鄱阳湖沙山单叶蔓荆不同器官碳、氮、磷化学计量特征

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2016.0231

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在鄱阳湖湖滨沙山沿沙化梯度测定了单叶蔓荆(Vitex rotundifolia)花、叶、枝条、匍匐茎、细根的碳(C)、氮(N)、磷(P)含量, 以阐明单叶蔓荆各器官C、N、P含量及化学计量比的分配格局, 探讨养分元素及其化学计量之间的关联及对沙化程度的响应。结果表明: (1)单叶蔓荆各器官C、N、P含量变化范围分别为386.28-449.47 mg·g^-1、11.40-25.37 mg·g^-1、0.89-1.54 mg·g^-1。各器官中以花的N、P含量最高。(2)沙化程度仅对C、N含量及C:P影响显著, 而器官是影响单叶蔓荆C、N、P含量及化学计量比的主导因子; 单叶蔓荆基于质量的N、P含量之间的关系在不同沙化程度区未发生策略位移现象, N:P化学计量比具有保守性特征, 没有随沙化程度与器官的改变而发生显著变化。(3)单叶蔓荆各器官的相关性主要集中在地上部分, 其中枝条与匍匐茎之间的关系最为密切, 二者之间的C、N、P含量及C:N、C:P化学计量比均表现为显著性相关。

关键词: 鄱阳湖, 沙山, 植物器官, 养分, 化学计量比

Abstract:

Aims The objectives were to clarify the responses of C, N and P stoichiometry of Vitex rotundifolia to desertification, and determine the C, N and P stoichiometric relationships among the organs.
Methods In this study, different organs (e.g. flowers, leaves, twigs, creeping stems, fine roots) of V. rotundifolia were sampled along a desertification gradient in a typical Poyang Lak sandy hill. Subsequently, C, N and P contents of various organs were measured.
Important findings The results showed nutrient contents in different organs ranged from 386.28 to 449.47 mg·g^-1for carbon, 11.40 to 25.37 mg·g^-1 for nitrogen and 0.89 to 1.54 mg·g^-1 for phosphorus, respectively. C, N and P contents differed significantly among the five organs. The maximum N and P content were found in flowers, whereas the minimums were observed in twigs and creping stems. Moreover, desertification intensity only significantly affected C, N and C:P. C:N and N:P ratios maintained relatively stable. Except N:P, the other nutrient elements and associated stoichiometry significantly differed among the organs. Hence, organs, rather than desertification intensity mainly controlled the C, N and P content and their stoichiometry variability. Although there was a positive correlation between mass-based N content (N_mass) and P content (P_mass) across the three desertification zones, the N_mass-P_mass relationship in V. rotundifolia did not shift. Irrespective desertification intensity and organs, N:P stoichiometry of V. rotundifolia was well constrained. In addition, significant correlations of C, N and P contents among organs were mainly found in the above-ground parts, especially between twigs and creeping stems.

Key words: Poyang Lake, desertification hill, plant organ, nutrient, stoichiometry

周红艳, 吴琴, 陈明月, 匡伟, 常玲玲, 胡启武. 鄱阳湖沙山单叶蔓荆不同器官碳、氮、磷化学计量特征. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(4): 461-470. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0231

Hong-Yan ZHOU, Qin WU, Ming-Yue CHEN, Wei KUANG, Ling-Ling CHANG, Qi-Wu HU. C, N and P stoichiometry in different organs of Vitex rotundifolia in a Poyang Lake desertification hill. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2017, 41(4): 461-470. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0231

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2016.0231

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2017/V41/I4/461

图/表 8

参考文献 39

[1]	Ågren GI (2004). The C:N:P stoichiometry of autotrophs-theory and observations.Ecology Letters, 7, 185-191.
[2]	Chapin FS, Bloom AJ, Field CB, Waring RH (1987). Plant responses to multiple environmental factors.BioScience, 37, 49-57.
[3]	Craine JM, Lee WG (2003). Covariation in leaf and root traits for native and non-native grasses along an altitudinal gradient in New Zealand.Oecologia, 134, 471-478.
[4]	Cui GY, Cao Y, Chen YM (2015). Characteristics of nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across components of forest ecosystem in Shaanxi Province.Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 39, 1146-1155. (in Chinese with English abstract)[崔高阳, 曹扬, 陈云明 (2015). 陕西省森林各生态系统组分氮磷化学计量特征. 植物生态学报, 39, 1146-1155.]
[5]	Dong GR, Wu B, Ci LJ, Zhou HS, Lu Q, Luo B (1999). Present situation, causes and control way of desertification in China.Journal of Desert Research, 19(4), 22-36. (in Chinese with English abstract)[董光荣, 吴波, 慈龙骏, 周欢水, 卢琦, 罗斌 (1999). 我国荒漠化现状、成因与防治对策. 中国沙漠, 19(4), 22-36.]
[6]	Elser JJ, Fagan WF, Denno RF, Dobberfuhl DR, Ayoola F, Andrea H, Sebastian I, Kilham SS, Edward M, Schulz KL, Siemann EH, Sterner RW (2000). Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater food webs.Nature, 408, 578-580.
[7]	Elser JJ, Fagan WF, Kerkhoff AJ, Swenson NG, Enquis BJ (2010). Biological stoichiometry of plant production: Metabolism, scaling and ecological response to global change.New Phytologist, 186, 593-608.
[8]	Eviner VT, Chapin FS III (2003). Functional matrix: A conceptual framework for predicting multiple plant effects on ecosystem processes.Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 34, 455-485.
[9]	Geng Y, Wang L, Jin DM, Liu HY, He JS (2014). Alpine climate alters the relationships between leaf and root morphological traits but not chemical traits.Oecologia, 175, 445-455.
[10]	Guo DL, Li H, Mitchell RJ, Han WX, Hendricks JJ, Fahey TJ, Hendrick RL (2008). Heterogeneity by root branch order: Exploring the discrepancy in root longevity and turnover estimates between minirhizotron and C isotope methods.New Phytologist, 177, 443-456.
[11]	Güsewell S (2004). N:P ratios in terrestrial plants: Variation and functional significance.New Phytologist, 164, 243-266.
[12]	He JS, Han XG (2010). Ecological stoichiometry: Searching for unifying principles from individuals to ecosystems.Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 34, 2-6. (in Chinese with English abstract)[贺金生, 韩兴国 (2010). 生态化学计量学: 探索从个体到生态系统的统一化理论. 植物生态学报, 34, 2-6.]
[13]	Hu MY, Zhang L, Luo TX, Shen W (2012). Variations in leaf functional traits of Stipa purpurea along a rainfall gradient in Xizang, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 36, 136-143. (in Chinese with English abstract)[胡梦瑶, 张林, 罗天祥, 沈维 (2012). 西藏紫花针茅叶功能性状沿降水梯度的变化. 植物生态学报, 36, 136-143.]
[14]	Huang JY, Yu HL (2016). Responses of growth of four desert species to different N addition levels.Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 40, 165-176. (in Chinese with English abstract)[黄菊莹, 余海龙 (2016). 四种荒漠草原植物的生长对不同氮添加水平的响应. 植物生态学报, 40, 165-176.]
[15]	Kattge J, Diaz S, Lavorel S, Prentice LC, Leadley P, Garnier E, Westoby M, Reich PB, Wright IJ, Cornelissen JHC, Violle C, Harrison SP, Bodegom PMV, Reichstein M, Enquist BJ, Soudzilovskaia NA, Ackerly DD, Anand M, Atkin O, Bahn M, Baker TR, Baldocchi D, Bekker R, Blanco CC, Blonder B, Bond WJ, Bradstock R, Bunker DE, Casanoves F, Cavender BJ, Chambers JQ, Chapin FS, Chave J, Coomes D, Cornwell WK, Craine JM, Dobrin BH, Duarte L, Durka W, Elser J, Esser G, Estiarte M, Fagan WF, Fang J, Fidelis GT, Fyllas NM, Gallagher RV, Green WA, Gutierrez AG, Hickler T, Higgins SI, Hodgson GJ, Jalili A, Jansen S, Joly CA, Kerkhoff AJ, Kirkup D, Kitajima K, Kleyer M, Klotz S, Knops JMH, Kramer K, Kurokawa H, Laughlin D, Lee TD, Leishman M, Lens F, Lenz T, Lewis SL, Lloyd J, Louault F, Ma S, Mahecha MD, Manning P, Massad P, Massad T, Medlyn BE, Messier J, Moles AT, Nadrowski K, Naeem S, Ogaya R, Oleksyn J, Onipchenko VG, Onoda Y, Overbeck G, Ozinga WA, Paula S, Pausas JG, Phillips OL, Pillar V, Poorter H, Poorter L, Poschlod P, Prinzing A, Proulx R, Rammig A, Reinsch S, Reu B, Sack L, Salgado NB, Sardans J, Shiodera S, Shipley B, Siefert A, Sosinski E, Swaine E, Swenson N, Thompson K, Thornton P, Waldram M, Weiher E, White M, Wright SJ, Yguel B, Zaehle S, Zanne AE, Wirth C (2011). TRY—A global database of plant traits.Global Change Biology, 17, 2905-2935.
[16]	Kerkhoff AJ, Fagan WF, Elser JJ, Enquist BJ (2006). Phylogenetic and growth form variation in the scaling of nitrogen and phosphorus in the seed plants.The American Naturalist, 168, 103-122.
[17]	Killingbeck KT, Whitford WG (1996). High foliar nitrogen in desert shrubs: An important ecosystem trait or defective desert doctrine.Ecology, 77, 1728-1737.
[18]	Koerselman W, Meuleman AFM (1996). The vegetation N:P ratio: A new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation.Journal of Applied Ecology, 33, 1441-1450.
[19]	Li YH, Luo TX, Lu Q, Tian XY, Wu B, Yang HH (2005). Comparisons of leaf traits among 17 major plant species in Shazhuyu Sand Control Experimental Station of Qinghai Province.Acta Ecology Sinica, 25, 994-999. (in Chinese with English abstract)[李永华, 罗天祥, 卢琦, 田晓娅, 吴波, 杨恒华 (2005). 青海省沙珠玉治沙站17种主要植物叶性因子的比较. 生态学报, 25, 994-999.]
[20]	Li YL, Mao W, Zhao XY, Zhang TH (2010). Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry in typical desert and desertified regions, North China.Environment Science, 31, 1716-1725. (in Chinese with English abstract)[李玉霖, 毛伟, 赵学勇, 张铜会 (2010). 北方典型荒漠及荒漠化地区植物叶片氮磷化学计量特征研究. 环境科学, 31, 1716-1725.]
[21]	Liu WD, Su JR, Li SF, Zhang ZJ, Li ZG (2010). Stoichiometry study of C, N and P in plant and soil at different successional stages of monsoon evergreen broad-leaved forest in Pu’er, Yunnan Province.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30, 6581-6590. (in Chinese with English abstract)[刘万德, 苏建荣, 李帅锋, 张志钧, 李忠文 (2010). 云南普洱季风常绿阔叶林演替系列植物和土壤C、N、P化学计量特征. 生态学报, 30, 6581-6590.]
[22]	Luo MW, Mao L, Li QQ, Zhao X, Xiao Y, Jia TT, Guo ZG (2015). C, N, and P stoichiometry of plant and soil in the restorable plant communities distributed on the land used for Qinghai-Tibet Highway Construction in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35, 7832-7841. (in Chinese with English abstract)[雒明伟, 毛亮, 李倩倩, 赵旭, 肖玉, 贾婷婷, 郭正刚 (2015). 青藏高原筑路取土迹地恢复植物群落与土壤的碳氮磷化学计量特征. 生态学报, 35, 7832-7841.]
[23]	Ma YZ, Zhong QL, Jin BJ, Lu HD, Guo BQ, Zheng Y, Li M, Cheng DL (2015). Spatial changes and influencing factors of fine root carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry of plants in China.Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 39, 159-166. (in Chinese with English abstract)[马玉珠, 钟全林, 靳冰洁, 卢宏典, 郭炳桥, 郑媛, 李曼, 程栋梁 (2015). 中国植物细根碳、氮、磷化学计量学的空间变化及其影响因子. 植物生态学报, 39, 159-166.]
[24]	Marschner H (1995). Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Academic Press, London.
[25]	Nie LQ, Wu Q, Yao B, Fu S, Hu QW (2016). Leaf litter and soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus stoichiometry of dominant plant species in the Poyang Lake wetland.Acta Eclogica Sinica, 36, 1898-1906. (in Chinese with English abstract)[聂兰琴, 吴琴, 尧波, 付姗, 胡启武 (2016). 鄱阳湖湿地优势植物叶片-凋落物-土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征. 生态学报, 36, 1898-1906.]
[26]	Niklas KJ, Owens T, Reich PB, Cobb ED (2005). Nitrogen phosphorus leaf stoichiometry and the scaling of plant growth.Ecology Letters, 8, 636-642.
[27]	Pregitzer KS, Deforest JL, Burton AJ, Allen ME, Ruess RW, Hendrick RL (2002). Fine root architecture of nine North American trees. Ecological Monographs, 72, 293-309.
[28]	Reich PB (2014). The world-wide “fast-slow” plant economics spectrum: A traits manifesto.Journal of Ecology, 102, 275-301.
[29]	Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2002). Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.
[30]	Tjoelker MG, Craine JM, Wedin D, Reich PB, Tilman D (2005). Linking leaf and root trait syndromes among 39 grassland and savannah species.New Phytologist, 167, 493-508.
[31]	Wang WQ, Wang C, Sardans J, Zeng CS, Tong C, Penuelas J (2015). Plant invasive success associated with higher N-use efficiency and stoichiometric shifts in the soil-plant system in the Minjiang River tidal estuarine wetlands of China.Wetlands Ecology and Management, 23, 865-880.
[32]	Wang ZQ, Guo DL (2008). Root ecology. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version), 32, 1213-1216. (in Chinese)[王政权, 郭大立 (2008). 根系生态学. 植物生态学报, 32, 1213-1216.]
[33]	Wei H, Wu B, Yang W, Luo T (2011). Low rainfall-induced shift in leaf trait relationship within species along a semi-arid sandy land transect in northern China.Plant Biology, 13, 85-92.
[34]	Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M (2001). Strategy shifts in leaf physiology, structure and nutrient content between species of high -and low-rainfall and high -and low-nutrient habitats.Functional Ecology, 15, 423-434.
[35]	Xu B, Cheng YX, Gan HJ, Zhou WJ, He JS (2010). Correlations between leaf and fine root traits among and within species of typical temperate grassland in Xilin River Basin, Inner Mongolia, China.Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 34, 29-38. (in Chinese with English abstract)[徐冰, 程雨曦, 甘慧洁, 周文嘉, 贺金生 (2010). 内蒙古锡林河流域典型草原植物叶片与细根性状在种间及种内水平上的关联. 植物生态学报, 34, 29-38.]
[36]	Yu Q, Chen QS, Elser JJ, He NP, Wu HH, Zhang GM, Wu JG, Bai YF, Han XG (2010). Linking stoichiometric homoeostasis with ecosystem structure, functioning and stability.Ecology Letters, 13, 1390-1399.
[37]	Yuan ZY, Chen HYH, Reich PB (2011). Global-scale latitudinal patterns of plant fine-root nitrogen and phosphorus.Nature Communications, 2, 1-6.
[38]	Zhu ZD, Cui SH (1996). The problem of land desertification in South China.Journal of Desert Research, 16, 331-337. (in Chinese with English abstract)[朱震达, 崔书红. 中国南方的土地荒漠化问题 (1996). 中国沙漠, 16, 331-337.]
[39]	Zuo CQ (1986). Analysis for the causes, utilization and governance in sand hill, Poyang Lake.Soil and Water Conservation, (4), 2-5. (in Chinese)[左长青 (1986). 鄱阳湖沙山成因及治理利用浅析. 中国水土保持, (4), 2-5.]

采样区 Sampling site	土壤有机碳 SOC ( mg·g^-1)	土壤全氮 TN ( mg·g^-1)	土壤全磷 TP ( mg·g^-1)	植被类型 Vegetation type	盖度 Coverage	物种组成 Species composition
重度沙化区 HD zone	3.57 ± 1.14^a	0.14 ± 0.05^a	0.10 ± 0.07^a	灌木+草本 Shrub and herb	0.08 ± 0.02^a	单叶蔓荆 Vitex rotundifolia 狗牙根 Cynodon dactylon 马唐 Digitaria sanguinalis
中度沙化区 MD zone	5.74 ± 0.86^b	0.32 ± 0.06^b	0.11 ± 0.01^a	灌木+小乔木 Shrub and small trees	0.34 ± 0.11^b	单叶蔓荆 Vitex rotundifolia 算盘子 Glochidion puberum 糯米条 Abelia chinensis 湿地松 Pinus elliottii
轻度沙化区 LD zone	8.66 ± 2.23^c	0.61 ± 0.26^c	0.22 ± 0.04^b	灌木+小乔木 Shrub and small trees	0.57 ± 0.13^c	单叶蔓荆 Vitex rotundifolia 算盘子 Glochidion puberum 牡荆 Vitex negundo 山矾 Symplocos sumuntia 檵木 Loropetalum chinense 短柄枹 Quercus glandulifera 刺槐 Robinia pseudoacacia 湿地松 Pinus elliottii

采样区 Sampling site	土壤有机碳 SOC ( mg·g^-1)	土壤全氮 TN ( mg·g^-1)	土壤全磷 TP ( mg·g^-1)	植被类型 Vegetation type	盖度 Coverage	物种组成 Species composition
重度沙化区 HD zone	3.57 ± 1.14^a	0.14 ± 0.05^a	0.10 ± 0.07^a	灌木+草本 Shrub and herb	0.08 ± 0.02^a	单叶蔓荆 Vitex rotundifolia 狗牙根 Cynodon dactylon 马唐 Digitaria sanguinalis
中度沙化区 MD zone	5.74 ± 0.86^b	0.32 ± 0.06^b	0.11 ± 0.01^a	灌木+小乔木 Shrub and small trees	0.34 ± 0.11^b	单叶蔓荆 Vitex rotundifolia 算盘子 Glochidion puberum 糯米条 Abelia chinensis 湿地松 Pinus elliottii
轻度沙化区 LD zone	8.66 ± 2.23^c	0.61 ± 0.26^c	0.22 ± 0.04^b	灌木+小乔木 Shrub and small trees	0.57 ± 0.13^c	单叶蔓荆 Vitex rotundifolia 算盘子 Glochidion puberum 牡荆 Vitex negundo 山矾 Symplocos sumuntia 檵木 Loropetalum chinense 短柄枹 Quercus glandulifera 刺槐 Robinia pseudoacacia 湿地松 Pinus elliottii

		花 Flower	叶 Leaf	枝条 Twig	匍匐茎 Creeping stem
C	叶 Leaf	0.480^**
	枝条 Twig	-0.475^**	-0.652^**
	匍匐茎 Creeping stem	0.115	0.177	-0.391^*
N	枝条 Twig	0.672^**	0.058
N	匍匐茎 Creeping stem	-0.543^**	0.022	-0.681^**
P	匍匐茎 Creeping stem	-0.049	0.174	0.518^**
P	细根 Fine root	-0.001	-0.074	-0.438^*	-0.214
C:N	枝条 Twig	0.472^**	0.131
C:N	匍匐茎 Creeping stem	-0.437^*	-0.221	-0.411^*
C:P	匍匐茎 Creeping stem	-0.051	0.373^*	0.369^*
C:P	细根 Fine root	-0.035	-0.203	-0.400^*	-0.248

		花 Flower	叶 Leaf	枝条 Twig	匍匐茎 Creeping stem
C	叶 Leaf	0.480^**
	枝条 Twig	-0.475^**	-0.652^**
	匍匐茎 Creeping stem	0.115	0.177	-0.391^*
N	枝条 Twig	0.672^**	0.058
N	匍匐茎 Creeping stem	-0.543^**	0.022	-0.681^**
P	匍匐茎 Creeping stem	-0.049	0.174	0.518^**
P	细根 Fine root	-0.001	-0.074	-0.438^*	-0.214
C:N	枝条 Twig	0.472^**	0.131
C:N	匍匐茎 Creeping stem	-0.437^*	-0.221	-0.411^*
C:P	匍匐茎 Creeping stem	-0.051	0.373^*	0.369^*
C:P	细根 Fine root	-0.035	-0.203	-0.400^*	-0.248

N_mass-P_mass (n = 160)	重度沙化区 HD zone	中度沙化区 MD zone	轻度沙化区 LD zone	F	p
斜率 Slope	5.2	8.3	10.1	1.13	0.33
截距 Intercept	9.3	7.5	5.8	2.66	0.073