浙江天童常绿阔叶林、常绿针叶林与落叶阔叶林的C:N:P化学计量特征

doi:10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.01.008

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以浙江天童常绿阔叶林、常绿针叶林和落叶阔叶林为对象, 通过对叶片和凋落物C:N:P比率与N、P重吸收的研究, 揭示3种植被类型N、P养分限制和N、P重吸收的内在联系。结果显示: 1)叶片C:N:P在常绿阔叶林为758:18:1, 在常绿针叶林为678:14:1, 在落叶阔叶林为338:11:1; 凋落物C:N:P在常绿阔叶林为777:13:1, 常绿针叶林为691:14:1, 落叶阔叶林为567:14:1; 2)常绿阔叶林和常绿针叶林叶片与凋落物C:N均显著高于落叶阔叶林; 叶片C:P在常绿阔叶林最高, 常绿针叶林中等, 落叶阔叶林最低, 常绿阔叶林和常绿针叶林凋落物C:P显著高于落叶阔叶林; 叶片N:P比也是常绿阔叶林最高、常绿针叶林次之, 落叶阔叶林最低, 但常绿阔叶林凋落物N:P最低; 3)植被叶片N、P含量间(N为x, P为y)的II类线性回归斜率显著大于1 (p < 0.05), 表明叶片P含量的增加可显著提高叶片N含量; 凋落物N、P含量的回归斜率约等于1, 反映了凋落物中单位P含量与单位N含量间的等速损耗关系; 4)常绿阔叶林N重吸收率显著高于常绿针叶林与落叶阔叶林, 落叶阔叶林P重吸收率显著高于常绿阔叶林和常绿针叶林。虽然植被的N:P指示常绿阔叶林受P限制, 落叶阔叶林受N限制, 常绿针叶林受N、P的共同限制, 但是N、P重吸收研究结果表明: 受N素限制的常绿阔叶林具有高的N重吸收率, 受P限制的落叶阔叶林并不具有高的P重吸收率。可见, 较高的N、P养分转移率可能不是植物对N、P养分胁迫的一种重要适应机制, 是物种固有的特征。

关键词: C:N:P比率, II类线性回归, 养分限制, 养分重吸收, 化学计量学

Abstract:

Aims Little is known about constrained ratios of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus (C:N:P) in terrestrial ecosystems. Our objective was to examine the C:N:P stoichiometry and its relationship with N and P resorption in evergreen broad-leaved forests (EBLF), evergreen coniferous forests (CF) and deciduous broad-leaved forests (DF) at the regional scale.

Methods The study was conducted in Tiantong National Forest Park (29°52′ N, 121°39′ E), Zhejiang Province, eastern China. To estimate foliar and litter C:N:P ratios and N and P resorption efficiencies, we quantified the C, N and P concentrations in leaf and litterfall in EBLF, CF and DF. We used type II regression slopes (reduced major axis, RMA) to determine whether C:N:P stoichiometry varied across gradients of forest production and nutrients.

Important findings The C:N:P ratios in EBLF, CF and DF were 758:18:1, 678:14:1 and 338:11:1 in fresh leaves and 777:13:1, 691:14:1 and 567:14:1 in litterfall, respectively. The foliar C:N ratio was highest in CF, intermediate in EBLF and lowest in DF, while the foliar C:P and N:P ratios were highest in EBLF, intermediate in CF and lowest in DF. In contrast, the litterfall C:N and C:P ratios were higher in EBLF than in CF and DF, and there were no significant differences of N:P ratio among forests. The type II regression slope for N vs. P in leaves of overall plants was statistically >1, suggesting an increasing investment of N with increasing of P in fresh leaves. In contrast, the slope for N vs. P in litterfall approximated 1. N resorption in EBLF was significantly higher than in CF and in DF, but the highest P resorption was observed in DF. Although foliar N:P ratios indicated that EBLF was P limited, DF was N limited and CF was both N and P limited, the nutrient resorption efficiency did not respond with relatively high N resorption in EBLF and high P resorption in DF. We concluded that the relative higher resorption of N and P before leaf abscission could be an inherent property of plants, but was not a mechanism thought to have evolved to conserve nutrients in environments with limited N or P supply.

Key words: C:N:P ratio, model Type II regression, nutrient limitation, nutrient resorption, stoichiometry

阎恩荣, 王希华, 郭明, 仲强, 周武. 浙江天童常绿阔叶林、常绿针叶林与落叶阔叶林的C:N:P化学计量特征. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(1): 48-57. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.01.008

YAN En-Rong, WANG Xi-Hua, GUO Ming, ZHONG Qiang, ZHOU Wu. C:N:P stoichiometry across evergreen broad-leaved forests, evergreen coniferous forests and deciduous broad-leaved forests in the Tiantong region, Zhejiang Province, eastern China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(1): 48-57. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.01.008

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.01.008

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2010/V34/I1/48

图/表 4

参考文献 32

[1]	Aerts R (1996). Nutrient resorption from senescing leaves of perennials: Are there general patterns? Journal of Ecology, 84, 597-608. DOI URL
[2]	Aerts R, Chapin FS III (1999). The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Advances in Ecological Research, 30, 1-67.
[3]	Boerner REJ (1984). Foliar nutrient dynamics and nutrient use efficiency of four deciduous tree species in relation to site fertility. Journal of Applied Ecology, 21, 1029-1040. DOI URL
[4]	Chapin FS III, Kedrowski RA (1983). Seasonal changes in nitrogen and phosphorous fractions and autumn retranslocation in evergreen and deciduous Taiga tree. Ecology, 64, 376-391. DOI URL
[5]	Chapin FS III, Moilanen L (1991). Nutrient controls over nitrogen and phosphorus resorption from Alaskan birch leaves. Ecology, 72, 709-715. DOI URL
[6]	Davidson EA, de Carvalho CJR, Figueira AM, Ishida FY, Ometto JPHB, Nardoto GB, Sabá RT, Hayashi SN, Leal EC, Vieira ICG, Martinelli LA (2007). Recuperation of nitrogen cycling in Amazonian forests following agricultural abandonment. Nature, 447, 995-999. DOI URL PMID
[7]	Elser JJ, Fagan WF, Denno RF, Dobberfuhl DR, Folarin A, Huberty A, Interlandi S, Kilham SS, McCauley E, Schulz KL, Siemann EH, Sterner RW (2000). Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater food webs. Nature, 408, 578-580. DOI URL PMID
[8]	Falster DS, Warton DI, Wright IJ (2006). User’s Guide to SMATR: Standardised Major Axis Tests & Routines, Version 2.0, Copyright 2006. http://www.bio.mq.edu.au/ecology/SMATR20.
[9]	Güsewell S, Koerselman W, Verhoeven JTA (2003). Biomass N:P ratios as indicators of nutrient limitation for plant populations in wetlands. Ecological Appications, 13, 372-384.
[10]	Güsewell S (2004). N:P ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance. New Phytologist, 164, 243-266. DOI URL
[11]	Han WX, Fang JY, Guo DL, Zhang Y (2005). Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across 753 terrestrial plant species in China. New Phytologist, 1682, 377-385.
[12]	He JS, Fang J, Wang Z, Guo D, Flynn DFB, Gerg Z (2006). Stoichiometry and large-scale patterns of leaf carbon and nitrogen in the grassland biomes of China. Oecologia, 149, 115-122. URL PMID
[13]	He JS, Wang L, Flynn DFB, Wang X, Ma W, Fang J (2008). Leaf nitrogen : phosphorus stoichiometry across Chinese grassland biomes. Oecologia, 155, 301-310. URL PMID
[14]	Hessen DO, Ägren GI, Anderson TR, Elser JJ, de Ruiter PC (2004). Carbon sequestration in ecosystems: the role of stoichiometry. Ecology, 85, 1179-1192. DOI URL
[15]	Huang JJ (黄建军), Wang XH (王希华) (2003). Leaf nutrient and structural characteristics of 32 evergreen broad-leaved species. Journal of East China Normal University (Natural Science Edition) 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版)), (1), 92-97. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	Killingbeck KT (1996). Nutrient in senesced leaves: keys to the search for potential resorption and resorption proficiency. Ecology, 77, 1716-1727. DOI URL
[17]	Koerselman W, Meuleman AFM (1996). The vegetation N:P ratio: a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 33, 1441-1450. DOI URL
[18]	Liu C, Berg B, Kutsch W, Westman CJ, Ilvesniemi H, Shen X, Shen G, Chen X (2006). Leaf litter nitrogen concentration as related to climatic factors in Eurasian. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 15, 438-444. DOI URL
[19]	McGroddy ME, Daufresne T, Hedin LO (2004). Scaling of C:N:P stoichiometry in forests worldwide: implications of terrestrial Redfield-type ratios. Ecology, 85, 2390-2401. DOI URL
[20]	Niklas KJ (2006). Plant allometry, leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry, and interspecific trends in annual growth rates. Annuals of Botany, 97, 155-163. DOI URL
[21]	Reich PB, Oleksyn J (2004). Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 11001-11006. DOI URL PMID
[22]	Shi JY (施家月), Wang XH (王希华), Yan ER (阎恩荣), Cheng MH (程铭华) (2006). Saplings nutrient characteristics of common plants in Tiantong National Forest Park. Journal of East China Normal University (Natural Science Edition) 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版)), 2, 121-129. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	Sun SC (孙书存), Chen LZ (陈灵芝) (2001). Leaf nutrient dynamics and resorption efficiency of Quercus liaotungensis in the Dongling mountain region. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 25, 76-82. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	Sun SC, Jin DM, Shi PL (2006). The leaf size-twig size spectrum of temperate woody species along an altitudinal gradient: an invariant allometric scaling relationship. Annals of Botany, 97, 97-107. URL PMID
[25]	Tessier JT, Raynal DJ (2003). Use of nitrogen to phosphorus ratios in plant tissue as an indicator of nutrient limitation and nitrogen saturation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 40, 523-534. DOI URL
[26]	Verhoeven JTA, Koerselman W, Meuleman AFM (1996). Nitrogen- or phosphorus-limited growth in herbaceous, wet vegetation: relations with atmospheric inputs and management regimes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 494-497. URL PMID
[27]	Wardle DA, Walker LR, Bardgett RD (2004). Ecosystem properties and forest decline in contrasting long-term chronosequences. Science, 305, 509-513. DOI URL PMID
[28]	Yan ER (阎恩荣), Wang XH (王希华), Zhou W (周武) (2008a). Characteristics of litterfall in relation to soil nutrients in mature and degraded evergreen broad-leaved forests of Tiantong, east China. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version) (植物生态学报), 32, 1-12. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	Yan ER (阎恩荣), Wang XH (王希华), Zhou W (周武) (2008b). N:P stoichiometry in secondary succession within evergreen broad-leaved forest Tiantong, east China. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese version) (植物生态学报), 32, 13-22. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	Zeng DH (曾德慧), Chen GS (陈广生) (2005). Ecological stoichiometry: a science to explore the complexity of living systems. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 29, 1007-1019. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	Zhang LX, Bai YF, Han XG (2003). Application of N:P stoichiometry to ecology studies. Acta Botanica Sinica, 45, 1009-1018.
[32]	Zhang L (张林), Luo TX (罗天祥) (2004). Advances in ecological studies on leaf lifesdan and associated leaf traits. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 28, 844-852. (in Chinese with English abstract)

植被类型和群落类型 Vegetation and community types			冠层 Foliage
植被类型和群落类型 Vegetation and community types			碳 C (%)	氮 N (g·kg^-1)	磷 P (g·kg^-1)	碳 C (%)	氮 N (g·kg^-1)	磷 P (g·kg^-1)
常绿阔叶林 Evergreen broad-leaved forests
栲树群落﹟		栲树 Castanopsis fargesii	43.8 (1.6)	13.9 (1.5)	0.7 (0.1)	46.2 (1.4)	9.0 (1.6)	0.6 (0.1)
		狗骨柴 Tricalysia dubia	44.2 (2.2)	17.6 (2.1)	0.9 (0.1)	39.7 (1.7)	4.9 (1.4)	0.4 (0.1)
		黄丹木姜子 Litsea elongata	48.6 (2.5)	11.5 (1.7)	0.7 (0.1)	46.4 (1.9)	4.3 (0.6)	0.5 (0.1)
		连蕊茶 Camellia fraterna	41.9 (2.6)	10.4 (2.3)	0.5 (0.1)	42.4 (3.9)	4.9 (1.0)	0.4 (0.1)
		天竺桂 Cinnamomum japonicum	49.1 (1.4)	12.1 (1.7)	0.7 (0.1)	47.2 (1.8)	5.0 (0.9)	0.5 (0.1)
		交让木 Daphniphyllum macropodum	41.8 (2.2)	12.6 (1.6)	0.6 (0.1)	39.2 (2.1)	6.2 (1.1)	0.4 (0.1)
		笔罗子 Meliosma regida	43.2 (1.9)	9.4 (0.7)	0.7 (0.1)	39.7 (1.7)	4.9 (1.4)	0.5 (0.1)
木荷群落＊		木荷 Schima superba	49.7 (3.1)	9.7 (1.4)	0.6 (0.1)	44.9 (0.8)	7.7 (0.9)	0.5 (0.1)
		栲树 Castanopsis fargesii	46.2 (4.2)	13.6 (1.2)	0.6 (0.1)	42.1 (1.9)	11.2 (1.8)	0.7 (0.1)
		马尾松 Pinus massoniana	51.4 (1.2)	11.8 (1.5)	0.5 (0.1)	47.9 (0.4)	8.8 (0.1)	0.8 (0.1)
		石栎 Lithocarpus glaber	47.9 (1.2)	9.7 (1.3)	0.7 (0.1)	46.9 (5.2)	8.8 (1.1)	0.6 (0.1)
		连蕊茶 Camellia fraterna	43.5 (1.1)	10.7 (1.9)	0.7 (0.1)	40.4 (1.7)	7.4 (1.2)	0.7 (0.1)
		山矾 Symplocos sumuntia	32.0 (1.6)	9.3 (0.9)	0.5 (0.1)	33.5 (1.6)	6.0 (0.6)	0.5 (0.1)
		柃木属植物 Eurya spp.	40.5 (1.6)	8.9 (1.8)	0.4 (0.1)	37.5 (2.8)	6.6 (0.3)	0.7 (0.2)
常绿针叶林 Evergreen coniferous forests
马尾松木荷群落※	马尾松 Pinus massoniana		42.4 (5.7)	11.3 (0.6)	1.1 (0.1)	50.4 (1.7)	5.4 (0.4)	0.6 (0.1)
	木荷 Schima superba		33.6 (5.9)	9.1 (0.7)	0.5 (0.1)	47.7 (1.8)	6.4 (0.8)	0.5 (0.1)
	苦槠 Castanopsis sclerophylla		42.0 (5.0)	10.4 (1.2)	0.9 (0.1)	46.9 (1.3)	10.1 (0.7)	0.7 (0.1)
	栲树 Castanopsis fargesii		39.3 (1.0)	12.5 (1.2)	0.8 (0.2)	45.7 (1.2)	8.7 (1.2)	0.7 (0.1)
	赤皮青冈 Cyclobalanopsis gilva		35.5 (5.1)	14.6 (1.1)	0.9 (0.1)	46.6 (1.5)	10.4 (2.3)	0.7 (0.1)
	连蕊茶 Camellia fraterna		37.7 (5.9)	7.9 (1.7)	0.6 (0.1)	39.1 (1.7)	9.4 (0.5)	0.7 (0.1)
	披针叶山矾 Symplocos lancifolia		39.1 (5.6)	11.9 (1.3)	0.6 (0.1)	35.3 (1.6)	10.5 (1.5)	0.6 (0.1)
	山矾 Symplocos sumuntia		38.6 (3.7)	10.5 (1.9)	0.6 (0.1)	39.8 (3.6)	11.2 (0.9)	0.7 (0.1)
	窄基红褐柃 Eurya rubiginosa		36.0 (1.2)	11.0 (1.1)	0.7 (0.1)	42.3 (3.1)	7.2 (1.1)	0.5 (0.1)
马尾松群落§	马尾松 Pinus massoniana		51.4 (1.6)	5.8 (1.0)	0.5 (0.1)	48.7 (1.7)	5.4 (0.6)	0.5 (0.1)
	木荷 Schima superba		45.9 (1.2)	9.1 (1.3)	0.6 (0.1)	46.6 (1.3)	6.6 (0.6)	0.5 (0.1)
	苦槠 Castanopsis sclerophylla		46.1 (1.7)	8.5 (1.1)	0.5 (0.1)	45.5 (1.7)	9.3 (0.8)	0.7 (0.1)
	石栎 Lithocarpus glaber		51.6 (2.6)	8.1 (1.5)	0.6 (0.1)	43.0 (2.1)	10.9 (1.2)	0.6 (0.1)
	栲树 Castanopsis fargesii		47.4 (1.9)	8.3 (1.1)	0.6 (0.1)	43.2 (1.7)	10.4 (0.8)	0.8 (0.1)
	山矾 Symplocos sumuntia		32.9 (1.9)	9.5 (2.0)	0.6 (0.1)	31.7 (1.5)	10.3 (1.2)	0.7 (0.1)
	檵木 Loropetalum chinense		44.2 (1.6)	11.6 (1.5)	0.8 (0.1)	40.2 (4.3)	8.5 (2.3)	0.7 (0.1)
落叶阔叶林 Deciduous broad-leaved forests
枫香群落^∆	枫香 Liquidambar formosana		43.4 (1.8)	18.5 (2.0)	1.4 (0.1)	37.9 (1.3)	13.3 (1.1)	1.0 (0.1)
	化香 Platycarya strobilacea		43.6 (1.2)	16.7 (2.5)	1.8 (0.2)	35.5 (3.4)	15.4 (1.1)	1.2 (0.2)
	白栎 Quercus fabri		43.9 (1.4)	17.3 (1.5)	1.7 (0.1)	39.6 (2.0)	12.5 (1.7)	1.0 (0.2)
	青灰叶下珠 Phyllanthus glaucus		39.5 (1.3)	23.5 (3.5)	2.1 (0.5)	40.1 (3.6)	14.1 (1.7)	0.9 (0.2)
	天仙果 Ficus erecta var. beecheyana		36.6 (1.2)	18.3 (1.7)	1.3 (0.1)	39.2 (2.7)	13.8 (1.6)	0.9 (0.1)
	箬竹 Indocalamus tessellates		41.4 (1.1)	15.6 (1.2)	1.8 (0.2)	33.3 (3.5)	13.2 (1.9)	0.9 (0.1)
南酸枣群落☆	南酸枣 Choerospondias axillaries		36.3 (1.2)	14.4 (2.3)	1.8 (0.3)	44.0 (1.5)	7.9 (0.4)	0.5 (0.1)
	长叶石栎 Lithocarpus harlandii		40.0 (1.1)	11.5 (0.9)	1.4 (0.3)	46.9 (3.4)	8.4 (1.6)	0.5 (0.1)
	华东楠 Machilus leptophylla		41.5 (2.6)	12.5 (1.3)	1.1 (0.2)	42.1 (2.7)	11.6 (1.2)	0.8 (0.1)
	披针叶茴香 Illicium lanceolatum		38.5 (2.1)	8.3 (0.7)	0.9 (0.1)	45.6 (1.9)	7.6 (0.9)	0.5 (0.1)
	紫楠 Phoebe sheareri		39.7 (2.2)	14.3 (1.8)	1.0 (0.2)	38.7 (2.3)	8.8 (1.5)	0.6 (0.2)
	黄丹木姜子 Litsea elongata		37.6 (1.5)	11.6 (1.6)	0.8 (0.1)	45.9 (3.6)	6.6 (0.1)	0.6 (0.1)
	连蕊茶 Camellia fraterna		40.1 (1.3)	7.9 (0.5)	0.7 (0.1)	35.7 (4.5)	10.6 (0.6)	0.9 (0.1)
	赤杨叶 Alniphyllum fortunei		41.6 (1.4)	16.3 (1.6)	0.9 (0.1)	42.1 (4.4)	10.9 (1.1)	1.1 (0.1)

植被类型和群落类型 Vegetation and community types			冠层 Foliage
植被类型和群落类型 Vegetation and community types			碳 C (%)	氮 N (g·kg^-1)	磷 P (g·kg^-1)	碳 C (%)	氮 N (g·kg^-1)	磷 P (g·kg^-1)
常绿阔叶林 Evergreen broad-leaved forests
栲树群落﹟		栲树 Castanopsis fargesii	43.8 (1.6)	13.9 (1.5)	0.7 (0.1)	46.2 (1.4)	9.0 (1.6)	0.6 (0.1)
		狗骨柴 Tricalysia dubia	44.2 (2.2)	17.6 (2.1)	0.9 (0.1)	39.7 (1.7)	4.9 (1.4)	0.4 (0.1)
		黄丹木姜子 Litsea elongata	48.6 (2.5)	11.5 (1.7)	0.7 (0.1)	46.4 (1.9)	4.3 (0.6)	0.5 (0.1)
		连蕊茶 Camellia fraterna	41.9 (2.6)	10.4 (2.3)	0.5 (0.1)	42.4 (3.9)	4.9 (1.0)	0.4 (0.1)
		天竺桂 Cinnamomum japonicum	49.1 (1.4)	12.1 (1.7)	0.7 (0.1)	47.2 (1.8)	5.0 (0.9)	0.5 (0.1)
		交让木 Daphniphyllum macropodum	41.8 (2.2)	12.6 (1.6)	0.6 (0.1)	39.2 (2.1)	6.2 (1.1)	0.4 (0.1)
		笔罗子 Meliosma regida	43.2 (1.9)	9.4 (0.7)	0.7 (0.1)	39.7 (1.7)	4.9 (1.4)	0.5 (0.1)
木荷群落＊		木荷 Schima superba	49.7 (3.1)	9.7 (1.4)	0.6 (0.1)	44.9 (0.8)	7.7 (0.9)	0.5 (0.1)
		栲树 Castanopsis fargesii	46.2 (4.2)	13.6 (1.2)	0.6 (0.1)	42.1 (1.9)	11.2 (1.8)	0.7 (0.1)
		马尾松 Pinus massoniana	51.4 (1.2)	11.8 (1.5)	0.5 (0.1)	47.9 (0.4)	8.8 (0.1)	0.8 (0.1)
		石栎 Lithocarpus glaber	47.9 (1.2)	9.7 (1.3)	0.7 (0.1)	46.9 (5.2)	8.8 (1.1)	0.6 (0.1)
		连蕊茶 Camellia fraterna	43.5 (1.1)	10.7 (1.9)	0.7 (0.1)	40.4 (1.7)	7.4 (1.2)	0.7 (0.1)
		山矾 Symplocos sumuntia	32.0 (1.6)	9.3 (0.9)	0.5 (0.1)	33.5 (1.6)	6.0 (0.6)	0.5 (0.1)
		柃木属植物 Eurya spp.	40.5 (1.6)	8.9 (1.8)	0.4 (0.1)	37.5 (2.8)	6.6 (0.3)	0.7 (0.2)
常绿针叶林 Evergreen coniferous forests
马尾松木荷群落※	马尾松 Pinus massoniana		42.4 (5.7)	11.3 (0.6)	1.1 (0.1)	50.4 (1.7)	5.4 (0.4)	0.6 (0.1)
	木荷 Schima superba		33.6 (5.9)	9.1 (0.7)	0.5 (0.1)	47.7 (1.8)	6.4 (0.8)	0.5 (0.1)
	苦槠 Castanopsis sclerophylla		42.0 (5.0)	10.4 (1.2)	0.9 (0.1)	46.9 (1.3)	10.1 (0.7)	0.7 (0.1)
	栲树 Castanopsis fargesii		39.3 (1.0)	12.5 (1.2)	0.8 (0.2)	45.7 (1.2)	8.7 (1.2)	0.7 (0.1)
	赤皮青冈 Cyclobalanopsis gilva		35.5 (5.1)	14.6 (1.1)	0.9 (0.1)	46.6 (1.5)	10.4 (2.3)	0.7 (0.1)
	连蕊茶 Camellia fraterna		37.7 (5.9)	7.9 (1.7)	0.6 (0.1)	39.1 (1.7)	9.4 (0.5)	0.7 (0.1)
	披针叶山矾 Symplocos lancifolia		39.1 (5.6)	11.9 (1.3)	0.6 (0.1)	35.3 (1.6)	10.5 (1.5)	0.6 (0.1)
	山矾 Symplocos sumuntia		38.6 (3.7)	10.5 (1.9)	0.6 (0.1)	39.8 (3.6)	11.2 (0.9)	0.7 (0.1)
	窄基红褐柃 Eurya rubiginosa		36.0 (1.2)	11.0 (1.1)	0.7 (0.1)	42.3 (3.1)	7.2 (1.1)	0.5 (0.1)
马尾松群落§	马尾松 Pinus massoniana		51.4 (1.6)	5.8 (1.0)	0.5 (0.1)	48.7 (1.7)	5.4 (0.6)	0.5 (0.1)
	木荷 Schima superba		45.9 (1.2)	9.1 (1.3)	0.6 (0.1)	46.6 (1.3)	6.6 (0.6)	0.5 (0.1)
	苦槠 Castanopsis sclerophylla		46.1 (1.7)	8.5 (1.1)	0.5 (0.1)	45.5 (1.7)	9.3 (0.8)	0.7 (0.1)
	石栎 Lithocarpus glaber		51.6 (2.6)	8.1 (1.5)	0.6 (0.1)	43.0 (2.1)	10.9 (1.2)	0.6 (0.1)
	栲树 Castanopsis fargesii		47.4 (1.9)	8.3 (1.1)	0.6 (0.1)	43.2 (1.7)	10.4 (0.8)	0.8 (0.1)
	山矾 Symplocos sumuntia		32.9 (1.9)	9.5 (2.0)	0.6 (0.1)	31.7 (1.5)	10.3 (1.2)	0.7 (0.1)
	檵木 Loropetalum chinense		44.2 (1.6)	11.6 (1.5)	0.8 (0.1)	40.2 (4.3)	8.5 (2.3)	0.7 (0.1)
落叶阔叶林 Deciduous broad-leaved forests
枫香群落^∆	枫香 Liquidambar formosana		43.4 (1.8)	18.5 (2.0)	1.4 (0.1)	37.9 (1.3)	13.3 (1.1)	1.0 (0.1)
	化香 Platycarya strobilacea		43.6 (1.2)	16.7 (2.5)	1.8 (0.2)	35.5 (3.4)	15.4 (1.1)	1.2 (0.2)
	白栎 Quercus fabri		43.9 (1.4)	17.3 (1.5)	1.7 (0.1)	39.6 (2.0)	12.5 (1.7)	1.0 (0.2)
	青灰叶下珠 Phyllanthus glaucus		39.5 (1.3)	23.5 (3.5)	2.1 (0.5)	40.1 (3.6)	14.1 (1.7)	0.9 (0.2)
	天仙果 Ficus erecta var. beecheyana		36.6 (1.2)	18.3 (1.7)	1.3 (0.1)	39.2 (2.7)	13.8 (1.6)	0.9 (0.1)
	箬竹 Indocalamus tessellates		41.4 (1.1)	15.6 (1.2)	1.8 (0.2)	33.3 (3.5)	13.2 (1.9)	0.9 (0.1)
南酸枣群落☆	南酸枣 Choerospondias axillaries		36.3 (1.2)	14.4 (2.3)	1.8 (0.3)	44.0 (1.5)	7.9 (0.4)	0.5 (0.1)
	长叶石栎 Lithocarpus harlandii		40.0 (1.1)	11.5 (0.9)	1.4 (0.3)	46.9 (3.4)	8.4 (1.6)	0.5 (0.1)
	华东楠 Machilus leptophylla		41.5 (2.6)	12.5 (1.3)	1.1 (0.2)	42.1 (2.7)	11.6 (1.2)	0.8 (0.1)
	披针叶茴香 Illicium lanceolatum		38.5 (2.1)	8.3 (0.7)	0.9 (0.1)	45.6 (1.9)	7.6 (0.9)	0.5 (0.1)
	紫楠 Phoebe sheareri		39.7 (2.2)	14.3 (1.8)	1.0 (0.2)	38.7 (2.3)	8.8 (1.5)	0.6 (0.2)
	黄丹木姜子 Litsea elongata		37.6 (1.5)	11.6 (1.6)	0.8 (0.1)	45.9 (3.6)	6.6 (0.1)	0.6 (0.1)
	连蕊茶 Camellia fraterna		40.1 (1.3)	7.9 (0.5)	0.7 (0.1)	35.7 (4.5)	10.6 (0.6)	0.9 (0.1)
	赤杨叶 Alniphyllum fortunei		41.6 (1.4)	16.3 (1.6)	0.9 (0.1)	42.1 (4.4)	10.9 (1.1)	1.1 (0.1)

层次 Layer	总体 Overall		常绿阔叶林 Evergreen broad-leaved forests		常绿针叶林 Evergreen coniferous forests		落叶阔叶林 Deciduous broad-leaved forests
层次 Layer	b (conf. inter.)	R²(n)	b (conf. inter.)	R²(n)	b (conf. inter.)	R²(n)	b (conf. inter.)	R²(n)
冠层 Foliage
乔木 Tree	1.39 (1.15-1.69)	0.47 (58)	1.03^* (0.65-1.64)	0.31 (16)	1.04 (0.8-1.35)	0.58 (27)	1.03^** (0.66-1.59)	0.44 (15)
灌木 Shrub	1.21 (1.05-1.39)	0.62 (78)	1.0 (0.77-1.31)	0.57 (27)	0.67 (0.5-0.9)	0.6 (21)	1.08 (0.88-1.32)	0.72 (30)
整体 Total	1.29 (1.15-1.45)	0.54 (136)	1.01 (0.81-1.27)	0.47 (43)	0.92 (0.76-1.13)	0.54 (48)	1.12 (0.93-1.35)	0.63 (45)
凋落物 Senesced litter
乔木 Tree	0.92 (0.76-1.1)	0.53 (58)			0.73 (0.53-0.99)	0.41 (27)	1.44 (1.29-1.6)	0.97 (15)
灌木 Shrub	0.89 (0.77-1.04)	0.53 (78)	0.75^** (0.54-1.04)	0.34 (27)	0.7 (0.51-0.95)	0.57 (21)	0.99 (0.8-1.24)	0.68 (30)
整体 Total	0.9 (0.8-1.01)	0.53 (136)	0.76 (0.58-0.98)	0.31 (43)	0.69 (0.56-0.86)	0.49 (48)	1.09 (0.92-1.28)	0.72 (45)

层次 Layer	总体 Overall		常绿阔叶林 Evergreen broad-leaved forests		常绿针叶林 Evergreen coniferous forests		落叶阔叶林 Deciduous broad-leaved forests
层次 Layer	b (conf. inter.)	R²(n)	b (conf. inter.)	R²(n)	b (conf. inter.)	R²(n)	b (conf. inter.)	R²(n)
冠层 Foliage
乔木 Tree	1.39 (1.15-1.69)	0.47 (58)	1.03^* (0.65-1.64)	0.31 (16)	1.04 (0.8-1.35)	0.58 (27)	1.03^** (0.66-1.59)	0.44 (15)
灌木 Shrub	1.21 (1.05-1.39)	0.62 (78)	1.0 (0.77-1.31)	0.57 (27)	0.67 (0.5-0.9)	0.6 (21)	1.08 (0.88-1.32)	0.72 (30)
整体 Total	1.29 (1.15-1.45)	0.54 (136)	1.01 (0.81-1.27)	0.47 (43)	0.92 (0.76-1.13)	0.54 (48)	1.12 (0.93-1.35)	0.63 (45)
凋落物 Senesced litter
乔木 Tree	0.92 (0.76-1.1)	0.53 (58)			0.73 (0.53-0.99)	0.41 (27)	1.44 (1.29-1.6)	0.97 (15)
灌木 Shrub	0.89 (0.77-1.04)	0.53 (78)	0.75^** (0.54-1.04)	0.34 (27)	0.7 (0.51-0.95)	0.57 (21)	0.99 (0.8-1.24)	0.68 (30)
整体 Total	0.9 (0.8-1.01)	0.53 (136)	0.76 (0.58-0.98)	0.31 (43)	0.69 (0.56-0.86)	0.49 (48)	1.09 (0.92-1.28)	0.72 (45)