植物生态学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 314-322.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0042
收稿日期:
2005-01-13
接受日期:
2005-09-13
出版日期:
2006-01-13
发布日期:
2006-03-30
作者简介:
E-mail:
基金资助:
SHI Gang_Rong(), TANG Ying, ZHANG Zheng
Received:
2005-01-13
Accepted:
2005-09-13
Online:
2006-01-13
Published:
2006-03-30
摘要:
对淮北相山混交林5个优势种叶片的生态解剖学观察表明,其叶片结构具有一定的旱生特征:表皮具发达的表皮毛或角质层,全栅等面叶或具发达的栅栏组织,维管组织发达。牡荆(Vitex negundo var. cannabifolia)和酸枣(Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa)作为两个广布优势树种,叶片结构表现出很大的可塑性:1)同一群落环境(混交林)中,叶片结构随着季节的变化表现出发育可塑性(5月初的叶片比9月中旬更具有阳生叶的特点);2)不同恢复演替阶段的群落中,叶片结构随着群落环境的变化表现出环境可塑性,其变化趋势为:灌草丛(旱生/阳生)-灌丛(旱生/阳生)-落叶疏林(中生/阳生)-人工侧柏(Platycladus orientalis)林(中生/阴生)。这种可塑性既是植物适应其异质生境的一种重要机制,同时又是不同群落环境的反映。非参数相关分析表明,牡荆和酸枣的叶片结构受多个生态因子综合影响,其中水分和风速是影响叶片结构的主导因子。叶片的上表皮角质层厚度、气孔器密度、栅栏组织厚度、叶片厚度、木质部厚度、韧皮部厚度、维管束厚度等性状均与土壤含水量和空气相对湿度呈显著负相关,与风速呈显著正相关。
史刚荣, 汤盈, 张铮. 淮北相山恢复演替群落优势树种叶片的生态解剖. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(2): 314-322. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0042
SHI Gang_Rong, TANG Ying, ZHANG Zheng. LEAF ANATOMY OF DOMINANT PLANT SPECIES IN THE SUCCESSIONAL COMMUNITIES OF XIANGSHAN MOUTNAIN, HUAIBEI, CHINA. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2006, 30(2): 314-322. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0042
群落 Communities | 树种 Species | PH (m) | SH (m) | CH (m) | Alt (m) | Slo (°) | CD (%) | MLI (lx) | SWC (%) | RH (%) | MAT (℃) | DDT (℃) | WV (m·s-1) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
人工侧柏林 Platycladus orientalis forest | ①2) ②2) | 1.2 0.8 | 0.8 0.6 | 9.3 | 145 | 26 | 96 | 9700 | 24.2 | 93.0 | 19.4 | 6.5 | 0.25 | ||||||||||||||
侧柏、构树混交林 Platycladus orientalis + Broussonetia papyrifera mixed forest | ①1)2) ②1)2) ③1) ④1) ⑤1) | 1.6 1.3 3.2 2.8 0.8 | 1.2 1.1 2.4 2.0 0.6 | 8.7 | 170 | 33 | 47 | 68 700 | 19.4 | 89.1 | 21.8 | 8.7 | 0.42 | ||||||||||||||
酸枣、牡荆灌丛 Vitex negundo var. cannabifolia +Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa shrub | ①2) ②2) | 2.2 1.7 | 1.6 1.2 | 2.3 | 340 | 12 | 0 | 83 100 | 16.1 | 84.4 | 23.5 | 12.0 | 1.65 | ||||||||||||||
牡荆、金色狗尾草灌草丛 Vitex negundo var. cannabifolia +Setaria glauca shrub_herb | ①2) ②2) | 1.8 1.4 | 1.5 1.2 | 1.8 | 235 | 52 | 0 | 82 500 | 14.7 | 78.2 | 22.7 | 11.2 | 1.84 |
表1 相山不同群落中的取样情况及其生态条件
Table 1 Leaf sampled and ecological conditions in different communities in Xiangshan
群落 Communities | 树种 Species | PH (m) | SH (m) | CH (m) | Alt (m) | Slo (°) | CD (%) | MLI (lx) | SWC (%) | RH (%) | MAT (℃) | DDT (℃) | WV (m·s-1) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
人工侧柏林 Platycladus orientalis forest | ①2) ②2) | 1.2 0.8 | 0.8 0.6 | 9.3 | 145 | 26 | 96 | 9700 | 24.2 | 93.0 | 19.4 | 6.5 | 0.25 | ||||||||||||||
侧柏、构树混交林 Platycladus orientalis + Broussonetia papyrifera mixed forest | ①1)2) ②1)2) ③1) ④1) ⑤1) | 1.6 1.3 3.2 2.8 0.8 | 1.2 1.1 2.4 2.0 0.6 | 8.7 | 170 | 33 | 47 | 68 700 | 19.4 | 89.1 | 21.8 | 8.7 | 0.42 | ||||||||||||||
酸枣、牡荆灌丛 Vitex negundo var. cannabifolia +Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa shrub | ①2) ②2) | 2.2 1.7 | 1.6 1.2 | 2.3 | 340 | 12 | 0 | 83 100 | 16.1 | 84.4 | 23.5 | 12.0 | 1.65 | ||||||||||||||
牡荆、金色狗尾草灌草丛 Vitex negundo var. cannabifolia +Setaria glauca shrub_herb | ①2) ②2) | 1.8 1.4 | 1.5 1.2 | 1.8 | 235 | 52 | 0 | 82 500 | 14.7 | 78.2 | 22.7 | 11.2 | 1.84 |
①1) | ①2) | ②1) | ②2) | ③1) | ④1) | ⑤1) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TUE(μm) | 25.57±3.48 | 33.41±8.30** | 10.82±2.46 | 13.10±2.80** | 14.50±3.36 | 19.10±2.73 | 14.46±1.87 |
CTUE(μm) | 4.74±2.27 | 3.80±1.35* | 3.44±0.91 | 2.34±0.77** | 4.16±1.40 | 4.38±1.16 | 4.37±1.08 |
SDUE(mm-2) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 296.3 | 0 | 0 |
TLE(μm) | 13.99±4.16 | 17.47±4.73** | 9.60±1.93 | 9.74±2.13 | 5.52±1.65 | 13.39±2.89 | 10.68±2.82 |
CTLE(μm) | 4.38±1.81 | 2.84±0.91** | 3.06±0.94 | - | 2.88±0.73 | 4.68±1.06 | 4.19±1.09 |
SDLE(mm-2) | 483.1 | 459.1 | 844.6 | 780.2 | 716.0 | 654.3 | 781.3 |
TPT(μm) | 86.09±25.88 | 66.16±26.06** | 96.48±34.56 | 72.99±24.10** | 87.51±12.41 | 75.87±10.41 | 48.96±9.82 |
TST(μm) | 14.00±19.60 | 38.00±17.10** | 33.59±30.97 | 49.45±14.30** | 0 | 77.49±19.93 | 36.46±9.09 |
TST/TPT | 0.28±0.41 | 0.68±0.37** | 0.50±0.50 | 0.82±0.57** | 0.00±0.00 | 1.04±0.31 | 0.79±0.31 |
TL(μm) | 149.4±15.2 | 155.1±31.4 | 155.9±18.4 | 145.3±23.5* | 115.1±15.7 | 195.5±27.3 | 118.9±13.2 |
XT(μm) | 100.25±19.99 | 80.22±21.32** | 140.45±30.52 | 78.35±17.45** | 296.90±64.09 | 174.80±37.22 | 29.34±4.75 |
PT(μm) | 62.48±14.00 | 74.02±17.53* | 57.04±14.81 | 48.72±8.31* | 117.79±21.51 | 63.35±15.90 | 21.35±6.00 |
XT/PT | 1.64±0.33 | 1.10±0.24** | 2.51±0.75 | 1.66±0.49** | 2.17±0.54 | 2.84±0.60 | 1.44±0.32 |
TB(μm) | 162.72±30.99 | 154.24±34.86 | 197.49±33.37 | 127.07±19.96** | 414.69±73.70 | 238.14±48.70 | 50.69±8.96 |
TMV(μm) | 382.80±54.21 | 426.38±82.82** | 692.90±109.50 | 646.50±111.60 | 1341.90±162.83 | 599.14±177.72 | 135.98±11.37 |
TRBM | 0.42±0.04 | 0.36±0.06** | 0.29±0.05 | 0.20±0.03** | 0.31±0.05 | 0.41±0.06 | 0.37±0.06 |
表2 混交林5个优势树种叶片的解剖特征
Table 2 Anatomic traits of leaves of five dominant species in mixed forest
①1) | ①2) | ②1) | ②2) | ③1) | ④1) | ⑤1) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TUE(μm) | 25.57±3.48 | 33.41±8.30** | 10.82±2.46 | 13.10±2.80** | 14.50±3.36 | 19.10±2.73 | 14.46±1.87 |
CTUE(μm) | 4.74±2.27 | 3.80±1.35* | 3.44±0.91 | 2.34±0.77** | 4.16±1.40 | 4.38±1.16 | 4.37±1.08 |
SDUE(mm-2) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 296.3 | 0 | 0 |
TLE(μm) | 13.99±4.16 | 17.47±4.73** | 9.60±1.93 | 9.74±2.13 | 5.52±1.65 | 13.39±2.89 | 10.68±2.82 |
CTLE(μm) | 4.38±1.81 | 2.84±0.91** | 3.06±0.94 | - | 2.88±0.73 | 4.68±1.06 | 4.19±1.09 |
SDLE(mm-2) | 483.1 | 459.1 | 844.6 | 780.2 | 716.0 | 654.3 | 781.3 |
TPT(μm) | 86.09±25.88 | 66.16±26.06** | 96.48±34.56 | 72.99±24.10** | 87.51±12.41 | 75.87±10.41 | 48.96±9.82 |
TST(μm) | 14.00±19.60 | 38.00±17.10** | 33.59±30.97 | 49.45±14.30** | 0 | 77.49±19.93 | 36.46±9.09 |
TST/TPT | 0.28±0.41 | 0.68±0.37** | 0.50±0.50 | 0.82±0.57** | 0.00±0.00 | 1.04±0.31 | 0.79±0.31 |
TL(μm) | 149.4±15.2 | 155.1±31.4 | 155.9±18.4 | 145.3±23.5* | 115.1±15.7 | 195.5±27.3 | 118.9±13.2 |
XT(μm) | 100.25±19.99 | 80.22±21.32** | 140.45±30.52 | 78.35±17.45** | 296.90±64.09 | 174.80±37.22 | 29.34±4.75 |
PT(μm) | 62.48±14.00 | 74.02±17.53* | 57.04±14.81 | 48.72±8.31* | 117.79±21.51 | 63.35±15.90 | 21.35±6.00 |
XT/PT | 1.64±0.33 | 1.10±0.24** | 2.51±0.75 | 1.66±0.49** | 2.17±0.54 | 2.84±0.60 | 1.44±0.32 |
TB(μm) | 162.72±30.99 | 154.24±34.86 | 197.49±33.37 | 127.07±19.96** | 414.69±73.70 | 238.14±48.70 | 50.69±8.96 |
TMV(μm) | 382.80±54.21 | 426.38±82.82** | 692.90±109.50 | 646.50±111.60 | 1341.90±162.83 | 599.14±177.72 | 135.98±11.37 |
TRBM | 0.42±0.04 | 0.36±0.06** | 0.29±0.05 | 0.20±0.03** | 0.31±0.05 | 0.41±0.06 | 0.37±0.06 |
人工侧柏林 Platycladus orientalis forest | 侧柏、构树混交林 Platycladus orientalis+ Broussonetia papyrifera mixed forest | 酸枣、牡荆灌丛 Vitex negundo var. cannabifolia+ Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa shrub | 牡荆、金色狗尾草灌草丛 Vitex negundo var. cannabifolia + Setaria glauca shrub_herb | 可塑性指数 Plasticity index | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTUE(μm) | 0.80±0.37A | 2.34±0.77B | 2.61±0.42B | 3.21±0.76C | 0.75 |
TUE(μm) | 13.14±3.44a | 13.14±2.78a | 13.20±2.30a | 14.22±2.78a | 0.08 |
TLE(μm) | 10.15±2.43a | 9.74±2.13a | 8.79±3.87a | 9.81±2.46a | 0.13 |
HDLE(mm-1) | 9.09±17.09A | 64.02±20.44B | 56.06±21.48B | 41.67±19.93C | 0.86 |
SDLE(mm-2) | 707.8±254.6A | 780.2±240.7A | 975.7±309.5B | 994.8±266.2B | 0.30 |
SL(μm) | 19.32±2.05A | 22.10±2.69B | 21.60±2.08b | 20.21±2.83a | 0.13 |
TPT(μm) | 34.13±12.04A | 72.99±24.10B | 103.17±20.43C | 113.93±35.09C | 0.70 |
LPC | 1~2 | 2~4 | 3~5(7) | 3~5(7) | - |
TST(μm) | 38.88±9.95A | 49.45±14.31bc | 43.97±11.96ac | 52.82±20.60b | 0.26 |
TST/TPT | 1.23±0.41A | 0.82±0.57b | 0.44±0.13C | 0.59±0.30c | 0.64 |
TL(μm) | 96.29±19.98A | 145.32±23.49B | 169.12±21.29c | 180.77±28.11d | 0.47 |
XT(μm) | 72.50±20.53a | 78.35±17.45ab | 80.28±23.66b | 85.66±23.53ab | 0.15 |
PT(μm) | 45.54±11.37A | 48.72±8.31a | 56.85±14.44B | 58.82±16.59b | 0.23 |
XT/PT | 1.63±0.43a | 1.66±0.49a | 1.47±0.46a | 1.49±0.34a | 0.11 |
TB(μm) | 118.04±28.44a | 127.07±19.96ab | 137.13±29.51C | 144.48±34.24bc | 0.18 |
TMV(μm) | 539.09±129.27A | 646.46±111.61b | 633.65±101.93b | 671.88±135.79b | 0.20 |
TRBM | 0.22±0.03a | 0.20±0.03a | 0.22±0.03a | 0.22±0.04a | 0.09 |
表3 不同群落环境中牡荆叶片的解剖特征
Table 3 Leaf anatomic characters of Vitex negundo var. cannabifolia living in different communities
人工侧柏林 Platycladus orientalis forest | 侧柏、构树混交林 Platycladus orientalis+ Broussonetia papyrifera mixed forest | 酸枣、牡荆灌丛 Vitex negundo var. cannabifolia+ Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa shrub | 牡荆、金色狗尾草灌草丛 Vitex negundo var. cannabifolia + Setaria glauca shrub_herb | 可塑性指数 Plasticity index | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTUE(μm) | 0.80±0.37A | 2.34±0.77B | 2.61±0.42B | 3.21±0.76C | 0.75 |
TUE(μm) | 13.14±3.44a | 13.14±2.78a | 13.20±2.30a | 14.22±2.78a | 0.08 |
TLE(μm) | 10.15±2.43a | 9.74±2.13a | 8.79±3.87a | 9.81±2.46a | 0.13 |
HDLE(mm-1) | 9.09±17.09A | 64.02±20.44B | 56.06±21.48B | 41.67±19.93C | 0.86 |
SDLE(mm-2) | 707.8±254.6A | 780.2±240.7A | 975.7±309.5B | 994.8±266.2B | 0.30 |
SL(μm) | 19.32±2.05A | 22.10±2.69B | 21.60±2.08b | 20.21±2.83a | 0.13 |
TPT(μm) | 34.13±12.04A | 72.99±24.10B | 103.17±20.43C | 113.93±35.09C | 0.70 |
LPC | 1~2 | 2~4 | 3~5(7) | 3~5(7) | - |
TST(μm) | 38.88±9.95A | 49.45±14.31bc | 43.97±11.96ac | 52.82±20.60b | 0.26 |
TST/TPT | 1.23±0.41A | 0.82±0.57b | 0.44±0.13C | 0.59±0.30c | 0.64 |
TL(μm) | 96.29±19.98A | 145.32±23.49B | 169.12±21.29c | 180.77±28.11d | 0.47 |
XT(μm) | 72.50±20.53a | 78.35±17.45ab | 80.28±23.66b | 85.66±23.53ab | 0.15 |
PT(μm) | 45.54±11.37A | 48.72±8.31a | 56.85±14.44B | 58.82±16.59b | 0.23 |
XT/PT | 1.63±0.43a | 1.66±0.49a | 1.47±0.46a | 1.49±0.34a | 0.11 |
TB(μm) | 118.04±28.44a | 127.07±19.96ab | 137.13±29.51C | 144.48±34.24bc | 0.18 |
TMV(μm) | 539.09±129.27A | 646.46±111.61b | 633.65±101.93b | 671.88±135.79b | 0.20 |
TRBM | 0.22±0.03a | 0.20±0.03a | 0.22±0.03a | 0.22±0.04a | 0.09 |
人工侧柏林 Platycladus orientalis forest | 侧柏、构树混交林 Platycladus orientalis+ Broussonetia papyrifera mixed forest | 酸枣、牡荆灌丛 Vitex negundo var. cannabifolia+ Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa shrub | 牡荆、金色狗尾草灌草丛 Vitex negundo var. cannabifolia + Setaria glauca shrub_herb | 可塑性指数 Plasticity index | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTUE(μm) | 1.38±0.73A | 3.80±1.35b | 4.00±0.50b | 4.03±0.84b | 0.66 |
TUE(μm) | 25.89±5.71A | 33.41±8.37b | 35.00±5.76b | 33.87±8.13b | 0.26 |
TLE(μm) | 16.64±8.00a | 17.47±4.73a | 15.80±3.92a | 19.96±14.05a | 0.21 |
CTLE(μm) | 0.97±0.30A | 2.84±0.91B | 3.40±0.73D | 4.09±1.00C | 0.76 |
SDLE(mm-2) | 352.0±217.4a | 459.1±283.5c | 554.8±236.4B | 566.3±221.5B | 0.38 |
SL(μm) | 22.10±2.27A | 24.99±1.95b | 25.71±2.36b | 23.44±2.47A | 0.14 |
TPT(μm) | 25.58±8.23A | 66.16±26.06B | 84.35±25.89C | 108.29±44.86D | 0.76 |
LPC | 1(2) | 2~4 | 3~5(7) | 3~5(7) | - |
TST(μm) | 34.29±10.24a | 38.03±17.11a | 40.58±24.15a | 27.20±28.31a | 0.33 |
TST/TPT | 1.40±0.42A | 0.68±0.37b | 0.58±0.38b | 0.40±0.42c | 0.71 |
TL(μm) | 103.25±17.57A | 155.06±31.43B | 175.73±16.01C | 184.97±32.99C | 0.44 |
XT(μm) | 66.44±35.93a | 80.22±21.32ab | 93.01±28.70bc | 101.27±20.32C | 0.34 |
PT(μm) | 66.67±18.22a | 74.02±17.53ab | 84.83±28.66B | 79.76±18.30b | 0.21 |
XT/PT | 1.00±0.27a | 1.10±0.24a | 1.10±0.29a | 1.28±0.13B | 0.22 |
TB(μm) | 133.11±50.94A | 154.24±34.86ab | 177.84±46.39C | 181.03±37.66bc | 0.26 |
TMV(μm) | 394.33±60.30a | 426.38±82.82ab | 455.45±48.38B | 431.90±63.53b | 0.13 |
TRBM | 0.34±0.11a | 0.36±0.06ab | 0.38±0.08C | 0.42±0.04bc | 0.19 |
表4 不同群落环境中酸枣叶片的解剖特征
Table 4 Leaf anatomic characters of Ziziphus jujuba living in different communities
人工侧柏林 Platycladus orientalis forest | 侧柏、构树混交林 Platycladus orientalis+ Broussonetia papyrifera mixed forest | 酸枣、牡荆灌丛 Vitex negundo var. cannabifolia+ Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa shrub | 牡荆、金色狗尾草灌草丛 Vitex negundo var. cannabifolia + Setaria glauca shrub_herb | 可塑性指数 Plasticity index | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTUE(μm) | 1.38±0.73A | 3.80±1.35b | 4.00±0.50b | 4.03±0.84b | 0.66 |
TUE(μm) | 25.89±5.71A | 33.41±8.37b | 35.00±5.76b | 33.87±8.13b | 0.26 |
TLE(μm) | 16.64±8.00a | 17.47±4.73a | 15.80±3.92a | 19.96±14.05a | 0.21 |
CTLE(μm) | 0.97±0.30A | 2.84±0.91B | 3.40±0.73D | 4.09±1.00C | 0.76 |
SDLE(mm-2) | 352.0±217.4a | 459.1±283.5c | 554.8±236.4B | 566.3±221.5B | 0.38 |
SL(μm) | 22.10±2.27A | 24.99±1.95b | 25.71±2.36b | 23.44±2.47A | 0.14 |
TPT(μm) | 25.58±8.23A | 66.16±26.06B | 84.35±25.89C | 108.29±44.86D | 0.76 |
LPC | 1(2) | 2~4 | 3~5(7) | 3~5(7) | - |
TST(μm) | 34.29±10.24a | 38.03±17.11a | 40.58±24.15a | 27.20±28.31a | 0.33 |
TST/TPT | 1.40±0.42A | 0.68±0.37b | 0.58±0.38b | 0.40±0.42c | 0.71 |
TL(μm) | 103.25±17.57A | 155.06±31.43B | 175.73±16.01C | 184.97±32.99C | 0.44 |
XT(μm) | 66.44±35.93a | 80.22±21.32ab | 93.01±28.70bc | 101.27±20.32C | 0.34 |
PT(μm) | 66.67±18.22a | 74.02±17.53ab | 84.83±28.66B | 79.76±18.30b | 0.21 |
XT/PT | 1.00±0.27a | 1.10±0.24a | 1.10±0.29a | 1.28±0.13B | 0.22 |
TB(μm) | 133.11±50.94A | 154.24±34.86ab | 177.84±46.39C | 181.03±37.66bc | 0.26 |
TMV(μm) | 394.33±60.30a | 426.38±82.82ab | 455.45±48.38B | 431.90±63.53b | 0.13 |
TRBM | 0.34±0.11a | 0.36±0.06ab | 0.38±0.08C | 0.42±0.04bc | 0.19 |
Alt | MLI | SWC | RH | MAT | DDT | WV | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTUE(μm) | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.000** |
TUE(μm) | 0.738 | 0.738 | -0.949 | -0.949 | 0.738 | 0.738 | 0.949 |
TLE(μm) | -0.800 | -0.800 | 0.400 | 0.400 | -0.800 | -0.800 | -0.400 |
HDLE(mm-1) | 0.400 | 0.400 | -0.200 | -0.200 | 0.400 | 0.400 | 0.200 |
SDLE(mm-2) | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.000** |
SL(μm) | 0.400 | 0.400 | -0.200 | -0.200 | 0.400 | 0.400 | 0.200 |
TPT(μm) | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.000** |
TST(μm) | 0.400 | 0.400 | -0.800 | -0.800 | 0.400 | 0.400 | 0.800 |
TST/TPT | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | -0.800 |
TL(μm) | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.000** |
XT(μm) | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.000** |
PT(μm) | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.000** |
XT/PT | -0.800 | -0.800 | 0.600 | 0.600 | -0.800 | -0.800 | -0.600 |
TB(μm) | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.000** |
TMV(μm) | 0.400 | 0.400 | -0.800 | -0.800 | 0.400 | 0.400 | 0.800 |
TRBM | 0.258 | 0.258 | -0.258 | -0.258 | 0.258 | 0.258 | 0.258 |
NCC | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
表5 牡荆叶片的解剖特征与生态因子之间的非参数相关关系
Table 5 Spearman correlation between leaf anatomic characters of Vitex negundo var. cannabifolia and ecological factors
Alt | MLI | SWC | RH | MAT | DDT | WV | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTUE(μm) | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.000** |
TUE(μm) | 0.738 | 0.738 | -0.949 | -0.949 | 0.738 | 0.738 | 0.949 |
TLE(μm) | -0.800 | -0.800 | 0.400 | 0.400 | -0.800 | -0.800 | -0.400 |
HDLE(mm-1) | 0.400 | 0.400 | -0.200 | -0.200 | 0.400 | 0.400 | 0.200 |
SDLE(mm-2) | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.000** |
SL(μm) | 0.400 | 0.400 | -0.200 | -0.200 | 0.400 | 0.400 | 0.200 |
TPT(μm) | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.000** |
TST(μm) | 0.400 | 0.400 | -0.800 | -0.800 | 0.400 | 0.400 | 0.800 |
TST/TPT | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | -0.800 |
TL(μm) | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.000** |
XT(μm) | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.000** |
PT(μm) | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.000** |
XT/PT | -0.800 | -0.800 | 0.600 | 0.600 | -0.800 | -0.800 | -0.600 |
TB(μm) | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.000** |
TMV(μm) | 0.400 | 0.400 | -0.800 | -0.800 | 0.400 | 0.400 | 0.800 |
TRBM | 0.258 | 0.258 | -0.258 | -0.258 | 0.258 | 0.258 | 0.258 |
NCC | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
Alt | MLI | SWC | RH | MAT | DDT | WV | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTUE(μm) | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.000** |
TUE(μm) | 1.000 | 1.000** | -0.800 | -0.800 | 1.000** | 1.000** | 0.800 |
TLE(μm) | -0.200 | -0.200 | -0.400 | -0.400 | -0.200 | -0.200 | 0.400 |
CTLE(μm) | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.000** |
SDLE(mm-2) | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.000** |
SL(μm) | 0.800 | 0.800 | -0.400 | -0.400 | 0.800 | 0.800 | 0.400 |
TPT(μm) | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.000** |
TST(μm) | 0.400 | 0.400 | 0.200 | 0.200 | 0.400 | 0.400 | -0.200 |
TST/TPT | -0.800 | -0.800 | 1.000** | 1.000** | -0.800 | -0.800 | -1.000** |
TL(μm) | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.000** |
XT(μm) | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.000** |
PT(μm) | 1.000** | 1.000** | -0.800 | -0.800 | 1.000** | 1.000** | 0.800 |
XT/PT | 0.632 | 0.632 | -0.949 | -0.949 | 0.632 | 0.632 | 0.949 |
TB(μm) | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.000** |
TMV(μm) | 1.000** | 1.000** | -0.500 | -0.500 | 1.000** | 1.000** | 0.500 |
TRBM | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.000** |
NCC | 2 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
表6 酸枣叶片的解剖特征与生态因子之间的非参数相关关系
Table 6 Spearman correlation between leaf anatomic characters of Ziziphus jujuba and ecological factors
Alt | MLI | SWC | RH | MAT | DDT | WV | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTUE(μm) | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.000** |
TUE(μm) | 1.000 | 1.000** | -0.800 | -0.800 | 1.000** | 1.000** | 0.800 |
TLE(μm) | -0.200 | -0.200 | -0.400 | -0.400 | -0.200 | -0.200 | 0.400 |
CTLE(μm) | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.000** |
SDLE(mm-2) | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.000** |
SL(μm) | 0.800 | 0.800 | -0.400 | -0.400 | 0.800 | 0.800 | 0.400 |
TPT(μm) | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.000** |
TST(μm) | 0.400 | 0.400 | 0.200 | 0.200 | 0.400 | 0.400 | -0.200 |
TST/TPT | -0.800 | -0.800 | 1.000** | 1.000** | -0.800 | -0.800 | -1.000** |
TL(μm) | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.000** |
XT(μm) | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.000** |
PT(μm) | 1.000** | 1.000** | -0.800 | -0.800 | 1.000** | 1.000** | 0.800 |
XT/PT | 0.632 | 0.632 | -0.949 | -0.949 | 0.632 | 0.632 | 0.949 |
TB(μm) | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.000** |
TMV(μm) | 1.000** | 1.000** | -0.500 | -0.500 | 1.000** | 1.000** | 0.500 |
TRBM | 0.800 | 0.800 | -1.000** | -1.000** | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.000** |
NCC | 2 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
[1] |
Abrams MD, Mostoller SA (1995). Gas exchange, leaf structure and nitrogen in contrasting successional tree species growing in open and under story sites during a drought. Tree Physiology, 15,361-370.
DOI URL PMID |
[2] | Ashton PMS, Olander LP, Berlyn GP, Thadani R, Cameron IR (1998). Changes in leaf structure in relation to crown position and tree size of Betula papyrifera within fire_origin stands of interior cedar_hemlock . Canadian Journal of Botany, 76,1180-1187. |
[3] | Bazzaz FA (1979). The physiological ecology of plant. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 10,351-371. |
[4] | Bazzaz FA (1996). Plants in Changing Environments: Linking Physiological, Population, and Community Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. |
[5] | Bongers F, Popma J (1990). Leaf characteristics of the tropical forest flora of Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Botanical Gazette, 151,354-365. |
[6] | Cai YL (蔡永立), Da LJ (达良俊) (2002). Leaf ecological anatomy of six evergreen species of Fagaceae in the eastern subtropical area of China. Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology (应用与环境生物学报), 8,460-466. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[7] | Cai YL (蔡永立), Wang XH (王希华), Song YC (宋永昌) (1999). An ecoanatomical study on leaves of Cyclobalanopsis glauca populations in the eastern subtropical zone, China . Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 19,844-849. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[8] | Carpenter SB, Smith NB (1975). Stomatal distribution and size in southern Appalachian hard woods. Canadian Journal of Botany, 53,1153-1156. |
[9] | Fang JY (方精云), Fei SL (费松林), Fan YJ (樊拥军), Cui KM (崔克明) (2000). Ecological patterns in anatomic characters of leaves and woods Fagus lucida and their climatic control in Mountain Fanjingshan, Guizhou, China . Acta Botonica Sinica (植物学报), 42,636-642. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[10] | Fahn A (1964). Some anatomical adaptation of desert plant. Phytomophology, 14,93-102. |
[11] | Fahn A (1986). Structural and functional properties of trichomes of xeromorphic leaves. Annual of Botany, 57,631-637. |
[12] | Fei SL (费松林), Fang JY (方精云), Fan YJ (樊拥军), Zhao K (赵坤), Liu XJ (刘雪皎), Cui KM (崔克明) (1999). Anational characteristics of leaves and woods Fagus lucida and their relationship to ecological factors in Mountain Fanjingshan, Guizhou, China . Acta Botonica Sinica (植物学报), 41,498-499. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] | Guo YH (郭玉华), Cai ZQ (蔡志全), Cao KF (曹坤芳), Wang WL (王渭玲) (2004). Leaf photosynthetic and anatomic acclimation of four tropical rainforest tree species to different growth light conditions. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research (武汉植物研究), 22,240-244. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[14] | He JS (贺金生), Chen WL (陈伟烈), Wang XL (王勋陵) (1994). Morphological and anatomical features of Quercus section Suber and its adaptation to ecological environment . Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 18,219-227. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[15] | Huang ZY (黄振英), Wu H (吴鸿), Hu ZH (胡正海) (1997) The structures of 30 species of psammophytes and their adaptation to the sandy desert environment in Xinjiang. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 21,521-530. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[16] | Jackson LWR (1967). Effect of shade on leaf structure of deciduous tree species. Ecology, 48,498-499. |
[17] | Liu QH (刘全宏), Wang XA (王孝安), Tian XH (田先华), Xiao YP (肖娅萍) (2001). Morphological and anatomical characteristics of leaf of Larix chinensis and their relationship to environmental factors in Taibaishan Mountain . Acta Botanica Boreali_Occidentalia Sinica (西北植物学报), 21,885-893. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[18] | Morisset P, Boutin C (1984). The biosystematic importance of phenotypic plasticity. In: Grant WF ed. Plant Biosystematics. Academic Press, London,293-306. |
[19] | Mott KA, Gibson AG, O'Leary JW (1982). The adaptive significance of amphistomatic leaves. Plant, Cell and Environment, 9,455-460. |
[20] | Neuner G, Bannister P (1995). Frost resistance and susceptibly to ice formation during natural hardening in relation to leaf anatomy in three evergreen tree species from New Zealand. Tree Physiology, 15,371-377. |
[21] | Peng SL (彭少麟), Li YL (李跃林), Yu H (余华), Ren H (任海) (2002). Ecoanatomical study on leaf characteristics of dominant species in different succession stages of forest communities in Dinghushan. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany (热带亚热带植物学报), 10,1-8. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[22] | Raich JW (1989). Seasonal and spatial variation in the light environment in the tropical Dipterocarp forest and gaps. Biotropica, 21,229-302. |
[23] | RØÇas G, Barros CF, Scarano FR (1997). Leaf anatomy plasticity of Alchornea triplinervia (Euphorbiaceae) under distinct light regimes in a Brazilian montane Atlantic rain forest . Trees, 11,469-473. |
[24] | Shi GR (史刚荣) (2004). A study on ecological anatomy of leaves in 7 broad_leaved evergreen plants. Guihaia (广西植物), 24,334-338. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[25] | Strauss_Debenedetti S, Bazzaz FA (1991). Plasticity and acclimation to light in tropical Moraceae of different sucessional positions. Oecologia, 87,377-387. |
[26] | Strauss_Debenedetti S, Berlyn GP (1994). Leaf anatomical responses to light in five tropical Moraceae of different successional status. American Journal of Botany, 81,1582-1591. |
[27] | Strobel DM, Sundberg MD (1984). Stomatal density in leaves of various xerophytes preliminary studies. Journal of the Minnesota Academy of Science, 49,7-9. |
[28] | Turner IM (1994). Sclerophylly: primarily protective? Functional Ecology, 8,669-675. |
[29] | Wang WY (王为义) (1985). A study on the structural particularity of alpine plants. Acta Biologica Plateau Sinica (高原生物学集刊), 4,19-32. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[30] | Wang XL (王勋陵), Ma J (马骥) (1999). A study on leaf_structure and the diversity of xerophytes ecology adaptation. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 19,787-792. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[31] | Wang XL (王勋陵), Wang J (王静) (1989). Plant Morphology and Environment (植物形态结构与环境). Lanzhou University Press, Lanzhou. (in Chinese) |
[32] | Weyers JDB, Meidner H (1990). Methods in Stomatal Research. Longman, London. |
[33] | Wylie RB (1951). Principles of foliar organization shown by sunshade leaves from ten species of deciduous dicotyledon trees. American Journal of Botany, 38,355-361. |
[34] |
Zangerl AR, Bazzaz FA (1983). Responses of early and late successional species of polygonum to variations in resource availability. Oecologia, 56,397-404.
DOI URL PMID |
[35] | Zhang X (张兴), Yang XJ (杨晓杰) (2003). Study of leaves characters of 3 species and relationship between in structure and moist habitat. Journal of Science of Teacher's College and University (高师理科学刊), 23(1),46-49. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[36] | Zhao P (赵平), Zeng XP (曾小平), Peng SL (彭少麟) (2003). Ecological adaptation of leaf gas exchange of trees used for revegetation under different experimental light regimes. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 22(3),1-8. (in Chinese with English). |
[37] | Zheng SX (郑淑霞), Shangguan ZP (上官周平) (2005). Comparison of the leaf stomatal characteristic parameters of three plants in Loess Plateau over the last 70 years. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment (植物资源与环境学报), 14(1),1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[38] | Zhou GT (周广泰), Liu FQ (刘风琴), Wu XM (吴学明), Fan JP (范建平) (1992). A Study on the anatomical characteristics of alpine plants in Qinghai Plateau. Journal of Qinghai Normal University (Natural Science) (青海师范大学学报(自然科学版)), 6(4),45-57. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 萨其拉, 张霞, 朱琳, 康萨如拉. 长期不同放牧强度下荒漠草原优势种无芒隐子草叶片解剖结构变化[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(3): 331-340. |
[2] | 杜旭龙, 黄锦学, 杨智杰, 熊德成. 增温对植物叶片和细根氧化损伤与防御特征及其相互关联影响的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(2): 135-146. |
[3] | 马常钦, 黄海龙, 彭政淋, 吴纯泽, 韦庆钰, 贾红涛, 卫星. 水曲柳雌雄株复叶类型及光合功能对不同生境的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(9): 1287-1297. |
[4] | 周莹莹, 林华. 不同水热梯度下冠层优势树种叶片热力性状及适应策略的变化趋势[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(5): 733-744. |
[5] | 刘婧, 缑倩倩, 王国华, 赵峰侠. 晋西北丘陵风沙区柠条锦鸡儿叶片与土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(4): 546-558. |
[6] | 王文伟, 韩伟鹏, 刘文文. 滨海湿地入侵植物互花米草叶片功能性状对潮位的短期响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(2): 216-226. |
[7] | 叶洁泓, 于成龙, 卓少菲, 陈新兰, 杨科明, 文印, 刘慧. 木兰科植物叶片光合系统耐热性与叶片形态及温度生态位的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(10): 1432-1440. |
[8] | 林马震, 黄勇, 李洋, 孙建. 高寒草地植物生存策略地理分布特征及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(1): 41-50. |
[9] | 姚萌, 康荣华, 王盎, 马方园, 李靳, 台子晗, 方运霆. 利用15N示踪技术研究木荷与马尾松幼苗叶片对NO2的吸收与分配[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(1): 114-122. |
[10] | 李一丁, 桑清田, 张灏, 刘龙昌, 潘庆民, 王宇, 刘伟, 袁文平. 内蒙古半干旱地区空气和土壤加湿对幼龄樟子松生长的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 1077-1085. |
[11] | 李露, 金光泽, 刘志理. 阔叶红松林3种阔叶树种柄叶性状变异与相关性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(6): 687-699. |
[12] | 程思祺, 姜峰, 金光泽. 温带森林阔叶植物幼苗叶经济谱及其与防御性状的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(6): 678-686. |
[13] | 翟江维, 林馨慧, 武瑞哲, 徐义昕, 靳豪豪, 金光泽, 刘志理. 小兴安岭不同功能型阔叶植物的柄叶权衡[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(6): 700-711. |
[14] | 王广亚, 陈柄华, 黄雨晨, 金光泽, 刘志理. 着生位置对水曲柳小叶性状变异及性状间相关性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(6): 712-721. |
[15] | 熊映杰, 于果, 魏凯璐, 彭娟, 耿鸿儒, 杨冬梅, 彭国全. 天童山阔叶木本植物叶片大小与叶脉密度及单位叶脉长度细胞壁干质量的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(2): 136-147. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19