刈割与施肥干扰下高寒草甸植物功能性状的构建模式

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00086

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对目前关于植物群落功能性状构建模式及其驱动因素存在的争议, 研究了33个物种10个功能性状的构建模式。研究结果显示: (1)在刈割-施肥复合梯度上, 这些功能性状主要表现为随机构建模式, 发生随机性和确定性构建的样方比例分别为82.7%和17.3%; (2)在10个功能性状中, 生长型、生活周期、单株地上干质量、叶面积和叶干质量5个功能性状为随机构建模式, 不受试验处理和群落特征(地上净初级生产力、刈割生物量损失、群落高度)变化的影响。植物倾斜度、繁殖方式、固氮性、株高和比叶面积5个功能性状的构建模式与试验处理或群落特征变化有关, 表现出趋同或趋异构建响应。其中, 植物倾斜度和比叶面积的构建模式仅受群落特征影响, 而固氮性、繁殖方式和株高3个性状的构建模式同时还受刈割或施肥处理的影响, 其构建模式因功能性状而异; (3)群落的生物量损失和地上净初级生产力是解释植物功能性状构建模式变化较理想的群落特征; (4)刈割和施肥处理对株高的构建模式具有相反效应, 而刈割和施肥的交互作用对其无显著影响。上述结果说明该研究群落植物功能性状的构建存在不同模式, 以随机构建模式为主, 确定性构建模式居次要地位。确定性构建模式与试验处理和群落特征变化有关, 而且是性状依赖的。相反选择力对趋同和趋异构建模式的平衡效应能引起功能性状发生随机构建。

关键词: 群落构建, 生态筛, 功能多样性, 性状趋同, 性状趋异

Abstract:

Aims Fully understanding the assembly patterns of plant functional traits in plant communities is a big challenge in the study of community ecology. The assembly patterns in alpline meadow and driving factors are still poorly known. In this study, experiments with different mowing intensities and various treatments of fertilization were conducted in alpline meadow for the purpose of improving the understanding of the assembly patterns of plant functional traits in plant community.
Methods Data on functional diversity of 10 traits for 33 species from 108 quadrats (with varying combinations of mowing and fertilization) were analyzed by randomizations tests, ANCOVA and regression analysis, respectively, for the trait convergence/divergence.
Important findings None of the traits studied showed consistently significant convergence or divergence pattern in integral gradients of fertilization and mowing treatments, while the ratios of quadrats assembled under deterministic and stochastic processes were 82.7% and 17.3%, respectively. Among the functional traits tested, growth form, life cycle, aboveground dry mass per plant, leaf area and leaf dry mass showed a stochastic pattern of assembly, but they were not affected by variations in mowing treatments and community characteristics (i.e. aboveground net primary productivity, biomass loss and vegetation height). Convergence or divergence patterns were shown in traits such as plant inclination, reproductive modes, nitrogen fixation, plant height and specific leaf area, which were affected by variations in mowing treatments and community characteristics. Among them, assembly patterns of plant inclination and specific leaf area were only affected by community characteristics, while nitrogen fixation, reproductive modes and plant height were affected by both mowing treatments and community characteristics. Moreover, the patterns of assembly varied by traits. Aboveground net primary productivity and biomass loss well explained variations in the assembly pattern of plant functional traits. Mowing and fertilization showed the reversed effects on the assembly pattern of plant height, while no significant interaction was found between mowing and fertilization. The results suggested that there were different assembly patterns of functional traits in the community: stochastic pattern of assembly was the primary, and the deterministic pattern was secondary. Deterministic pattern was trait-dependent and correlated with variations in mowing treatments and community characteristics. The balancing effect of opposite selection forces, on the other hand, could lead to stochastic assembly patterns in plant functional traits.

Key words: community assembly, ecological filters, functional diversity, trait convergence, trait divergence

吕美强,朱志红,李英年,姚天华,潘石玉,孔彬彬. 刈割与施肥干扰下高寒草甸植物功能性状的构建模式. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(9): 916-928. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00086

LÜ Mei-Qiang,ZHU Zhi-Hong,LI Ying-Nian,YAO Tian-Hua,PAN Shi-Yu,KONG Bin-Bin. Assembly patterns of plant functional traits in alpine meadow under disturbances by mowing and fertilization. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2014, 38(9): 916-928. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00086

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00086

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2014/V38/I9/916

图/表 5

参考文献 59

[1]	Aiba M, Katabuchi M, Takafumi H, Matsuzaki SIS, Sasaki T, Hiura T (2013). Robustness of trait distribution metrics for community assembly studies under the uncertainties of assembly processes. Ecology, 94, 2873-2885. DOI URL
[2]	Beisner BE, Haydon DT, Cuddington K (2003). Alternative stable states in ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1, 376-382.
[3]	Bersier LF, Sugihara G (1997). Species abundance patterns: the problem of testing stochastic models. Journal of Animal Ecology, 66, 769-774.
[4]	Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002). Model Selection and Multi-model Inference: a Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. 2nd edn. Springer, New York.
[5]	Cingolani AM, Cabido M, Gurvich DE, Renison D, Díaz S (2007). Filtering processes in the assembly of plant communities: Are species presence and abundance driven by the same traits? Journal of Vegetation Science, 18, 911-920.
[6]	Cleland EE, Clark CM, Collins SL, Fargione JE, Gough L, Gross KL, Pennings SC, Suding KN (2011). Patterns of trait convergence and divergence among native and exotic species in herbaceous plant communities are not modified by nitrogen enrichment. Journal of Ecology, 99, 1327-1338.
[7]	Cornelissen JHC, Lavorel S, Garnier E, Díaz S, Buchmann N, Gurvich DE, Reich PB, Ter Steege H, Morgan HD, van der Heijden MGA, Pansas JG, Poorter H (2003). A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measure- ment of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany, 51, 335-380.
[8]	Cornwell WK, Ackerly DD (2009). Community assembly and shifts in plant trait distributions across an environmental gradient in coastal California. Ecological Monographs, 79, 109-126.
[9]	de Bello F, Lepš J, Sebastià MT (2006). Variations in species and functional plant diversity along climatic and grazing gradients. Ecography, 29, 801-810.
[10]	de Bello F, Thuiller W, Lepš J, Choler P, Clément JC, Macek P, Sebastià MT, Lavorel S (2009). Partitioning of functional diversity reveals the scale and extent of trait convergence and divergence. Journal of Vegetation Science, 20, 475-486.
[11]	Diamond JM (1975). Assembly of species communities. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM eds. Ecology and Evolution of Communities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, USA. 342-444.
[12]	Díaz S, Cabido M (2001). Vive la difference: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16, 646-655.
[13]	Du XG, Zhou SR (2008). Testing the neutral theory of plant communities in subalpine meadow. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version), 32, 347-354. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 杜晓光, 周淑荣 (2008). 亚高寒草甸植物群落的中性理论验证. 植物生态学报, 32, 347-354.]
[14]	Fukami T, Bezemer TM, Mortimer SR, van der Putten WH (2005). Species divergence and trait convergence in experimental plant community assembly. Ecology Letters, 8, 1283-1290.
[15]	Garnier E, Cortez J, Billès G, Navas ML, Roumet C, Debussche M, Laurent G, Blanchard A, Aubry D, Bellmann A, Neill C, Toussaint JP (2004). Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession. Ecology, 85, 2630-2637.
[16]	Gotelli NJ, McCabe DJ (2002). Species co-occurrence: a meta-analysis of J. M. diamond’s assembly rules model. Ecology, 83, 2091-2096.
[17]	Götzenberger L, de Bello F, Bråthen KA, Davison J, Dubuis A, Guisan A, Lepš J, Lindberg R, Moora M, Pärtel M, Pellissier L, Pottier J, Vittoz P, Zobel K, Zobel M (2012). Ecological assembly rules in plant communities— approaches, patterns and prospects. Biological Reviews, 87, 111-127. URL PMID
[18]	Grime JP (2006). Trait convergence and trait divergence in herbaceous plant communities: mechanisms and conseq- uences. Journal of Vegetation Science, 17, 255-260.
[19]	Grman E, Suding KN (2010). Within-year soil legacies contribute to strong priority effects of exotics on native California grassland communities. Restoration Ecology, 18, 664-670.
[20]	Helsen K, Hermy M, Honnay O (2012). Trait but not species convergence during plant community assembly in restored semi-natural grasslands. Oikos, 121, 2121-2130.
[21]	Hillebrand H, Bennett DM, Cadotte MW (2008). Consequences of dominance: a review of evenness effects on local and regional ecosystem processes. Ecology, 89, 1510-1520. URL PMID
[22]	Hillebrand H, Matthiessen B (2009). Biodiversity in a complex world: consolidation and progress in functional biodiversity research. Ecology Letters, 12, 1405-1419. URL PMID
[23]	Hubbell SP (2001). The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography (MPB-32) (Vol. 32). Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.
[24]	Inouye RS, Tilman D (1995). Convergence and divergence of old-field vegetation after 11 yr of nitrogen addition. Ecology, 76, 1872-1887.
[25]	Kraft NJB, Ackerly DD (2010). Functional trait and phylogenetic tests of community assembly across spatial scales in an Amazonian forest. Ecological Monographs, 80, 401-422.
[26]	Kraft NJB, Crutsinger GM, Forrestel EJ, Emery NC (2014). Functional trait differences and the outcome of community assembly: an experimental test with vernal pool annual plants. Oikos, doi: 10.1111/oik.01311. DOI URL PMID
[27]	Kühner A, Kleyer M (2008). A parsimonious combination of functional traits predicting plant response to disturbance and soil fertility. Journal of Vegetation Science, 19, 681-692.
[28]	Lepš J, de Bello F, Lavorel S, Berman S (2006). Quantifying and interpreting functional diversity of natural comm.- unities: practical considerations matter. Preslia, 78, 481-501.
[29]	Li YN, Wang QX, Gu S, Fu YL, Du MY, Zhao L, Zhao XQ, Yu GR (2004). Integrated monitoring of alpine vegetation types and its primary production. Acta Geographica Sinica, 59, 40-48. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 李英年, 王勤学, 古松, 伏玉玲, 杜明远, 赵亮, 赵新全, 于贵瑞 (2004). 高寒植被类型及其植物生产力的监测. 地理学报, 59, 40-48.]
[30]	MacArthur R, Levins R (1967). The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. The American Naturalist, 101, 377-385.
[31]	Mason NWH, MacGillivray K, Steel JB, Wilson JB (2003). An index of functional diversity. Journal of Vegetation Science, 14, 571-578.
[32]	McGill BJ, Enquist BJ, Weiher E, Westoby M (2006). Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21, 178-185. DOI URL PMID
[33]	Niu KC, Liu YN, Shen ZH, He FL, Fang JY (2009). Community assembly: the relative importance of neutral theory and niche theory. Biodiversity Science, 17, 579-593. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 牛克昌, 刘怿宁, 沈泽昊, 何芳良, 方精云 (2009). 群落构建的中性理论和生态位理论. 生物多样性, 17, 579-593.]
[34]	Pakeman RJ (2004). Consistency of plant species and trait responses to grazing along a productivity gradient: a multi-site analysis. Journal of Ecology, 92, 893-905.
[35]	Pakeman RJ, Lennon JJ, Brooker RW (2011). Trait assembly in plant assemblages and its modulation by productivity and disturbance. Oecologia, 167, 209-218. URL PMID
[36]	Perry LG, Neuhauser C, Galatowitsch SM (2003). Founder control and coexistence in a simple model of asymmetric competition for light. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 222, 425-436. DOI URL PMID
[37]	Pillar VD, Duarte LDS, Sosinski EE, Joner F (2009). Discri- minating trait-convergence and trait-divergence assembly patterns in ecological community gradients. Journal of Vegetation Science, 20, 334-348.
[38]	Qiao AH, Han JG, Gong AQ, Li W, Wang YW, Qing GJ, Guo SD, Wu JM, Zhao DZ (2006). Effect of nitrogen fertilizer application on Elymus nutans seed quality and yield in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 14, 48-51, 56. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 乔安海, 韩建国, 巩爱岐, 李伟, 王赟文, 秦歌菊, 郭树栋, 吴精明, 赵殿智 (2006). 氮肥对垂穗披碱草种子产量和质量的影响. 草地学报, 14, 48-51, 56.]
[39]	Sasaki T, Okubo S, Okayasu T, Jamsran U, Ohkuro T, Takeuchi K (2009). Two-phase functional redundancy in plant communities along a grazing gradient in Mongolian rangelands. Ecology, 90, 2598-2608. DOI URL PMID
[40]	Schamp BS, Aarssen LW (2009). The assembly of forest communities according to maximum species height along resource and disturbance gradients. Oikos, 118, 564-572.
[41]	Sonnier G, Shipley B, Navas ML (2010). Quantifying relationships between traits and explicitly measured gradients of stress and disturbance in early successional plant communities. Journal of Vegetation Science, 21, 1014-1024.
[42]	Stubbs WJ, Wilson JB (2004). Evidence for limiting similarity in a sand dune community. Journal of Ecology, 92, 557-567.
[43]	Swenson NG, Enquist BJ (2007). Ecological and evolutionary determinants of a key plant functional trait: wood density and its community-wide variation across latitude and elevation. American Journal of Botany, 94, 451-459. URL PMID
[44]	Swenson NG, Enquist BJ (2009). Opposing assembly mechanisms in a Neotropical dry forest: implications for phylogenetic and functional community ecology. Ecology, 90, 2161-2170. DOI URL PMID
[45]	Thompson K, Petchey OL, Askew AP, Dunnett NP, Beckerman AP, Willis AJ (2010). Little evidence for limiting similarity in a long-term study of a roadside plant community. Journal of Ecology, 98, 480-487.
[46]	Walker B, Kinzig A, Langridge J (1999). Plant attribute diversity, resilience, and ecosystem function: the nature and significance of dominant and minor species. Ecosystems, 2, 95-113.
[47]	Wang HD, Zhang LL, Zhu ZH (2013). Effects of clipping and fertilizing on the relationships between species diversity and ecosystem functioning and mechanisms of community stability in alpine meadow. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 37, 279-295. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 王海东, 张璐璐, 朱志红 (2013). 刈割、施肥对高寒草甸物种多样性与生态系统功能关系的影响及群落稳定性机制. 植物生态学报, 37, 279-295.]
[48]	Weiher E, Keddy PA (1995). Assembly rules, null models, and trait dispersion: new questions from old patterns. Oikos, 74, 159-164.
[49]	Weiher E, Clarke GDP, Keddy PA (1998). Community ass- embly rules, morphological dispersion, and the coexis- tence of plant species. Oikos, 81, 309-322.
[50]	Wilson JB (2007). Trait-divergence assembly rules have been demonstrated: limiting similarity lives! a reply to grime. Journal of Vegetation Science, 18, 451-452.
[51]	Yamaoka K, Nakagawa T, Uno T (1978). Application of Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) in the evaluation of linear pharmacokinetic equations. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 6, 165-175. DOI URL PMID
[52]	Yang FT (1982). Natural geography survey of Haibei Alpine Meadow Ecosystem Research Station in Qinghai,. In: Xia WP ed. Alpine Meadow Ecosystem. Facs.1. Gansu People’s Publishing House, Lanzhou. 1-7. (in Chinese)
	[ 杨福囤 (1982). 青海高寒草甸生态系统定位站的自然地理概况. 见: 夏武平主编. 高寒草甸生态系统. 第1集. 甘肃人民出版社, 兰州. 1-7.]
[53]	Yang ZL, van Ruijven J, Du GZ (2011). The effects of long- term fertilization on the temporal stability of alpine meadow communities. Plant and Soil, 345, 315-324.
[54]	Young TP, Chase JM, Huddleston RT (2001). Community succession and assembly comparing, contrasting and com- bining paradigms in the context of ecological restoration. Ecological Restoration, 19, 5-18.
[55]	Zhao XQ (2009). Global Change and Ecological System in Alpine Meadow. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[ 赵新全 (2009). 高寒草甸生态系统与全球变化. 科学出版社, 北京.]
[56]	Zhou XS, Zhu ZH, Li YN, Yuan FR, Fan RJ (2011). Community compensatory mechanism under clipping, fertilizing and watering treatment in alpine meadow. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Science), 47(3), 50-57. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 周晓松, 朱志红, 李英年, 袁芙蓉, 樊瑞俭 (2011). 刈割、施肥和浇水处理下高寒矮嵩草草甸补偿机制. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 47(3), 50-57.]
[57]	Zhu ZH, Wang G, Zhao SL (1994). Aboveground biomass dynamics of clonal ramet population of Kobresia humilis in alpine meadow under different stocking intensities. Grassland of China, (3), 10-14. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 朱志红, 王刚, 赵松岭 (1994). 不同放牧强度下高寒草甸矮嵩草(Kobresia humilis)无性系分株种群的地上生物量动态. 中国草地, (3), 10-14.]
[58]	Zhu ZH, Wang G (1996). An approach to analyzing nature of community structure: with examples of alpine meadow and alpine brushland. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 20, 184-192. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 朱志红, 王刚 (1996). 群落结构特性的分析方法探讨——以高寒草甸和高寒灌丛为例. 植物生态学报, 20, 184-192.]
[59]	Zhu ZH, Wang XA, Li YN, Wang G, Guo H (2012). Predicting plant traits and functional types response to grazing in an alpine shrub meadow on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Science China Earth Sciences, 55, 837-851. DOI URL

性状 Trait		FD_var	Mean p	N_M	N_L	Rq (%)
植株性状 Plant trait	生长型 Growth form	0.250	0.635	2	2	96.3
	植株倾斜度 Plant inclination	0.262	0.388	17	1	84.3
	繁殖方式 Reproductive mode	0.105	0.396	46	0	57.4
	生活周期 Life cycle	0.006	0.321	1	16	84.2
	固氮性 Nitrogen fixation	0.046	0.365	1	18	82.4
	株高 Plant height (cm)	0.083	0.133	14	10	77.8
	单株地上干质量 Aboveground dry mass per plant (mg)	0.541	0.362	18	2	81.5
叶性状 Leaf trait	叶面积 Leaf area (cm²)	0.375	0.589	14	1	86.1
	比叶面积 Specific leaf area (m²·kg^-1)	0.613	0.461	14	0	87.0
	叶干质量 Leaf dry mass (mg)	0.537	0.368	10	1	89.8

性状 Trait		FD_var	Mean p	N_M	N_L	Rq (%)
植株性状 Plant trait	生长型 Growth form	0.250	0.635	2	2	96.3
	植株倾斜度 Plant inclination	0.262	0.388	17	1	84.3
	繁殖方式 Reproductive mode	0.105	0.396	46	0	57.4
	生活周期 Life cycle	0.006	0.321	1	16	84.2
	固氮性 Nitrogen fixation	0.046	0.365	1	18	82.4
	株高 Plant height (cm)	0.083	0.133	14	10	77.8
	单株地上干质量 Aboveground dry mass per plant (mg)	0.541	0.362	18	2	81.5
叶性状 Leaf trait	叶面积 Leaf area (cm²)	0.375	0.589	14	1	86.1
	比叶面积 Specific leaf area (m²·kg^-1)	0.613	0.461	14	0	87.0
	叶干质量 Leaf dry mass (mg)	0.537	0.368	10	1	89.8

性状 Trait	协变量 Covariates df = (1, 4)	变异来源 Source of variance
		主区 Whole plot	副区 Subplot
		C df = (2, 4)		F df = (1, 2)	C × F df = (2, 4)
固氮性 Nitrogen fixation	D	1.347	10.269^*		6.801
繁殖方式 Reproductive mode	ANPP	7.688^*	0.001		1.424
固氮性 Nitrogen fixation	ANPP	12.237^*	1.910		5.557
株高 Plant height (cm)	ANPP	0.879^*	9.382^*		0.474

性状 Trait	协变量 Covariates df = (1, 4)	变异来源 Source of variance
		主区 Whole plot	副区 Subplot
		C df = (2, 4)		F df = (1, 2)	C × F df = (2, 4)
固氮性 Nitrogen fixation	D	1.347	10.269^*		6.801
繁殖方式 Reproductive mode	ANPP	7.688^*	0.001		1.424
固氮性 Nitrogen fixation	ANPP	12.237^*	1.910		5.557
株高 Plant height (cm)	ANPP	0.879^*	9.382^*		0.474

性状 Trait	协变量 Covariate	刈割处理 Mowing treatment			施肥处理 Fertilization treatment
性状 Trait	协变量 Covariate	不刈割 Un-mowed	中度刈割 Moderate mowing	重度刈割 Heavy mowing	不施肥 Unfertilized	施肥 Fertilized
固氮性 Nitrogen fixation	D	0.038 ± 0.017^a	0.065 ± 0.007^a	0.065 ± 0.005^a	0.073 ± 0.006^b	0.039 ± 0.011^a
繁殖方式 Reproductive modes	ANPP	0.056 ± 0.020^a	0.099 ± 0.016^b	0.116 ± 0.013^b	0.090 ± 0.026^a	0.090 ± 0.018^a
固氮性 Nitrogen fixation	ANPP	0.003 ± 0.013^a	0.043 ± 0.010^b	0.046 ± 0.009^b	0.046 ± 0.017^a	0.015 ± 0.012^a
株高 Plant height (cm)	ANPP	0.065 ± 0.022^b	0.017 ± 0.017^a	0.048 ± 0.014^ab	-0.012 ± 0.028^a	0.098 ± 0.019^b