼) (1996). Soil Physical and Chemical Analysis Description of Soil Profile (土壤理化分析与剖面描述). Standard Press of China, Beijing,121-135. (in Chinese) |
[16] | Mei L (梅莉), Wang ZQ (王政权), Cheng YH (程云环), Guo DL (郭大立) (2004). A review: factors influencing fine root longevity in forest ecosystems. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 28,704-710. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[17] | Pregitzer KS, Deforest JL, Burton AJ, Allen MF, Ruess RW, Hendrick RL (2002). Fine root architecture of nine north American trees. Ecological Monographs, 72,293-309. |
[18] |
Pregitzer KS, Kubiske ME, Yu CK, Hendrick RL (1997). Relationships among root branch order, carbon, and nitrogen in four temperate species. Oecologia, 111,302-308.
URL PMID |
[19] | Wells CE, Eissenstat DM (2003). Beyond the roots of young seedlings: the influence of age and order on fine root physiology. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 21,324-334. |
[20] |
Wells CE, Glenn DM, Eissenstat DM (2002). Changes in the risk of fine-root mortality with age: a case study in peach, Prunus persica (Rosaceae). American Journal of Botany, 89,79-87.
DOI URL PMID |
[21] | Wu C (吴楚), Wang ZQ (王政权), Fan ZQ (范志强) (2004). Significance of senescence study on tree roots and its advances. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 15,1276-1280. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 李文博 孙龙 娄虎 于澄 韩宇 胡同欣. 火干扰对兴安落叶松种子萌发的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(预发表): 0-0. |
[2] | 梁逸娴, 王传宽, 臧妙涵, 上官虹玉, 刘逸潇, 全先奎. 落叶松径向生长和生物量分配对气候变暖的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 459-468. |
[3] | 臧妙涵, 王传宽, 梁逸娴, 刘逸潇, 上官虹玉, 全先奎. 基于纬度移栽的落叶松叶、枝、根生态化学计量特征对气候变暖的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 469-482. |
[4] | 马常钦, 黄海龙, 彭政淋, 吴纯泽, 韦庆钰, 贾红涛, 卫星. 水曲柳雌雄株复叶类型及光合功能对不同生境的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(9): 1287-1297. |
[5] | 胡同欣, 李蓓, 李光新, 任玥霄, 丁海磊, 孙龙. 火烧黑碳对生长季兴安落叶松林外生菌根真菌群落物种组成的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(6): 792-803. |
[6] | 和璐璐, 张萱, 章毓文, 王晓霞, 刘亚栋, 刘岩, 范子莹, 何远洋, 席本野, 段劼. 辽东山区不同坡向长白落叶松人工林树冠特征与林木生长关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(11): 1523-1539. |
[7] | 方文静, 蔡琼, 朱江玲, 吉成均, 岳明, 郭卫华, 张峰, 高贤明, 唐志尧, 方精云. 华北地区落叶松林的分布、群落结构和物种多样性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(9): 742-752. |
[8] | 焦亮, 王玲玲, 李丽, 陈晓霞, 闫香香. 阿尔泰山西伯利亚落叶松径向生长对气候变化的分异响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(4): 320-330. |
[9] | 温晓示, 陈彬杭, 张树斌, 徐凯, 叶新宇, 倪伟杰, 王襄平. 不同林龄、树种落叶松人工林径向生长与气候变化的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(1): 27-36. |
[10] | 解雅麟, 王海燕, 雷相东. 基于过程模型的气候变化对长白落叶松人工林净初级生产力的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(8): 826-839. |
[11] | 刘泽彬, 王彦辉, 刘宇, 田奥, 王亚蕊, 左海军. 宁夏六盘山半湿润区华北落叶松林冠层叶面积指数的时空变化及坡面尺度效应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(7): 749-760. |
[12] | 常永兴, 陈振举, 张先亮, 白学平, 赵学鹏, 李俊霞, 陆旭. 气候变暖下大兴安岭落叶松径向生长对温度的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(3): 279-289. |
[13] | 陈冠陶, 彭勇, 郑军, 李顺, 彭天驰, 邱细容, 涂利华. 氮添加对亚热带次生常绿阔叶林扁刺栲细根生物量、寿命和形态的短期影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(10): 1041-1050. |
[14] | 贾彦龙, 李倩茹, 许中旗, 桑卫国. 基于CO2FIX模型的华北落叶松人工林碳循环过程[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(4): 405-415. |
[15] | 于健, 徐倩倩, 刘文慧, 罗春旺, 杨君珑, 李俊清, 刘琪璟. 长白山东坡不同海拔长白落叶松径向生长对气候变化的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(1): 24-35. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19