长期封育演替下典型草原植物群落生产力与多样性关系

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2021.0397

植物生态学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 176-187.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2021.0397 cstr: 32100.14.cjpe.2021.0397

所属专题：植被生态学；生物多样性；草原与草业

长期封育演替下典型草原植物群落生产力与多样性关系

张义¹^,², 程杰³, 苏纪帅⁴, 程积民¹^,²^,⁵^,^*()

¹中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌 712100
²中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
³国家林业和草原局西北调查规划设计院, 旱区生态水文与灾害防治国家林业局重点实验室, 西安 710048
⁴中国科学院植物研究所植被与环境变化国家重点实验室, 北京 100093
⁵西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所, 西北农林科技大学草业与草原学院, 陕西杨凌 712100

收稿日期:2021-11-04 接受日期:2022-01-18 出版日期:2022-02-20 发布日期:2022-01-25
作者简介:*(gyzcjm@ms.iswc.ac.cn)
基金资助:
国家重点研发项目(2016YFC0500700);中国科学院野外站联盟项目(KFJ-SW-YW028-07)

Diversity-productivity relationship of plant communities in typical grassland during the long- term grazing exclusion succession

ZHANG Yi¹^,², CHENG Jie³, SU Ji-Shuai⁴, CHENG Ji-Min¹^,²^,⁵^,^*()

¹Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
²University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
³Key Laboratory of National Forestry Administration on Ecological Hydrology and Disaster Prevention in Arid Regions, Northwest Surveying, Planning and Designing Institute of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Xi’an 710048, China
⁴State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China
⁵Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, College of Grassland Agriculture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China

Received:2021-11-04 Accepted:2022-01-18 Online:2022-02-20 Published:2022-01-25
Supported by:
National Key R&D Program of China(2016YFC0500700);Chinese Academy of Sciences Field Station Alliance Project(KFJ-SW-YW028-07)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

封育是退化草地的重要恢复措施, 理解长期封育过程中草地群落生产力和植物多样性变化特征及两者间关系, 有助于草地植被的恢复管理与利用。该研究依托宁夏云雾山国家级自然保护区典型草原长期封育演替梯度, 选择持续放牧、封育9年、26年和34年的草地群落作为研究对象, 分析其地上生产力、物种多样性和功能多样性的变化特征及内在联系。结果表明, 封育显著提高典型草原植物群落的地上生产力、凋落物生物量、功能丰富度和功能离散度, 未改变草地群落的物种丰富度、Shannon-Wiener指数和功能均匀度, 但Simpson优势度指数和Pielou均匀度指数在长期封育(34年)后显著下降。此外, 封育对不同植物群落加权平均功能性状的影响存在差异。随机森林模型和方差分解结果显示, 群落加权平均功能性状对封育草地群落地上生产力变异的解释度高达70.70%, 其中植株高度是最主要的解释因子; 功能多样性的解释度为36.86%, 主要由功能丰富度贡献; 而物种多样性的解释度仅为14.72%。由此可见, 植物功能性状和功能多样性对草地群落地上生产力的贡献远高于物种多样性, 建议将其纳入植物群落恢复演替动态研究, 以便全面了解植物多样性与生态系统功能的关系, 为更好地实现生态恢复目标奠定基础。

关键词: 功能多样性, 植物功能性状, 物种多样性, 封育, 地上净初级生产力

Abstract:

Aims Grazing exclusion is an important intervention for restoring degraded grasslands. Understanding the changes of grassland productivity and plant diversity during the long-term grazing exclusion succession, as well as the relationship between diversity and productivity, are helpful for grassland restoration management and utilization.

Methods This study was conducted in a typical grassland system with a long-term grazing exclusion gradient, located at Yunwu Mountain National Nature Reserve in Ningxia Huizu Autonomous Region. The grassland communities under continuous grazing, 9 years of grazing exclusion, 26 years of grazing exclusion, and 34 years of grazing exclusion were chosen as the study objects. We tracked changes in aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP), species diversity and functional diversity, and quantified the relationships between diversity and productivity.

Important findings The results showed that grazing exclusion significantly increased ANPP, litter biomass, functional richness, and functional dispersion of typical grassland, but did not alter species richness, Shannon- Wiener index and functional evenness. In contrast, Simpson dominance index and Pielou evenness index significantly decreased after long-term grazing exclusion (34 years). In addition, grazing exclusion showed diverse effects on community-weighted means of different functional traits. The results of random forest model and variance partition analysis indicated that community-weighted mean functional traits accounted for 70.70% of ANPP variation, and plant height was identified as the most important trait. Functional diversity explained 36.86% of ANPP variation, mainly contributed by functional richness. In contrast, species diversity only explained 14.72% of ANPP variation. Therefore, the contribution of mean trait values and functional diversity to ANPP was much higher than that of species diversity in grassland after grazing exclusion. We suggest that community mean trait values and functional diversity should be incorporated into the studies of plant community dynamics during restoration succession, which will contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between plant diversity and ecosystem function, and provide basis for better realization of ecological restoration goals.

Key words: functional diversity, plant functional trait, species diversity, grazing exclusion, aboveground net primary productivity

张义, 程杰, 苏纪帅, 程积民. 长期封育演替下典型草原植物群落生产力与多样性关系. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(2): 176-187. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2021.0397

ZHANG Yi, CHENG Jie, SU Ji-Shuai, CHENG Ji-Min. Diversity-productivity relationship of plant communities in typical grassland during the long- term grazing exclusion succession. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2022, 46(2): 176-187. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2021.0397

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2021.0397

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2022/V46/I2/176

图/表 6

表1 封育草地群落植物地上生产力与物种多样性(平均值±标准误)

Table 1 Aboveground net primary productivity and species diversity of grassland communities after grazing exclusion (mean ± SE)

封育年限 GED (a)	纬度 Latitude (° N)	经度 Longitude (° E)	海拔 Altitude (m)	地上生产力 ANPP (g·m^-2)	凋落物生物量 Litter biomass (g·m^-2)	丰富度 Richness	Shannon- Wiener 指数 H′	Pielou均匀度指数 E	Simpson优势度指数 D
0	36.22	106.38	1 942	115.60 ± 13.13^c	30.78 ± 8.02^c	13.33 ± 0.74^a	2.21 ± 0.05^ab	0.86 ± 0.01^a	0.85 ± 0.01^a
9	36.22	106.39	1 928	165.14 ± 10.10^b	61.66 ± 7.38^bc	12.64 ± 0.62^a	2.17 ± 0.07^ab	0.86 ± 0.01^a	0.85 ± 0.01^a
26	36.20	106.41	1 885	253.38 ± 15.32^a	160.06 ± 34.83^b	14.17 ± 0.67^a	2.30 ± 0.05^a	0.87 ± 0.01^a	0.87 ± 0.01^a
34	36.24	106.38	2 098	261.79 ± 19.87^a	346.74 ± 57.52^a	14.42 ± 0.96^a	2.11 ± 0.06^b	0.80 ± 0.01^b	0.81 ± 0.01^b

图1 封育草地植物群落加权平均功能性状和功能多样性(平均值±标准误)。不同小写字母表示差异显著(p < 0.05)。

Fig. 1 Community weighted mean functional traits and functional diversity of grassland communities after grazing exclusion (mean ± SE). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). FDis, functional dispersion; FEve, functional evenness; FRic, functional richness; LCC, leaf carbon concentration; LDMC, leaf dry matter content; LNC, leaf nitrogen concentration; LPC, leaf phosphorus concentration; LT, leaf thickness; SLA, specific leaf area.

图2 封育草地群落地上生产力与植物群落加权平均功能性状的关系。

Fig. 2 Relationships between aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) and community-weighted mean functional traits in grasslands after grazing exclusion. LCC, leaf carbon concentration; LDMC, leaf dry matter content; LNC, leaf nitrogen concentration; LPC, leaf phosphorus concentration; LT, leaf thickness; SLA, specific leaf area.

图3 封育草地群落地上生产力与物种多样性(A-D)和功能多样性(E-G)的关系。

Fig. 3 Relationship between aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) and plant species diversity (A-D) and functional diversity (E-G) in grassland communities after grazing exclusion. D, Simpson dominance index; E, Pielou evenness index; FDis, functional dispersion; FEve, functional evenness; FRic, functional richness; H′, Shannon-Wiener index.

图4 封育草地群落地上生产力影响因子的随机森林模型(A)和方差分解(B)结果。*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01。

Fig. 4 Results of random forest model (A) and variance partition analysis (B) for factors influencing aboveground net primary productivity of grassland communities after grazing exclusion. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.0l. D, Simpson dominance index; E, Pielou evenness index; FDis, functional dispersion; FEve, functional evenness; FRic, functional richness; H′, Shannon-Wiener index; LCC, leaf carbon concentration; LDMC, leaf dry matter content; LNC, leaf nitrogen concentration; LPC, leaf phosphorus concentration; LT, leaf thickness; SLA, specific leaf area.

表2 封育草地植物群落加权平均功能性状、功能多样性与物种多样性的Pearson相关系数

Table 2 Pearson coefficients showing the correlation of community-weighted mean functional traits to functional diversity and species diversity in grasslands after grazing exclusion

	高度 Height	叶片厚度 LT	叶干物质含量 LDMC	比叶面积 SLA	叶片碳含量 LCC	叶片氮含量 LNC	叶片磷含量 LPC	功能丰富度 FR_ic	功能均匀度 FE_ve	功能离散度 FD_is
物种丰富度 Richness	0.106	0.014	-0.347^*	0.301^*	-0.077	0.133	0.145	0.551^**	0.199	0.206
Shannon-Wiener指数 H′	-0.232	-0.188	-0.233	0.327^*	-0.145	0.369^**	0.347^*	0.284	0.294^*	0.100
Pielou均匀度指数 E	-0.502^**	-0.280	0.108	0.082	-0.120	0.416^**	0.364^*	-0.243	0.225	-0.094
Simpson优势度指数 D	-0.376^**	-0.263	-0.043	0.266	-0.104	0.414^**	0.360^*	0.037	0.181	0.048

参考文献 65

[1]	Adler PB, Seabloom EW, Borer ET, Hillebrand H, Hautier Y, Hector A, Harpole WS, O’Halloran LR, Grace JB, Anderson TM, Bakker JD, Biederman LA, Brown CS, Buckley YM, Calabrese LB, et al. (2011). Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness. Science, 333, 1750-1753. DOI URL
[2]	Alberti J, Bakker ES, van Klink R, Olff H, Smit C (2017). Herbivore exclusion promotes a more stochastic plant community assembly in a natural grassland. Ecology, 98, 961-970. DOI PMID
[3]	Balvanera P, Pfisterer AB, Buchmann N, He JS, Nakashizuka T, Raffaelli D, Schmid B (2006). Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecology Letters, 9, 1146-1156. PMID
[4]	Cadotte MW, Carscadden K, Mirotchnick N (2011). Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48, 1079-1087. DOI URL
[5]	Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A, Hooper DU, Perrings C, Venail P, Narwani A, Mace GM, Tilman D, Wardle DA, Kinzig AP, Daily GC, Loreau M, Grace JB, Larigauderie A, Srivastava DS, Naeem S (2012). Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature, 486, 59-67.
[6]	Carmona D, Lajeunesse MJ, Johnson MTJ (2011). Plant traits that predict resistance to herbivores. Functional Ecology, 25, 358-367. DOI URL
[7]	Chen ZZ, Wang SP (2000). Typical Grassland Ecosystem of China. Science Press, Beijing.
	[ 陈佐忠, 汪诗平 (2000). 中国典型草原生态系统. 科学出版社, 北京.]
[8]	Cheng JM, Jing GH, Wei L, Jing ZB (2016). Long-term grazing exclusion effects on vegetation characteristics, soil properties and bacterial communities in the semi-arid grasslands of China. Ecological Engineering, 97, 170-178. DOI URL
[9]	Craine JM, Ocheltree TW, Nippert JB, Towne EG, Skibbe AM, Kembel SW, Fargione JE (2013). Global diversity of drought tolerance and grassland climate-change resilience. Nature Climate Change, 3, 63-67. DOI URL
[10]	Deng L, Shangguan ZP, Wu GL, Chang XF (2017). Effects of grazing exclusion on carbon sequestration in China’s grassland. Earth-Science Reviews, 173, 84-95. DOI URL
[11]	Dı́az S, Cabido M (2001). Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16, 646-655. DOI URL
[12]	Dı́az S, Lavorel S, McIntyre S, Falczuk V, Casanoves F, Milchunas DG, Skarpe C, Rusch G, Sternberg M, Noy-Meir I, Landsberg J, Zhang W, Clark H, Campbell BD (2007). Plant trait responses to grazing-A global synthesis. Global Change Biology, 13, 313-341. DOI URL
[13]	Dong SK, Tang L, Zhang XF, Liu SL, Liu QR, Su XK, Zhang Y, Wu XY, Zhao ZZ, Li Y, Sha W (2017). Relationship between plant species diversity and functional diversity in alpine grasslands. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37, 1472-1483.
	[ 董世魁, 汤琳, 张相锋, 刘世梁, 刘全儒, 苏旭坤, 张勇, 武晓宇, 赵珍珍, 李钰, 沙威 (2017). 高寒草地植物物种多样性与功能多样性的关系. 生态学报, 37, 1472-1483.]
[14]	Fernández-Lugo S, Bermejo LA, de Nascimento L, Méndez J, Naranjo-Cigala A, Arévalo JR (2013). Productivity: key factor affecting grazing exclusion effects on vegetation and soil. Plant Ecology, 214, 641-656. DOI URL
[15]	Flynn DFB, Gogol-Prokurat M, Nogeire T, Molinari N, Richers BT, Lin BB, Simpson N, Mayfield MM, DeClerck F (2009). Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa. Ecology Letters, 12, 22-33. DOI PMID
[16]	Flynn DFB, Mirotchnick N, Jain M, Palmer MI, Naeem S (2011). Functional and phylogenetic diversity as predictors of biodiversity-ecosystem-function relationships. Ecology, 92, 1573-1581. PMID
[17]	Fraser LH, Pither J, Jentsch A, Sternberg M, Zobel M, Askarizadeh D, Bartha S, Beierkuhnlein C, Bennett JA, Bittel A, Boldgiv B, Boldrini II, Bork E, Brown L, Cabido M, et al. (2015). Worldwide evidence of a unimodal relationship between productivity and plant species richness. Science, 349, 302-305. DOI URL
[18]	Garnier E, Cortez J, Billès G, Navas ML, Roumet C, Debussche M, Laurent G, Blanchard A, Aubry D, Bellmann A, Neill C, Toussaint JP (2004). Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession. Ecology, 85, 2630-2637. DOI URL
[19]	Golodets C, Sternberg M, Kigel J (2009). A community-level test of the leaf-height-seed ecology strategy scheme in relation to grazing conditions. Journal of Vegetation Science, 20, 392-402. DOI URL
[20]	Grace JB, Anderson TM, Seabloom EW, Borer ET, Adler PB, Harpole WS, Hautier Y, Hillebrand H, Lind EM, Pärtel M, Bakker JD, Buckley YM, Crawley MJ, Damschen EI, Davies KF, et al. (2016). Integrative modelling reveals mechanisms linking productivity and plant species richness. Nature, 529, 390-393. DOI URL
[21]	Grigulis K, Lavorel S, Krainer U, Legay N, Baxendale C, Dumont M, Kastl E, Arnoldi C, Bardgett RD, Poly F, Pommier T, Schloter M, Tappeiner U, Bahn M, Clément J-C (2013). Relative contributions of plant traits and soil microbial properties to mountain grassland ecosystem services. Journal of Ecology, 101, 47-57. DOI URL
[22]	Grime JP (1997). Biodiversity and ecosystem function: the debate deepens. Science, 277, 1260-1261. DOI URL
[23]	Grime JP (1998). Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. Journal of Ecology, 86, 902-910. DOI URL
[24]	Han JG, Zhang YJ, Wang CJ, Bai WM, Wang YR, Han GD, Li LH (2008). Rangeland degradation and restoration management in China. The Rangeland Journal, 30, 233-239. DOI URL
[25]	He NP, Li Y, Liu CC, Xu L, Li MX, Zhang JH, He JS, Tang ZY, Han XG, Ye Q, Xiao CW, Yu Q, Liu SR, Sun W, Niu SL, Li SG, Sack L, Yu GR (2020). Plant trait networks: improved resolution of the dimensionality of adaptation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 35, 908-918. DOI URL
[26]	Hu ZM, Li SG, Guo Q, Niu SL, He NP, Li LH, Yu GR (2016). A synthesis of the effect of grazing exclusion on carbon dynamics in grasslands in China. Global Change Biology, 22, 1385-1393. DOI URL
[27]	Jeddi K, Chaieb M (2010). Changes in soil properties and vegetation following livestock grazing exclusion in degraded arid environments of South Tunisia. Flora, 205, 184-189. DOI URL
[28]	Jing ZB, Cheng JM, Chen A (2013). Assessment of vegetative ecological characteristics and the succession process during three decades of grazing exclusion in a continental steppe grassland. Ecological Engineering, 57, 162-169. DOI URL
[29]	Jing ZB, Cheng JM, Su JS, Bai Y, Jin JW (2014). Changes in plant community composition and soil properties under 3-decade grazing exclusion in semiarid grassland. Ecological Engineering, 64, 171-178. DOI URL
[30]	Klumpp K, Soussana J-F (2009). Using functional traits to predict grassland ecosystem change: a mathematical test of the response-and-effect trait approach. Global Change Biology, 15, 2921-2934. DOI URL
[31]	Laliberté E, Legendre P (2010). A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. Ecology, 91, 299-305. PMID
[32]	Lanta V, Lepš J (2006). Effect of functional group richness and species richness in manipulated productivity-diversity studies: a glasshouse pot experiment. Acta Oecologica, 29, 85-96. DOI URL
[33]	Lepš J, de Bello F, Lavorel S, Berman S (2006). Quantifying and interpreting functional diversity of natural communities: practical considerations matter. Preslia, 78, 481-501.
[34]	Li WH, Xu FW, Zheng SX, Taube F, Bai YF (2017). Patterns and thresholds of grazing-induced changes in community structure and ecosystem functioning: species-level responses and the critical role of species traits. Journal of Applied Ecology, 54, 963-975. DOI URL
[35]	Liu XJ, Ma KP (2015). Plant functional traits-Concepts, applications and future directions. Scientia Sinica (Vitae) (Chinese Version), 45, 325-339.
	[ 刘晓娟, 马克平 (2015). 植物功能性状研究进展. 中国科学: 生命科学, 45, 325-339.]
[36]	Liu XQ, Zhang X, Zhang LF, Li YN, Zhao L, Xu SX, Li HQ, Ma RR, Niu B, Gao YB, Gu S (2016). Effects of exclosure duration on the community structure and species diversity of an alpine meadow in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36, 5150-5162.
	[ 刘晓琴, 张翔, 张立锋, 李英年, 赵亮, 徐世晓, 李红琴, 马荣荣, 牛犇, 高玉葆, 古松 (2016). 封育年限对高寒草甸群落组分和物种多样性的影响. 生态学报, 36, 5150-5162.]
[37]	Lü TT, Wang P, Yan H, Zhang W, Liao GX, Jiang HB, Zou CL, Sheng LX (2014). Relationship between functional diversity and productivity in meadow and marsh plant communities. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 38, 405-416. DOI URL
	[ 吕亭亭, 王平, 燕红, 张稳, 廖桂项, 姜海波, 邹畅林, 盛连喜 (2014). 草甸和沼泽植物群落功能多样性与生产力的关系. 植物生态学报, 38, 405-416.] DOI
[38]	Ma JJ, Yao H, Feng ZY, Zhang SL (2012). Changes in plant functional groups and species diversity under three grassland using modes in typical grassland area of Inner Mongolia, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 36, 1-9. DOI URL
	[ 马建军, 姚虹, 冯朝阳, 张树礼 (2012). 内蒙古典型草原区3种不同草地利用模式下植物功能群及其多样性的变化. 植物生态学报, 36, 1-9.] DOI
[39]	Mason NWH, Mouillot D, Lee WG, Wilson JB (2005). Functional richness, functional evenness and functional divergence: the primary components of functional diversity. Oikos, 111, 112-118. DOI URL
[40]	McGill BJ, Enquist BJ, Weiher E, Westoby M (2006). Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21, 178-185. DOI URL
[41]	Mokany K, Ash J, Roxburgh S (2008). Functional identity is more important than diversity in influencing ecosystem processes in a temperate native grassland. Journal of Ecology, 96, 884-893. DOI URL
[42]	Mouchet MA, Villéger S, Mason NWH, Mouillot D (2010). Functional diversity measures: an overview of their redundancy and their ability to discriminate community assembly rules. Functional Ecology, 24, 867-876. DOI URL
[43]	Mouillot D, Villéger S, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Mason NWH (2011). Functional structure of biological communities predicts ecosystem multifunctionality. PLOS ONE, 6, e17476. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017476. DOI URL
[44]	Naeem S (2002). Disentangling the impacts of diversity on ecosystem functioning in combinatorial experiments. Ecology, 83, 2925-2935. DOI URL
[45]	Pan Q, Zheng H, Wang ZH, Wen Z, Yang YZ (2021). Effects of plant functional traits on ecosystem services: a review. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 45, 1140-1153. DOI URL
	[ 潘权, 郑华, 王志恒, 文志, 杨延征 (2021). 植物功能性状对生态系统服务影响研究进展. 植物生态学报, 45, 1140-1153.] DOI
[46]	Petchey OL, Gaston KJ (2002). Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition. Ecology Letters, 5, 402-411. DOI URL
[47]	Petchey OL, Gaston KJ (2006). Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. Ecology Letters, 9, 741-758. PMID
[48]	Qiu LP, Wei XR, Zhang XC, Cheng JM (2013). Ecosystem carbon and nitrogen accumulation after grazing exclusion in semiarid grassland. PLOS ONE, 8, e55433. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055433. DOI URL
[49]	Reich PB, Tilman D, Naeem S, Ellsworth DS, Knops J, Craine J, Wedin D, Trost J (2004). Species and functional group diversity independently influence biomass accumulation and its response to CO₂ and N. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 10101-10106.
[50]	Risser PG (1995). Biodiversity and ecosystem function. Conservation Biology, 9, 742-746. DOI URL
[51]	Roscher C, Schumacher J, Gubsch M, Lipowsky A, Weigelt A, Buchmann N, Schmid B, Schulze E-D (2012). Using plant functional traits to explain diversity-productivity relationships. PLOS ONE, 7, e36760. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036760. DOI URL
[52]	Sasaki T, Okubo S, Okayasu T, Jamsran U, Ohkuro T, Takeuchi K (2009). Two-phase functional redundancy in plant communities along a grazing gradient in Mongolian rangelands. Ecology, 90, 2598-2608. DOI URL
[53]	Su JS, Xu FW (2021). Root, not aboveground litter, controls soil carbon storage under grazing exclusion across grasslands worldwide. Land Degradation & Development, 32, 3326-3337. DOI URL
[54]	Suding KN, Collins SL, Gough L, Clark C, Cleland EE, Gross KL, Milchunas DG, Pennings S (2005). Functional- and abundance-based mechanisms explain diversity loss due to N fertilization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 4387-4392.
[55]	Tilman D, Lehman CL, Thomson KT (1997). Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94, 1857-1861. PMID
[56]	Villéger S, Mason NWH, Mouillot D (2008). New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. Ecology, 89, 2290-2301. DOI URL
[57]	Violle C, Navas M-L, Vile D, Kazakou E, Fortunel C, Hummel I, Garnier E (2007). Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos, 116, 882-892. DOI URL
[58]	Wacker L, Baudois O, Eichenberger-Glinz S, Schmid B (2009). Diversity effects in early- and mid-successional species pools along a nitrogen gradient. Ecology, 90, 637-648. PMID
[59]	Wagg C, Bender SF, Widmer F, van der Heijden MGA (2014). Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 5266-5270.
[60]	Walker B, Kinzig A, Langridge J (1999). Plant attribute diversity, resilience, and ecosystem function: the nature and significance of dominant and minor species. Ecosystems, 2, 95-113. DOI URL
[61]	Wang HD, Zhang LL, Zhu ZH (2013). Effects of clipping and fertilizing on the relationships between species diversity and ecosystem functioning and mechanisms of community stability in alpine meadow. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 37, 279-295. DOI URL
	[ 王海东, 张璐璐, 朱志红 (2013). 刈割、施肥对高寒草甸物种多样性与生态系统功能关系的影响及群落稳定性机制. 植物生态学报, 37, 279-295.] DOI
[62]	Xiong DP, Shi PL, Zhang XZ, Zou CB (2016). Effects of grazing exclusion on carbon sequestration and plant diversity in grasslands of China-A meta-analysis. Ecological Engineering, 94, 647-655. DOI URL
[63]	Yan YC, Tang HP, Xin XP, Wang X (2009). Advances in research on the effects of exclosure on grasslands. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 29, 5039-5046.
	[ 闫玉春, 唐海萍, 辛晓平, 王旭 (2009). 围封对草地的影响研究进展. 生态学报, 29, 5039-5046.]
[64]	Zhang JH, Huang YM, Chen HY, Gong JR, Qi Y, Li EG, Wu XC (2018). Response of plant functional traits at species and community levels to grazing exclusion on Inner Mongolian steppe, China. The Rangeland Journal, 40, 179-189. DOI URL
[65]	Zuo XA, Zhou X, Lv P, Zhao XY, Zhang J, Wang SK, Yue XY (2016). Testing associations of plant functional diversity with carbon and nitrogen storage along a restoration gradient of sandy grassland. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 189.

长期封育演替下典型草原植物群落生产力与多样性关系

Diversity-productivity relationship of plant communities in typical grassland during the long- term grazing exclusion succession

全文

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 65

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	段建林, 孟晟, 陈仁利, 熊林峰, 卢春洋, 席念勋. 全球变化因子多样性对菌根植物性状的影响[J]. , 2026, 50(预发表): 0-.
[2]	何青, 袁旭东, 任博申, 冯治洋, 鲁梦珍, 林巧玲, 姜庆虎, 杨林森, 余辉亮, 姚辉, 杨敬元, 刘峰, 江明喜. 一年蓬（Erigeron annuus）入侵对亚高山泥炭湿地植物群落结构与多样性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(预发表): 0-.
[3]	张安宁, 肖亚宁, 赵霞, 张淼, 崔瀚文, 陈书燕, 安黎哲. 青藏高原灌木化与氮添加对土壤线虫及功能性状的交互作用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(预发表): 0-.
[4]	郑子仪, 陈江慧, 刘慧颖. 气候变暖提高青藏高原高寒草甸优势物种的根系分泌速率[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1363-1373.
[5]	崔冬晴, 田晨, 宋慧敏, 鲁小名, 萨其日, 徐国庆, 杨培志, 白永飞, 田建卿. 典型草原优势植物根际细菌群落多样性和功能群组成对长期放牧的响应机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(7): 1163-1176.
[6]	惠城阳, 章巧依, 刘腾腾, 刘维勇, 周丽娜, 金鑫杰, 张永华, 刘金亮. 温州大罗山主要植被类型及物种组成特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(6): 990-998.
[7]	杜英杰, 范爱连, 王雪, 闫晓俊, 陈廷廷, 贾林巧, 姜琦, 陈光水. 亚热带天然常绿阔叶林乔木树种与林下灌木树种根-叶功能性状协调性及差异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(4): 585-595.
[8]	吴闫宁, 郝珉辉, 何怀江, 张春雨, 赵秀海. 长白山森林功能多样性与地上碳汇功能的关系及其随演替的变化[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(2): 232-243.
[9]	卞嘉琛, 王睿, 高阳阳, 梁雯君, 晋红, 张文轩, 张晓荣, 郝杰, $\boxed{\hbox{王常慧}}$, 董宽虎, 刁华杰. 不同水平氮添加对晋北赖草草地地上和地下净初级生产力的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(12): 2043-2053.
[10]	郭欢敏, 沈小雪, 李瑞利. 深圳湾福田红树林自然保护区物种共存特征与物种分布概率[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(11): 1833-1843.
[11]	张晓婷, 王俊杰. 盐和铜处理下红树植物叶绿素荧光特性变化与叶片结构及生化组分关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(11): 1944-1956.
[12]	童金莲, 张博纳, 汤璐瑶, 叶琳峰, 李姝雯, 谢江波, 李彦, 王忠媛. C₄植物狗尾草功能性状网络沿降水梯度带的区域分异规律[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(11): 1817-1832.
[13]	郝毅晴, 刘伟, 杨阳, 安冰儿, 范冰, 李超, 崔久辉, 程延彬, 孙佳美, 潘庆民. 有机肥和无机肥对退化草原羊草种群密度和个体生物量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(1): 148-158.
[14]	马东峰, 贾存智, 王学朋, 赵鹏鹏, 胡小文. 甘南高寒退化草甸多物种组配的修复效果评估[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(1): 93-102.
[15]	秦嘉晨, 王欢, 朱江, 王扬, 田晨, 白永飞, 杨培志, 郑淑霞. 基于种内与种间性状变异的放牧过滤作用及其尺度效应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(7): 858-871.