植物生态学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 167-175.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00167

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

内蒙古农牧交错区不同土地利用方式下土壤呼吸速率及其温度敏感性变化

马骏1,2, 唐海萍1,2,*()   

  1. 1北京师范大学地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室, 北京 100875
    2北京师范大学资源学院, 北京 100875
  • 收稿日期:2010-04-14 接受日期:2010-11-12 出版日期:2011-04-14 发布日期:2011-01-21
  • 通讯作者: 唐海萍
  • 作者简介:*E-mail: tanghp@bnu.edu.cn

Variations of soil respiration rate and its temperature sensitivity among different land use types in the agro-pastoral ecotone of Inner Mongolia

MA Jun1,2, TANG Hai-Ping1,2,*()   

  1. 1State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    2College of Resources Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
  • Received:2010-04-14 Accepted:2010-11-12 Online:2011-04-14 Published:2011-01-21
  • Contact: TANG Hai-Ping

摘要:

2009年8-10月, 采用动态气室法观测了内蒙古农牧交错区多伦县农田、弃耕和围封3种土地利用方式下, 土壤呼吸速率从6:00到18:00的变化规律, 分析了不同深度的土壤温度与土壤含水量对土壤呼吸速率的控制作用。结果表明, 空间尺度上, 不同土地利用方式的土壤呼吸速率由高到低依次为: 农田>弃耕>围封; 时间尺度上, 土壤呼吸速率在6:00-18:00的变化趋势为单峰曲线, 在12:00-15:00达到峰值, 随后降低, 在18:00基本恢复到6:00左右的呼吸水平, 同时, 土壤呼吸速率在9、10月显著降低。利用Van’t Hoff指数模型研究不同深度土壤温度对土壤呼吸速率的影响发现, 10-15 cm深度的土壤温度对土壤呼吸速率的影响最为显著, 其中, 土壤呼吸温度敏感性由高到低分别为: 农田>围封>弃耕。相反, 由于8-10月土壤含水量变化较小, 故土壤含水量与土壤呼吸速率间的相关性不显著, 土壤含水量不能解释该时段土壤呼吸速率的变化。

关键词: Q10, 土壤呼吸速率, 土壤温度, 土壤含水量

Abstract:

Aims Our objectives are to compare soil respiration rate and its temperature sensitivity at different land use types and discuss soil respiration response to soil temperature (Ts) and soil water content at different soil depths.
Methods Periodic measurements of soil respiration rates (Rs) were made during August-October 2009 with a LI-8100 portable automated soil CO2 flux system in three agro-pastoral ecotone land use types: cropland, abandoned cultivated land and grazing enclosure. Soil temperature and soil water content at 0-5, 5-10 and 10-15 cm depths were measured simultaneous adjacent to the soil collar.
Important findings Rs is significantly different among the three land use types and greatest in cropland. Rs exhibited a unimodal curve during 6:00-18:00, with a maximum during 12:00-15:00. Rs decreased with Ts, so Rs was significantly higher in August than in September and October. With the Van’t Hoff model, we concluded there is a positive, exponential relationship between measured Ts and Rs. In addition, temperature sensitivity of soil respiration (Q10), which is derived from the Van’t Hoff model, was largest in cropland. In contrast, Rs was negatively related to soil water content in different soil depths at the sites.

Key words: Q10, soil respiration rate, soil temperature, soil water content