物种多样性和功能群多样性与生态系统生产力的关系——以内蒙古短花针茅草原为例

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00064

植物生态学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (7): 620-630.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00064

所属专题：生态系统结构与功能；生物多样性

物种多样性和功能群多样性与生态系统生产力的关系——以内蒙古短花针茅草原为例

马文静¹,张庆^1,^2,^*(),牛建明^1,²,康萨如拉¹,刘朋涛³,何欣¹,杨艳¹,张艳楠¹,邬建国^2,⁴

¹内蒙古大学生命科学学院, 呼和浩特 010021
²中美生态、能源及可持续性科学研究中心, 呼和浩特 010021
³内蒙古气象局, 呼和浩特 010051

收稿日期:2013-01-04 接受日期:2013-05-03 出版日期:2013-01-04 发布日期:2013-07-05
通讯作者: 张庆
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(31200414);高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20121501120006);国家重点基础研究发展计划(2012CB722201);内蒙古大学高层次引进人才科研启动项目(125106)

Relationship of ecosystem primary productivity to species diversity and functional group diversity: evidence from Stipa breviflora grassland in Nei Mongol

MA Wen-Jing¹,ZHANG Qing^1,^2,^*(),NIU Jian-Ming^1,²,KANG Sarula¹,LIU Peng-Tao³,HE Xin¹,YANG Yan¹,ZHANG Yan-Nan¹,WU Jian-Guo^2,⁴

¹College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China
²Sino-US Center for Conservation, Energy and Sustainability Science in Inner Mongolia, Hohhot 010021, China
³Inner Mongolia Meteorology Bureau, Hohhot 010051, China

Received:2013-01-04 Accepted:2013-05-03 Online:2013-01-04 Published:2013-07-05
Contact: ZHANG Qing

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

生物多样性与生态系统生产力之间的关系是当前生态学领域的热点问题。短花针茅(Stipa breviflora)草原是内蒙古荒漠草原的主要类型, 生态系统脆弱, 气候波动剧烈, 研究内蒙古短花针茅草原生物多样性与生产力的关系具有十分重要的意义。该研究在内蒙古短花针茅草原区设置了202个样地进行群落调查, 在干旱区及半干旱区两种资源供给下, 分析了物种丰富度、功能群丰富度与生产力的关系, 旨在解决两个科学问题: 1)物种多样性和功能群多样性中, 哪一种与生产力关系更为密切?2)资源供给对多样性和生产力关系的影响。结果表明: 1)物种丰富度、群落生产力与年降水量呈正相关关系, 而功能群丰富度与年降水量之间不存在显著相关性; 2)群落生产力随物种丰富度的增加而增加, 且两者间呈正线性关系, 功能群丰富度与生产力之间不存在显著相关关系; 3)资源供给会影响多样性与生产力之间的关系, 资源供给低时, 多样性对生产力贡献较低, 资源供给高时, 多样性对生产力的贡献较高。该研究丰富了多样性与生产力关系的研究, 同时, 考虑到植物功能性状的研究在近几年受到生态学家的重视, 且多数研究集中于小尺度的人工控制实验, 因此, 在大尺度自然生态系统中开展功能性状多样性与生态系统功能关系的研究将十分必要。

关键词: 功能群丰富度, 生产力, 资源供给, 物种丰富度

Abstract:

Aims The relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning has been a central issue in ecology. However, this relationship is poorly understood for the Stipa breviflora grassland, which is a major community type of desert steppe in Nei Mongol. With unpredictably fluctuating climate conditions, these desert steppe ecosystems are fragile and provide a unique opportunity to test our current understanding of the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. This study has two objectives: (1) to examine if species diversity and functional group diversity affect ecosystem primary productivity in the desert steppe of Nei Mongol and (2) to explore how resource supply levels affect the relationship between diversity and productivity.
Methods Based on life forms, species were classified into five functional groups: shrub and semishrub, perennial bunchgrass, perennial rhizome grass, perennial forb, and annual and biennial. Species richness and functional group richness were used to represent species diversity and functional group diversity, respectively. Based on the dryness coefficient, 202 sites across the S. breviflora grassland in Nei Mongol were sampled, and divided into two resource supply levels: arid and semiarid zones. In order to tease out the effect of precipitation, partial regression analysis and partial correlation analysis were used for exploring the relationship of ecosystem primary productivity to species richness and functional group richness, respectively. According to the determination coefficient of regression analysis, the effect of resource supply levels on the diversity-productivity relationship was evaluated.
Important findings Species richness and ecosystem primary productivity were both positively and linearly correlated with precipitation, but no significant correlation was found between functional group richness and precipitation. Ecosystem primary productivity increased significantly with species richness, but not with functional group richness. Resource supply levels could affect the diversity-productivity relationship in that plant species diversity generally had a weaker effect on ecosystem primary productivity at the lower resource supply level and a stronger effect at the higher resource supply level.

Key words: functional group richness, productivity, resource supply, species richness

马文静,张庆,牛建明,康萨如拉,刘朋涛,何欣,杨艳,张艳楠,邬建国. 物种多样性和功能群多样性与生态系统生产力的关系——以内蒙古短花针茅草原为例. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(7): 620-630. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00064

MA Wen-Jing,ZHANG Qing,NIU Jian-Ming,KANG Sarula,LIU Peng-Tao,HE Xin,YANG Yan,ZHANG Yan-Nan,WU Jian-Guo. Relationship of ecosystem primary productivity to species diversity and functional group diversity: evidence from Stipa breviflora grassland in Nei Mongol. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2013, 37(7): 620-630. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00064

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00064

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2013/V37/I7/620

图/表 6

图1 样地分布。

Fig. 1 Distribution of sites.

图2 物种丰富度、功能群丰富度、生产力与年降水量的关系。

Fig. 2 Relationships between annual precipitation and species richness, functional group richness, and productivity.

表1 物种丰富度、功能群丰富度与生产力的关系

Table 1 Relationships between species richness, functional group richness and productivity

尺度 Scale	相关分析 Correlation	研究区 Study zone	半干旱区 Semiarid zone	干旱区 Arid zone
物种丰富度 Species richness	p_偏相关 p_partial	0.000	0.001	0.016
物种丰富度 Species richness	R²_偏相关 R²_partial	0.078	0.085	0.076
功能群丰富度 Functional group richness	p_偏相关 p_partial	0.376	0.227	0.693
功能群丰富度 Functional group richness	R²_偏相关 R²_partial	0.004	0.012	0.002

图3 物种丰富度和功能群丰富度与生产力的关系。A, 研究区。B, 半干旱区。C, 干旱区。

Fig. 3 Relationships between species richness, functional group richness and productivity. A, Study zone. B, Semiarid zone. C, Arid zone.

图4 物种丰富度和功能群丰富度对生产力的贡献。

Fig. 4 Contribution of species richness and functional group richness to productivity.

图5 资源供给对多样性和生产力关系的影响。

Fig. 5 Impact of resource supply on relationships between diversity and productivity.

参考文献 58

[1]	Bai YF, Han XG, Wu JG, Chen ZZ, Li LH (2004). Ecosystem stability and compensatory effects in the Inner Mongolia grassland. Nature, 431, 181-184. DOI URL PMID
[2]	Bai YF, Li LH, Huang JH, Chen ZZ (2001). The influence of plant diversity and functional composition on ecosystem stability of four Stipa communities in the Inner Mongolia Plateau. Acta Botanica Sinica, 43, 280-287.
[3]	Bai YF, Li LH, Wang QB, Zhang LX, Zhang Y, Chen ZZ (2000). Changes in plant species diversity and productivity along gradients of precipitation and elevation in the Xilin River Basin, Inner Mongolia. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 24, 667-673. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 白永飞, 李凌浩, 王其兵, 张丽霞, 张焱, 陈佐忠 (2000). 锡林河流域草原群落植物多样性和初级生产力沿水热梯度变化的样带研究. 植物生态学报, 24, 667-673.]
[4]	Bai YF, Wu JG, Pan QM, Huang JH, Wang QB, Li FS, Buyantuyev A, Han XG (2007). Positive linear relationship between productivity and diversity: evidence from the Eurasian Steppe. Journal of Applied Ecology, 44, 1023-1034.
[5]	Cardinale BJ, Ives AR, Inchausti P (2004). Effects of species diversity on the primary productivity of ecosystems: extending our spatial and temporal scales of inference. Oikos, 104, 437-450.
[6]	Chang XL, Zhao AF, Li SG (2000). Responses of species diversity to precipitation change on fixed-dunes of the Naiman Banner region. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 24, 147-151. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 常学礼, 赵爱芬, 李胜功 (2000). 科尔沁沙地固定沙丘植被物种多样性对降水变化的响应. 植物生态学报, 24, 147-151.]
[7]	Chapin FS III, Walker BH, Hobbs RJ, Hooper DU, Lawton JH, Sala OE, Tilman D (1997). Biotic control over the functioning of ecosystems. Science, 277, 500-504.
[8]	Chapin FS III, Zavaleta ES, Eviner VT, Naylor RL, Vitousek PM, Reynolds HL, Hooper DU, Lavorel S, Sala OE, Hobbie SE, Mack MC, Díaz S (2000). Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature, 405, 234-242. URL PMID
[9]	de Bello F, Lepš J, Sebastià MT (2006). Variations in species and functional plant diversity along climatic and grazing gradients. Ecography, 29, 801-810.
[10]	Díaz S, Symstad AJ, Stuart Chapin F, Wardle DA, Huenneke LF (2003). Functional diversity revealed by removal experiments. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18, 140-146.
[11]	Fang JY, Piao SL, Zhou LM, He JS, Wei YF, Myneni RB, Tucker CJ, Tan K (2005). Precipitation patterns alter growth of temperate vegetation. Geophysical Research Letters, 32, L21411.
[12]	Fridley JD (2002). Resource availability dominates and alters the relationship between species diversity and ecosystem productivity in experimental plant communities. Oecologia, 132, 271-277. URL PMID
[13]	Fridley JD (2003). Diversity effects on production in different light and fertility environments: an experiment with communities of annual plants. Journal of Ecology, 91, 396-406.
[14]	Grace JB, Michael Anderson T, Smith MD, Seabloom E, Andelman SJ, Meche G, Weiher E, Allain LK, Jutila H, Sankaran M, Knops J, Ritchie M, Willig MR (2007). Does species diversity limit productivity in natural grassland communities? Ecology Letters, 10, 680-689. DOI URL PMID
[15]	Gross KL, Willig MR, Gough L, Inouye R, Cox SB (2000). Patterns of species density and productivity at different spatial scales in herbaceous plant communities. Oikos, 89, 417-427.
[16]	Guo QF, Berry WL (1998). Species richness and biomass: dissection of the hump-shaped relationships. Ecology, 79, 2555-2559. DOI URL
[17]	Han B, Fan JW, Zhong HP (2006). Grassland biomass of communities along gradients of the Inner Mongolia grassland transect. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version), 30, 553-562. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 韩彬, 樊江文, 钟华平 (2006). 内蒙古草地样带植物群落生物量的梯度研究. 植物生态学报, 30, 553-562.]
[18]	He JS, Bazzaz FA, Schmid B (2002). Interactive effects of diversity, nutrients and elevated CO₂ on experimental plant communities. Oikos, 97, 337-348. DOI URL
[19]	He JS, Fang JY, Ma KP, Huang JH (2003). Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity: Why is there a discrepancy in the relationship between experimental and natural ecosystem? Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 27, 835-843. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 贺金生, 方精云, 马克平, 黄建辉 (2003). 生物多样性与生态系统生产力: 为什么野外观测和受控实验结果不一致? 植物生态学报, 27, 835-844.]
[20]	Hector A, Schmid B, Beierkuhnlein C, Caldeira MC, Diemer M, Dimitrakopoulos PG, Finn JA, Freitas H, Giller PS, Good J, Harris H, Högberg P, Huss-Danell K, Joshi J, Jumpponen A, Körner C, Leadley PW, Loreau M, Minns A, Mulder CPH, O’Donovan G, Otway SJ, Pereira JS, Prinz A, Read DJ, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Schulze ED, Siamantziouras ASD, Spehn EM, Terry AC, Troumbis AY, Woodward FI, Yachi S, Lawton JH (1999). Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. Science, 286, 1123-1127. DOI URL PMID
[21]	Hooper DU (1998). The role of complementarity and competition in ecosystem responses to variation in plant diversity. Ecology, 79, 704-719. DOI URL
[22]	Hooper DU, Chapin FS III, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M, Naeem S, Schmid B, Setälä H, Symstad AJ, Vandermeer J, Wardle DA (2005). Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs, 75, 3-35.
[23]	Hooper DU, Vitousek PM (1998). Effects of plant composition and diversity on nutrient cycling. Ecological Monographs, 68, 121-149.
[24]	Hu ZM, Fan JW, Zhong HP, Yu GR (2006). Spatial-temporal variability of aboveground biomass along a precipitation gradient in temperate grassland of China. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 36, 1154-1162. (in Chinese)
	[ 胡中民, 樊江文, 钟华平, 于贵瑞 (2006). 中国温带草地地上生产力沿降水梯度的时空变异性. 中国科学D辑: 地球科学, 36, 1154-1162.]
[25]	Huston MA, Aarssen LW, Austin MP, Cade BS, Fridley JD, Garnier E, Grime JP, Hodgson J, Lauenroth WK, Thompson K, Vandermeer JH, Wardle DA (2000). No consistent effect of plant diversity on productivity. Science, 289, 1255. DOI URL PMID
[26]	Inner Mongolia-Ningxia Joint Inspection Group of Chinese Academy of Sciences (1985). Vegetation of Inner Mongolia. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[ 中国科学院内蒙古宁夏综合考察队 (1985). 内蒙古植被. 科学出版社, 北京.]
[27]	Jiang XL, Zhang WG, Yan L, Wang G (2004). Effects of plant species diversity on productivity of ecosystem. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 13(6), 8-13. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 江小雷, 张卫国, 严林, 王刚 (2004). 植物群落物种多样性对生态系统生产力的影响. 草业学报, 13(6), 8-13.]
[28]	Klironomos JN, McCune J, Hart M, Neville J (2000). The influence of arbuscular mycorrhizae on the relationship between plant diversity and productivity. Ecology Letters, 3, 137-141. DOI URL
[29]	Kong DL, Wu HF, Zeng H, Lü XT, Simmons M, Wang M, Sun XF, Han XG (2011). Plant functional group removal alters root biomass and nutrient cycling in a typical steppe in Inner Mongolia, China. Plant and Soil, 346, 133-144. DOI URL
[30]	Lanta V, Lepš J (2006). Effect of functional group richness and species richness in manipulated productivity-diversity studies: a glasshouse pot experiment. Acta Oecologica, 29, 85-96. DOI URL
[31]	Li DX (1990). Dynamics and ecological stability of form Stipa breviflora desert steppe. Grassland of China, (4), 1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 李德新 (1990). 短花针茅荒漠草原动态规律及其生态稳定性. 中国草地, (4), 1-5.]
[32]	Li XG, Zhu ZH, Zhou XS, Yuan FR, Fan RJ, Xu ML (2011). Effects of clipping, fertilizing and watering on the relationship between species diversity, functional diversity and primary productivity in alpine meadow of China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 35, 1136-1147. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 李晓刚, 朱志红, 周晓松, 袁芙蓉, 樊瑞俭, 许曼丽 (2011). 刈割、施肥和浇水对高寒草甸物种多样性、功能多样性与初级生产力关系的影响. 植物生态学报, 35, 1136-1147.] DOI URL
[33]	Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P, Bengtsson J, Grime JP, Hector A, Hooper DU, Huston MA, Raffaelli D, Schmid B, Tilman D, Wardle DA (2001). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science, 294, 804-808. DOI URL PMID
[34]	McCann KS (2000). The diversity-stability debate. Nature, 405, 228-233. DOI URL PMID
[35]	Mittelbach GG, Steiner CF, Scheiner SM, Gross KL, Reynolds HL, Waide RB, Willig MR, Dodson SI, Gough L (2001). What is the observed relationship between species richness and productivity? Ecology, 82, 2381-2396. DOI URL
[36]	Naeem S (2002). Ecosystem consequences of biodiversity loss: the evolution of a paradigm. Ecology, 83, 1537-1552. DOI URL
[37]	Ni J (2004). Estimating net primary productivity of grasslands from field biomass measurements in temperate northern China. Plant Ecology, 174, 217-234. DOI URL
[38]	Niu JM (2000). Relationship between main vegetation types and climatic factors in Inner Mongolia. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 11, 47-52. (in Chinese with English abstract) URL PMID
	[ 牛建明 (2000). 内蒙古主要植被类型与气候因子关系的研究. 应用生态学报, 11, 47-52.] URL PMID
[39]	Petchey OL, Gaston KJ (2002). Functional diversity (fd), species richness and community composition. Ecology Letters, 5, 402-411. DOI URL
[40]	Pontes LS, Maire V, Louault F, Soussana JF, Carrère P (2012). Impacts of species interactions on grass community productivity under contrasting management regimes. Oecologia, 168, 761-771. DOI URL PMID
[41]	Proulx M, Mazumder A (1998). Reversal of grazing impact on plant species richness in nutrient-poor vs. nutrient-rich ecosystems. Ecology, 79, 2581-2592. DOI URL
[42]	Qian JL, Lin ZG (1965). A preliminary study on the dry and wet climatic regionalization of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 31, 1-14. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 钱纪良, 林之光 (1965). 关子中国干湿气候区划的初步研究. 地理学报, 31, 1-14.]
[43]	Rapson GL, Thompson K, Hodgson JG (1997). The humped relationship between species richness and biomass-testing its sensitivity to sample quadrat size. Journal of Ecology, 85, 99-100. DOI URL
[44]	Sasaki T, Okubo S, Okayasu T, Jamsran U, Ohkuro T, Takeuchi K (2009). Two-phase functional redundancy in plant communities along a grazing gradient in Mongolian rangelands. Ecology, 90, 2598-2608. DOI URL PMID
[45]	Sun GJ, Zhang R, Zhou L (2003). Trends and advances in researches on plant functional diversity and functional groups. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 23, 1430-1435. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 孙国钧, 张荣, 周立 (2003). 植物功能多样性与功能群研究进展. 生态学报, 23, 1430-1435.]
[46]	Thompson K, Askew AP, Grime JP, Dunnett NP, Willis AJ (2005). Biodiversity, ecosystem function and plant traits in mature and immature plant communities. Functional Ecology, 19, 355-358. DOI URL
[47]	Tilman D, Knops J, Wedin D, Reich P, Ritchie M, Siemann E (1997). The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science, 277, 1300-1302. DOI URL
[48]	Tilman D, Reich PB, Knops J, Wedin D, Mielke T, Lehman C (2001). Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment. Science, 294, 843-845. URL PMID
[49]	Tilman D, Wedin D, Knops J (1996). Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature, 379, 718-720. DOI URL
[50]	Turner RM, Alcorn SM, Olin G, Booth JA (1966). The influence of shade, soil, and water on saguaro seedling establishment. Botanical Gazette, 127, 95-102. DOI URL
[51]	Waide RB, Willig MR, Steiner CF, Mittelbach G, Gough L, Dodson SI, Juday GP, Parmenter R (1999). The relationship between productivity and species richness. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 30, 257-300. DOI URL
[52]	Wang CT, Long RJ, Ding LM (2004). The effects of differences in functional group diversity and composition on plant community productivity in four types of alpine meadow communities. Biodiversity Science, 12, 403-409. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 王长庭, 龙瑞军, 丁路明 (2004). 高寒草甸不同草地类型功能群多样性及组成对植物群落生产力的影响. 生物多样性, 12, 403-409.]
[53]	Wang GJ, Wang SP, Hao YB, Cai XC (2005). Effect of grazing on the plant functional group diversity and community biomass. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 25, 1649-1656. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 王国杰, 汪诗平, 郝彦宾, 蔡学彩 (2005). 水分梯度上放牧对内蒙古主要草原群落功能群多样性与生产力关系的影响. 生态学报, 25, 1649-1656.]
[54]	Yuan ZQ, Wei PP, Gao BQ, Zhang R (2012). Effect of sampling scale on the relationship between species diversity and productivity in subalpine meadows. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 36, 1248-1255. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 袁自强, 魏盼盼, 高本强, 张荣 (2012). 取样尺度对亚高寒草甸物种多样性与生产力关系的影响. 植物生态学报, 36, 1248-1255.] DOI URL
[55]	Zang YM, Zhu ZH, Li YN, Wang WJ, Xi B (2009). Effects of species diversity and functional diversity on primary productivity of alpine meadow. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 28, 999-1005. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 臧岳铭, 朱志红, 李英年, 王文娟, 席博 (2009). 高寒矮嵩草草甸物种多样性与功能多样性对初级生产力的影响. 生态学杂志, 28, 999-1005.]
[56]	Zhang Q, Niu JM, Buyantuyev A, Zhang J, Ding Y, Dong JJ (2011). Productivity-species richness relationship changes from unimodal to positive linear with increasing spatial scale in the Inner Mongolia steppe. Ecological Research, 26, 649-658. DOI URL
[57]	Zhang Q, Niu JM, Buyantuyev A, Ding Y, Kang S, Wang FL, Zhang YN, Yang Y, Han YJ (2012). Ecological analysis and classification of Stipa breviflora communities in the Inner Mongolia region: the role of environmental factors. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 21, 83-92. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 张庆, 牛建明, Buyantuyev A, 丁勇, 康萨如拉, 王凤兰, 张艳楠, 杨艳, 韩砚君 (2012). 内蒙古短花针茅群落数量分类及环境解释. 草业学报, 21, 83-92.] DOI URL
[58]	Zobel K, Liira J (1997). A scale-independent approach to the richness vs. biomass relationship in ground-layer plant communities. Oikos, 80, 325-332. DOI URL

物种多样性和功能群多样性与生态系统生产力的关系——以内蒙古短花针茅草原为例

Relationship of ecosystem primary productivity to species diversity and functional group diversity: evidence from Stipa breviflora grassland in Nei Mongol

全文

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 58

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	白皓然侯盟刘艳杰. 少花蒺藜草入侵与干旱对羊草草原生产力的影响机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(5): 577-589.
[2]	杨宇萌, 来全, 刘心怡. 气候变化和人类活动对内蒙古植被总初级生产力的定量影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(3): 306-316.
[3]	李伟, 张荣. 亚高寒草甸群落结构决定群落生产力实例验证[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(5): 713-723.
[4]	钟姣, 姜超, 刘世荣, 龙文兴, 孙建新. 海南长臂猿食源植物的潜在物种丰富度分布格局[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(4): 491-505.
[5]	杨元合, 张典业, 魏斌, 刘洋, 冯雪徽, 毛超, 徐玮婕, 贺美, 王璐, 郑志虎, 王媛媛, 陈蕾伊, 彭云峰. 草地群落多样性和生态系统碳氮循环对氮输入的非线性响应及其机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(1): 1-24.
[6]	刘沛荣, 同小娟, 孟平, 张劲松, 张静茹, 于裴洋, 周宇. 散射辐射对中国东部典型人工林总初级生产力的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(8): 904-918.
[7]	原媛, 母艳梅, 邓钰洁, 李鑫豪, 姜晓燕, 高圣杰, 查天山, 贾昕. 植被覆盖度和物候变化对典型黑沙蒿灌丛生态系统总初级生产力的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(2): 162-175.
[8]	张义, 程杰, 苏纪帅, 程积民. 长期封育演替下典型草原植物群落生产力与多样性关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(2): 176-187.
[9]	韩聪, 刘鹏, 母艳梅, 原媛, 郝少荣, 田赟, 查天山, 贾昕. 黑沙蒿灌丛生态系统碳平衡对昼夜非对称增温的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(12): 1473-1485.
[10]	臧永新, 马剑英, 周晓兵, 陶冶, 尹本丰, 沙亚古丽•及格尔, 张元明. 极端干旱和降水对沙垄不同坡向坡位短命植物地上生产力的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(12): 1537-1550.
[11]	崔光帅, 罗天祥, 梁尔源, 张林. 干旱半干旱区灌丛对草本植物的促进作用研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(11): 1321-1333.
[12]	薛金儒, 吕肖良. 黄土高原生态工程实施下基于日光诱导叶绿素荧光的植被恢复生产力效益评价[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(10): 1289-1304.
[13]	汲玉河, 周广胜, 王树东, 王丽霞, 周梦子. 2000-2019年秦岭地区植被生态质量演变特征及驱动力分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(6): 617-625.
[14]	王奕丹, 李亮, 刘琪璟, 马泽清. 亚热带6个典型树种吸收细根寿命与形态属性格局[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(4): 383-393.
[15]	丁键浠, 周蕾, 王永琳, 庄杰, 陈集景, 周稳, 赵宁, 宋珺, 迟永刚. 叶绿素荧光主动与被动联合观测应用前景[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(2): 105-118.