Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2013, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (10): 933-941.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00096 cstr: 32100.14.SP.J.1258.2013.00096
Special Issue: 生态化学计量
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Yang(
),ZHANG Jian(
),CHEN Ya-Mei,CHEN Lei,LIU Qiang
Received:2013-04-09
Accepted:2013-08-19
Online:2013-04-09
Published:2013-09-29
Contact:
LIU Yang,ZHANG Jian
LIU Yang,ZHANG Jian,CHEN Ya-Mei,CHEN Lei,LIU Qiang. Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on biomass allocation and C:N:P stoichiometric characteristics of Eucalyptus grandis seedlings[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2013, 37(10): 933-941.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00096
Fig. 1 Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on biomass of Eucalyptus grandis seedlings and its allocation proportion (mean ± SD, n = 5). CK, control; N1, N2, N3, N4, add urea 200, 400, 600, 800 mg·kg-1, respectively; P1, P2, P3, P4, add calcium superphosphate 400, 800, 1200, 2400 mg·kg-1, respectively. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between biomass of the same organ under nitrogen or phosphorus treatment (p < 0.05); different upper- case letters indicate significant differences between the total biomass under nitrogen or phosphorus treatment (p < 0.05).
| 含量(mg·g-1) | 处理 Treatment | 根 Root | 茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf | 处理 Treatment | 根 Root | 茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | CK | 397.44 ± 21.04a | 398.18 ± 11.77a | 413.25 ± 38.50a | CK | 397.44 ± 21.04a | 398.18 ± 11.77a | 413.25 ± 38.50a |
| N1 | 406.53 ± 30.69a | 433.31 ± 24.94b | 436.24 ± 63.39a | P1 | 379.42 ± 27.87a | 452.33 ± 34.05b | 431.35 ± 40.03a | |
| N2 | 421.02 ± 29.55a | 457.77 ± 19.91c | 428.51 ± 31.06a | P2 | 441.03 ± 112.54a | 429.97 ± 28.42bc | 440.84 ± 29.99a | |
| N3 | 403.61 ± 18.73a | 439.95 ± 13.92bc | 433.50 ± 103.16a | P3 | 384.19 ± 26.31a | 420.58 ± 24.67ab | 439.00 ± 13.39a | |
| N4 | 394.15 ± 14.97a | 451.81 ± 11.36b | 413.81 ± 13.56a | P4 | 418.64 ± 26.34a | 412.66 ± 44.00ac | 409.86 ± 47.27a | |
| N | CK | 1.34 ± 0.34a | 5.48 ± 1.22a | 5.41 ± 2.41a | CK | 1.34 ± 0.34a | 5.48 ± 1.22a | 6.80 ± 0.59a |
| N1 | 3.77 ± 0.79bd | 6.63 ± 0.71a | 7.48 ± 0.59a | P1 | 2.33 ± 0.86bc | 4.20 ± 1.03b | 8.78 ± 3.79a | |
| N2 | 4.63 ± 1.15c | 7.33 ± 1.27a | 10.18 ± 1.95ab | P2 | 2.64 ± 1.10bc | 4.35 ± 0.86ab | 9.13 ± 2.46a | |
| N3 | 3.74 ± 0.76bc | 8.74 ± 0.90ab | 16.64 ± 3.22b | P3 | 1.28 ± 0.48a | 3.93 ± 1.12ab | 6.99 ± 1.96a | |
| N4 | 2.76 ± 0.80d | 10.01 ± 1.45b | 40.64 ± 6.41c | P4 | 2.15 ± 0.31c | 3.91 ± 1.40b | 6.79 ± 0.64a | |
| P | CK | 0.615 ± 0.046a | 1.028 ± 0.255a | 0.956 ± 0.146a | CK | 0.615 ± 0.046a | 1.028 ± 0.255a | 0.956 ± 0.146a |
| N1 | 0.499 ± 0.087b | 0.268 ± 0.099b | 0.629 ± 0.924b | P1 | 1.483 ± 0.221b | 2.782 ± 0.453b | 2.348 ± 0.202b | |
| N2 | 0.480 ± 0.024b | 0.372 ± 0.075b | 0.800 ± 0.359b | P2 | 1.781 ± 0.128cd | 3.537 ± 0.344c | 2.794 ± 0.129bc | |
| N3 | 0.456 ± 0.018b | 0.461 ± 0.036b | 0.566 ± 0.165b | P3 | 1.681 ± 0.180bc | 3.448 ± 0.852cd | 3.122 ± 0.899c | |
| N4 | 0.849 ± 0.710b | 0.471 ± 0.039b | 0.597 ± 0.162b | P4 | 2.146 ± 0.681d | 4.142 ± 0.534d | 3.750 ± 0.331d |
Table 1 Content of C, N, P of Eucalyptus grandis seedings under nitrogen and phosphorus treatments (mean ± SD, n = 5)
| 含量(mg·g-1) | 处理 Treatment | 根 Root | 茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf | 处理 Treatment | 根 Root | 茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | CK | 397.44 ± 21.04a | 398.18 ± 11.77a | 413.25 ± 38.50a | CK | 397.44 ± 21.04a | 398.18 ± 11.77a | 413.25 ± 38.50a |
| N1 | 406.53 ± 30.69a | 433.31 ± 24.94b | 436.24 ± 63.39a | P1 | 379.42 ± 27.87a | 452.33 ± 34.05b | 431.35 ± 40.03a | |
| N2 | 421.02 ± 29.55a | 457.77 ± 19.91c | 428.51 ± 31.06a | P2 | 441.03 ± 112.54a | 429.97 ± 28.42bc | 440.84 ± 29.99a | |
| N3 | 403.61 ± 18.73a | 439.95 ± 13.92bc | 433.50 ± 103.16a | P3 | 384.19 ± 26.31a | 420.58 ± 24.67ab | 439.00 ± 13.39a | |
| N4 | 394.15 ± 14.97a | 451.81 ± 11.36b | 413.81 ± 13.56a | P4 | 418.64 ± 26.34a | 412.66 ± 44.00ac | 409.86 ± 47.27a | |
| N | CK | 1.34 ± 0.34a | 5.48 ± 1.22a | 5.41 ± 2.41a | CK | 1.34 ± 0.34a | 5.48 ± 1.22a | 6.80 ± 0.59a |
| N1 | 3.77 ± 0.79bd | 6.63 ± 0.71a | 7.48 ± 0.59a | P1 | 2.33 ± 0.86bc | 4.20 ± 1.03b | 8.78 ± 3.79a | |
| N2 | 4.63 ± 1.15c | 7.33 ± 1.27a | 10.18 ± 1.95ab | P2 | 2.64 ± 1.10bc | 4.35 ± 0.86ab | 9.13 ± 2.46a | |
| N3 | 3.74 ± 0.76bc | 8.74 ± 0.90ab | 16.64 ± 3.22b | P3 | 1.28 ± 0.48a | 3.93 ± 1.12ab | 6.99 ± 1.96a | |
| N4 | 2.76 ± 0.80d | 10.01 ± 1.45b | 40.64 ± 6.41c | P4 | 2.15 ± 0.31c | 3.91 ± 1.40b | 6.79 ± 0.64a | |
| P | CK | 0.615 ± 0.046a | 1.028 ± 0.255a | 0.956 ± 0.146a | CK | 0.615 ± 0.046a | 1.028 ± 0.255a | 0.956 ± 0.146a |
| N1 | 0.499 ± 0.087b | 0.268 ± 0.099b | 0.629 ± 0.924b | P1 | 1.483 ± 0.221b | 2.782 ± 0.453b | 2.348 ± 0.202b | |
| N2 | 0.480 ± 0.024b | 0.372 ± 0.075b | 0.800 ± 0.359b | P2 | 1.781 ± 0.128cd | 3.537 ± 0.344c | 2.794 ± 0.129bc | |
| N3 | 0.456 ± 0.018b | 0.461 ± 0.036b | 0.566 ± 0.165b | P3 | 1.681 ± 0.180bc | 3.448 ± 0.852cd | 3.122 ± 0.899c | |
| N4 | 0.849 ± 0.710b | 0.471 ± 0.039b | 0.597 ± 0.162b | P4 | 2.146 ± 0.681d | 4.142 ± 0.534d | 3.750 ± 0.331d |
Fig. 2 C, N and P accumulation and distribution characteristics of each organ of Eucalyptus grandis seedlings with N or P fertilization. CK, control; N1, N2, N3, N4, add urea 200, 400, 600, 800 mg·kg-1, respectively; P1, P2, P3, P4, add calcium superphosphate 400, 800, 1200, 2400 mg·kg-1, respectively.
| 处理 Treatment | 施N利用效率 Use efficiency with nitrogen fertilization | 处理 Treatment | 施P利用效率 Use efficiency with phosphorus fertilization | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NUEN | NUEP | NUEN | NUEP | ||
| CK | 246 ± 36a | 1 237 ± 163a | CK | 246 ± 36a | 1 237 ± 163a |
| N1 | 159 ± 8b | 1 889 ± 532b | P1 | 229 ± 25ab | 476 ± 52b |
| N2 | 136 ± 16b | 1 959 ± 357b | P2 | 208 ± 16b | 384 ± 20b |
| N3 | 94 ± 14c | 2 054 ± 214b | P3 | 272 ± 21c | 386 ± 63b |
| N4 | 49 ± 8d | 1 768 ± 502b | P4 | 249 ± 33a | 303 ± 19b |
Table 2 Nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiency (NUEN, NUEP) of Eucalyptus grandis seedlings under nitrogen and phosphorus treatments (mean ± SD, n = 5)
| 处理 Treatment | 施N利用效率 Use efficiency with nitrogen fertilization | 处理 Treatment | 施P利用效率 Use efficiency with phosphorus fertilization | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NUEN | NUEP | NUEN | NUEP | ||
| CK | 246 ± 36a | 1 237 ± 163a | CK | 246 ± 36a | 1 237 ± 163a |
| N1 | 159 ± 8b | 1 889 ± 532b | P1 | 229 ± 25ab | 476 ± 52b |
| N2 | 136 ± 16b | 1 959 ± 357b | P2 | 208 ± 16b | 384 ± 20b |
| N3 | 94 ± 14c | 2 054 ± 214b | P3 | 272 ± 21c | 386 ± 63b |
| N4 | 49 ± 8d | 1 768 ± 502b | P4 | 249 ± 33a | 303 ± 19b |
| 处理Treatment | 根 Root | 茎 Stem | 叶片 Leaf | 处理Treatment | 根 Root | 茎 Stem | 叶片 Leaf | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C:N | CK | 247.61 ± 31.63a | 75.87 ± 18.15a | 57.92 ± 14.62a | CK | 317.96 ± 25.88a | 75.87 ± 18.15a | 57.99 ± 3.42a |
| N1 | 110.37 ± 16.97bc | 10.80 ± 1.18b | 66.93 ± 3.20a | P1 | 200.39 ± 55.38b | 113.28 ± 30.61b | 57.02 ± 26.15a | |
| N2 | 95.43 ± 23.93b | 28.40 ± 5.90c | 60.16 ± 12.04ab | P2 | 185.54 ± 69.12b | 101.11 ± 15.25ab | 51.39 ± 18.50a | |
| N3 | 111.53 ± 24.30b | 55.69 ± 10.39c | 55.75 ± 3.34bc | P3 | 339.35 ± 47.94a | 112.84 ± 27.48ab | 70.14 ± 19.34a | |
| N4 | 151.31 ± 39.26c | 83.65 ± 4.10a | 41.44 ± 1.88 c | P4 | 197.47 ± 30.48b | 115.11 ± 26.85b | 60.07 ± 8.29a | |
| C:P | CK | 647.47 ± 46.50a | 372.74 ± 130.79a | 477.22 ± 104.73a | CK | 647.47 ± 46.50a | 412.11 ± 130.79a | 477.22 ± 104.73a |
| N1 | 822.79 ± 115.55b | 1 237.54 ± 56.54b | 467.31 ± 187.04b | P1 | 258.59 ± 27.37b | 167.27 ± 37.32b | 188.25 ± 10.83b | |
| N2 | 879.37 ± 102.03b | 1 158.83 ± 32.96b | 619.89 ± 193.61b | P2 | 221.69 ± 81.50b | 125.05 ± 16.38bc | 158.20 ± 13.37bc | |
| N3 | 886.01 ± 69.76b | 956.96 ± 65.93c | 933.07 ± 252.70b | P3 | 232.30 ± 36.44b | 116.52 ± 39.83bc | 156.45 ± 39.51bc | |
| N4 | 782.19 ± 58.50b | 961.80 ± 71.15c | 796.55 ± 277.98b | P4 | 221.50 ± 66.60b | 100.62 ± 14.06c | 118.50 ± 19.72c | |
| N:P | CK | 2.21 ± 0.68a | 5.09 ± 1.23a | 7.91 ± 2.01a | CK | 2.21 ± 0.68a | 5.60 ± 1.88a | 7.91 ± 2.01a |
| N1 | 7.54 ± 0.60b | 16.43 ± 2.08b | 9.71 ± 1.25ab | P1 | 1.52 ± 0.55b | 1.58 ± 0.64b | 3.84 ± 1.95b | |
| N2 | 9.70 ± 2.63c | 16.42 ± 3.02b | 10.52 ± 1.26b | P2 | 1.49 ± 0.61bc | 1.24 ± 0.29b | 3.26 ± 0.82bc | |
| N3 | 8.22 ± 1.68c | 14.61 ± 1.12b | 13.69 ± 2.43c | P3 | 0.77 ± 0.31c | 1.17 ± 0.27b | 2.28 ± 0.50bc | |
| N4 | 4.57 ± 2.70bd | 16.62 ± 3.07b | 15.58 ± 1.45c | P4 | 1.10 ± 0.43bc | 0.95 ± 0.34b | 1.98 ± 0.35c |
Table 3 C:N, C:P, N:P of Eucalyptus grandis seedlings under nitrogen and phosphorus treatments (mean ± SD, n = 5)
| 处理Treatment | 根 Root | 茎 Stem | 叶片 Leaf | 处理Treatment | 根 Root | 茎 Stem | 叶片 Leaf | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C:N | CK | 247.61 ± 31.63a | 75.87 ± 18.15a | 57.92 ± 14.62a | CK | 317.96 ± 25.88a | 75.87 ± 18.15a | 57.99 ± 3.42a |
| N1 | 110.37 ± 16.97bc | 10.80 ± 1.18b | 66.93 ± 3.20a | P1 | 200.39 ± 55.38b | 113.28 ± 30.61b | 57.02 ± 26.15a | |
| N2 | 95.43 ± 23.93b | 28.40 ± 5.90c | 60.16 ± 12.04ab | P2 | 185.54 ± 69.12b | 101.11 ± 15.25ab | 51.39 ± 18.50a | |
| N3 | 111.53 ± 24.30b | 55.69 ± 10.39c | 55.75 ± 3.34bc | P3 | 339.35 ± 47.94a | 112.84 ± 27.48ab | 70.14 ± 19.34a | |
| N4 | 151.31 ± 39.26c | 83.65 ± 4.10a | 41.44 ± 1.88 c | P4 | 197.47 ± 30.48b | 115.11 ± 26.85b | 60.07 ± 8.29a | |
| C:P | CK | 647.47 ± 46.50a | 372.74 ± 130.79a | 477.22 ± 104.73a | CK | 647.47 ± 46.50a | 412.11 ± 130.79a | 477.22 ± 104.73a |
| N1 | 822.79 ± 115.55b | 1 237.54 ± 56.54b | 467.31 ± 187.04b | P1 | 258.59 ± 27.37b | 167.27 ± 37.32b | 188.25 ± 10.83b | |
| N2 | 879.37 ± 102.03b | 1 158.83 ± 32.96b | 619.89 ± 193.61b | P2 | 221.69 ± 81.50b | 125.05 ± 16.38bc | 158.20 ± 13.37bc | |
| N3 | 886.01 ± 69.76b | 956.96 ± 65.93c | 933.07 ± 252.70b | P3 | 232.30 ± 36.44b | 116.52 ± 39.83bc | 156.45 ± 39.51bc | |
| N4 | 782.19 ± 58.50b | 961.80 ± 71.15c | 796.55 ± 277.98b | P4 | 221.50 ± 66.60b | 100.62 ± 14.06c | 118.50 ± 19.72c | |
| N:P | CK | 2.21 ± 0.68a | 5.09 ± 1.23a | 7.91 ± 2.01a | CK | 2.21 ± 0.68a | 5.60 ± 1.88a | 7.91 ± 2.01a |
| N1 | 7.54 ± 0.60b | 16.43 ± 2.08b | 9.71 ± 1.25ab | P1 | 1.52 ± 0.55b | 1.58 ± 0.64b | 3.84 ± 1.95b | |
| N2 | 9.70 ± 2.63c | 16.42 ± 3.02b | 10.52 ± 1.26b | P2 | 1.49 ± 0.61bc | 1.24 ± 0.29b | 3.26 ± 0.82bc | |
| N3 | 8.22 ± 1.68c | 14.61 ± 1.12b | 13.69 ± 2.43c | P3 | 0.77 ± 0.31c | 1.17 ± 0.27b | 2.28 ± 0.50bc | |
| N4 | 4.57 ± 2.70bd | 16.62 ± 3.07b | 15.58 ± 1.45c | P4 | 1.10 ± 0.43bc | 0.95 ± 0.34b | 1.98 ± 0.35c |
| [1] | Aber JD, Nadelhoffer KJ, Steudler P, Melillo JM(1989). Nitrogen saturation in northern forest ecosystems. BioScience, 39, 378-386. |
| [2] | An Z, Niu DC, Wen HY, Yang Y, Zhang HR, Fu H (2011). Effects of N addition on nutrient resorption efficiency and C:N:P stoichiometric characteristics in Stipa bungeana of steppe grasslands in the Loess Plateau, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 35, 801-807. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 安卓, 牛得草, 文海燕, 杨益, 张洪荣, 傅华 (2011). 氮素添加对黄土高原典型草原长芒草氮磷重吸收率及C:N:P化学计量特征的影响. 植物生态学报, 35, 801-807.] | |
| [3] | Bennett LT, Weston CJ, Attiwill PM(1997). Biomass, nutrient content and growth response to fertilisers of six-year-old Eucalyptus globulus plantations at three contrasting sites in Gippsland, Victoria. Australian Journal of Botany, 45, 103-121. |
| [4] | Bowman WD(1994). Accumulation and use of nitrogen and phosphorus following fertilization in two alpine tundra communities. Oikos, 70, 261-270. |
| [5] | Chapin SF III, Matson P, Mooney HA(2002). Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York. |
| [6] | Chen LY (2010). Effects of N, P Addition on N:P Stoichiometry of Different Functional Groups in Potentilla fruticosa Community in a Sub-alpine Meadow. Master degree dissertation, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 陈凌云 (2010). 添加氮磷对亚高寒草甸金露梅群落各功能群化学计量学特征的影响. 硕士学位论文, 兰州大学, 兰州. ] | |
| [7] | da Silva PHM, Poggiani F, Libardi PL, Gonçalves AN(2013). Fertilizer management of eucalypt plantations on sandy soil in Brazil: initial growth and nutrient cycling. Forest Ecology and Management, 301, 67-78. |
| [8] | Graciano C, Goya JF, Frangi JL, Guiamet JJ(2006). Fertilization with phosphorus increases soil nitrogen absorption in young plants of Eucalyptus grandis. Forest Ecology and Management, 236, 202-210. |
| [9] | Graciano C, Guiamet JJ, Goya JF(2005). Impact of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on drought responses in Eucalyptus grandis seedlings. Forest Ecology and Management, 212, 40-49. |
| [10] | Güsewell S(2004). N:P ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance. New Phytologist, 164, 243-266. |
| [11] | Güsewell S(2005). Responses of wetland graminoids to the relative supply of nitrogen and phosphorus. Plant Ecology, 176, 35-55. |
| [12] | Güsewell S, Koerselman W, Verhoeven TA(2004). Biomass N:P ratios as indicators of nutrient limitation for plant populations in Wetlands. Ecological Applications, 13, 372-384. |
| [13] | Han WX, Fang JY, Guo DL, Zhang Y(2005). Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across 753 terrestrial plant species in China. New Phylologist, 168, 377-385. |
| [14] | He JS, Fang JY, Wang ZH, Guo DL, Flynn DFB, Geng Z(2006). Stoichiometry and large-scale patterns of leaf carbon and nitrogen in the grassland biomes of China. Oecologia, 149, 115-122. |
| [15] | He JS, Han XG (2010). Ecological stoichiometry: searching for unifying principles from individuals to ecosystems. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 34, 2-6. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 贺金生, 韩兴国 (2010). 生态化学计量学: 探索从个体到生态系统的统一化理论. 植物生态学报, 34, 2-6.] | |
| [16] | Herbert MA (1996). Fertilizer and eucalypt plantations in South Africa. In: Attiwill PM, Adams M eds. Nutrition of Eucalypts. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood. 303-325. |
| [17] | Hessen DO, Ågren GI, Anderson TR, Elser JJ, de Tuiter PC(2004). Carbon sequestration in ecosystems: the role of stoichiometry. Ecology, 85, 1179-1192. |
| [18] | Koerselman W, Meuleman AF(1996). The vegetation N:P ratio: a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 33, 1441-1450. |
| [19] | Ptacnik R, Jenerette GD, Verschoor AM, Huberty AF, Solimini AG, Brookes JD(2005). Applications of ecological stoichiometry for sustainable acquisition of ecosystem services. Oikos, 109, 52-62. |
| [20] | Reich PB, Oleksyn J(2004). Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 11001-11006. |
| [21] | Sterner RW, Elser JJ, Vitousek P 2002 Ecological Stoichiometry: the Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere. Princeton University Press, Princeton. |
| [22] | Tessier JT, Raynal DJ(2003). Use of nitrogen to phosphorus ratios in plant tissue as an indicator of nutrient limitation and nitrogen saturation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 40, 523-534. |
| [23] | Treseder KK, Vitousek PM(2001). Effects of soil nutrient availability on investment in acquisition of N and P in Hawaiian rain forests. Ecology, 82, 946-954. |
| [24] |
Vitousek PM(1982). Nutrient cycling and nutrient use efficiency. The American Naturalist, 119, 553-572.
DOI URL |
| [25] |
Wardle DA, Walker LR, Bardgett RD(2004). Ecosystem properties and forest decline in contrasting long-term chronosequences. Science, 305, 509-513.
DOI URL |
| [26] | Zeng DH, Chen GS (2005). Ecological stoichiometry: a science to explore the complexity of living systems. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 29, 1007-1019. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 曾德慧, 陈广生 (2005). 生态化学计量学: 复杂生命系统奥秘的探索. 植物生态学报, 29, 1007-1019.] | |
| [27] | Zhang J, Yang WQ (2008). Ecosystem of Short-Term Rotation Plantation of Eucalypt (Eucalyptus grandis). Sichuan Science and Technology Press, Chengdu. (in Chinese) |
| [ 张健, 杨万勤 (2008). 短轮伐期巨桉人工林生态系统. 四川科学技术出版社, 成都.] | |
| [28] | Zhang LX, Bai YF, Han XG(2003). Application of N:P stoichiometry to ecology studies. Acta Botanica Sinica, 45, 1009-1018. |
| [29] | Zhang LX, Bai YF, Han XG (2004). Differential Responses of N:P stoichiometry of Leymus chinensis and Carex korshinskyi to N additions in a steppe ecosystem in Nei Mongol. Acta Botanica Sinica, 46, 259-270. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 张丽霞, 白永飞, 韩兴国 (2004). 内蒙古典型草原生态系统中N素添加对羊草和黄囊苔草N:P化学计量学特征的影响. 植物学报, 46, 259-270.] |
| [1] | CHEN Xin-Rui, SONG Wei-Feng, Yi WANG, Hao WANG, Shi-Yao SUN, Cai-Jiang WANG, Shi-Peng CAI, Hong REN, Yu-Tao HE, Min PAN, Guang-Xiu CAO, Yi YAN, Zhi-Yong XIE, WANG Hang. Nitrogen and phosphorus resorption characteristics and adaptive strategies of typical emergent plants in the lakeshore zone of Dianchi Lake, China [J]. , 2026, 50(预发表): 0-. |
| [2] | LI Xin-Mao, JIN Guang-Ze, LIU Zhi-Li. Seasonal dynamics and organ differences in growth and defense strategies of “twig system” of Corylus mandshurica [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(2): 293-305. |
| [3] | ZHANG Jing, CHEN Jie, LI Yan-Peng, PAN Li-Jun, XU Han, LI Yi-De, HE Hai-Sheng. Comparison of plant biomass in conifer and broadleaf mixed artificial forests in south subtropical area and analyses of influential factors [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(2): 400-416. |
| [4] | ZHANG Jing-Wen, LI Jing, WANG Ru-Miao, WANG He-Nian, CUI Li-Juan. Ecological stoichiometry characteristics and homeostasis analysis of plant roots and soil in coastal wetlands at different latitudes [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(2): 461-473. |
| [5] | FENG Zhe, XU Ge-Xi, LIU Shun, CHEN Jian, LI Fei-Fan, GONG Shan-Shan, JIA Lei, SUN Zhen, YU Mei-Ni, SHI Zuo-Min, ZHOU Qing-Hong, JIANG Dong-Mei. Habitat factors and phylogeny jointly drive leaf stoichiometry in dry-hot valley region of Jinsha River, Yunnan, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(2): 352-361. |
| [6] | HOU Xiao-Fan, MA Chen-Han, SUN Yu-Qian, GAO Yu-Han, LI Pin. Differential ecological stoichiometry of leaf and fine root litter decomposition under ozone stress [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(2): 268-278. |
| [7] | XU En-Xiang, ZHOU Lei, ZHANG Xiao-Wei, ZHANG Guo-Ping, ZHONG Du-Wei, HUANG Zhi, LIU Pai, CHI Yong-Gang. Estimation of rice yield based on canopy reflectance spectra and carbon flux in diverse growth phases [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(1): 82-93. |
| [8] | LIANG Tian-Hao, WU Fan, HUANG Jin-Xue, JING Chen-Hong, FU He-Jing, YANG Zhi-Jie, XIONG De-Cheng. Effects of soil warming on fine root growth and morphology of Castanopsis kawakamii in mid-subtropical forests [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(1): 94-106. |
| [9] | PI Hui-Zhi, ZHANG Qiu-Fang, SUN Hao, ZENG Quan-Xin, PENG Yuan-Zhen, YUAN Xiao-Chun, XU Jian-Guo, CHEN Yue-Min. Microbial carbon-nitrogen imbalance affects the response of microbial nitrogen use efficiency to nitrogen enrichment in Castanopsis faberi forest soils [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(1): 34-44. |
| [10] | ZHU Rui-De, YANG Jun-Wei, LIU Xiao-Han, CHEN Bing-Rui, CHI Xiu-Lian, TIAN Di, YANG Guang, CHENG Meng, DAI Ya-Feng, WANG Shi-Wen. Nutrient regulation of plant-microbial association in Dendrobium huoshanense facilities and understory cultivation patterns [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2025, 49(9): 1434-1447. |
| [11] | SHEN Hui-Tao, YU Xiao-Ya, QIN Yan-Jie, WU Ai-Bin. Ecosystem ecological stoichiometry and carbon storage along a chronosequence of Juglans regia plantations on the Eastern of Taihang Mountain, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2025, 49(9): 1543-15555. |
| [12] | SONG Shan-Shan, TANG Zhi-Yao. Relationship between rhizosphere soil fungi and plant aboveground biomass in the meadow steppe of Saihanba, Hebei, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2025, 49(9): 1461-1471. |
| [13] | CHEN Gang-Gang, ZHU Si-Jie, GUO Liang-Na, FU Fang-Wei, LIU Yu-Zhuo, LI Jiang-Rong. Aboveground and belowground nutrient allocation strategies for trees and shrubs at alpine treeline in Sygera Mountains of the southeastern Qingzang Plateau [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2025, 49(9): 1515-1526. |
| [14] | XING Qiang, ZHAO Bin, HU Yong-Hong, YANG Jun, QIN Jun, LIU He-Ming, WANG Hong-Bing, ZHOU Peng. Root trait variation in response to a novel soil substrate in two typical vertical greening plants from the East China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2025, 49(9): 1498-1514. |
| [15] | ZHANG Fa-Wei, LI Hong-Qin, ZHU Jing-Bin, FAN Bo, ZHOU Hua-Kun, LI Ying-Nian, LIANG Nai-Shen. Response of aboveground and belowground carbon storage to nitrogen addition and precipitation change in an alpine meadow ecosystem [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2025, 49(9): 1399-1409. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2026 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn