植物生态学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 142-149.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00015
所属专题: 碳储量
吴亚丛, 李正才*(), 程彩芳, 刘荣杰, 王斌, 格日乐图
收稿日期:
2012-10-09
接受日期:
2013-01-04
出版日期:
2013-10-09
发布日期:
2013-01-31
通讯作者:
李正才
作者简介:
* (E-mail: lizccaf@126.com)基金资助:
WU Ya-Cong, LI Zheng-Cai*(), CHENG Cai-Fang, LIU Rong-Jie, WANG Bin, GERI Le-Tu
Received:
2012-10-09
Accepted:
2013-01-04
Online:
2013-10-09
Published:
2013-01-31
Contact:
LI Zheng-Cai
摘要:
以亚热带东部地区48年生樟(Cinnamomum camphora)人工林为研究对象, 探讨不同林下植被处理方式对植被和土壤碳储量的影响。研究结果表明: 1)林下植被抚育增加了植被的碳储量, 增幅为48.87%, 平均每年比未抚育林分增加了0.62 t·hm-2; 2)林下植被抚育降低了土壤有机碳含量, 降低幅度介于4.79%-34.13%之间, 其中0-10 cm、10-20 cm土层比未抚育林分分别降低了10.16 g·kg-1和8.58 g·kg-1, 差异达到显著水平(p < 0.05); 3)林下植被抚育降低了森林土壤碳储量, 降低幅度介于1.98%-43.45%之间, 其中0-10 cm和10-20 cm土层分别降低了15.39 t·hm-2和11.58 t·hm-2, 差异达到极显著水平(p < 0.01)和显著水平(p < 0.05); 4)林下植被抚育降低了森林生态系统总碳储量, 降低幅度为4.27%, 但差异不显著。因此, 林下植被抚育虽有利于植被碳储量的积累, 但降低了土壤有机碳含量和储量。
吴亚丛, 李正才, 程彩芳, 刘荣杰, 王斌, 格日乐图. 林下植被抚育对樟人工林生态系统碳储量的影响. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(2): 142-149. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00015
WU Ya-Cong, LI Zheng-Cai, CHENG Cai-Fang, LIU Rong-Jie, WANG Bin, GERI Le-Tu. Effects of understory removal on forest carbon storage in Cinnamomum camphora plantation ecosystem. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2013, 37(2): 142-149. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00015
林分类型 Stand type | 主要植物 Main plant species | 树高 Tree height (m) | 胸径 DBH (cm) | 立木密度 Stem density (株·hm-2) | 林龄 Stand age (a) | 郁闭度 Canopy density | 坡向 Slope aspect | 林下植被 Understory vegetation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抚育 UR | 樟 Cinnamomum camphora | 13.5 ± 1.07 | 18.96 ± 1.98 | 917 ± 88 | 48 | 0.9 | 阳坡 Sunny slope | 无灌木, 少量草本 With few shrubs and a few herbs |
未抚育 UU | 樟、青冈、檵木 Cinnamomum camphora, Cyclobalanopsis glauca, and Loropetalum chinensis | 10.0 ± 0.59 | 10.58 ± 2.62 | 1 658 ± 300 | 48 | 0.9 | 阳坡 Sunny slope | 灌草丛生 With lots of shrubs and herbs |
表1 研究样地基本情况(平均值±标准偏差)
Table 1 Basic situation of experimental plots (mean ± SD)
林分类型 Stand type | 主要植物 Main plant species | 树高 Tree height (m) | 胸径 DBH (cm) | 立木密度 Stem density (株·hm-2) | 林龄 Stand age (a) | 郁闭度 Canopy density | 坡向 Slope aspect | 林下植被 Understory vegetation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抚育 UR | 樟 Cinnamomum camphora | 13.5 ± 1.07 | 18.96 ± 1.98 | 917 ± 88 | 48 | 0.9 | 阳坡 Sunny slope | 无灌木, 少量草本 With few shrubs and a few herbs |
未抚育 UU | 樟、青冈、檵木 Cinnamomum camphora, Cyclobalanopsis glauca, and Loropetalum chinensis | 10.0 ± 0.59 | 10.58 ± 2.62 | 1 658 ± 300 | 48 | 0.9 | 阳坡 Sunny slope | 灌草丛生 With lots of shrubs and herbs |
处理 Treatment | 乔木层 Arborous layer | 林下植被 Understory vegetation | 凋落物层Litter layer | 合计 Total | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
树干 Trunk | 树皮 Bark | 树枝 Branch | 叶 Leaf | 根 Root | 灌木 Shrub | 草本 Herb | |||||
抚育 UR (t·hm-1) | 36.64 ± 5.25a | 6.06 ± 0.85a | 26.36 ± 4.14a | 3.40 ± 0.45 | 14.55 ± 1.98a | 0.07 ± 0.01a | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 3.48 ± 0.86 | 90.62 ± 12.53a | ||
未抚育 UU (t·hm-1) | 23.88 ± 3.29b | 4.05 ± 0.52b | 16.00 ± 2.72b | 2.65 ± 0.24 | 10.33 ± 1.13b | 0.87 ± 0.48b | 0.05 ± 0.05 | 3.03 ± 0.21 | 60.87 ± 8.19b | ||
增加幅度 Increment (%) | 53.43 | 49.68 | 64.78 | 28.09 | 40.85 | -92.18 | 2.96 | 14.80 | 48.87 | ||
年变化量 Annual variation (t·hm-1·a-1) | 0.27 | 0.04 | 0.22 | 0.02 | 0.09 | 0.62 |
表2 不同处理下林分植被有机碳储量比较(平均值±标准偏差)
Table 2 Comparison of vegetation organic carbon storage in the stands under different treatments (mean ± SD)
处理 Treatment | 乔木层 Arborous layer | 林下植被 Understory vegetation | 凋落物层Litter layer | 合计 Total | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
树干 Trunk | 树皮 Bark | 树枝 Branch | 叶 Leaf | 根 Root | 灌木 Shrub | 草本 Herb | |||||
抚育 UR (t·hm-1) | 36.64 ± 5.25a | 6.06 ± 0.85a | 26.36 ± 4.14a | 3.40 ± 0.45 | 14.55 ± 1.98a | 0.07 ± 0.01a | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 3.48 ± 0.86 | 90.62 ± 12.53a | ||
未抚育 UU (t·hm-1) | 23.88 ± 3.29b | 4.05 ± 0.52b | 16.00 ± 2.72b | 2.65 ± 0.24 | 10.33 ± 1.13b | 0.87 ± 0.48b | 0.05 ± 0.05 | 3.03 ± 0.21 | 60.87 ± 8.19b | ||
增加幅度 Increment (%) | 53.43 | 49.68 | 64.78 | 28.09 | 40.85 | -92.18 | 2.96 | 14.80 | 48.87 | ||
年变化量 Annual variation (t·hm-1·a-1) | 0.27 | 0.04 | 0.22 | 0.02 | 0.09 | 0.62 |
处理 Treatment | 土层 Soil layer | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0-10 cm | 10-20 cm | 20-30 cm | 30-40 cm | 40-50 cm | 50-60 cm | |
抚育 UR (g·kg-1) | 26.08 ± 3.79a | 16.56 ± 3.01a | 13.42 ± 1.40 | 12.38 ± 1.36 | 11.32 ± 2.02 | 11.52 ± 2.26 |
未抚育 UU (g·kg-1) | 36.24 ± 3.71b | 25.14 ± 3.79b | 18.84 ± 3.93 | 15.84 ± 4.96 | 13.49 ± 4.27 | 12.10 ± 4.20 |
降低幅度 Decrease (%) | 28.04 | 34.13 | 28.77 | 21.84 | 16.09 | 4.79 |
年变化量 Annual variation (g·kg-1·a-1) | -0.21 | -0.18 | -0.11 | -0.07 | -0.05 | -0.01 |
表3 不同处理下林分土壤有机碳含量比较(平均值±标准偏差)
Table 3 Comparison of content of soil organic carbon in the stands under different treatments (mean ± SD)
处理 Treatment | 土层 Soil layer | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0-10 cm | 10-20 cm | 20-30 cm | 30-40 cm | 40-50 cm | 50-60 cm | |
抚育 UR (g·kg-1) | 26.08 ± 3.79a | 16.56 ± 3.01a | 13.42 ± 1.40 | 12.38 ± 1.36 | 11.32 ± 2.02 | 11.52 ± 2.26 |
未抚育 UU (g·kg-1) | 36.24 ± 3.71b | 25.14 ± 3.79b | 18.84 ± 3.93 | 15.84 ± 4.96 | 13.49 ± 4.27 | 12.10 ± 4.20 |
降低幅度 Decrease (%) | 28.04 | 34.13 | 28.77 | 21.84 | 16.09 | 4.79 |
年变化量 Annual variation (g·kg-1·a-1) | -0.21 | -0.18 | -0.11 | -0.07 | -0.05 | -0.01 |
处理 Treatment | 土层 Soil layer | 合计 Total | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0-10 cm | 10-20 cm | 20-30 cm | 30-40 cm | 40-50 cm | 50-60 cm | ||
抚育 UR (t·hm-1) | 25.56 ± 3.72A | 15.07 ± 2.74a | 12.88 ± 1.34 | 13.99 ± 1.53 | 12.23 ± 2.18 | 11.86 ± 2.33 | 91.59a |
未抚育 UU (t·hm-1) | 40.95 ± 4.19B | 26.65 ± 4.01b | 18.09 ± 3.78 | 18.06 ± 5.65 | 13.62 ± 4.31 | 12.10 ± 4.20 | 129.47b |
降低幅度 Decrease (%) | 37.58 | 43.45 | 28.80 | 22.54 | 10.21 | 1.98 | 29.26 |
年变化量 Annual variation (t·hm-1·a-1) | -0.32 | -0.24 | -0.11 | -0.08 | -0.03 | -0.01 | -0.79 |
表4 不同处理下林分土壤有机碳储量比较(平均值±标准偏差)
Table 4 Comparison of storage of soil organic carbon in the stands under different treatments (mean ± SD)
处理 Treatment | 土层 Soil layer | 合计 Total | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0-10 cm | 10-20 cm | 20-30 cm | 30-40 cm | 40-50 cm | 50-60 cm | ||
抚育 UR (t·hm-1) | 25.56 ± 3.72A | 15.07 ± 2.74a | 12.88 ± 1.34 | 13.99 ± 1.53 | 12.23 ± 2.18 | 11.86 ± 2.33 | 91.59a |
未抚育 UU (t·hm-1) | 40.95 ± 4.19B | 26.65 ± 4.01b | 18.09 ± 3.78 | 18.06 ± 5.65 | 13.62 ± 4.31 | 12.10 ± 4.20 | 129.47b |
降低幅度 Decrease (%) | 37.58 | 43.45 | 28.80 | 22.54 | 10.21 | 1.98 | 29.26 |
年变化量 Annual variation (t·hm-1·a-1) | -0.32 | -0.24 | -0.11 | -0.08 | -0.03 | -0.01 | -0.79 |
图1 樟人工林生态系统总碳储量。两种林分总碳储量(植被层和土壤层)差异不显著。
Fig. 1 Total carbon storage in Cinnamomum camphora plantation ecosystem. UR, understory removal; UU, understory unremoval. Difference of total carbon storage (vegetation and soil layers) between the two stands are not significant.
[1] | Berthrong ST, Jobbágy EG, Jackson RB (2009). A global meta analysis of soil exchangeable cations, pH, carbon, and nitrogen with afforestation. Ecological Applications, 19, 2228-2241. |
[2] | Bret-Harte MS, García EA, Sacré VM, Whorley JR, Wagner JL, Lippert SC, Chapin Ⅲ FS (2004). Plant and soil responses to neighbour removal and fertilization in Alaskan tussock tundra. Journal of Ecology, 92, 635-647. |
[3] | Busse MD, Cochran PH, Barrett JW (1996). Changes in Ponderosa pine site productivity following removal of understory vegetation. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 60, 1614-1621. |
[4] | Chen CH, Tian DL, Fang X, Tian M (2010). Correlativity between undergrowth vegetation species diversity/biomass and soil fertility of four types planted forest in suburbs. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 24(6), 213-217. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 陈彩虹, 田大伦, 方晰, 田蜜 (2010). 城郊4种人工林林下植被物种多样性、生物量与土壤养分相关性. 水土保持学报, 24(6), 213-217.] | |
[5] | Deng BZ (2007). Influences of the ground clearances with ecological view on Chinese fir growth and diversity of species. China Forestry Science and Technology, 21(5), 32-34. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 邓宝珍 (2007). 生态型林地清理对杉木生长及物种多样性的影响. 林业科技开发, 21(5), 32-34.] | |
[6] | Fang JY, Chen AP (2001). Dynamic forest biomass carbon pools in China and their significance. Acta Botanica Sinica, 43, 967-973. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 方精云, 陈安平 (2001). 中国森林植被碳库的动态变化及其意义. 植物学报, 43, 967-973.] | |
[7] | Feng ZW, Wang XK, Wu G (1999). Biomass and Productivity of Forest Ecosystem in China. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[ 冯宗炜, 王效科, 吴刚 (1999). 中国森林生态系统的生物量和生产力. 科学出版社, 北京.] | |
[8] | He YL (2000). Understory in Different Stands of Phyllostachys pubescens and Its Relationship with Soil Nutrients. Master degree dissertation, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 何艺玲 (2000). 不同类型毛竹林林下植被的发育状况及其与土壤养分关系的研究. 硕士学位论文, 中国林业科学研究院, 北京.] | |
[9] | He YL, Fu MY (2002). Research of understory vegetation in plantations. Forest Research, 15, 727-733. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 何艺玲, 傅懋毅 (2002). 人工林林下植被的研究现状. 林业科学研究, 15, 727-733.] | |
[10] | Institute of Soil Science. Chinese Academy of Sciences(1978). Soi Physico-Chemical Analysis. Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, Shanghai. (in Chinese) |
[ 中国科学院土壤研究所 (1978). 土壤理化分析. 上海科学技术出版社, 上海.] | |
[11] | IPCC (2000). Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry. Special Report, Inter-Governmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. |
[12] | Jandl R, Lindner M, Vesterdal L, Bauwens B, Baritz R, Hagedorn F, Johnson DW, Minkkinen K, Byrne KA (2007). How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration? Geoderma, 137, 253-268. |
[13] | Johnson DW (1992). Effects of forest management on soil carbon storage. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 64, 83-120. |
[14] | Johnson DW (1995). Soil properties beneath ceanothus and pine stands in the eastern Sierra Nevada. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 59, 918-924. |
[15] | Kim C, Son Y, Lee WK, Jaeyeob J, Noh NJ (2009). Influences of forest tending works on carbon distribution and cycling in a Pinus densiflora S. et Z. stand in Korea. Forest Ecology and Management, 257, 1420-1426. |
[16] | Kobayashi T, Miki N, Kato K, Kubo T, Nishimura S, Uemura S, Ono K, Sumida A, Ohta T, Hara T (2006). Understory removal increases carbon gain and transpiration in the overstory of birch (Betula ermanii) stands in northern Hokkaido, Japan: trends in leaf, shoot and canopy. Amsterdam, 19-22. |
[17] | Kume A, Satomura T, Tsuboi N, Chiwa M, Hanba YT, Nakane K, Horikoshi T, Sakugawa H (2003). Effects of understory vegetation on the ecophysiological characteristics of an overstory pine, Pinus densiflora. Forest Ecology and Management, 176, 195-203. |
[18] | Li HF, Fu SL, Zhao HT, Xia HP (2012). Effects of understory removal and N-fixing species seeding on soil N2O fluxes in four forest plantations in southern China. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 56, 541-551. |
[19] | Li YL, Wang SL, Yan SK (2011). Short-term effects of understory vegetation removal on nutrient cycling in litter layer of Chinese fir plantation. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 22, 2560-2566. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 李媛良, 汪思龙, 颜绍馗 (2011). 杉木人工林剔除林下植被对凋落层养分循环的短期影响. 应用生态学报, 22, 2560-2566.] | |
[20] | Liu RJ, Wu YC, Zhang Y, Li ZC, Ma SJ, Wang B, Geri LT (2012). Comparison of soil labile organic carbon in Chinese fir plantations and natural secondary forests in north subtropical areas of China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 36, 431-437. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 刘荣杰, 吴亚丛, 张英, 李正才, 马少杰, 王斌, 格日乐图 (2012). 中国北亚热带天然次生林与杉木人工林土壤活性有机碳库的比较. 植物生态学报, 36, 431-437.] | |
[21] | Liu SR, Wang H, Luan JW (2011). A review of research progress and future prospective of forest soil carbon stock and soil carbon process in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31, 5437-5448. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 刘世荣, 王晖, 栾军伟 (2011). 中国森林土壤碳储量与土壤碳过程研究进展. 生态学报, 31, 5437-5448.] | |
[22] | Liu ZF, Wu JP, Zhou LX, Lin YB, Fu SL (2012). Effect of understory fern (Dicranopteris dichotoma) removal on substrate utilization patterns of culturable soil bacterial communities in subtropical Eucalyptus plantations. Pedobiologia-International Journal of Soil Biology, 55, 7-13. |
[23] | Ma SJ, Li ZC, Zhou BZ, Geri LT, Kong WJ, An YF (2010). Effects of community succession on soil organic carbon in north subtropical areas. Forest Research, 23, 845-849. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 马少杰, 李正才, 周本智, 格日乐图, 孔维健, 安艳飞 (2010). 北亚热带天然次生林群落演替对土壤有机碳的影响. 林业科学研究, 23, 845-849.] | |
[24] | Matsushima M, Chang SX (2006). Vector analysis of understory competition, N fertilization, and litter layer removal effects on white spruce growth and nutrition in a 13-year-old plantation. Forest Ecology and Management, 236, 332-341. |
[25] | Matsushima M, Chang SX (2007). Effects of understory removal, N fertilization, and litter layer removal on soil N cycling in a 13-year-old white spruce plantation infested with Canada bluejoint grass. Plant Soil, 292, 243-258. |
[26] | Mo JM, Brown S, Peng SL, Kong GH, Zhang DQ, Zhang YC (2002). Role of understory plants on nutrient cycling of a restoring degraded pine forests in a MAB reserve of subtropical China. Acta Ecology Sinica, 22, 1047-1413. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 莫江明, Brown S, 彭少麟, 孔国辉, 张德强, 张佑昌 (2002). 林下层植物在退化马尾松林恢复初期养分循环中的作用. 生态学报, 22, 1047-1413.] | |
[27] | Monleon VJ, Newton M, Hooper C, Tappeiner II JC (1999). Ten-year growth response of young Douglas-fir to variable density varnishleaf ceanothus and herb competition. Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 14, 208-213. |
[28] | Sartori F, Lal R, Ebinger MH, Eaton JA (2007). Changes in soil carbon and nutrient pools along a chronosequence of poplar plantations in the Columbia Plateau, Oregon, USA. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 122, 325-339. |
[29] | Sun WJ (2000). Test of understory vegetation unremoval in Larix olgensis forest tending. Journal of Liaoning Forestry Science & Technology, ( 2), 13-28. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 孙万吉 (2000). 落叶松生长抚育保留林下植被的试验. 辽宁林业科技, ( 2), 13-28.] | |
[30] | Sun WX, Shi XZ, Yu DS, Wang K, Wang HJ (2004). Estimation of soil organic carbon density and storage of northeast China. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 41, 298-300. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 孙维侠, 史学正, 于东升, 王库, 王洪杰 (2004). 我国东北地区土壤有机碳密度和储量的估算研究. 土壤学报, 41, 298-300.] | |
[31] | Tian DL, Peng YY, Yan WD, Fang X, Kang WX, Wang FJ, Chen XY (2010). Effects of thinning and litter fall removal on fine root production and soil organic carbon content in masson pine plantations. Pedosphere, 20, 486-493. |
[32] | Tao YH, Feng JZ, Ma LY, Cao SG, Long WG, Guo Q (2012). Study on carbon storage of Eucalyptus plantations in short period in Liuzhou, Guangxi Province. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 28(7), 80-84. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 陶玉华, 冯金朝, 马麟英, 曹书阁, 隆卫革, 郭耆 (2012). 柳州市短周期桉树人工林生态系统碳储量研究. 中国农学通报, 28(7), 80-84.] | |
[33] | Wang XL, Zhao J, Wu JP, Chen H, Lin YB, Zhou LX, Fu SL (2011). Impacts of understory species removal and/or addition on soil respiration in a mixed forest plantation with native species in southern China. Forest Ecology and Management, 261, 1053-1060. |
[34] | Wang WJ, Liu W, Sun W, Zu YG, Cui S (2008). Influences of forest floor cleaning on the soil respiration and soil physical property of a larch plantation. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 28, 4750-4756. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 王文杰, 刘玮, 孙伟, 祖元刚, 崔崧 (2008). 林床清理对落叶松(Larix gmelinii)人工林土壤呼吸和物理性质的影响. 生态学报, 28, 4750-4756.] | |
[35] | Wu JP, Liu ZF, Wang XL, Sun YX, Zhou LX, Lin YB, Fu SL (2011). Effects of understory removal and tree girdling on soil microbial community composition and litter decomposition in two Eucalyptus plantations in South China. Functional Ecology, 25, 921-931. |
[36] | Xiong YM, Xia HP, Li ZA, Cai XA, Fu SL (2008). Impacts of litter and understory removal on soil properties in a subtropical Acacia mangium plantation in China. Plant Soil, 304, 179-188. |
[37] | Yang CD, Jiao RZ, Tu XN, Xiong YQ, Chen ZL (1995). Effect of understory vegetation on soil properties of 5-15 cm layer in Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation. Forest Research, 8, 514-519. (in Chinese) |
[ 杨承栋, 焦如珍, 屠星男, 熊有强, 陈仲庐 (1995). 杉木林下植被对5-15 cm土壤性质的改良. 林业科学研究, 8, 514-519.] | |
[38] | Yang K, Guan DS (2006). Biomass distribution and its functioning of forest understory vegetation. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 25, 1252-1256. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 杨昆, 管东生 (2006). 林下植被的生物量分布特征及其作用. 生态学杂志, 25, 1252-1256.] | |
[39] | Yao YJ, Kang WX, Tian DL (2003). Study of the biomass and productivity of Cinnamomum camphora plantation. Journal of Central South Forestry University, 23, 1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 姚迎九, 康文星, 田大伦 (2003). 18年生樟树人工林生物量的结构与分布. 中南林学院学报, 23, 1-5.] | |
[40] | Yildiz O, Cromack Jr K, Radosevich SR, Martinez-Ghersa MA, Baham JE (2011). Comparison of 5th- and 14th-year Douglas-fir and understory vegetation responses to selective vegetation removal. Forest Ecology and Management, 262, 586-597. |
[41] | Yu YC (1998). Effects of undergrowth on microelements states of soils under Chinese fir stand. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University, 22(2), 75-78. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 俞元春 (1998). 林下植被对杉林土壤微量元素状况的影响. 南京林业大学学报, 22(2), 75-78.] | |
[42] | Zhang DH, Ye ZF, Fan BY, Wei TL (2011). Influence of thinning on soil fertility in artificial forests. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 12, 672-676. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 张鼎华, 叶章发, 范必有, 危廷林 (2001). 抚育间伐对人工林土壤肥力的影响. 应用生态学报, 12, 672-676.] | |
[43] | Zhao J, Wang XL, Shao YH, Xu GL, Fu SL (2011). Effects of vegetation removal on soil properties and decomposer organisms. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 43, 954-960. |
[1] | 张智洋 赵颖慧 甄贞. 1986-2022年松花江流域陆地生态系统碳储量动态监测[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(预发表): 0-0. |
[2] | 张计深, 史新杰, 刘宇诺, 吴阳, 彭守璋. 气候变化下中国潜在自然植被生态系统碳储量动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 428-444. |
[3] | 徐干君, 吴胜义, 李伟, 赵欣胜, 聂磊超, 唐希颖, 翟夏杰. 陕西黄河湿地自然保护区碳储量估算[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(4): 469-478. |
[4] | 张亮, 王志磊, 薛婷婷, 郝笑云, 杨晨露, 高飞飞, 王莹, 韩星, 李华, 王华. 葡萄园生态系统碳源/汇及碳减排策略研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(3): 179-191. |
[5] | 魏红, 满秀玲. 中国寒温带不同林龄白桦林碳储量及分配特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(10): 843-852. |
[6] | 陈科宇, 字洪标, 阿的鲁骥, 胡雷, 王根绪, 王长庭. 青海省森林乔木层碳储量现状及固碳潜力[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(8): 831-840. |
[7] | 周序力, 蔡琼, 熊心雨, 方文静, 朱剑霄, 朱江玲, 方精云, 吉成均. 贵州月亮山不同演替阶段亮叶水青冈林碳储量及其分配格局[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(7): 703-712. |
[8] | 杨昊天, 王增如, 贾荣亮. 腾格里沙漠东南缘荒漠草地不同群落类型土壤有机碳分布及储量特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(3): 288-296. |
[9] | 李茜, 王芳, 曹扬, 彭守璋, 陈云明. 陕西省森林土壤固碳特征及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(9): 953-963. |
[10] | 邢娟, 郑成洋, 冯婵莹, 曾发旭. 河北塞罕坝樟子松人工林生长及碳储量的变化[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(8): 840-849. |
[11] | 汲玉河, 郭柯, 倪健, 徐小牛, 王志高, 王树东. 安徽省森林碳储量现状及固碳潜力[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(4): 395-404. |
[12] | 李银, 陈国科, 林敦梅, 陈彬, 高雷明, 简兴, 杨波, 徐武兵, 苏宏新, 赖江山, 王希华, 杨海波, 马克平. 浙江省森林生态系统碳储量及其分布特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(4): 354-363. |
[13] | 黄晓琼, 辛存林, 胡中民, 李钢铁, 张铜会, 赵玮, 杨浩, 张雷明, 郭群, 岳永杰, 高润宏, 乌志颜, 闫志刚, 刘新平, 李玉强, 李胜功. 内蒙古森林生态系统碳储量及其空间分布[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(4): 327-340. |
[14] | 关晋宏, 杜盛, 程积民, 吴春荣, 李国庆, 邓磊, 张建国, 何秋月, 时伟宇. 甘肃省森林碳储量现状与固碳速率[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(4): 304-317. |
[15] | 王建, 王根绪, 王长庭, 冉飞, 常瑞英. 青藏高原高寒区阔叶林植被固碳现状、速率和潜力[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(4): 374-384. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19