植物生态学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 1190-1198.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0148
所属专题: 生物多样性
收稿日期:
2006-12-08
接受日期:
2007-05-17
出版日期:
2007-12-08
发布日期:
2007-11-30
作者简介:
E-mail: mlq0417@163.com
Received:
2006-12-08
Accepted:
2007-05-17
Online:
2007-12-08
Published:
2007-11-30
摘要:
该文运用ISSR分子标记技术,研究不同纬度、不同海拔紫椴(Tilia amurensis)天然种群的遗传多样性变化规律,探讨紫椴种群的濒危机制,为紫椴遗传资源的有效保护和合理利用提供理论依据。14个ISSR引物扩增结果显示:紫椴种群多态位点百分率(P)为93.85%,基因多样性指数(H)和Shannon多样性指数(I)分别为0.243 3和0.380 3。不同纬度紫椴种群的遗传多样性由高到低依次为:CBS种群>BL种群>NA种群>LS种群>FHS种群>DYS种群;不同海拔紫椴种群的遗传多样性由高到低依次为:H1种群>H2种群>H3种群>H4种群>H6种群>H5种群。紫椴种群的遗传多样性没有随纬度的升高而呈现规律性的变化,但随海拔的升高呈现遗传多样性逐渐降低的趋势。用AMOVA进行分子方差分析表明,紫椴种群间遗传分化较大,遗传变异主要来自种群内部。紫椴种群间遗传距离与地理距离没有相关性,但随着海拔的逐渐增高种群间遗传距离增大。该研究结果揭示,紫椴种群具有较高的遗传多样性,遗传多样性不是导致其种群濒危的主要原因,导致其濒危的主要原因可能与人为采伐、生境破坏和生境退化及其自身生物学特性所导致的自然更新不良有密切关系。因此,应加强对紫椴生境的保护,防止人为因素对紫椴天然种群的进一步破坏。
穆立蔷, 刘赢男. 不同地理分布区紫椴种群的遗传多样性变化. 植物生态学报, 2007, 31(6): 1190-1198. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0148
MU Li-Qiang, LIU Ying-Nan. GENETIC DIVERSITY OF TILIA AMURENSIS POPULATIONS IN DIFFERENT GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION REGIONS. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2007, 31(6): 1190-1198. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0148
对 照 Control | 种 群 Populations | 样本数 Samples | 纬 度 Latitude (N) | 经 度 Longitude (E) | 海拔 Altitude (m) | 生 境 Habitats | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
水平对照 | 凤凰山(FHS) | 15 | 40°24'37″ | 124°04'35″ | 560~580 | 以辽东栎为主的阔叶混交次生林1) | ||||||||||||||||
Level control | 长白山(CBS) | 15 | 42°20'56″ | 128°05'26″ | 780~820 | 红松、沙冷杉针阔混交林2) | ||||||||||||||||
宁 安(NA) | 30 | 44°19'44″ | 129°38'03″ | 510~530 | 以蒙古栎为主的阔叶混交次生林3) | |||||||||||||||||
勃 利(BL) | 30 | 45°42'02″ | 130°25'08″ | 390~420 | 红松针阔混交林4) | |||||||||||||||||
凉 水(LS) | 30 | 47°10'56″ | 128°53'28″ | 300~310 | 云冷杉红松林5) | |||||||||||||||||
大杨树(DYS) | 15 | 50°02'22″ | 124°56'01″ | 290~320 | 杂木林6) | |||||||||||||||||
垂直对照 | 海拔1(H1) | 15 | 42°37'34″ | 127°56'16″ | 600~620 | 红松、沙冷杉针阔混交林2) | ||||||||||||||||
Upright control | 海拔2(H2) | 15 | 42°34'26″ | 127°50'47″ | 720~740 | 红松、沙冷杉针阔混交林2) | ||||||||||||||||
海拔3(H3) | 15 | 42°20'56″ | 128°05'26″ | 780~820 | 红松、沙冷杉针阔混交林2) | |||||||||||||||||
海拔4(H4) | 15 | 42°18'16″ | 128°07'42″ | 900~920 | 红松、沙冷杉针阔混交林2) | |||||||||||||||||
海拔5(H5) | 15 | 42°15'48″ | 128°09'15″ | 980~1000 | 针叶林7) | |||||||||||||||||
海拔6(H6) | 15 | 42°12'36″ | 128°10'10″ | 1 080~1 090 | 针叶林7) |
表1 紫椴种群取样地点
Table 1 Natural populations of Tilia amurensis in this study
对 照 Control | 种 群 Populations | 样本数 Samples | 纬 度 Latitude (N) | 经 度 Longitude (E) | 海拔 Altitude (m) | 生 境 Habitats | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
水平对照 | 凤凰山(FHS) | 15 | 40°24'37″ | 124°04'35″ | 560~580 | 以辽东栎为主的阔叶混交次生林1) | ||||||||||||||||
Level control | 长白山(CBS) | 15 | 42°20'56″ | 128°05'26″ | 780~820 | 红松、沙冷杉针阔混交林2) | ||||||||||||||||
宁 安(NA) | 30 | 44°19'44″ | 129°38'03″ | 510~530 | 以蒙古栎为主的阔叶混交次生林3) | |||||||||||||||||
勃 利(BL) | 30 | 45°42'02″ | 130°25'08″ | 390~420 | 红松针阔混交林4) | |||||||||||||||||
凉 水(LS) | 30 | 47°10'56″ | 128°53'28″ | 300~310 | 云冷杉红松林5) | |||||||||||||||||
大杨树(DYS) | 15 | 50°02'22″ | 124°56'01″ | 290~320 | 杂木林6) | |||||||||||||||||
垂直对照 | 海拔1(H1) | 15 | 42°37'34″ | 127°56'16″ | 600~620 | 红松、沙冷杉针阔混交林2) | ||||||||||||||||
Upright control | 海拔2(H2) | 15 | 42°34'26″ | 127°50'47″ | 720~740 | 红松、沙冷杉针阔混交林2) | ||||||||||||||||
海拔3(H3) | 15 | 42°20'56″ | 128°05'26″ | 780~820 | 红松、沙冷杉针阔混交林2) | |||||||||||||||||
海拔4(H4) | 15 | 42°18'16″ | 128°07'42″ | 900~920 | 红松、沙冷杉针阔混交林2) | |||||||||||||||||
海拔5(H5) | 15 | 42°15'48″ | 128°09'15″ | 980~1000 | 针叶林7) | |||||||||||||||||
海拔6(H6) | 15 | 42°12'36″ | 128°10'10″ | 1 080~1 090 | 针叶林7) |
种群 Population | 样本数 No. of sample | 多态位点百分率 Percentage of plymerphic P | 等位基因数 Observed number of alleles A | 有效等位基因数 Effective number of alleles Ae | 期望杂合度 Mean expected heterozygosity H | 香农信息指数 Shannon's information index I |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHS | 15 | 56.15% | 1.561 5 | 1.278 4 | 0.169 2 | 0.261 1 |
CBS | 15 | 86.92% | 1.869 2 | 1.377 4 | 0.230 7 | 0.358 9 |
NA | 30 | 65.38% | 1.653 8 | 1.319 4 | 0.194 6 | 0.299 9 |
BL | 30 | 70.77% | 1.707 7 | 1.332 3 | 0.203 5 | 0.315 8 |
LS | 30 | 58.46% | 1.584 6 | 1.302 8 | 0.179 3 | 0.272 8 |
DYS | 15 | 57.69% | 1.576 9 | 1.261 7 | 0.161 2 | 0.250 8 |
总 Total | 135 | 93.85% | 1.938 5 | 1.396 1 | 0.243 3 | 0.380 3 |
表2 不同纬度紫椴6个种群的遗传多样性
Table 2 Genetic diversity of Tilia amurensis from 6 populations at different latitudes
种群 Population | 样本数 No. of sample | 多态位点百分率 Percentage of plymerphic P | 等位基因数 Observed number of alleles A | 有效等位基因数 Effective number of alleles Ae | 期望杂合度 Mean expected heterozygosity H | 香农信息指数 Shannon's information index I |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHS | 15 | 56.15% | 1.561 5 | 1.278 4 | 0.169 2 | 0.261 1 |
CBS | 15 | 86.92% | 1.869 2 | 1.377 4 | 0.230 7 | 0.358 9 |
NA | 30 | 65.38% | 1.653 8 | 1.319 4 | 0.194 6 | 0.299 9 |
BL | 30 | 70.77% | 1.707 7 | 1.332 3 | 0.203 5 | 0.315 8 |
LS | 30 | 58.46% | 1.584 6 | 1.302 8 | 0.179 3 | 0.272 8 |
DYS | 15 | 57.69% | 1.576 9 | 1.261 7 | 0.161 2 | 0.250 8 |
总 Total | 135 | 93.85% | 1.938 5 | 1.396 1 | 0.243 3 | 0.380 3 |
变异来源 Source of variation | 自由度 df | 总方差 SSD | 均方差 MSD | 变异成分 Variance component | 显著度检验 p | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Absolute | % | |||||
种群间 Among populations | 5 | 358.66 | 71.73 | 4.36 | 23.75 | <0.002 |
种群内 Within populations | 74 | 1 035.20 | 13.98 | 13.99 | 76.25 | <0.002 |
总 Total | 79 | 18.35 | 100 |
表3 不同纬度紫椴6个种群的AMOVA分析
Table 3 AMOVA analysis of Tilia amurensis from 6 populations at different latitudes
变异来源 Source of variation | 自由度 df | 总方差 SSD | 均方差 MSD | 变异成分 Variance component | 显著度检验 p | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Absolute | % | |||||
种群间 Among populations | 5 | 358.66 | 71.73 | 4.36 | 23.75 | <0.002 |
种群内 Within populations | 74 | 1 035.20 | 13.98 | 13.99 | 76.25 | <0.002 |
总 Total | 79 | 18.35 | 100 |
种群 Population | FHS | CBS | NA | BL | LS | DYS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHS | 0 | 0.953 7 | 0.949 9 | 0.957 7 | 0.905 7 | 0.920 5 |
CBS | 0.066 4 | 0 | 0.952 1 | 0.957 5 | 0.940 5 | 0.917 8 |
NA | 0.051 4 | 0.049 1 | 0 | 0.968 9 | 0.936 8 | 0.943 6 |
BL | 0.043 2 | 0.043 4 | 0.031 6 | 0 | 0.936 7 | 0.928 9 |
LS | 0.099 1 | 0.061 3 | 0.065 3 | 0.065 4 | 0 | 0.925 0 |
DYS | 0.082 8 | 0.085 8 | 0.055 2 | 0.073 8 | 0.078 0 | 0 |
表4 不同纬度紫椴种群Nei遗传距离和遗传一致度
Table 4 Nei genetic distance and genetic identity of Tilia amurensis at different latitudes
种群 Population | FHS | CBS | NA | BL | LS | DYS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHS | 0 | 0.953 7 | 0.949 9 | 0.957 7 | 0.905 7 | 0.920 5 |
CBS | 0.066 4 | 0 | 0.952 1 | 0.957 5 | 0.940 5 | 0.917 8 |
NA | 0.051 4 | 0.049 1 | 0 | 0.968 9 | 0.936 8 | 0.943 6 |
BL | 0.043 2 | 0.043 4 | 0.031 6 | 0 | 0.936 7 | 0.928 9 |
LS | 0.099 1 | 0.061 3 | 0.065 3 | 0.065 4 | 0 | 0.925 0 |
DYS | 0.082 8 | 0.085 8 | 0.055 2 | 0.073 8 | 0.078 0 | 0 |
图2 不同纬度紫椴种群间Nei遗传距离UPGMA聚类图 FHS、CBS、NA、BL、LS、DYS:见表1 See Table 1
Fig.2 UPGMA dendrogram of Tilia amurensis based on Nei genetic distance at different latitudes
变异来源 Source of variation | 自由度 df | 总方差 SSD | 均方差 MSD | 变异成分 Variance component | 显著度检验 p | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Absolute | % | |||||
种群间 Among population | 5 | 291.833 | 58.36 | 4.61 | 27.29 | <0.002 |
种群内 Within population | 54 | 663.200 | 12.28 | 12.28 | 72.71 | <0.002 |
总 Total | 59 | 16.89 | 100 |
表5 不同海拔紫椴6个种群122条ISSR标记的AMOVA分析
Table 5 AMOVA analysis of Tilia amurensis from 6 populations using 122 ISSR markers at different altitudes
变异来源 Source of variation | 自由度 df | 总方差 SSD | 均方差 MSD | 变异成分 Variance component | 显著度检验 p | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Absolute | % | |||||
种群间 Among population | 5 | 291.833 | 58.36 | 4.61 | 27.29 | <0.002 |
种群内 Within population | 54 | 663.200 | 12.28 | 12.28 | 72.71 | <0.002 |
总 Total | 59 | 16.89 | 100 |
种群 Population | H1 | H2 | H3 | H4 | H5 | H6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | 0 | 0.855 0 | 0.918 4 | 0.906 1 | 0.914 7 | 0.945 6 |
H2 | 0.156 7 | 0 | 0.871 0 | 0.882 9 | 0.878 6 | 0.853 0 |
H3 | 0.085 1 | 0.138 1 | 0 | 0.944 2 | 0.937 7 | 0.928 8 |
H4 | 0.098 7 | 0.124 6 | 0.057 4 | 0 | 0.939 3 | 0.933 6 |
H5 | 0.089 1 | 0.129 4 | 0.064 3 | 0.062 6 | 0 | 0.942 0 |
H6 | 0.056 0 | 0.159 1 | 0.073 9 | 0.068 7 | 0.059 7 | 0 |
表6 不同海拔紫椴种群Nei遗传距离和遗传一致度
Table 6 Nei genetic distance and genetic identity of Tilia amurensis at different altitudes
种群 Population | H1 | H2 | H3 | H4 | H5 | H6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | 0 | 0.855 0 | 0.918 4 | 0.906 1 | 0.914 7 | 0.945 6 |
H2 | 0.156 7 | 0 | 0.871 0 | 0.882 9 | 0.878 6 | 0.853 0 |
H3 | 0.085 1 | 0.138 1 | 0 | 0.944 2 | 0.937 7 | 0.928 8 |
H4 | 0.098 7 | 0.124 6 | 0.057 4 | 0 | 0.939 3 | 0.933 6 |
H5 | 0.089 1 | 0.129 4 | 0.064 3 | 0.062 6 | 0 | 0.942 0 |
H6 | 0.056 0 | 0.159 1 | 0.073 9 | 0.068 7 | 0.059 7 | 0 |
[1] | Alpert P, Lumaret R, Digiusto F (1993). Population structure inferred from allozyme analysis in the clonal herb, Fragaria chiloensis (Rosaceae). American Journal of Botany, 80,1002-1006. |
[2] | Cui JZ (崔继哲), Zu YG (祖元刚), Nie JL (聂江力), Wang GL (王桂玲) (2001). Genetic differentiation of Leymus chinensis populations in Songnen grassland. Bulletin of Botanical Research (植物研究), 21,116-215. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[3] | Du FG (杜凤国), Su CH (苏春华), Li YF (李云凤), Qian SL (钱树伦), Zhang XJ (张孝江), Chen Y (陈英), Li GC (李光成) (1994). Study on the seed anatomy structure of Tilia amurensis Rupr. and Tilia mandshurica Rupr. et Maxim. Journal of Jilin Forestry Institute (吉林林学院学报), 10 (2),99-104. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[4] | Feng FJ (冯富娟), Wang FY (王凤友), Li CS (李长松) (2004). Genetic differentiation of Pinus koraiensis under different altitude conditions in Changbai Mountains. Journal of Northeast Forestry University (东北林业大学学报), 32 (3),1-3. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[5] | Fu LG (傅立国), Chen TQ (陈谭清), Lang KY (郎楷永), Hong T (洪涛), Lin Q (林祁), Li Y (李勇) (2003). Higher Plant of China (中国高等植物). Qingdao Press, Qingdao,17-18. (in Chinese) |
[6] | Ge YQ (葛永奇), Qiu YX (邱英雄), Ding BY (丁炳扬), Fu CX (傅承新) (2003). An ISSR analysis on population genetic diversity of the relict plant Ginkgo biloba. Biodiversity Science (生物多样性), 11,276-287. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[7] | Hamrick JL, Godt MJW (1989). Allozyme diversity in plant species. In: Brown ADH, Clegg MT, Kahler AL, Weir BSeds. Plant Population Genetics, Breeding, and Genetic Resources. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA,43-63. |
[8] | Huang JX (黄久香), Zhuang XY (庄雪影) (2002). Genetic diversity of the populations of Tsoongiodendron odorum. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 26,413-419. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[9] | Jian SG (简曙光), Tang T (唐恬), Zhang ZH (张志红), Wei Q (韦强), Shi SH (施苏华) (2004). The population characteristics and endangered causes of Heritiera littoralis Dryand in China. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni (中山大学学报(自然科学版)), 43 (Suppl.),91-96. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[10] | King YT, Chiang YC (1990). Companing differentiation of wild soja bean (Clycine soja Sieb and Zucc.) population based on isozymes and quantitative traits. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica, 31,129-142. |
[11] |
Lande R (1988). Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science, 241,1455-1460.
URL PMID |
[12] | Li HS (李海生), Chen GZ (陈桂珠), Shi SH (施苏华) (2004). Genetic diversity of Sonneratia hainanensis (Sonneratiaceae) detected by inter-simple sequence repeats (ISSR) analysis. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni (中山大学学报(自然科学版)), 43(2),67-71. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] | Li J (李进), Chen KY (陈可咏), Li BS (李渤生) (1998). The variation of genetic diversity of Quercus aquifolioides in different elevations. Acta Botanica Sinica (植物学报), 40,761-767. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[14] | Li Q (李群), Xiao M (肖猛), Guo L (郭亮), Li J (李静), Duan WX (段文霞), Chen F (陈放), Wang L (王丽) (2005). Genetic diversity of the rare and endangered plant Trillium tschonoskii in Sichuan Province. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (北京林业大学学报), 27(4),1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[15] | Li S (李珊), Qian ZQ (钱增强), Cai YL (蔡宇良), Zhao GF (赵桂仿) (2005). A comparative study on the genetic diversity of Dipteronia sinensis and Dipteronia dyeriana. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 29,785-792. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[16] | Li XD (李晓东), Huang HW (黄宏文), Li JQ (李建强) (2003). Genetic diversity of the relict plant Metasequoia glyptostroboides. Biodiversity Science (生物多样性), 11,100-108. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[17] | Liao WF (廖文芳), Xia NH (夏念和), Deng YF (邓云飞), Zheng QY (郑庆衍) (2004). Study on genetic diversity of Manglietia decidua (Magnoliaceae). Acta Botanica Yunnanica (云南植物研究), 26,58-64. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[18] | Mu LQ (穆立蔷), Han ZJ (韩志坚) (2004). Classification and Identification of Chinese Conserved Plants (中国保护植物分类与识别). Northeast Forestry University Press, Harbin, 128. (in Chinese) |
[19] | Mu LQ (穆立蔷), Liu YN (刘赢男), Yang GT (杨国亭), Feng FJ (冯富娟) (2006). Establishment and optimization of ISSR-PCR reaction system for Tilia amurensis. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 42(6),26-29. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[20] | Nie SQ (聂绍荃), Guan WB (关文彬), Yang GT (杨国亭), Shi FC (石福臣), He XS (何小双) (1992). Research on Population Ecology of Amur Linden (紫椴种群生态学研究). Northeast Forestry University Press, Harbin,6-8. (in Chinese) |
[21] | Pang GC (庞广昌), Wang L (王琳), Wang H (王宏), Wang JH (王军厚), Zhou SW (周士威) (1992). Study on population genetic structure geographical provenance of Populus euphratica Olive. and their interaction with environment. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica (西北植物学报), 12,295-302. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[22] | Qiao J (乔静), Lian SX (廉守喜), Li GL (李贵莲), Qi YH (祁永会) (2004). Study on reproduction of Tilia amurensis by cutting. Protection Forest Science and Technology (防护林科技).(4),16-17. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[23] | Shi MZ (时明芝), Xiao YA (肖宜安), Li XH (李晓红) (2003). Conservative genetics and its utilization in studies of endangered plants. World Forestry Research (世界林业研究), 16 (4),13-16. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[24] | Tang Y (唐亚), Zhu GR (诸葛仁) (1999). Geographical distribution of Tilia Linn. In: Lu AM 路安民ed. The Geography of Spermatophyti (种子植物科属地理). Science Press, Beijing,374-381. (in Chinese) |
[25] | TaylorDR, AarssenLW (1990). Complex competitive relationships among genotypes of three perennial grasses: implications for species coexistence. American Naturalist, 136,105-327. |
[26] | Wang J (王军), He PC (贺普超) (2000). Extraction of genomic DNA from Vitis amurensis and its RAPD analysis. Journal of Fruit Science (果树科学), 17(2),79-82. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[27] | Xu FH (许凤华), Kang M (康明), Huang HW (黄宏文), Jiang MX (江明喜) (2006). Genetic diversity in fragmented populations of Berchemielia wilsonii var. pubipetiolata, an endangered plant endemic to eastern China. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version) (Formerly Acta Phytoecologica Sinica)(植物生态学报), 30,157-164. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[28] | Zang DY (张大勇), Jiang XH (姜新华) (1999). Progress in studies of genetic diversity and conservation biology of endangered plant species. Chinese Biodiversity (生物多样性), 7,31-37. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[29] | Zhou HT (周涵韬), Lin P (林鹏) (2001). Analysis on genetic diversity of seven mangroves in Rhizophoraceae in China. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica (水生生物学报), 25,362-369. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[30] | Zhou YL (周以良), Dong SL (董世林), Nie SQ (聂绍荃) (1986). Ligneous Flora of Heilongjiang (黑龙江树木志). Heilongjiang Science and Technology Press, Harbin,429-432. (in Chinese) |
[31] | Zou XZ (邹学忠), Yan ZL (阎忠林), Liu QT (刘清田), Lü CB (吕长波) (1991). The study on seed dormancy of Tilia amurensis and dealing method. Journal of Liaoning Forestry Science & Technology (辽宁林业科技), (5),6-10. (in Chinese) |
[1] | 张金峰, 葛树森, 梁金花, 李俊清. 长白山阔叶红松林红松种群年龄结构与数量动态特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(6): 667-677. |
[2] | 陈天翌, 娄安如. 青藏高原东侧白桦种群的遗传多样性与遗传结构[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(5): 561-568. |
[3] | 张新新, 王茜, 胡颖, 周玮, 陈晓阳, 胡新生. 植物边缘种群遗传多样性研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(5): 383-395. |
[4] | 张俪文, 韩广轩. 植物遗传多样性与生态系统功能关系的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(10): 977-989. |
[5] | 王锦楠, 陈进福, 陈武生, 周新洋, 许东, 李际红, 亓晓. 柴达木地区野生黑果枸杞种群遗传多样性的AFLP分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(10): 1003-1011. |
[6] | 刘军, 姜景民, 邹军, 徐金良, 沈汉, 刁松峰. 中国特有濒危树种毛红椿核心和边缘居群的遗传多样性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(1): 52-60. |
[7] | 张炜, 罗建勋, 辜云杰, 胡庭兴. 西南地区麻疯树天然种群遗传多样性的等位酶变异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(3): 330-336. |
[8] | 魏源, 王世杰, 刘秀明, 黄天志. 不同喀斯特小生境中土壤丛枝菌根真菌的遗传多样性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(10): 1083-1090. |
[9] | 张云红, 侯艳, 娄安如. 华北地区小丛红景天种群的AFLP遗传多样性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(9): 1084-1094. |
[10] | 刘伟, 王曦, 干友民, 黄林凯, 谢文刚, 苗佳敏. 高山嵩草种群在放牧干扰下遗传多样性的变化[J]. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(5): 966-973. |
[11] | 陈良华, 胡庭兴, 张帆, 李国和. 用AFLP技术分析四川核桃资源的遗传多样性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(6): 1362-1372. |
[12] | 周会平, 陈进, 张寿洲. 具混合繁殖策略的草本植物异果舞花姜的居群遗传结构[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(4): 751-759. |
[13] | 严茂粉, 李向华, 王克晶. 北京地区野生大豆种群SSR标记的遗传多样性评价[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(4): 938-950. |
[14] | 刘亚令, 李作洲, 姜正旺, 刘义飞, 黄宏文. 中华猕猴桃和美味猕猴桃自然居群遗传结构及其种间杂交渐渗[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(3): 704-718. |
[15] | 魏宇昆, 高玉葆. 禾草内生真菌的遗传多样性及其共生关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(2): 512-520. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19